survey

Large-scale Semantic Integration of Linked Data: A Survey

Authors:

Michalis Mountantonakis and

Yannis TzitzikasAuthors Info & Claims

ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), Volume 52, Issue 5

Article No.: 103, Pages 1 - 40

https://doi.org/10.1145/3345551

Published: 13 September 2019 Publication History

Abstract

A large number of published datasets (or sources) that follow Linked Data principles is currently available and this number grows rapidly. However, the major target of Linked Data, i.e., linking and integration, is not easy to achieve. In general, information integration is difficult, because (a) datasets are produced, kept, or managed by different organizations using different models, schemas, or formats, (b) the same real-world entities or relationships are referred with different URIs or names and in different natural languages,<?brk?>(c) datasets usually contain complementary information, (d) datasets can contain data that are erroneous, out-of-date, or conflicting, (e) datasets even about the same domain may follow different conceptualizations of the domain, (f) everything can change (e.g., schemas, data) as time passes. This article surveys the work that has been done in the area of Linked Data integration, it identifies the main actors and use cases, it analyzes and factorizes the integration process according to various dimensions, and it discusses the methods that are used in each step. Emphasis is given on methods that can be used for integrating several datasets. Based on this analysis, the article concludes with directions that are worth further research.

Supplementary Material

a103-mountantonakis-suppl.pdf (mountantonakis.zip)

Supplemental movie, appendix, image and software files for, Large-scale Semantic Integration of Linked Data: A Survey

Download
88.23 KB

References

[1]

A. Abello, O. Romero, T. B. Pedersen, R. Berlanga, V. Nebot, M. J. Aramburu, and A. Simitsis. 2015. Using semantic web technologies for exploratory OLAP: A survey. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 27, 2 (2015), 571--588.

[2]

M. Acosta, E. Simperl, F. Flöck, and M. Vidal. 2017. Enhancing answer completeness of SPARQL queries via crowdsourcing. Web Semantics: Sci. Serv. Agents World Wide Web 45 (2017), 41--62.

[3]

Maribel Acosta, Maria-Esther Vidal, Tomas Lampo, Julio Castillo, and Edna Ruckhaus. 2011. ANAPSID: An adaptive query processing engine for SPARQL endpoints. In Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC’11). Springer, 18--34.

Digital Library

[4]

Maribel Acosta, Amrapali Zaveri, Elena Simperl, Dimitris Kontokostas, Fabian Flöck, and Jens Lehmann. 2018. Detecting linked data quality issues via crowdsourcing: A dbpedia study. Semantic Web 9, 3 (2018), 303--335.

[5]

Grigoris Antoniou and Frank Van Harmelen. 2004. A Semantic Web Primer. MIT Press.

Digital Library

[6]

Ciro Baron Neto, Kay Müller, Martin Brümmer, Dimitris Kontokostas, and Sebastian Hellmann. 2016. LODVader: An interface to LOD visualization, analytics and discovERy in real-time. In Proceedings of the Conference on the World Wide Web (WWW’16). 163--166.

Digital Library

[7]

Sonia Bergamaschi, Silvana Castano, and Maurizio Vincini. 1999. Semantic integration of semistructured and structured data sources. ACM SIGMOD Rec. 28, 1 (1999), 54--59.

Digital Library

[8]

Tim Berners-Lee and Mark Fischetti. 2001. Weaving the Web: The Original Design and Ultimate Destiny of the World Wide Web by Its Inventor. DIANE Publishing Company.

Digital Library

[9]

Tim Berners-Lee, James Hendler, Ora Lassila et al. 2001. The semantic web. Sci. Amer. 284, 5 (2001), 28--37.

[10]

Nikos Bikakis and Timos K. Sellis. 2016. Exploration and visualization in the web of big linked data: A survey of the state of the art. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Extending Database Technology and International Conference on Database Theory (EDBT/ICDT’16), Vol. 1558.

[11]

N. Bikakis, C. Tsinaraki, N. Gioldasis, I. Stavrakantonakis, and S. Christodoulakis. 2013. The XML and semantic web worlds: Technologies, interoperability and integration: a survey of the state of the art. In Semantic Hyper/Multimedia Adaptation. Springer, 319--360.

