research-article

Open access

Can Children Learn Creativity from a Social Robot?

Authors:

Cynthia BreazealAuthors Info & Claims

C&C '19: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Creativity and Cognition

Pages 359 - 368

https://doi.org/10.1145/3325480.3325499

Published: 13 June 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Children's creativity contributes to their learning outcomes and personal growth. Standardized measures of creative thinking reveal that as children enter elementary school, their creativity drops. In this work, we evaluated whether a social robotic peer can help 6-10-year-old children think creatively by demonstrating creative behavior. We designed verbal and non-verbal behaviors of the social robot that constitute interaction patterns for artificial creativity. 51 participants played the Droodle Creativity Game with the robot to generate creative titles for ambiguous images. One group of participants interacted with the creative robot, and one group interacted with the non-creative robot. Participants that interacted with the creative robot generated significantly higher number of Droodle titles, expressed greater variety in titles, and scored higher on the Droodles' creativity. We observe that children can model a social robotic peer's creativity, and hence inform robot interaction patterns for artificial creativity that can foster creativity in children.

Supplementary Material

MOV File (ccfp1110.mov)

Supplemental video

Download
24.50 MB

References

[1]

Alves-Oliveira, P., Arriaga, P., Paiva, A., & Hoffman, G. (2017, June). YOLO, a Robot for Creativity: A Co-Design Study with Children. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (pp. 423--429). ACM.

Digital Library

[2]

Amabile, T. M., & Gryskiewicz, N. D. (1989). The creative environment scales: Work environment inventory. Creativity research journal, 2(4), 231--253.

[3]

Belpaeme, T., Kennedy, J., Ramachandran, A., Scassellati, B., & Tanaka, F. (2018). Social robots for education: A review. Science Robotics, 3(21), eaat5954.

[4]

Boden, M. A. (2004). The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms. Routledge.

Digital Library

[5]

Bots Alive. Dash Robotics. https://botsalive.com/

[6]

Cognimates (2018). MIT Media Lanb. cognimates.me/

[7]

Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and psychological measurement, 20(1), 37--46.

[8]

Cooper, E. (1991). A critique of six measures for assessing creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 25(3), 194--204.

[9]

Cozmo (1999). Anki. https://www.anki.com/en-us/cozmo

[10]

Cramond, B. (2001). Interview with E. Paul Torrance on creativity in the last and next millennia. Journal of Secondary Gifted Educa- tion, 12, 116--121.

[11]

Cropley, A. J. (1999). Creativity and cognition: Producing effective novelty. Roeper Review, 21, 253--260

[12]

Davis, G. A. (1997). Identifying creative students and measuring creativity. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 269--281). Needham Heights, MA: Viacom.

[13]

Duncker, K. (1945). On problem solving. Psychological. lonographs. 58(5, Whole No. 270).?

[14]

Fischer, G., Nakakoji, K., Ostwald, J., Stahl, G., & Sumner, T. (1993). Embedding computer-based critics in the contexts of design (pp. 157--164). Proceedings of CHI'93, New York, NY: ACM Press.

Digital Library

[15]

Florida, R. (2004). The rise of the creative class and how it's transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life (Paperback Ed.).

[16]

Gaut, B. (2010). The philosophy of creativity. Philosophy Compass, 5(12), 1034--1046.

[17]

Google Cloud -- Text to Speech. https://cloud.google.com/speech-to-text/

[18]

Gordon, G., Breazeal, C., & Engel, S. (2015, March). Can children catch curiosity from a social robot?. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 91--98). ACM.

Digital Library

[19]

Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444--445.

[20]

Jibo SDK. https://www.jibo.com/

[21]

Jung, M. F., Martelaro, N., Hoster, H., & Nass, C. (2014, June). Participatory materials: having a reflective conversation with an artifact in the making. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems (pp. 25--34). ACM.

Digital Library

[22]

Kafai, Y. B. (2012). Minds in play: Computer game design as a context for children's learning. Routledge.

[23]

Kahn Jr, P. H., Friedman, B., Severson, R. L., & Feldman, E. N. (2005). CREATIVITY TASKS AND CODING SYSTEM--USED IN THE PLASMA DISPLAY WINDOW STUDY. University of Washington, Seattle, WA: The Information School, University of Washington.

[24]

Kahn Jr, P. H., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Gill, B. T., Shen, S., Ruckert, J. H., & Gary, H. E. (2016, March). Human creativity can be facilitated through interacting with a social robot. In The Eleventh ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction (pp. 173--180). IEEE Press.

