Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3340531.3412756acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

U-rank: Utility-oriented Learning to Rank with Implicit Feedback

Published: 19 October 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Learning to rank with implicit feedback is one of the most important tasks in many real-world information systems where the objective is some specific utility, e.g., clicks and revenue. However, we point out that existing methods based on probabilistic ranking principle do not necessarily achieve the highest utility. To this end, we propose a novel ranking framework called U-rank that directly optimizes the expected utility of the ranking list. With a position-aware deep click-through rate prediction model, we address the attention bias considering both query-level and item-level features. Due to the item-specific attention bias modeling, the optimization for expected utility corresponds to a maximum weight matching on the item-position bipartite graph. We base the optimization of this objective in an efficient Lambdaloss framework, which is supported by both theoretical and empirical analysis. We conduct extensive experiments for both web search and recommender systems over three benchmark datasets and two proprietary datasets, where the performance gain of U-rank over state-of-the-arts is demonstrated. Moreover, our proposed U-rank has been deployed on a large-scale commercial recommender and a large improvement over the production baseline has been observed in an online A/B testing.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (3340531.3412756.mp4)
Video presentation for our paper **U-rank: Utility-oriented Learning to Rank with Implicit Feedback**.

References

[1]
Aman Agarwal, Ivan Zaitsev, Xuanhui Wang, Cheng Li, Marc Najork, and Thorsten Joachims. 2019. Estimating Position Bias without Intrusive Interventions. In WSDM.
[2]
Qingyao Ai, Keping Bi, Cheng Luo, Jiafeng Guo, and W. Bruce Croft. 2018. Unbiased Learning to Rank with Unbiased Propensity Estimation. In SIGIR.
[3]
Xiao Bai, Reza Abasi, Bora Edizel, and Amin Mantrach. 2019. Position-aware deep character-level CTR prediction for sponsored search. TKDE (2019).
[4]
Alexey Borisov, Ilya Markov, Maarten de Rijke, and Pavel Serdyukov. 2016. A Neural Click Model for Web Search. In WWW.
[5]
Christopher Burges, Tal Shaked, Erin Renshaw, Ari Lazier, Matt Deeds, Nicole Hamilton, and Gregory N Hullender. 2005. Learning to rank using gradient descent. In ICML.
[6]
Christopher J Burges, Robert Ragno, and Quoc V Le. 2007. Learning to rank with nonsmooth cost functions. In NeuIPS.
[7]
Olivier Chapelle and Ya Zhang. 2009. A Dynamic Bayesian Network Click Model for Web Search Ranking. In WWW.
[8]
Craswell, Nick, Zoeter, Onno, Taylor, Michael Lyu, Ramsey, and Bill. 2008. An experimental comparison of click position-bias models. In WSDM.
[9]
Georges E. Dupret and Benjamin Piwowarski. 2008. A User Browsing Model to Predict Search Engine Click Data from Past Observations. In SIGIR.
[10]
Zhichong Fang, Aman Agarwal, and Thorsten Joachims. 2019. Intervention Harvesting for Context-Dependent Examination-Bias Estimation. In SIGIR.
[11]
Fan Guo, Chao Liu, Anitha Kannan, Tom Minka, Michael Taylor, Yi-Min Wang, and Christos Faloutsos. 2009. Click Chain Model in Web Search. In WWW.
[12]
Huifeng Guo, Ruiming Tang, Yunming Ye, Zhenguo Li, and Xiuqiang He. 2017. DeepFM: A Factorization-Machine based Neural Network for CTR Prediction. In IJCAI.
[13]
Huifeng Guo, Jinkai Yu, Qing Liu, Ruiming Tang, and Yuzhou Zhang. 2019. PAL: A Position-Bias Aware Learning Framework for CTR Prediction in Live Recommender Systems. In Recsys.
[14]
Ziniu Hu, Yang Wang, Qu Peng, and Hang Li. 2019. Unbiased LambdaMART: An Unbiased Pairwise Learning-to-Rank Algorithm. In WWW.
[15]
Thorsten Joachims. 2006. Training Linear SVMs in Linear Time. In KDD.
[16]
Thorsten Joachims, Adith Swaminathan, and Tobias Schnabel. 2017. Unbiased Learning-to-Rank with Biased Feedback. In WSDM.
[17]
Alexandros Karatzoglou, Linas Baltrunas, and Yue Shi. 2013. Learning to rank for recommender systems. In Recsys.
[18]
Shubhra Kanti Karmaker Santu, Parikshit Sondhi, and ChengXiang Zhai. 2017. On application of learning to rank for e-commerce search. In SIGIR.
[19]
Harold W Kuhn. 1955. The Hungarian method for the assignment problem. Naval research logistics quarterly (1955).
[20]
Tie-Yan Liu. 2011. Learning to rank for information retrieval .Springer Science & Business Media.
[21]
Lori Lorigo, Maya Haridasan, Hrönn Brynjarsdóttir, Ling Xia, Thorsten Joachims, Geri Gay, Laura Granka, Fabio Pellacini, and Bing Pan. 2008. Eye tracking and online search: Lessons learned and challenges ahead. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (2008).
[22]
Lori Lorigo, Bing Pan, Helene Hembrooke, Thorsten Joachims, Laura Granka, and Geri Gay. 2006. The influence of task and gender on search and evaluation behavior using Google. Information Processing & Management (2006).
[23]
Claudio Lucchese, Franco Maria Nardini, Salvatore Orlando, Raffaele Perego, Fabrizio Silvestri, and Salvatore Trani. 2016. Post-Learning Optimization of Tree Ensembles for Efficient Ranking. In SIGIR.
[24]
Pavel Metrikov, Fernando Diaz, Sebastien Lahaie, and Justin Rao. 2014. Whole Page Optimization: How Page Elements Interact with the Position Auction.
[25]
James Munkres. 1957. Algorithms for the assignment and transportation problems. Journal of the society for industrial and applied mathematics (1957).
[26]
Yanru Qu, Bohui Fang, Weinan Zhang, Ruiming Tang, Minzhe Niu, Huifeng Guo, Yong Yu, and Xiuqiang He. 2018. Product-based neural networks for user response prediction over multi-field categorical data. TOIS (2018).
[27]
Richardson, Matthew, Dominowska, Ewa, Ragno, and Robert. 2007. Predicting clicks: Estimating the click-through rate for new ads. In WWW.
[28]
Stephen E Robertson. 1977. The probability ranking principle in IR. Journal of documentation (1977).
[29]
Yukihiro Tagami, Shingo Ono, Koji Yamamoto, Koji Tsukamoto, and Akira Tajima. 2013. Ctr prediction for contextual advertising: Learning-to-rank approach. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Data Mining for Online Advertising.
[30]
Xuanhui Wang, Michael Bendersky, Donald Metzler, and Marc Najork. 2016. Learning to Rank with Selection Bias in Personal Search. In SIGIR.
[31]
Xuanhui Wang, Nadav Golbandi, Michael Bendersky, Donald Metzler, and Marc Najork. 2018a. Position Bias Estimation for Unbiased Learning to Rank in Personal Search. In WSDM.
[32]
Xuanhui Wang, Cheng Li, Nadav Golbandi, Mike Bendersky, and Marc Najork. 2018b. The LambdaLoss Framework for Ranking Metric Optimization. In CIKM.
[33]
Liang Wu, Diane Hu, Liangjie Hong, and Huan Liu. 2018. Turning clicks into purchases: Revenue optimization for product search in e-commerce. In SIGIR.
[34]
Weinan Zhang, Tianming Du, and Jun Wang. 2016. Deep learning over multi-field categorical data. In ECIR.
[35]
Zhe Zhao, Lichan Hong, Li Wei, Jilin Chen, Aniruddh Nath, Shawn Andrews, Aditee Kumthekar, Maheswaran Sathiamoorthy, Xinyang Yi, and Ed Chi. 2019. Recommending what video to watch next: a multitask ranking system. In Recsys.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Debiasing the Conversion Rate Prediction Model in the Presence of Delayed Implicit FeedbackEntropy10.3390/e2609079226:9(792)Online publication date: 15-Sep-2024
  • (2024)Utility-Oriented Reranking with Counterfactual ContextACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data10.1145/367100418:8(1-22)Online publication date: 4-Jun-2024
  • (2023)Adversarially Trained Environment Models Are Effective Policy Evaluators and Improvers - An Application to Information RetrievalProceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Distributed Artificial Intelligence10.1145/3627676.3627680(1-12)Online publication date: 30-Nov-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. U-rank: Utility-oriented Learning to Rank with Implicit Feedback