[12]

Christian Bizer, Tom Heath, and Tim Berners-Lee. 2009. Linked data-the story so far. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems, Tom Heath, Martin Hepp, and Christian Bizer (Eds.), 5, 3 (2009), 1–22.

[13]

Christian Bizer and Andreas Schultz. 2010. The R2R framework: Publishing and discovering mappings on the web. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Consuming Linked Data. 97--108.

Digital Library

[14]

Christian Bizer, Andreas Schultz, David Ruiz, and Carlos R. Rivero. 2012. Benchmarking the performance of linked data translation systems. In Proceedings of the Conference on Linked Data on the Web (LDOW’12).

[15]

Christoph Böhm, Gerard de Melo, Felix Naumann, and Gerhard Weikum. 2012. LINDA: Distributed web-of-data-scale entity matching. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management Conference (CIKM’12). 2104--2108.

Digital Library

[16]

Kurt Bollacker, Colin Evans, Praveen Paritosh, Tim Sturge, and Jamie Taylor. 2008. Freebase: A collaboratively created graph database for structuring human knowledge. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD Conference. 1247--1250.

Digital Library

[17]

Angela Bonifati, Fabiano Cattaneo, Stefano Ceri, Alfonso Fuggetta, Stefano Paraboschi et al. 2001. Designing data marts for data warehouses. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 10, 4 (2001), 452--483.

Digital Library

[18]

Dan Brickley, Matthew Burgess, and Natasha Noy. 2019. Google dataset search: Building a search engine for datasets in an open web ecosystem. In Proceedings of the World Wide Web Conference. ACM, 1365--1375.

Digital Library

[19]

Qingqing Cai and Alexander Yates. 2013. Large-scale semantic parsing via schema matching and lexicon extension. In Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL’13). 423--433.

[20]

Alison Callahan, José Cruz-Toledo, Peter Ansell, and Michel Dumontier. 2013. Bio2RDF release 2: Improved coverage, interoperability and provenance of life science linked data. In Proceedings of the Extended Semantic Web Conference. Springer, 200--212.

[21]

Diego Calvanese, Giuseppe De Giacomo, Maurizio Lenzerini, Daniele Nardi, and Riccardo Rosati. 1998. Information integration: Conceptual modeling and reasoning support. In Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Cooperative Information Systems (IFCIS’98). 280--289.

Digital Library

[22]

Diego Calvanese, Domenico Lembo, and Maurizio Lenzerini. 2001. Survey on methods for query rewriting and query answering using views. Integrazione, Warehousing e Mining Di Sorgenti Eterogenee 25 (2001).

[23]

Silvana Castano, Alfio Ferrara, Stefano Montanelli, and Gaia Varese. 2011. Ontology and instance matching. In Knowledge-driven Multimedia Information Extraction and Ontology Evolution. Springer, 167--195.

Digital Library

[24]

M. Cheatham and P. Hitzler. 2013. String similarity metrics for ontology alignment. In Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC’13). Springer, 294--309.

Digital Library

[25]

Diego Collarana, Mikhail Galkin, Ignacio Traverso-Ribón, Christoph Lange, Maria-Esther Vidal, and Sören Auer. 2017. Semantic data integration for knowledge graph construction at query time. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC’17). IEEE, 109--116.

[26]

Diego Collarana, Mikhail Galkin, Ignacio Traverso-Ribón, Maria-Esther Vidal, Christoph Lange, and Sören Auer. 2017. MINTE: Semantically integrating RDF graphs. In Proceedings of International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics (WIMS’17). ACM, 22.

Digital Library

[27]

Gianluca Correndo, Manuel Salvadores, Ian Millard, Hugh Glaser, and Nigel Shadbolt. 2010. SPARQL query rewriting for implementing data integration over linked data. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Extending Database Technology and International Conference on Database Theory (EDBT/ICDT’10). ACM, 1--11.

Digital Library

[28]

Isabel F. Cruz, Flavio Palandri Antonelli, and Cosmin Stroe. 2009. AgreementMaker: Efficient matching for large real-world schemas and ontologies. Proc. VLDB Endow. 2, 2 (2009), 1586--1589.