Digital Library

[25]

Kaufman, J. C., & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.). (2010). The Cambridge handbook of creativity. Cambridge University Press.

[26]

Lego Mindstroms, The Lego Group. https://www.lego.com/en-us/mindstorms

[27]

Leyzberg, D., Spaulding, S., Toneva, M., & Scassellati, B. (2012, January). The physical presence of a robot tutor increases cognitive learning gains. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (Vol. 34, No. 34).

[28]

Lissitz, R. W., & Willhoft, J. L. (1985). A methodological study of the Torrance Tests of Creativity. Journal of Educational Measurement, 22, 1--111.

[29]

Mumford, M. D. (2000). Something old, something new: Revisiting Guilford's conception of creative problem solving. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 267--276.

[30]

Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books, Inc.

Digital Library

[31]

Park, H. W., Rosenberg-Kima, R., Rosenberg, M., Gordon, G., & Breazeal, C. (2017, March). Growing growth mindset with a social robot peer. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 137--145). ACM.

Digital Library

[32]

Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. T. (2004). Why isn't creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educa- tional Psychologist, 39, 83--96.

[33]

Price, R., & Lovka, B. (2000). Droodles: The classic collection. Tallfellow Press.

[34]

Rose, S., Engel, D., Cramer, N., & Cowley, W. (2010). Automatic keyword extraction from individual documents. Text Mining: Applications and Theory, 1--20.

[35]

Runco, M. A. (2000). Introduction to the special issue: Commemorating Guilford's 1950 presidential address. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 245.

[36]

Runco, M. A. (2014). Creativity: Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice. Elsevier.

[37]

Shaffer, D. W. (2006). How computer games help children learn. Macmillan.

Digital Library

[38]

Shneiderman, B., Fischer, G., Czerwinski, M., Resnick, M., Myers, B., Candy, L., ... & Jennings, P. (2006). Creativity support tools: Report from a US National Science Foundation sponsored workshop. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 20(2), 61--77.

[39]

Smith, G., & Carlsson, I. (1985). Creativity in middle and late school years. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 8(3), 329--343.

[40]

Smith, G.J.W. and Carlsson, L.M. (1990) The Creative Process: A Functional Model Based on Empirical Studies from Childhood to Middle Age. International Universities Press Inc., Madison.

[41]

Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2000). Guilford's structure of intellect model and model of creativity: Contributions and limi- tations. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 309--316.

[42]

Sung, I., & Berland, M. (2017, June). Forest Friends Demo: A Game-Exhibit to Promote Computer Science Concepts in Informal Spaces. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (pp. 701--704). ACM.

Digital Library

[43]

Torrance, E. P. (1966). The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking-Norms-Technical Manual Research Edition-Verbal Tests, Forms A and B-Figural Tests, Forms A and B. Princeton, NJ: Personnel Press

[44]

"TORRANCE, E. (1967). UNDERSTANDING THE FOURTH GRADE SLUMP IN CREATIVE THINKING. FINAL REPORT.

[45]

Torrance, E. P. (1968). A longitudinal examination of the fourth grade slump in creativity. Gifted Child Quarterly, 12(4), 195--199.

[46]

Wallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children: A study of the creativity-intelligence distinction.

[47]

Williams, R. C. (2018). PopBots: Leveraging Social Robots to Aid Preschool Children's Artificial Intelligence Education.

[48]

Witt, L. A., & Beorkrem, M. N. (1989). Climate for creative productivity as a predictor of research usefulness and organizational effectiveness in an R&D organization. Creativity Research Journal, 2(1--2), 30--40.

[49]

W. A. Bainbridge, J. W. Hart, E. S. Kim, and B. Scassellati. The benefits of interactions with physically present robots over video-displayed agents. International Journal of Social Robotics, 3(1):41--52, 2011.

Cited By

Rossi ARossi SBoratto LGena CMarras MGermanakos PPopescus E(2024)On the Way to a Transparent HRIAdjunct Proceedings of the 32nd ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization10.1145/3631700.3664890(215-219)Online publication date: 27-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3631700.3664890
Ho HHubbard EMutlu B(2024)"It's Not a Replacement:" Enabling Parent-Robot Collaboration to Support In-Home Learning Experiences of Young ChildrenProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642806(1-18)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642806
Zhang CLiu XZiska KJeon SYu CXu Y(2024)Mathemyths: Leveraging Large Language Models to Teach Mathematical Language through Child-AI Co-Creative StorytellingProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642647(1-23)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642647
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Can Children Learn Creativity from a Social Robot?

