Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3308558.3313512acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesthewebconfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Predicting pregnancy using large-scale data from a women's health tracking mobile application

Published: 13 May 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Predicting pregnancy has been a fundamental problem in women's health for more than 50 years. Previous datasets have been collected via carefully curated medical studies, but the recent growth of women's health tracking mobile apps offers potential for reaching a much broader population. However, the feasibility of predicting pregnancy from mobile health tracking data is unclear. Here we develop four models - a logistic regression model, and 3 LSTM models - to predict a woman's probability of becoming pregnant using data from a women's health tracking app, Clue by BioWink GmbH. Evaluating our models on a dataset of 79 million logs from 65,276 women with ground truth pregnancy test data, we show that our predicted pregnancy probabilities meaningfully stratify women: women in the top 10% of predicted probabilities have a 89% chance of becoming pregnant over 6 menstrual cycles, as compared to a 27% chance for women in the bottom 10%. We develop a technique for extracting interpretable time trends from our deep learning models, and show these trends are consistent with previous fertility research. Our findings illustrate the potential that women's health tracking data offers for predicting pregnancy on a broader population; we conclude by discussing the steps needed to fulfill this potential.

References

[1]
2017. Glow and National Institutes of Health Collaborate to Advance Fertility Model. PR Newswire (2017).
[2]
Alexandra Alvergne, Marija Vlajic Wheeler, and Vedrana Högqvist Tabor. 2018. Do sexually transmitted infections exacerbate negative premenstrual symptoms? Insights from digital health. Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health(2018).
[3]
John C Barrett and John Marshall. 1969. The risk of conception on different days of the menstrual cycle. Population Studies 23, 3 (1969), 455-461.
[4]
Inci M Baytas, Cao Xiao, Xi Zhang, Fei Wang, Anil K Jain, and Jiayu Zhou. 2017. Patient subtyping via time-aware LSTM networks. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, 65-74.
[5]
Jamie L Bigelow, David B Dunson, Joseph B Stanford, Rene´ Ecochard, Christian Gnoth, and Bernardo Colombo. 2004. Mucus observations in the fertile window: a better predictor of conception than timing of intercourse. Human Reproduction 19, 4 (2004), 889-892.
[6]
Charles L Buxton and William B Atkinson. 1948. Hormonal factors involved in the regulation of basal body temperature during the menstrual cycle and pregnancy. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology 8, 7 (1948), 544-549.
[7]
Shraddha Chakradhar. 2018. Discovery cycle. Nature Medicine (2018).
[8]
Leonard Chiazze, Franklin T Brayer, John J Macisco, Margaret P Parker, and Benedict J Duffy. 1968. The length and variability of the human menstrual cycle. JAMA 203, 6 (1968), 377-380.
[9]
David Clayton and Rene´ Ecochard. 1997. Artificial insemination by donor: discrete time survival data with crossed and nested random effects. In Proceedings of the First Seattle Symposium in Biostatistics. Springer, 99-122.
[10]
Bernardo Colombo, Guido Masarotto, and Menstrual Cycle Fecundability Study Group. 2000. Daily fecundability: first results from a new data base. Demographic Research 3(2000).
[11]
David B Dunson. 2001. Bayesian modeling of the level and duration of fertility in the menstrual cycle. Biometrics 57, 4 (2001), 1067-1073.
[12]
David B. Dunson, Donna D. Baird, and Bernardo Colombo. 2004. Increased Infertility With Age in Men and Women. Obstetrics & Gynecology(2004).
[13]
David B Dunson and Joseph B Stanford. 2005. Bayesian inferences on predictors of conception probabilities. Biometrics 61, 1 (2005), 126-133.
[14]
Rene´ Ecochard. 2006. Heterogeneity in fecundability studies: issues and modelling. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 15, 2 (2006), 141-160.
[15]
Daniel A Epstein, Nicole B Lee, Jennifer H Kang, Elena Agapie, Jessica Schroeder, Laura R Pina, James Fogarty, Julie A Kientz, and Sean Munson. 2017. Examining menstrual tracking to inform the design of personal informatics tools. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 6876-6888.
[16]
Richard J Fehring. 2002. Accuracy of the peak day of cervical mucus as a biological marker of fertility. Contraception 66, 4 (2002), 231-235.
[17]
Biowink GmbH. 2017. Clue by Biowink GmbH. helloclue.com
[18]
Arthur L Greil. 1997. Infertility and psychological distress: a critical review of the literature. Social Science & Medicine 45, 11 (1997), 1679-1704.
[19]
Erika Check Hayden. 2016. Mobile-phone health apps deliver data bounty. Nature 531, 7595 (2016), 422-423.
[20]
James J Heckman, Richard Robb, and James R Walker. 1990. Testing the mixture of exponentials hypothesis and estimating the mixing distribution by the method of moments. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 85, 410 (1990), 582-589.
[21]
Paula J Adams Hillard and Marija Vlajic Wheeler. 2017. Data from a Menstrual Cycle Tracking App Informs our Knowledge of the Menstrual Cycle in Adolescents and Young Adults. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology 30, 2(2017), 269-270.
[22]
Sepp Hochreiter and Jürgen Schmidhuber. 1997. Long short-term memory. Neural Computation 9, 8 (1997), 1735-1780.
[23]