Digital Library

[29]

A. Dadzie and M. Rowe. 2011. Approaches to visualising linked data: A survey. Semantic Web 2, 2 (2011), 89--124.

Digital Library

[30]

Mathieu d’Aquin and Enrico Motta. 2011. Watson, more than a semantic web search engine. Semantic Web 2, 1 (2011), 55--63.

Digital Library

[31]

Evangelia Daskalaki, Giorgos Flouris, Irini Fundulaki, and Tzanina Saveta. 2016. Instance matching benchmarks in the era of Linked Data. Web Semantics: Sci. Serv. Agents World Wide Web 39 (2016), 1--14.

Digital Library

[32]

Jeremy Debattista, Sören Auer, and Christoph Lange. 2016. Luzzu—A methodology and framework for linked data quality assessment. J. Data Info. Qual. 8, 1 (2016), 4.

Digital Library

[33]

Gianluca Demartini, Djellel Eddine Difallah, and Philippe Cudré-Mauroux. 2012. ZenCrowd: Leveraging probabilistic reasoning and crowdsourcing techniques for large-scale entity linking. In Proceedings of the Conference on the World Wide Web (WWW’12). ACM, 469--478.

Digital Library

[34]

Li Ding, Tim Finin, Anupam Joshi, Rong Pan, R. Scott Cost, Yun Peng, Pavan Reddivari, Vishal Doshi, and Joel Sachs. 2004. Swoogle: A search and metadata engine for the semantic web. In Proceedings of the Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM’04). ACM, 652--659.

Digital Library

[35]

Li Ding, Vassilios Peristeras, and Michael Hausenblas. 2012. Linked open government data {Guest editors’ introduction}. IEEE Intell. Syst. 27, 3 (2012), 11--15.

Digital Library

[36]

Renata Queiroz Dividino, Thomas Gottron, Ansgar Scherp, and Gerd Gröner. 2014. From changes to dynamics: Dynamics analysis of linked open data sources. In Proceedings of the European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC’14). Retrieved from CEUR-WS.org.

[37]

Warith Eddine Djeddi and Mohamed Tarek Khadir. 2014. A novel approach using context-based measure for matching large-scale ontologies. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Big Data Analytics and Knowledge Discovery (DaWaK’14). Springer, 320--331.

[38]

Martin Doerr. 2003. The CIDOC conceptual reference module: An ontological approach to semantic interoperability of metadata. AI Mag 24, 3 (2003), 75.

Digital Library

[39]

X. Dong, E. Gabrilovich, G. Heitz, W. Horn, Ni Lao, K. Murphy, T. Strohmann, S. Sun, and W. Zhang. 2014. Knowledge vault: A web-scale approach to probabilistic knowledge fusion. In Proceedings of the ACM Special Interest Group on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (SIGKDD’14). ACM, 601--610.

Digital Library

[40]

Xin Luna Dong, Barna Saha, and Divesh Srivastava. 2012. Less is more: Selecting sources wisely for integration. In Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, Vol. 6. VLDB Endowment, 37--48.

Digital Library

[41]

X. L. Dong and D. Srivastava. 2015. Big data integration. Synth. Lect. Data Manage. 7, 1 (2015), 1--198.

[42]

Vasilis Efthymiou, Kostas Stefanidis, and Vassilis Christophides. 2016. Minoan ER: Progressive entity resolution in the web of data. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Extending Database Technology.

[43]

Khadija M. Elbedweihy, Stuart N. Wrigley, Paul Clough, and Fabio Ciravegna. 2015. An overview of semantic search evaluation initiatives. Web Semantics: Sci. Serv. Agents World Wide Web 30 (2015), 82--105.

Digital Library

[44]

Mohamed Ben Ellefi, Zohra Bellahsene, Stefan Dietze, and Konstantin Todorov. 2016. Dataset recommendation for data linking: An intensional approach. In Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Springer, 36--51.

