Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3322431.3325419acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacmatConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Generalized Mining of Relationship-Based Access Control Policies in Evolving Systems

Published: 28 May 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Relationship-based access control (ReBAC) provides a flexible approach to specify policies based on relationships between system entities, which makes them a natural fit for many modern information systems, beyond online social networks. In this paper we are concerned with the problem of mining ReBAC policies from lower-level authorization information. Mining ReBAC policies can address transforming access control paradigms to ReBAC, reformulating existing ReBAC policies as more information becomes available, as well as inferring potentially unknown policies. Particularly, we propose a systematic algorithm for mining ReBAC authorization policies, and a first of its kind approach to mine graph transition policies that govern the evolution of ReBAC systems. Experimental evaluation manifests efficiency of the proposed approaches.

References

[1]
M. Berlingerio, F. Bonchi, B. Bringmann, and A. Gionis. Mining graph evolution rules. In joint European conference on machine learning and knowledge discovery in databases, pages 115--130. Springer, 2009.
[2]
B. Bringmann, M. Berlingerio, F. Bonchi, and A. Gionis. Learning and Predicting the Evolution of Social Networks. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 25(4):26--35, July 2010. issn: 1541--1672.
[3]
T. Bui, S. D. Stoller, and J. Li. Greedy and evolutionary algorithms for mining relationship-based access control policies. Computers & Security, 80: 317--333,2019.
[4]
T. Bui, S. D. Stoller, and J. Li. Mining Relationship-Based Access Control Policies. In Proceedings of the 22Nd ACM on Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies, SACMAT '17 Abstracts, pages 239--246. ACM, 2017.
[5]
J. Cendrowska. PRISM: An algorithm for inducing modular rules. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 27(4):349--370, Oct. 1, 1987. issn: 0020--7373.
[6]
Y. Chi, Y. Xia, Y. Yang, and R. R. Muntz. Mining closed and maximal frequent subtrees from databases of labeled rooted trees. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 17(2):190--202, Feb. 2005. issn: 1041--4347.
[7]
J. Crampton and J. Sellwood. ARPPM: Administration in the RPPM Model. In Proceedings of the Sixth ACM Conference on Data and Application Security and Privacy, CODASPY '16, pages 219--230. ACM, 2016.
[8]
J. Crampton and J. Sellwood. Path Conditions and Principal Matching: A New Approach to Access Control. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies, SACMAT '14, pages 187--198. ACM, 2014.
[9]
M. Decat, J. Bogaerts, B. Lagaisse, and W. Joosen. The work force management case study: functional analysis and access control requirements. CW Reports, volume CW655, 40, 2014.
[10]
P. W. Fong. Relationship-based access control: protection model and policy language. In Proc. CODASPY '11, pages 191--202. ACM, 2011.
[11]
P. W. Fong and I. Siahaan. Relationship-based access control policies and their policy languages. In Proc. 16th ACM Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies, SACMAT '11, pages 51--60. ACM, 2011.
[12]
P. Iyer and A. Masoumzadeh. Mining Positive and Negative Attribute-Based Access Control Policy Rules. In Proceedings of the 23Nd ACM on Symposiumon Access Control Models and Technologies, SACMAT '18, pages 161--172. ACM, 2018.
[13]
M. Kuramochi and G. Karypis. Finding frequent patterns in a large sparse graph. In Proceedings of the 2004 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, pages 345--356. SIAM, 2004.
[14]
A. Masoumzadeh. Inferring unknown privacy control policies in a social networking system. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society, pages 21--25. ACM, 2015.
[15]
E. Medvet, A. Bartoli, B. Carminati, and E. Ferrari. Evolutionary inference of attribute-based access control policies. In International Conference on Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization, pages 351--365. Springer, 2015.
[16]
B. Mitra, S. Sural, J. Vaidya, and V. Atluri. A Survey of Role Mining. ACM Comput. Surv., 48(4):50:1--50:37, Feb. 2016.issn: 0360-0300.
[17]
I. Molloy, N. Li, Y. A. Qi, J. Lobo, and L. Dickens. Mining roles with noisy data. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM symposium on Access control models and technologies, pages 45--54. ACM, 2010.
[18]
S. Z. R. Rizvi, P. W. Fong, J. Crampton, and J. Sellwood. Relationship-Based Access Control for an Open-Source Medical Records System. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies, SACMAT'15, pages 113--124. ACM, 2015.
[19]
S. D. Stoller. An Administrative Model for Relationship-Based Access Control. In Springer Link. IFIP Annual Conference on Data and Applications Security and Privacy, pages 53--68. Springer, Cham, July 13, 2015.
[20]
Z. Xu and S. D. Stoller. Mining Attribute-Based Access Control Policies.IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 12(5): 533--545, Sept. 2015. issn: 1545--5971.
[21]
X. Yan, H. Cheng, J. Han, and P. S. Yu. Mining Significant Graph Patterns by Leap Search. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, SIGMOD '08, pages 433--444. ACM, 2008.
[22]
X. Yan and J. Han. Gspan: graph-based substructure pattern mining. In 2002 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, 2002. Proceedings. Pages 721--724. IEEE, 2002.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Converting Rule-Based Access Control Policies: From Complemented Conditions to Deny RulesProceedings of the 29th ACM Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies10.1145/3649158.3657040(159-169)Online publication date: 24-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Behavioral and Human-Centric Access Control Model in XACML Reference Architecture: Design and Implementation of EHR Case StudyTechnological Innovation for Human-Centric Systems10.1007/978-3-031-63851-0_13(192-203)Online publication date: 28-Jun-2024
  • (2023)Towards Automated Learning of Access Control Policies Enforced by Web ApplicationsProceedings of the 28th ACM Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies10.1145/3589608.3594743(163-168)Online publication date: 24-May-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Generalized Mining of Relationship-Based Access Control Policies in Evolving Systems