Nathalie Japkowicz. 2000. The class imbalance problem: Significance and strategies. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
[24]
Remah M Kamel. 2010. Management of the infertile couple: an evidence- based protocol. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology(2010).
[25]
Zachary C Lipton, David C Kale, Charles Elkan, and Randall Wetzel. 2015. Learning to diagnose with LSTM recurrent neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.03677(2015).
[26]
Natasha Lomas. 2018. Clinic reports Natural Cycles app for 37 unwanted pregnancies since September. TechCrunch (2018).
[27]
Kirsten J Lum, Rajeshwari Sundaram, Germaine M Buck Louis, and Thomas A Louis. 2016. A Bayesian joint model of menstrual cycle length and fecundity. Biometrics 72, 1 (2016), 193-203.
[28]
Courtney Miller. 2013. How the Period and Fertility Prediction Feature Works. Kindara Blog (2013).
[29]
Michelle L Moglia, Henry V Nguyen, Kathy Chyjek, Katherine T Chen, and Paula M Casta&ntiled;o. 2016. Evaluation of smartphone menstrual cycle tracking applications using an adapted APPLICATIONS scoring system. Obstetrics & Gynecology 127, 6 (2016), 1153-1160.
[30]
Merry-K. Moos, Anne L. Dunlop, Brian W. Jack, Lauren Nelson, Dean V. Coonrod, Richard Long, Kim Boggess, and Paula M. Gardiner. 2008. Healthier women, healthier reproductive outcomes: recommendations for the routine care of all women of reproductive age. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology (2008).
[31]
Katie Morley. 2018. Advert for “Natural Cycles” contraceptive app banned for exaggerating effectiveness. The Telegraph (2018).
[32]
Catherine J O'shea, Andrew D McGavigan, Robyn A Clark, Derek PB Chew, and Anand Ganesan. 2017. Mobile health: an emerging technology with implications for global internal medicine. Internal medicine journal 47, 6 (2017), 616-619.
[33]
Arielle Pardes. 2018. In Contraceptive Tech, the App's Guess Is as Good as Yours. Wired (2018).
[34]
Trang Pham, Truyen Tran, Dinh Phung, and Svetha Venkatesh. 2016. Deepcare: A deep dynamic memory model for predictive medicine. In Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. Springer, 30-41.
[35]
Emma Pierson, Tim Althoff, and Jure Leskovec. 2018. Modeling Individual Cyclic Variation in Human Behavior. In Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference on World Wide Web. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 107-116.
[36]
Robert G Potter. 1960. Length of the observation period as a factor affecting the contraceptive failure rate. The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 38, 2 (1960), 140-152.
[37]
Roni Caryn Rabin. 2015. How Period Trackers Have Changed Girl Culture. New York Times (2015).
[38]
Rina Raphael. 2018. Can Silicon Valley Get You Pregnant?Fast Company (2018).
[39]
J Patrick Royston. 1982. Basal body temperature, ovulation and the risk of conception, with special reference to the lifetimes of sperm and egg. Biometrics (1982).
[40]
Patrick Royston and Alberto Ferreira. 1999. A new approach to modeling daily probabilities of conception. Biometrics 55, 4 (1999), 1005-1013.
[41]
Bruno Scarpa and David B Dunson. 2007. Bayesian methods for searching for optimal rules for timing intercourse to achieve pregnancy. Statistics in Medicine 26, 9 (2007), 1920-1936.
[42]
E Berglund Scherwitzl, O Lundberg, H Kopp Kallner, K Gemzell Danielsson, J Trussell, and R Scherwitzl. 2017. Perfect-use and typical-use Pearl Index of a contraceptive mobile app. Contraception 96, 6 (2017), 420-425.
[43]
D Schwartz, PDM MacDonald, and V Heuchel. 1980. Fecundability, coital frequency and the viability of ova. Population Studies 34, 2 (1980), 397-400.
[44]
Mindel C Sheps. 1964. On the time required for conception. Population Studies 18, 1 (1964), 85-97.
[45]
Joseph B Stanford and David B Dunson. 2007. Effects of sexual intercourse patterns in time to pregnancy studies. American Journal of Epidemiology 165, 9 (2007), 1088-1095.
[46]
Olivia Sudjic. 2018. “I felt colossally naive”: the backlash against the birth control app. The Guardian (2018).
[47]
Laura Symul, Katarzyna Wac, Paula Hillard, and Marcel Salathe. 2018. Assessment of Menstrual Health Status and Evolution through Mobile Apps for Fertility Awareness. bioRxiv (2018).
[48]
Sara L Tietze and Richard Lincoln. 1987. Differential Fecundity and Effectiveness of Contraception. In Fertility Regulation and the Public Health. Springer, 129-134.
[49]
John T Wilbanks and Eric J Topol. 2016. Stop the privatization of health data. Nature News 535, 7612 (2016), 345.
[50]
Allen J Wilcox, David Dunson, and Donna Day Baird. 2000. The timing of the “fertile window” in the menstrual cycle: day specific estimates from a prospective study. British Medical Journal 321, 7271 (2000), 1259-1262.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Powered by AIProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36314147:4(1-24)Online publication date: 12-Jan-2024
  • (2024)Time to pregnancy recognition among users of an FDA-cleared fertility applicationJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology10.1080/01443615.2024.233768744:1Online publication date: 17-Apr-2024
  • (2023)EBELİK ALANINDA KULLANILAN MOBİL SAĞLIK UYGULAMALARIMOBILE HEALTH APPLICATIONS USED IN THE FIELD OF MIDWIFERYKarya Journal of Health Science10.52831/kjhs.11777534:2(174-178)Online publication date: 31-Aug-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
WWW '19: The World Wide Web Conference
May 2019
3620 pages
ISBN:9781450366748
DOI:10.1145/3308558
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