Digital Library

[45]

Kemele M. Endris, Mikhail Galkin, Ioanna Lytra, Mohamed Nadjib Mami, Maria-Esther Vidal, and Sören Auer. 2017. MULDER: Querying the linked data web by bridging RDF molecule templates. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA’17). Springer, 3--18.

[46]

Ivan Ermilov, Sören Auer, and Claus Stadler. 2013. Csv2rdf: User-driven CSV to RDF mass conversion framework. In Proceedings of the Conference on Information Systems Engineering and Management (ISEM’13), Vol. 13. 4--6.

[47]

I. Ermilov, J. Lehmann, M. Martin, and S. Auer. 2016. LODStats: The data web census dataset. In Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC’16). Springer, 38--46.

[48]

Pavlos Fafalios, Thanos Yannakis, and Yannis Tzitzikas. 2016. Querying the web of data with SPARQL-LD. In International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries (TPDL’16). Springer, 175--187.

[49]

Michael Färber, Frederic Bartscherer, Carsten Menne, and Achim Rettinger. 2018. Linked data quality of dbpedia, freebase, opencyc, wikidata, and yago. Semantic Web 9, 1 (2018), 77--129.

Digital Library

[50]

Michael Färber, Basil Ell, Carsten Menne, and Achim Rettinger. 2015. A comparative survey of dbpedia, freebase, opencyc, wikidata, and yago. Semantic Web J. 1, 1 (2015), 1--5.

[51]

J. D. Fernández, W. Beek, M. A. Martínez-Prieto, and M. Arias. 2017. LOD-a-lot. In Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC’17). Springer, 75--83.

[52]

J. D. Fernández, M. A. Martínez-Prieto, C. Gutiérrez, A. Polleres, and M. Arias. 2013. Binary RDF representation for publication and exchange (HDT). Web Semantics: Sci. Serv. Agents World Wide Web 19 (2013), 22--41.

Digital Library

[53]

Valeria Fionda, Giuseppe Pirrò, and Claudio Gutierrez. 2015. NautiLOD: A formal language for the web of data graph. ACM Trans. Web 9, 1 (2015), 5.

Digital Library

[54]

Annika Flemming. 2010. Quality characteristics of linked data publishing datasources. Master’s Thesis, Humboldt-Universität of Berlin (2010).

[55]

Giorgos Flouris, Dimitris Manakanatas, Haridimos Kondylakis, Dimitris Plexousakis, and Grigoris Antoniou. 2008. Ontology change: Classification and survey. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 23, 2 (2008), 117--152.

Digital Library

[56]

Christian Fürber and Martin Hepp. 2011. Swiqa-a semantic web information quality assessment framework. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS’11), Vol. 15. 19.

[57]

D. Gerber, D. Esteves, J. Lehmann, L. Bühmann, R. Usbeck, A. N. Ngomo, and R. Speck. 2015. DeFacto-temporal and multilingual deep fact validation. Web Semantics: Sci. Serv. Agents World Wide Web 35 (2015), 85--101.

Digital Library

[58]

José M Giménez-Garcıa, Harsh Thakkar, and Antoine Zimmermann. 2016. Assessing trust with pagerank in the web of data. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Dataset PROFIling and fEderated Search for Linked Data.

[59]

Hugh Glaser, Afraz Jaffri, and Ian Millard. 2009. Managing co-reference on the semantic web. (2009).

[60]

Olaf Görlitz and Steffen Staab. 2011. Splendid: Sparql endpoint federation exploiting void descriptions. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Consuming Linked Data (COLD’11). 13--24.

Digital Library

[61]

P. Groth, A. Loizou, A. J. G. Gray, C. Goble, L. Harland, and S. Pettifer. 2014. API-centric linked data integration: The open PHACTS discovery platform case study. Web Semantics: Sci. Serv. Agents World Wide Web 29 (2014), 12--18.

Digital Library

[62]

Tobias Grubenmann, Abraham Bernstein, Dmitry Moor, and Sven Seuken. 2017. Challenges of source selection in the WoD. In Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Springer, 313--328.

[63]

Christophe Guéret, Paul Groth, Claus Stadler, and Jens Lehmann. 2012. Assessing linked data mappings using network measures. In The Semantic Web: Research and Applications. Springer, 87--102.

Digital Library

[64]

Yuanbo Guo, Zhengxiang Pan, and Jeff Heflin. 2005. LUBM: A benchmark for OWL knowledge base systems. Web Semantics: Sci. Serv. Agents World Wide Web 3, 2--3 (2005), 158--182.

Digital Library

[65]

A. Halevy, A. Rajaraman, and J. Ordille. 2006. Data integration: the teenage years. In Proceedings of the Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB’06). 9--16.

Digital Library

[66]

Andreas Harth, Craig A. Knoblock, Steffen Stadtmüller, Rudi Studer, and Pedro Szekely. 2013. On-the-fly integration of static and dynamic linked data. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Consuming Linked Data (COLD’13). Citeseer, 1613--0073.

Digital Library

[67]

Olaf Hartig. 2009. Provenance information in the web of data. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Linked Data on the Web (LDOW’09).

[68]

Olaf Hartig. 2013. An overview on execution strategies for Linked Data queries. Datenbank-Spektrum 13, 2 (2013), 89--99.

[69]

Olaf Hartig. 2013. SQUIN: A traversal-based query execution system for the web of linked data. In Proceedings of the ACM Special Interest Group on Management of Data (SIGMOD’13). ACM, 1081--1084.

Digital Library

[70]

Olaf Hartig and Jun Zhao. 2009. Using web data provenance for quality assessment. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on the role of Semantic Web in Provenance Management (SWPM’09). 29--34.

Digital Library

[71]

Olaf Hartig and Jun Zhao. 2010. Publishing and consuming provenance metadata on the web of linked data. In Provenance and Annotation of Data and Processes. Springer, 78--90.

[72]

A. Hogan, A. Harth, J. Umbrich, S. Kinsella, A. Polleres, and S. Decker. 2011. Searching and browsing linked data with swse: The semantic web search engine. Web Semantics: Sci. Serv. Agents World Wide Web 9, 4 (2011), 365--401.

Digital Library

[73]

A. Hogan, J. Umbrich, A. Harth, R. Cyganiak, A. Polleres, and S. Decker. 2012. An empirical survey of linked data conformance. Web Semantics: Sci. Serv. Agents World Wide Web 14 (2012), 14--44.

Digital Library

[74]

K. Hose, R. Schenkel, M. Theobald, and G. Weikum. 2011. Database foundations for scalable RDF processing. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Reasoning Web: Semantic Technologies for the Web of Data. Springer-Verlag, 202--249.

Digital Library

[75]

Filip Ilievski, Wouter Beek, Marieke van Erp, Laurens Rietveld, and Stefan Schlobach. 2016. LOTUS: Adaptive text search for big linked data. In Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Springer, 470--485.

Digital Library

[76]

A. Isaac and B. Haslhofer. 2013. Europeana linked open data—data.europeana.eu. Semantic Web 4, 3 (2013), 291--297.

Digital Library

[77]

Krzysztof Janowicz, Pascal Hitzler, Benjamin Adams, Dave Kolas, I. I. Vardeman et al. 2014. Five stars of linked data vocabulary use. Semantic Web 5, 3 (2014), 173--176.

Digital Library

[78]

Ernesto Jiménez-Ruiz and Bernardo Cuenca Grau. 2011. Logmap: Logic-based and scalable ontology matching. In Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Springer, 273--288.

Digital Library

[79]

Tobias Käfer, Ahmed Abdelrahman, Jürgen Umbrich, Patrick O’ Byrne, and Aidan Hogan. 2013. Observing linked data dynamics. In Proceedings of the Extended Semantic Web Conference. Springer, 213--227.

[80]

Maulik R. Kamdar and Mark A. Musen. 2017. PhLeGrA: Graph analytics in pharmacology over the web of life sciences linked open data. In Proceedings of the World Wide Web Conference. 321--329.

Digital Library

[81]

Zoi Kaoudi and Ioana Manolescu. 2015. RDF in the clouds: A survey. VLDB J. 24, 1 (2015), 67--91.

