Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3299869.3314047acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmodConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Socrates: The New SQL Server in the Cloud

Published: 25 June 2019 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    The database-as-a-service paradigm in the cloud (DBaaS) is becoming increasingly popular. Organizations adopt this paradigm because they expect higher security, higher availability, and lower and more flexible cost with high performance. It has become clear, however, that these expectations cannot be met in the cloud with the traditional, monolithic database architecture. This paper presents a novel DBaaS architecture, called Socrates. Socrates has been implemented in Microsoft SQL Server and is available in Azure as SQL DB Hyperscale. This paper describes the key ideas and features of Socrates, and it compares the performance of Socrates with the previous SQL DB offering in Azure.

    References

    [1]
    Hal Berenson, Phil Bernstein, Jim Gray, Jim Melton, Elizabeth O'Neil, and Patrick O'Neil. 1995. A Critique of ANSI SQL Isolation Levels. In Proceedings of the 1995 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD '95). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1--10.
    [2]
    Philip A. Bernstein, Colin W. Reid, and Sudipto Das. 2011. Hyder - A Transactional Record Manager for Shared Flash. In CIDR 2011, Fifth Biennial Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research, Asilomar, CA, USA, January 9--12, 2011, Online Proceedings. www.cidrdb.org, 9--20. http://cidrdb.org/cidr2011/Papers/CIDR11_Paper2.pdf
    [3]
    Dhruba Borthakur. {n. d.}. The Birth of RocksDB-Cloud . http://rocksdb.blogspot.com/2017/05/the-birth-of-rocksdb-cloud.html .
    [4]
    Peter Braam, Sean Roberts, Matthew O'Keefe, and David Bonnie. {n. d.}. The Limits of Open Source in Extreme-scale Storage Systems Design. https://docplayer.net/62056362-The-limits-of-open-source-in-extreme-scale-storage-systems-design.html .
    [5]
    Matthias Brantner, Daniela Florescu, David Graf, Donald Kossmann, and Tim Kraska. 2008. Building a Database on S3. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 251--264.
    [6]
    Alain Bui and Hacè ne Fouchal (Eds.). 2002. Procedings of the 6th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems. OPODIS 2002, Reims, France, December 11--13, 2002. Studia Informatica Universalis, Vol. 3. Suger, Saint-Denis, rue Catulienne, France.
    [7]
    Brad Calder, Ju Wang, Aaron Ogus, Niranjan Nilakantan, Arild Skjolsvold, Sam McKelvie, Yikang Xu, Shashwat Srivastav, Jiesheng Wu, Huseyin Simitci, Jaidev Haridas, Chakravarthy Uddaraju, Hemal Khatri, Andrew Edwards, Vaman Bedekar, Shane Mainali, Rafay Abbasi, Arpit Agarwal, Mian Fahim ul Haq, Muhammad Ikram ul Haq, Deepali Bhardwaj, Sowmya Dayanand, Anitha Adusumilli, Marvin McNett, Sriram Sankaran, Kavitha Manivannan, and Leonidas Rigas. 2011. Windows Azure Storage: a highly available cloud storage service with strong consistency. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles 2011, SOSP 2011, Cascais, Portugal, October 23--26, 2011, Ted Wobber and Peter Druschel (Eds.). ACM, 143--157.
    [8]
    James C. Corbett, Jeffrey Dean, Michael Epstein, Andrew Fikes, Christopher Frost, JJ Furman, Sanjay Ghemawat, Andrey Gubarev, Christopher Heiser, Peter Hochschild, Wilson Hsieh, Sebastian Kanthak, Eugene Kogan, Hongyi Li, Alexander Lloyd, Sergey Melnik, David Mwaura, David Nagle, Sean Quinlan, Rajesh Rao, Lindsay Rolig, Dale Woodford, Yasushi Saito, Christopher Taylor, Michal Szymaniak, and Ruth Wang. 2012. Spanner: Google's Globally-Distributed Database. In OSDI .
    [9]
    Michael J. Franklin, Bjö rn Þó r Jó nsson, and Donald Kossmann. 1996. Performance Tradeoffs for Client-Server Query Processing. In Proceedings of the 1996 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, June 4--6, 1996., H. V. Jagadish and Inderpal Singh Mumick (Eds.). ACM Press, 149--160.
    [10]
    Jim Gray, Pat Helland, Patrick E. O'Neil, and Dennis E. Shasha. 1996. The Dangers of Replication and a Solution. In Proceedings of the 1996 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, June 4--6, 1996. 173--182.
    [11]
    Jim Gray and Andreas Reuter. 1990. Transaction Processing: Concepts and Techniques .
    [12]
    Per-Åke Larson, Spyros Blanas, Cristian Diaconu, Craig Freedman, Jignesh M. Patel, and Mike Zwilling. 2011. High-Performance Concurrency Control Mechanisms for Main-Memory Databases. PVLDB, Vol. 5, 4 (2011), 298--309.
    [13]
    Simon Loesing, Markus Pilman, Thomas Etter, and Donald Kossmann. 2015. On the Design and Scalability of Distributed Shared-Data Databases. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, May 31 - June 4, 2015, Timos K. Sellis, Susan B. Davidson, and Zachary G. Ives (Eds.). ACM, 663--676.
    [14]
    David B. Lomet, Alan Fekete, Gerhard Weikum, and Michael J. Zwilling. 2009. Unbundling Transaction Services in the Cloud. In CIDR 2009, Fourth Biennial Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research, Asilomar, CA, USA, January 4--7, 2009, Online Proceedings . http://www-db.cs.wisc.edu/cidr/cidr2009/Paper_53.pdf
    [15]
    C. Mohan, Don Haderle, Bruce Lindsay, Hamid Pirahesh, and Peter Schwarz. 1992. ARIES: A Transaction Recovery Method Supporting Fine-granularity Locking and Partial Rollbacks Using Write-ahead Logging. ACM Trans. Database Syst., Vol. 17, 1 (March 1992), 94--162.
    [16]
    Mendel Rosenblum and John K. Ousterhout. 1992. The Design and Implementation of a Log-Structured File System. ACM Trans. Comput. Syst., Vol. 10, 1 (1992), 26--52.
    [17]
    Alexandre Verbitski, Anurag Gupta, Debanjan Saha, Murali Brahmadesam, Kamal Gupta, Raman Mittal, Sailesh Krishnamurthy, Sandor Maurice, Tengiz Kharatishvili, and Xiaofeng Bao. 2017. Amazon Aurora: Design Considerations for High Throughput Cloud-Native Relational Databases. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1041--1052.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)PolarDB-SCC: A Cloud-Native Database Ensuring Low Latency for Strongly Consistent ReadsProceedings of the VLDB Endowment10.14778/3611540.361156216:12(3754-3767)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2023
    • (2023)Taurus MM: Bringing Multi-Master to the CloudProceedings of the VLDB Endowment10.14778/3611540.361154216:12(3488-3500)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2023
    • (2023)Loom: A Closed-Box Disaggregated Database SystemProceedings of the 12th Latin-American Symposium on Dependable and Secure Computing10.1145/3615366.3615424(30-39)Online publication date: 16-Oct-2023
    • Show More Cited By

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SIGMOD '19: Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Management of Data
    June 2019
    2106 pages
    ISBN:9781450356435
    DOI:10.1145/3299869
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 25 June 2019

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. cloud database architecture
    2. database as a service
    3. high availability

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    SIGMOD/PODS '19
    Sponsor:
    SIGMOD/PODS '19: International Conference on Management of Data
    June 30 - July 5, 2019
    Amsterdam, Netherlands

    Acceptance Rates

    SIGMOD '19 Paper Acceptance Rate 88 of 430 submissions, 20%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 785 of 4,003 submissions, 20%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)119
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)9

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)PolarDB-SCC: A Cloud-Native Database Ensuring Low Latency for Strongly Consistent ReadsProceedings of the VLDB Endowment10.14778/3611540.361156216:12(3754-3767)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2023
    • (2023)Taurus MM: Bringing Multi-Master to the CloudProceedings of the VLDB Endowment10.14778/3611540.361154216:12(3488-3500)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2023
    • (2023)Loom: A Closed-Box Disaggregated Database SystemProceedings of the 12th Latin-American Symposium on Dependable and Secure Computing10.1145/3615366.3615424(30-39)Online publication date: 16-Oct-2023
    • (2023)A Model and Survey of Distributed Data-Intensive SystemsACM Computing Surveys10.1145/360480156:1(1-69)Online publication date: 26-Aug-2023
    • (2023)Antipode: Enforcing Cross-Service Causal Consistency in Distributed ApplicationsProceedings of the 29th Symposium on Operating Systems Principles10.1145/3600006.3613176(298-313)Online publication date: 23-Oct-2023
    • (2023)Persistent Memory Disaggregation for Cloud-Native Relational DatabasesProceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, Volume 310.1145/3582016.3582055(498-512)Online publication date: 25-Mar-2023
    • (2023)Disaggregated Database SystemsCompanion of the 2023 International Conference on Management of Data10.1145/3555041.3589403(37-44)Online publication date: 4-Jun-2023
    • (2023)Accelerating Cloud-Native Databases with Distributed PMem Stores2023 IEEE 39th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE)10.1109/ICDE55515.2023.00233(3043-3057)Online publication date: Apr-2023
    • (2023)dLSM: An LSM-Based Index for Memory Disaggregation2023 IEEE 39th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE)10.1109/ICDE55515.2023.00217(2835-2849)Online publication date: Apr-2023
    • (2022)CornusProceedings of the VLDB Endowment10.14778/3565816.356583716:2(379-392)Online publication date: 23-Nov-2022
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media