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CIKM '20: Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management
    October 2020
    3619 pages
    ISBN:9781450368599
    DOI:10.1145/3340531
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 19 October 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. implicit feedback
    2. learning to rank
    3. position bias
    4. utility maximization

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    • NSFC

    Conference

    CIKM '20
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,861 of 8,427 submissions, 22%

    Upcoming Conference

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)50
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
    Reflects downloads up to 15 Oct 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Debiasing the Conversion Rate Prediction Model in the Presence of Delayed Implicit FeedbackEntropy10.3390/e2609079226:9(792)Online publication date: 15-Sep-2024
    • (2024)Utility-Oriented Reranking with Counterfactual ContextACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data10.1145/367100418:8(1-22)Online publication date: 4-Jun-2024
    • (2023)Adversarially Trained Environment Models Are Effective Policy Evaluators and Improvers - An Application to Information RetrievalProceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Distributed Artificial Intelligence10.1145/3627676.3627680(1-12)Online publication date: 30-Nov-2023
    • (2023)Replace Scoring with Arrangement: A Contextual Set-to-Arrangement Framework for Learning-to-RankProceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management10.1145/3583780.3615031(1004-1013)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2023
    • (2023)Optimal Real-Time Bidding Strategy for Position Auctions in Online AdvertisingProceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management10.1145/3583780.3614727(4766-4772)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2023
    • (2023)Deep Landscape Forecasting in Multi-Slot Real-Time BiddingProceedings of the 29th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining10.1145/3580305.3599799(4685-4695)Online publication date: 6-Aug-2023
    • (2023)Model-based Unbiased Learning to RankProceedings of the Sixteenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining10.1145/3539597.3570395(895-903)Online publication date: 27-Feb-2023
    • (2023)Personalized Diversification for Neural Re-ranking in Recommendation2023 IEEE 39th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE)10.1109/ICDE55515.2023.00067(802-815)Online publication date: Apr-2023
    • (2022)Multi-Level Interaction Reranking with User Behavior HistoryProceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval10.1145/3477495.3532026(1336-1346)Online publication date: 6-Jul-2022
    • (2022)EAGCN: An Efficient Adaptive Graph Convolutional Network for Item Recommendation in Social Internet of ThingsIEEE Internet of Things Journal10.1109/JIOT.2022.31514009:17(16386-16401)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2022
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media