Recommendations

Can Children Catch Curiosity from a Social Robot?
HRI '15: Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

Curiosity is key to learning, yet school children show wide variability in their eagerness to acquire information. Recent research suggests that other people have a strong influence on children's exploratory behavior. Would a curious robot elicit ...
Can Children Emulate a Robotic Non-Player Character's Figural Creativity?
CHI PLAY '20: Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play

Can intelligent non-player game characters (NPCs) increase children's creativity during collaborative gameplay? Children's creativity is influenced by collaborative play with creative peers through social emulation. In this paper, we study children's ...
CreativeBot: a Creative Storyteller robot to stimulate creativity in children
ICMI '22: Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction

We present the design and evaluation of a storytelling activity between children and an autonomous robot aiming at nurturing children’s creativity. We assessed whether a robot displaying creative behavior will positively impact children’s creativity ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

C&C '19: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Creativity and Cognition

June 2019

745 pages

ISBN:9781450359177

DOI:10.1145/3325480

General Chairs:
Steven Dow
UC San Diego, USA
,
Mary Lou Maher
UNC Charlotte, USA
,
Program Chairs:
Andruid Kerne
Texas A&M University
,
Celine Latulipe
UNC Charlotte, USA

Copyright © 2019 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 13 June 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

C&C '19

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

C&C '19: Creativity and Cognition

June 23 - 26, 2019

CA, San Diego, USA

Acceptance Rates

C&C '19 Paper Acceptance Rate 30 of 101 submissions, 30%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 108 of 371 submissions, 29%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

49
Total Citations
View Citations
2,460
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)387
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)31

Reflects downloads up to 12 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Rossi ARossi SBoratto LGena CMarras MGermanakos PPopescus E(2024)On the Way to a Transparent HRIAdjunct Proceedings of the 32nd ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization10.1145/3631700.3664890(215-219)Online publication date: 27-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3631700.3664890
Ho HHubbard EMutlu B(2024)"It's Not a Replacement:" Enabling Parent-Robot Collaboration to Support In-Home Learning Experiences of Young ChildrenProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642806(1-18)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642806
Zhang CLiu XZiska KJeon SYu CXu Y(2024)Mathemyths: Leveraging Large Language Models to Teach Mathematical Language through Child-AI Co-Creative StorytellingProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642647(1-23)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642647
Williams RAli SAlcantara RBurghleh TAlghowinem SBreazeal CGrollman DBroadbent EJu WSoh HWilliams T(2024)Doodlebot: An Educational Robot for Creativity and AI LiteracyProceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610977.3634950(772-780)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3610977.3634950
Mahdi HJouaiti MSaleh SDautenhahn K(2024)Towards accessible robot-assisted physical play for children with physical disabilitiesInteraction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial SystemsInteraction Studies / Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial SystemsInteraction Studies10.1075/is.00023.mah25:1(36-69)Online publication date: 7-Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/is.00023.mah
de Rooij ABroek SBouw Mde Wit J(2024)Co-Creating with a Robot Facilitator: Robot Expressions Cause Mood Contagion Enhancing Collaboration, Satisfaction, and PerformanceInternational Journal of Social Robotics10.1007/s12369-024-01177-3Online publication date: 5-Oct-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-024-01177-3
Rudenko IRudenko ALilienthal AArras KBruno B(2024)The Child Factor in Child–Robot Interaction: Discovering the Impact of Developmental Stage and Individual CharacteristicsInternational Journal of Social Robotics10.1007/s12369-024-01121-516:8(1879-1900)Online publication date: 14-Aug-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-024-01121-5
Iga STakatsuka STetsukawa H(2024)Stimulating Creative Hypothesis Discovery by Future Human-AI TeamingCollaboration Technologies and Social Computing10.1007/978-3-031-67998-8_14(203-211)Online publication date: 20-Aug-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-67998-8_14
Weber AGreiff S(2023)ICT Skills in the Deployment of 21st Century Skills: A (Cognitive) Developmental Perspective through Early ChildhoodApplied Sciences10.3390/app1307461513:7(4615)Online publication date: 5-Apr-2023
https://doi.org/10.3390/app13074615
Fucinato KNiebuhr ONørskov SFischer K(2023)Charismatic speech features in robot instructions enhance team creativityFrontiers in Communication10.3389/fcomm.2023.11153608Online publication date: 22-May-2023
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2023.1115360
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents