Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3290605.3300774acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

What Can We Learn from Augmented Reality (AR)?: Benefits and Drawbacks of AR for Inquiry-based Learning of Physics

Published: 02 May 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Emerging technologies such as Augmented Reality (AR), have the potential to radically transform education by making challenging concepts visible and accessible to novices. In this project, we have designed a Hololens-based system in which collaborators are exposed to an unstructured learning activity in which they learned about the invisible physics involved in audio speakers. They learned topics ranging from spatial knowledge, such as shape of magnetic fields, to abstract conceptual knowledge, such as relationships between electricity and magnetism. We compared participants' learning, attitudes and collaboration with a tangible interface through multiple experimental conditions containing varying layers of AR information. We found that educational AR representations were beneficial for learning specific knowledge and increasing participants' self-efficacy (i.e., their ability to learn concepts in physics). However, we also found that participants in conditions that did not contain AR educational content, learned some concepts better than other groups and became more curious about physics. We discuss learning and collaboration differences, as well as benefits and detriments of implementing augmented reality for unstructured learning activities.

Supplementary Material

ZIP File (paper544pvc.zip)
Preview video captions
MP4 File (paper544p.mp4)
Preview video

References

[1]
Belcher, J. W., & Bessette, R. M. (2001). MIT educators share success. SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, 35(1), 18--21.
[2]
Maloney, D. P., O'Kuma, T. L., Hieggelke, C. J., & Van Heuvelen, A. (2001). Surveying students' conceptual knowledge of electricity and magnetism. American Journal of Physics, 69(7 Suppl. 1), S12--S23
[3]
Milgram, P., Takemura, H., Utsumi, A. and Kishino, F., 1995, December. Augmented reality: A class of displays on the realityvirtuality continuum. In Telemanipulator and telepresence technologies (Vol. 2351, pp. 282--293). International Society for Optics and Photonics.
[4]
Dunleavy, M. and Dede, C., 2014. Augmented reality teaching and learning. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 735--745). Springer, New York, NY.
[5]
Ibáñez, M.B., Di Serio, Á., Villarán, D. and Kloos, C.D., 2014. Experimenting with electromagnetism using augmented reality: Impact on flow student experience and educational effectiveness. Computers & Education, 71, pp.1--13.
[6]
Dünser, A., Walker, L., Horner, H. and Bentall, D., 2012, November. Creating interactive physics education books with augmented reality. In Proceedings of the 24th Australian computer-human interaction conference (pp. 107--114). ACM.
[7]
Kaufmann H, Du¨nser A (2007) Summary of usability evaluations of an educational augmented reality application. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on virtual reality. Springer, pp 660--669
[8]
Martín-Gutiérrez, J., Fabiani, P., Benesova, W., Meneses, M.D. and Mora, C.E., 2015. Augmented reality to promote collaborative and autonomous learning in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, pp.752--761.
[9]
O'Brien, H. L., E. G. Toms, E. K. Kelloway, and E. Kelley, "Developing and evaluating a reliable measure of user engagement," Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 1--10, Jan. 2008.
[10]
Valimont RB, Vincenzi DA, Gangadharan SN, Majoros AE (2002) The effectiveness of augmented reality as a facilitator of information acquisition. In: Digital avionics systems conference, vol 2, Irvine, CA, USA, pp 7C5--1--7C5--9
[11]
Tang A, Owen C, Biocca F, Mou W (2003) Comparative effectiveness of augmented reality in object assembly. In: Proceedings of the conference on human factors in computing systems-CHI'03, p 73
[12]
Bujak, K.R., Radu, I., Catrambone, R., Macintyre, B., Zheng, R. and Golubski, G., 2013. A psychological perspective on augmented reality in the mathematics classroom. Computers & Education, 68, pp.536--544.
[13]
Radu, I., 2014. Augmented reality in education: a meta-review and cross-media analysis. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 18(6), pp.1533--1543.
[14]
Cuendet, S., Bonnard, Q., Do-Lenh, S. and Dillenbourg, P., 2013. Designing augmented reality for the classroom. Computers & Education, 68, pp.557--569.
[15]
Wijdenes, P., Borkenhagen, D., Babione, J., Ma, I. and Hallihan, G., 2018, April. Leveraging Augmented Reality Training Tool for Medical Education: a Case Study in Central Venous Catheterization. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (p. CS11). ACM.
[16]
M. Dunleavy and C. Dede, "Augmented reality teaching and learning," in Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, Springer, 2014, pp. 735--745.
[17]
A. Morrison et al., "Like bees around the hive: a comparative study of a mobile augmented reality map," in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2009, pp. 1889--1898.