Digital Library

[82]

Michel Klein. 2001. Combining and relating ontologies: An analysis of problems and solutions. In Proceeding sof the International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence (OIS@ IJCAI’01).

[83]

T. Knap, J. Michelfeit, J. Daniel, P. Jerman, D. Rychnovskỳ, T. Soukup, and M. Nečaskỳ. 2012. ODCleanStore: A framework for managing and providing integrated linked data on the web. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering (WISE’12). Springer, 815--816.

Digital Library

[84]

Craig A Knoblock and Pedro Szekely. 2015. Exploiting semantics for big data integration. AI Magazine 36, 1 (2015).

[85]

Haridimos Kondylakis and Dimitris Plexousakis. 2013. Ontology evolution without tears. Web Semantics: Sci. Serv. Agents World Wide Web 19 (2013), 42--58.

Digital Library

[86]

Dimitris Kontokostas, Patrick Westphal, Sören Auer, Sebastian Hellmann, Jens Lehmann, Roland Cornelissen, and Amrapali Zaveri. 2014. Test-driven evaluation of linked data quality. In Proceedings of the 23rd World Wide Web Conference (WWW’14). ACM, 747--758.

Digital Library

[87]

Dimitris Kontokostas, Amrapali Zaveri, Sören Auer, and Jens Lehmann. 2013. Triplecheckmate: A Tool for Crowdsourcing the Quality Assessment of Linked Data. Springer, 265--272.

[88]

Christina Lantzaki, Panagiotis Papadakos, Anastasia Analyti, and Yannis Tzitzikas. 2017. Radius-aware approximate blank node matching using signatures. Knowl. Info. Syst. 50, 2 (2017), 505–542.

Digital Library

[89]

Wangchao Le, Songyun Duan, Anastasios Kementsietsidis, Feifei Li, and Min Wang. 2011. Rewriting queries on SPARQL views. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 655--664.

Digital Library

[90]

Jens Lehmann, Robert Isele, et al. 2015. DBpedia--a large-scale, multilingual knowledge base extracted from Wikipedia. Semantic Web 6, 2 (2015), 167--195.

[91]

Luiz André P. Paes Leme, Giseli Rabello Lopes, Bernardo Pereira Nunes, Marco Antonio Casanova, and Stefan Dietze. 2013. Identifying candidate datasets for data interlinking. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Engineering (ICWE’13). Springer, 354--366.

Digital Library

[92]

Maurizio Lenzerini. 2002. Data integration: A theoretical perspective. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems. ACM, 233--246.

Digital Library

[93]

Xian Li, Xin Luna Dong, Kenneth Lyons, Weiyi Meng, and Divesh Srivastava. 2012. Truth finding on the deep web: Is the problem solved? In Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, Vol. 6. VLDB Endowment, 97--108.

Digital Library

[94]

Vanessa Lopez, Christina Unger, Philipp Cimiano, and Enrico Motta. 2013. Evaluating question answering over linked data. Web Semantics: Sci. Serv. Agents World Wide Web 21 (2013), 3--13.

Digital Library

[95]

Konstantinos Makris, Nikos Bikakis, Nektarios Gioldasis, and Stavros Christodoulakis. 2012. SPARQL-RW: Transparent query access over mapped RDF data sources. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Extending Database Technology (EDBT’12). ACM, 610--613.

Digital Library

[96]

Pablo N. Mendes, Hannes Mühleisen, and Christian Bizer. 2012. Sieve: Linked data quality assessment and fusion. In Proceedings of the Joint International Conference on Extending Database Technology and International Conference on Database Theory (EDBT/ICDT’12). ACM, 116--123.

Digital Library

[97]

Tomas Mikolov, Kai Chen, Greg Corrado, and Jeffrey Dean. 2013. Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:1301.3781.

[98]

N. Minadakis, Y. Marketakis, H. Kondylakis, G. Flouris, M. Theodoridou, M. Doerr, and G. de Jong. 2015. X3ML framework: An effective suite for supporting data mappings. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Extending, Mapping and Focusing the CRM at the International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries (EMF-CRM@ TPDL’15). 1--12.