In-Cooperation

  • IW3C2: International World Wide Web Conference Committee

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 13 May 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Pregnancy prediction
  2. mobile health tracking

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

WWW '19
WWW '19: The Web Conference
May 13 - 17, 2019
CA, San Francisco, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)61
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
Reflects downloads up to 11 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Powered by AIProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36314147:4(1-24)Online publication date: 12-Jan-2024
  • (2024)Time to pregnancy recognition among users of an FDA-cleared fertility applicationJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology10.1080/01443615.2024.233768744:1Online publication date: 17-Apr-2024
  • (2023)EBELİK ALANINDA KULLANILAN MOBİL SAĞLIK UYGULAMALARIMOBILE HEALTH APPLICATIONS USED IN THE FIELD OF MIDWIFERYKarya Journal of Health Science10.52831/kjhs.11777534:2(174-178)Online publication date: 31-Aug-2023
  • (2023)Quantifier le corps menstruéRéseaux10.3917/res.241.0275N° 241:5(275-314)Online publication date: 31-Oct-2023
  • (2023)Artificial intelligence augmented clinical decision support systems for pregnancy care: a systematic review (Preprint)Journal of Medical Internet Research10.2196/54737Online publication date: 20-Nov-2023
  • (2023)Artificial intelligence in pregnancy predictionRossiiskii vestnik akushera-ginekologa10.17116/rosakush2023230218323:2(83)Online publication date: 2023
  • (2023)An Intersectional Look at Use of and Satisfaction with Digital Mental Health Platforms: A Survey of Perinatal Black WomenProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581475(1-20)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
  • (2023)An Integrated Approach for Pregnancy Detection Using Canny Edge Detection and Convolutional Neural NetworkProceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Computing, Communication and Information Security10.1007/978-981-99-1373-2_4(49-62)Online publication date: 4-Jul-2023
  • (2022)Male and Female Hormone Reading to Predict Pregnancy Percentage Using a Deep Learning Technique: A Real Case StudyAI10.3390/ai30400533:4(871-889)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2022
  • (2022)Feasibility of continuous distal body temperature for passive, early pregnancy detectionPLOS Digital Health10.1371/journal.pdig.00000341:5(e0000034)Online publication date: 16-May-2022
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media