[18]
Roth, W.M., 2001. Gestures: Their role in teaching and learning. Review of educational research, 71(3), pp.365--392.
[19]
Beheshti, E., Kim, D., Ecanow, G. and Horn, M.S., 2017, May. Looking inside the wires: Understanding museum visitor learning with an augmented circuit exhibit. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 15831594). ACM.
[20]
O'Malley, C. and Fraser, D.S., 2004. Literature Review in Learning with Tangible Technologies. 2004. NESTA Futurelab.
[21]
Chan, J., Pondicherry, T. and Blikstein, P., 2013, June. LightUp: an augmented, learning platform for electronics. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (pp. 491--494). ACM.
[22]
Bellucci, A., Ruiz, A., Díaz, P. and Aedo, I., 2018, May. Investigating augmented reality support for novice users in circuit prototyping. In Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (p. 35). ACM.
[23]
D. N. E. Phon, M. B. Ali, and N. D. A. Halim, "Collaborative augmented reality in education: A review," in Teaching and Learning in Computing and Engineering (LaTiCE), 2014 International Conference on, 2014, pp. 78--83.
[24]
Antle, A.N., Droumeva, M. and Ha, D., 2009, June. Hands on what?: comparing children's mouse-based and tangible-based interaction. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (pp. 80--88). ACM.
[25]
Cai, S., Chiang, F.K., Sun, Y., Lin, C. and Lee, J.J., 2017. Applications of augmented reality-based natural interactive learning in magnetic field instruction. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(6), pp.778--791.
[26]
Mannuß, F., Rubel, J., Wagner, C., Bingel, F. and Hinkenjann, A., 2011, October. Augmenting magnetic field lines for school experiments. In Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), 2011 10th IEEE International Symposium on (pp. 263--264). IEEE.
[27]
Meier, A., Spada, H., & Rummel, N. (2007). A rating scheme for assessing the quality of computer-supported collaboration processes. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(1), 63--86.
[28]
Unfried A, Faber M, Wiebe E. Gender and student attitudes toward science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. The Friday Institute for Educational Innovation at North Carolina State University. 2014.
[29]
DesPortes, K., Anupam, A., Pathak, N. and DiSalvo, B., 2016, October. Circuit diagrams vs. physical circuits: The effect of representational forms during assessment. In Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2016 IEEE (pp. 1--9). IEEE.
[30]
Cuendet, S., Bumbacher, E., & Dillenbourg, P. (2012, October). Tangible vs. virtual representations: when tangibles benefit the training of spatial skills. In Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making Sense Through Design (pp. 99--108). ACM
[31]
Ishii, H. and Ullmer, B., 1997, March. Tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 234--241). ACM.
[32]
Ainsworth, S. 2006. DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction 16, 3: 183--198.
[33]
Schneider, B., Strait, M., Muller, L., Elfenbein, S. Shaer, O., and Shen, C. 2012. Phylo-Genie: engaging students in collaborative "treethinking" through tabletop techniques. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12), 3071--3080.
[34]
Antle, A.N., Wise, A.F. and Nielsen, K., 2011, June. Towards Utopia: designing tangibles for learning. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (pp. 1120). ACM.
[35]
Fyfe, E.R., McNeil, N.M., Son, J.Y. and Goldstone, R.L., 2014. Concreteness fading in mathematics and science instruction: A systematic review. Educational Psychology Review, 26(1), pp.9--25.
[36]
I. Radu, E. Doherty, K. DiQuollo, B. McCarthy, and M. Tiu, "Cyberchase shape quest: pushing geometry education boundaries with augmented reality," in Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, 2015, pp. 430--433.
[37]
S. H. Kidd and H. Crompton, "Augmented learning with augmented reality," in Mobile Learning Design, Springer, 2016, pp. 97--108.
[38]
M. G. Hanna, I. Ahmed, J. Nine, S. Prajapati, and L. Pantanowitz, "Augmented Reality Technology Using Microsoft HoloLens in Anatomic Pathology," Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine, vol. 142, no. 5, pp. 638--644, 2018.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Interactive Learning with iPads and Augmented Reality: A Sustainability-Oriented Approach to Teaching Plastics ChemistrySustainability10.3390/su1608334216:8(3342)Online publication date: 16-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Augmented reality for chemistry education to promote the use of chemical terminology in teacher trainingFrontiers in Psychology10.3389/fpsyg.2024.139252915Online publication date: 22-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Teachers’ attitudes and self-efficacy toward augmented reality in chemistry educationFrontiers in Education10.3389/feduc.2023.12935718Online publication date: 4-Jan-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. What Can We Learn from Augmented Reality (AR)?: Benefits and Drawbacks of AR for Inquiry-based Learning of Physics