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SACMAT '19: Proceedings of the 24th ACM Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies
    May 2019
    243 pages
    ISBN:9781450367530
    DOI:10.1145/3322431
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 28 May 2019

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. graph transition
    2. policy mining
    3. relationship-based access control

    Qualifiers

    • Short-paper

    Conference

    SACMAT '19
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    SACMAT '19 Paper Acceptance Rate 12 of 52 submissions, 23%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 177 of 597 submissions, 30%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)20
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)8
    Reflects downloads up to 13 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Converting Rule-Based Access Control Policies: From Complemented Conditions to Deny RulesProceedings of the 29th ACM Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies10.1145/3649158.3657040(159-169)Online publication date: 24-Jun-2024
    • (2024)Behavioral and Human-Centric Access Control Model in XACML Reference Architecture: Design and Implementation of EHR Case StudyTechnological Innovation for Human-Centric Systems10.1007/978-3-031-63851-0_13(192-203)Online publication date: 28-Jun-2024
    • (2023)Towards Automated Learning of Access Control Policies Enforced by Web ApplicationsProceedings of the 28th ACM Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies10.1145/3589608.3594743(163-168)Online publication date: 24-May-2023
    • (2023)FLAP - A Federated Learning Framework for Attribute-based Access Control PoliciesProceedings of the Thirteenth ACM Conference on Data and Application Security and Privacy10.1145/3577923.3583641(263-272)Online publication date: 24-Apr-2023
    • (2023)System for Cross-Domain Identity Management (SCIM): Survey and Enhancement With RBACIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2023.330427011(86872-86894)Online publication date: 2023
    • (2022)Higher-Order Relationship-Based Access Control: A Temporal Instantiation with IoT ApplicationsProceedings of the 27th ACM on Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies10.1145/3532105.3535026(223-234)Online publication date: 7-Jun-2022
    • (2022)Effective Evaluation of Relationship-Based Access Control Policy MiningProceedings of the 27th ACM on Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies10.1145/3532105.3535022(127-138)Online publication date: 7-Jun-2022
    • (2022)Contemporaneous Update and Enforcement of ABAC PoliciesProceedings of the 27th ACM on Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies10.1145/3532105.3535021(31-42)Online publication date: 8-Jun-2022
    • (2022)Learning Relationship-Based Access Control Policies from Black-Box SystemsACM Transactions on Privacy and Security10.1145/351712125:3(1-36)Online publication date: 19-May-2022
    • (2021)Formal Analysis of ReBAC Policy Mining FeasibilityProceedings of the Eleventh ACM Conference on Data and Application Security and Privacy10.1145/3422337.3447828(197-207)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2021
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media