Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3331184.3331395acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Information Retrieval Meets Scalable Text Analytics: Solr Integration with Spark

Published: 18 July 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Despite the broad adoption of both Apache Spark and Apache Solr, there is little integration between these two platforms to support scalable, end-to-end text analytics. We believe this is a missed opportunity, as there is substantial synergy in building analytical pipelines where the results of potentially complex faceted queries feed downstream text processing components. This demonstration explores exactly such an integration: we evaluate performance under different analytical scenarios and present three simple case studies that illustrate the range of possible analyses enabled by seamlessly connecting Spark to Solr.

References

[1]
G. Ananthanarayanan, A. Ghodsi, S. Shenker, and I. Stoica. 2011. Disk-Locality in Datacenter Computing Considered Irrelevant. In HotOS.
[2]
R. Clancy, T. Eskildsen, N. Ruest, and J. Lin. 2019. Solr Integration in the Anserini Information Retrieval Toolkit. In SIGIR.
[3]
M. Efron, J. Lin, J. He, and A. de Vries. 2014. Temporal Feedback for Tweet Search with Non-Parametric Density Estimation. In SIGIR. 33--42.
[4]
T. Elsayed, F. Ture, and J. Lin. 2010. Brute-Force Approaches to Batch Retrieval: Scalable Indexing with MapReduce, or Why Bother? Technical Report HCIL-2010-23. University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.
[5]
S. Hendrickson, S. Sturdevant, T. Harter, V. Venkataramani, A. Arpaci-Dusseau, and R. Arpaci-Dusseau. 2016. Serverless Computation with OpenLambda. In HotCloud.
[6]
D. Hiemstra and C. Hauff. 2010. MapReduce for Information Retrieval Evaluation: "Let's Quickly Test This on 12 TB of Data". In CLEF. 64--69.
[7]
Y. Hu. 2005. Efficient, High-Quality Force-Directed Graph Drawing. Mathematica Journal, Vol. 10, 1 (2005), 37--71.
[8]
J. Lin and M. Efron. 2013. Overview of the TREC-2013 Microblog Track. In TREC.
[9]
J. Lin, D. Ryaboy, and K. Weil. 2011. Full-Text Indexing for Optimizing Selection Operations in Large-Scale Data Analytics. In MAPREDUCE. 59--66.
[10]
C. Macdonald. 2018. Combining Terrier with Apache Spark to Create Agile Experimental Information Retrieval Pipelines. In SIGIR. 1309--1312.
[11]
C. Manning, M. Surdeanu, J. Bauer, J. Finkel, S. Bethard, and D. McClosky. 2014. The Stanford CoreNLP Natural Language Processing Toolkit. In ACL Demos. 55--60.
[12]
F. Moretti. 2013. Distant Reading.
[13]
P. Yang, H. Fang, and J. Lin. 2017. Anserini: Enabling the Use of Lucene for Information Retrieval Research. In SIGIR. 1253--1256.
[14]
P. Yang, H. Fang, and J. Lin. 2018. Anserini: Reproducible Ranking Baselines Using Lucene. JDIQ, Vol. 10, 4 (2018), Article 16.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SIGIR'19: Proceedings of the 42nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval
July 2019
1512 pages
ISBN:9781450361729
DOI:10.1145/3331184
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 18 July 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. data analytics platform
  2. predicate pushdown
  3. text mining

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

SIGIR '19
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

SIGIR'19 Paper Acceptance Rate 84 of 426 submissions, 20%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 792 of 3,983 submissions, 20%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 209
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)11
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 07 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media