Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3307339.3342160acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesbcbConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Network-Based Modeling of Sepsis: Quantification and Evaluation of Simultaneity of Organ Dysfunctions

Published: 04 September 2019 Publication History

Abstract

It is shown that appropriate therapeutic management at early stages of sepsis are crucial for preventing further deterioration and irreversible organ damage. Although previous studies considered the cellular and physiological responses as the components of sepsis-related predictive models, temporal connections among the responses have not been widely studied. The objective of this study is to investigate simultaneous changes in cellular and physiological responses represented by 16 clinical variables contributing to seven organ system dysfunctions in patients with sepsis to predict in-hospital mortality. Organ dysfunctions were represented by undirected weighted network models composed of: i) nodes (i.e., 16 clinical variables and three biomarkers including procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, and sedimentation rate), ii) edges (i.e., connection between pair of nodes representing simultaneous dysfunctions), and iii) weights representing the persistence of the co-occurrence of two dysfunctions. Data was collected from 13,367 adult patients (corresponding to 17,953 visits) admitted to the study hospital from July 1, 2013, to December 31, 2015. The study population were categorized based on clinical criteria representing sepsis progression to identify different subpopulations. The findings quantify the optimal window for defining the simultaneity of two dysfunctions, the network properties corresponding to different subpopulations, the discriminatory patterns of simultaneous dysfunctions among subpopulations and in-hospital mortality prediction. The results show that the level of persistence of simultaneous dysfunctions are subpopulation-specific. Insights from this study regarding optimal thresholds of the persistence and combination of simultaneous organ dysfunctions can inform policies to personalize the in-hospital mortality prediction.

References

[1]
Rhodes, A., Evans, L. E., Alhazzani, W., Levy, M. M., Antonelli, M., Ferrer, R., Kumar, A., Sevransky, J. E., Sprung, C. L. and Nunnally, M. E. 2017. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Intensive care medicine, 43, 3, 304--377.
[2]
Rhee, C., Dantes, R., Epstein, L., Murphy, D. J., Seymour, C. W., Iwashyna, T. J., Kadri, S. S., Angus, D. C., Danner, R. L. and Fiore, A. E. 2017. Incidence and trends of sepsis in US hospitals using clinical vs claims data, 2009--2014. Jama, 318, 13, 1241--1249.
[3]
Rivers, E., Nguyen, B., Havstad, S., Ressler, J., Muzzin, A., Knoblich, B., Peterson, E., and Tomlanovich, M. 2001. Early Goal-Directed Therapy Collaborative, G. Early Goal-Directed Therapy in the Treatment of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock. The New England Journal of Medicine, 345, 19, 1368--1377.
[4]
Kumar, A., Roberts, D., Wood, K. E., Light, B., Parrillo, J. E., Sharma, S., Suppes, R., Feinstein, D., Zanotti, S., Taiberg, L., Gurka, D., Kumar, A. and Cheang, M. 2006. Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock. Critical Care Medicine, 34, 6, 1589--1596.
[5]
Group, B. D. W., Atkinson Jr, A. J., Colburn, W. A., DeGruttola, V. G., DeMets, D. L., Downing, G. J., Hoth, D. F., Oates, J. A., Peck, C. C. and Schooley, R. T. 2001. Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 69, 3, 89--95.
[6]
Singer, M. 2013. Biomarkers in sepsis. Current opinion in pulmonary medicine, 19, 3, 305.
[7]
Pierrakos, C. and Vincent, J.-L. 2010. Sepsis biomarkers: a review. Critical care, 14, 1, R15.
[8]
Forrest, D. M., Djurdjev, O., Zala, C., Singer, J., Lawson, L., Russell, J. A. and Montaner, J. S. 1998. Validation of the modified multisystem organ failure score as a predictor of mortality in patients with AIDS-related Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia and respiratory failure. Chest, 114, 1, 199--206.
[9]
Levraut, J., Ichai, C., Petit, I., Ciebiera, J.-P., Perus, O. and Grimaud, D. 2003. Low exogenous lactate clearance as an early predictor of mortality in normolactatemic critically ill septic patients. Critical care medicine, 31, 3, 705--710.
[10]
Lee, S., Hong, Y., Park, D., Choi, S., Moon, S., Park, J., Kim, J. and Baek, K. 2008. Lactic acidosis not hyperlactatemia as a predictor of inhospital mortality in septic emergency patients. Emergency Medicine Journal, 25, 10, 659--665.
[11]
Hermans, M., Leffers, P., Jansen, L., Keulemans, Y. and Stassen, P. 2011. The value of the Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis (MEDS) score, C reactive protein and lactate in predicting 28-day mortality of sepsis in a Dutch emergency department. Emergency Medicine Journal, emj. 2010.109090.
[12]
Innocenti, F., Bianchi, S., Guerrini, E., Vicidomini, S., Conti, A., Zanobetti, M. and Pini, R. 2014. Prognostic scores for early stratification of septic patients admitted to an emergency department-high dependency unit. European Journal of Emergency Medicine, 21, 4, 254--259.
[13]
Huang, D. T., Weissfeld, L. A., Kellum, J. A., Yealy, D. M., Kong, L., Martino, M., Angus, D. C. and Investigators, G. 2008. Risk prediction with procalcitonin and clinical rules in community-acquired pneumonia. Annals of emergency medicine, 52, 1, 48--58. e42.
[14]
Jiang, L., Feng, B., Gao, D. and Zhang, Y. 2015. Plasma concentrations of copeptin, C-reactive protein and procalcitonin are positively correlated with APACHE II scores in patients with sepsis. Journal of International Medical Research, 43, 2, 188--195.
[15]
Hong, D. Y., Kim, J. W., Paik, J. H., Jung, H. M., Baek, K. J., Park, S. O. and Lee, K. R. 2016. Value of plasma neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin in predicting the mortality of patients with sepsis at the emergency department. Clinica Chimica Acta, 452, 177--181.
[16]
Lee, C.-C., Chen, S.-Y., Tsai, C.-L., Wu, S.-C., Chiang, W.-C., Wang, J.-L., Sun, H.-Y., Chen, S.-C., Chen, W.-J. and Hsueh, P.-R. 2008. Prognostic value of mortality in emergency department sepsis score, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein in patients with sepsis at the emergency department. Shock, 29, 3, 322--327.
[17]
Garcia-Simon, M., Morales, J. M., Modesto-Alapont, V., Gonzalez-Marrachelli, V., Vento-Rehues, R., Jorda-Miñana, A., Blanquer-Olivas, J. and Monleon, D. 2015. Prognosis biomarkers of severe sepsis and septic shock by 1H NMR urine metabolomics in the intensive care unit. PLoS One, 10, 11, e0140993.
[18]
Liu, B., Chen, Y.-X., Yin, Q., Zhao, Y.-Z. and Li, C.-S. 2013. Diagnostic value and prognostic evaluation of Presepsin for sepsis in an emergency department. Critical Care, 17, 5, R244.
[19]
Giamarellos-Bourboulis, E. J., Norrby-Teglund, A., Mylona, V., Savva, A., Tsangaris, I., Dimopoulou, I., Mouktaroudi, M., Raftogiannis, M., Georgitsi, M. and Linnér, A. 2012. Risk assessment in sepsis: a new prognostication rule by APACHE II score and serum soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor. Critical care, 16, 4, R149.
[20]
Ju, M., Zhu, D., Tu, G., He, Y., Xue, Z., Luo, Z. and Wu, Z. 2012. Predictive value of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide in combination with the sequential organ failure assessment score in sepsis. Chinese medical journal, 125, 11, 1893--1898.
[21]
Kartal, E. D., Karkaç, E., Gülba, Z., Alpat, S. N., Erben, N. and Çolak, E. 2012. Several Cytokines and Protein C Levels with the Apache II Scoring System for Evaluation of Patients with Sepsis. Balkan medical journal, 29, 2, 174.
[22]
Shi, Z., Wu, J. and Ben-Arieh, D. 2014. A Modeling Comparative Study on Sepsis. IIE Annual Conference. Proceedings. Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers (IISE), 1069.
[23]
Sayama, H. 2015. Introduction to the modeling and analysis of complex systems. Open SUNY Textbooks.
[24]
Macal, C. M. and North, M. J. 2005. Tutorial on agent-based modeling and simulation. IEEE, City.
[25]
Macal, C. and North, M. 2014. Introductory tutorial: Agent-based modeling and simulation. IEEE, City.
[26]
Macal, C. M. and North, M. J. 2010. Tutorial on agent-based modelling and simulation. Journal of Simulation, 4, 3, 151--162.
[27]
Orphanou, K., Stassopoulou, A. and Keravnou, E. 2014. Temporal abstraction and temporal Bayesian networks in clinical domains: A survey. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 60, 3, 133--149.
[28]
Peelen, L., de Keizer, N. F., Jonge, E. d., Bosman, R.-J., Abu-Hanna, A. and Peek, N. 2010. Using hierarchical dynamic Bayesian networks to investigate dynamics of organ failure in patients in the Intensive Care Unit. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 43, 2, 273--286.
[29]
Nachimuthu, S. K. and Haug, P. J. 2012. Early detection of sepsis in the emergency department using Dynamic Bayesian Networks. American Medical Informatics Association, City.
[30]
Gultepe, E., Green, J. P., Nguyen, H., Adams, J., Albertson, T. and Tagkopoulos, I. 2013. From vital signs to clinical outcomes for patients with sepsis: a machine learning basis for a clinical decision support system. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 21, 2, 315--325.
[31]
Singer, M., Deutschman, C. S., Seymour, C. W., Shankar-Hari, M., Annane, D., Bauer, M., Bellomo, R., Bernard, G. R., Chiche, J.-D., Coopersmith, C. M., Hotchkiss, R. S., Levy, M. M., Marshall, J. C., Martin, G. S., Opal, S. M., Rubenfeld, G. D., van der Poll, T., Vincent, J.-L. and Angus, D. C. 2016. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA, 315, 8, 801--810.
[32]
Freund, Y. and Schapire, R. E. 1997. A Decision-Theoretic Generalization of On-Line Learning and an Application to Boosting. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 55, 1, 119--139.
[33]
Friedman, J. H. 2001. Greedy Function Approximation: A Gradient Boosting Machine. The Annals of Statistics, 29, 5, 1189--1232.
[34]
Friedman, J. H. 2002. Stochastic gradient boosting. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 38, 4, 367--378.
[35]
Ridgeway, G. 2007. Generalized Boosted Models: A guide to the gbm package. Update, 1, 1, 2007.
[36]
Howell, M. D., Donnino, M. W., Talmor, D., Clardy, P., Ngo, L. and Shapiro, N. I. 2007. Performance of Severity of Illness Scoring Systems in Emergency Department Patients with Infection. Academic Emergency Medicine, 14, 8, 709--714.
[37]
Capan, M., Hoover, S., Ivy, J. S., Miller, K. E., Arnold, R. and Collaborative, S. E. P. S. I. S. 2018. Not all organ dysfunctions are created equal -- Prevalence and mortality in sepsis. Journal of Critical Care, 48, 257--262.
[38]
Vincent, J. L., Moreno, R., Takala, J., Willatts, S., Mendon a, A. D., Bruining, H., Reinhart, C. K., Suter, P. M. and Thijs, L. G. 1996. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. Intensive Care Medicine, 22, 7, 707--710.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Frequent Pattern Mining in Continuous-Time Temporal NetworksIEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence10.1109/TPAMI.2023.332479946:1(305-321)Online publication date: Jan-2024
  • (2023)Frequent temporal patterns of physiological and biological biomarkers and their evolution in sepsisArtificial Intelligence in Medicine10.1016/j.artmed.2023.102576143:COnline publication date: 1-Sep-2023
  • (2023)AI and GNN Model for Predictive Analytics on Patient Data and Its Usefulness in Digital Healthcare TechnologiesIoT, Big Data and AI for Improving Quality of Everyday Life: Present and Future Challenges10.1007/978-3-031-35783-1_19(331-345)Online publication date: 24-Aug-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Network-Based Modeling of Sepsis: Quantification and Evaluation of Simultaneity of Organ Dysfunctions

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    BCB '19: Proceedings of the 10th ACM International Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Health Informatics
    September 2019
    716 pages
    ISBN:9781450366663
    DOI:10.1145/3307339
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 04 September 2019

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. network modeling
    2. sepsis prediction
    3. simultaneous dysfunctions

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    BCB '19
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    BCB '19 Paper Acceptance Rate 42 of 157 submissions, 27%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 254 of 885 submissions, 29%

    Upcoming Conference

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)53
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
    Reflects downloads up to 10 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Frequent Pattern Mining in Continuous-Time Temporal NetworksIEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence10.1109/TPAMI.2023.332479946:1(305-321)Online publication date: Jan-2024
    • (2023)Frequent temporal patterns of physiological and biological biomarkers and their evolution in sepsisArtificial Intelligence in Medicine10.1016/j.artmed.2023.102576143:COnline publication date: 1-Sep-2023
    • (2023)AI and GNN Model for Predictive Analytics on Patient Data and Its Usefulness in Digital Healthcare TechnologiesIoT, Big Data and AI for Improving Quality of Everyday Life: Present and Future Challenges10.1007/978-3-031-35783-1_19(331-345)Online publication date: 24-Aug-2023
    • (2022)Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Predictive Modeling in HealthcareJournal of Healthcare Informatics Research10.1007/s41666-022-00114-16:2(228-239)Online publication date: 11-Feb-2022
    • (2021)Proximity of Cellular and Physiological Response Failures in SepsisIEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics10.1109/JBHI.2021.309842825:11(4089-4097)Online publication date: Nov-2021

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Get Access

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media