Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3314994.3325074acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswccceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
tutorial

Dialing up the Active Learning in your Classroom

Published: 03 May 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Active learning has been shown to improve outcomes [1]. In this workshop, we will share our experiences with active learning in four core computer science courses from CS1 [2] to third year and with class sizes from 120 to 470. We will discuss fully flipped courses, as well as others that were "semi-flipped", and why. We will address practical issues such as doing active learning in ill-suited lecture halls, getting student buy-in, deciding what course activities to grade, and using TAs to assist in the classroom. We will provide specific examples of our own active-learning activities, including some that have been very effective, and others that have not. We will also address the challenge of designing the out-of-class activities that prepare students and create time for active learning in class.
Participants will have a chance to participate in some activities from our own classrooms, to share some of their own, and to identify and discuss principles on which we can base decisions such as what course content is best suited to be learned in class vs outside of class, and what topics to prioritize for active learning.
This workshop is suitable for those who want to simply dial up the amount of active learning in their classroom, as well as those interested in investing in a more significant course redesign to a semi or fully flipped format.

References

[1]
Scott Freeman, Sarah L Eddy, Miles McDonough, Michelle K Smith, Nnadozie Okoroafor, Hannah Jordt, and Mary Pat Wenderoth. 2014. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111, 23 (2014), 8410--8415.
[2]
Diane Horton, Michelle Craig, Jennifer Campbell, Paul Gries, and Daniel Zingaro. 2014. Comparing Outcomes in Inverted and Traditional CS1. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Innovation & Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 261--266.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
WCCCE '19: Proceedings of the 24th Western Canadian Conference on Computing Education
May 2019
79 pages
ISBN:9781450367158
DOI:10.1145/3314994
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

In-Cooperation

  • UOC: University of Calgary

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 03 May 2019

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. active learning
  2. blended
  3. course design
  4. flipped
  5. inverted

Qualifiers

  • Tutorial
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

WCCCE '19
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

WCCCE '19 Paper Acceptance Rate 15 of 29 submissions, 52%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 78 of 117 submissions, 67%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 61
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 26 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media