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CHI '19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    May 2019
    9077 pages
    ISBN:9781450359702
    DOI:10.1145/3290605
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 02 May 2019

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. augmented reality
    2. collaborative learning
    3. physics education

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    CHI '19
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    CHI '19 Paper Acceptance Rate 703 of 2,958 submissions, 24%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

    Upcoming Conference

    CHI 2025
    ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 26 - May 1, 2025
    Yokohama , Japan

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)1,189
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)103
    Reflects downloads up to 12 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Interactive Learning with iPads and Augmented Reality: A Sustainability-Oriented Approach to Teaching Plastics ChemistrySustainability10.3390/su1608334216:8(3342)Online publication date: 16-Apr-2024
    • (2024)Augmented reality for chemistry education to promote the use of chemical terminology in teacher trainingFrontiers in Psychology10.3389/fpsyg.2024.139252915Online publication date: 22-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Teachers’ attitudes and self-efficacy toward augmented reality in chemistry educationFrontiers in Education10.3389/feduc.2023.12935718Online publication date: 4-Jan-2024
    • (2024)LeARn at Home: Comparing Augmented Reality and Video Conferencing Remote TutoringProceedings of the International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia10.1145/3701571.3701577(255-263)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2024
    • (2024)Enhancing AI Education for Business Students through Extended Reality: An Exploratory StudyProceedings of Mensch und Computer 202410.1145/3670653.3677506(599-604)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2024
    • (2024)SonifyAR: Context-Aware Sound Generation in Augmented RealityProceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology10.1145/3654777.3676406(1-13)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
    • (2024)Augmented Physics: Creating Interactive and Embedded Physics Simulations from Static Textbook DiagramsProceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology10.1145/3654777.3676392(1-12)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
    • (2024)CoAR-TV: Design and Evaluation of Asynchronous Collaboration in AR-Supported TV ExperiencesProceedings of the 2024 ACM International Conference on Interactive Media Experiences10.1145/3639701.3656320(231-245)Online publication date: 7-Jun-2024
    • (2024)Co-located Mixed Reality Classrooms: Four Case Studies from Higher EducationExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3650790(1-7)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)Towards Understanding Group Collaboration Patterns Around Mobile Augmented-Reality Interfaces for Geospatial Science Data VisualizationsExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3650739(1-7)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Login options

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media