[99]

Paolo Missier, Khalid Belhajjame, and James Cheney. 2013. The W3C PROV family of specifications for modelling provenance metadata. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Extending Database Technology (EDBT’13). ACM, 773--776.

Digital Library

[100]

Gabriela Montoya. 2016. Answering SPARQL Queries Using Views. Ph.D. Dissertation. Université de Nantes.

[101]

Gabriela Montoya, Luis-Daniel Ibáñez, Hala Skaf-Molli, Pascal Molli, and Maria-Esther Vidal. 2014. Semlav: Local-as-view mediation for sparql queries. In Transactions on Large-Scale Data- and Knowledge-Centered Systems XIII. Springer, 33--58.

[102]

Camilo Morales, Diego Collarana, Maria-Esther Vidal, and Sören Auer. 2017. MateTee: A semantic similarity metric based on translation embeddings for knowledge graphs. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Engineering (ICWE’17). Springer, 246--263.

[103]

L. Moreau, B. Ludäscher, I. Altintas, R. S. Barga, S. Bowers, S. Callahan, G. Chin Jr, B. Clifford et al. 2008. The first provenance challenge. Concurr. Comput.: Pract. Exper. 20, 5 (2008), 409--418.

Digital Library

[104]

M. Mountantonakis, N. Minadakis, Y. Marketakis, P. Fafalios, and Y. Tzitzikas. 2016. Quantifying the connectivity of a semantic warehouse and understanding its evolution over time. Int. J. Semantic Web Info. Syst. 12, 3 (2016), 27--78.

[105]

Michalis Mountantonakis and Yannis Tzitzikas. 2016. On measuring the lattice of commonalities among several linked datasets. Proc. VLDB Endow. 9, 12 (2016), 1101--1112.

Digital Library

[106]

Michalis Mountantonakis and Yannis Tzitzikas. 2018. High performance methods for linked open data connectivity analytics. Information 9, 6 (2018).

[107]

Michalis Mountantonakis and Yannis Tzitzikas. 2018. Scalable methods for measuring the connectivity and quality of large numbers of linked datasets. J. Data Info. Qual. 9, 3 (2018), 15.

Digital Library

[108]

Markus Nentwig, Michael Hartung, Axel-Cyrille Ngonga Ngomo, and Erhard Rahm. 2017. A survey of current link discovery frameworks. Semantic Web 8, 3 (2017), 419--436.

Digital Library

[109]

Markus Nentwig, Tommaso Soru, Axel-Cyrille Ngonga Ngomo, and Erhard Rahm. 2014. LinkLion: A link repository for the web of data. In Proceedings of the European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC’14). Springer, 439--443.

[110]

DuyHoa Ngo, Zohra Bellahsene, and R Coletta. 2016. Overview of YAM++—(not) Yet Another Matcher for ontology alignment task. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 41 (2016), 30–49.

[111]

Axel-Cyrille Ngonga Ngomo and Sören Auer. 2011. Limes-a time-efficient approach for large-scale link discovery on the web of data. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’11). 2312--2317.

Digital Library

[112]

Andriy Nikolov, Mathieu d’ Aquin, and Enrico Motta. 2011. What should i link to? identifying relevant sources and classes for data linking. In Proceedings of the Joint International Semantic Technology Conference. Springer, 284--299.

Digital Library

[113]

N. F. Noy. 2004. Semantic integration: A survey of ontology-based approaches. ACM SIGMOD Rec. 33, 4 (2004), 65--70.

Digital Library

[114]

Peter Ochieng and Swaib Kyanda. 2018. A statistically based ontology matching tool. Distrib. Parallel Databases 36, 1 (2018), 195–217.

Digital Library

[115]

D. Oguz, B. Ergenc, S. Yin, O. Dikenelli, and A. Hameurlain. 2015. Federated query processing on linked data: A qualitative survey and open challenges. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 30, 5 (2015), 545--563.

[116]

Eyal Oren, Renaud Delbru, Michele Catasta, Richard Cyganiak, Holger Stenzhorn, and Giovanni Tummarello. 2008. Sindice.com: A document-oriented lookup index for open linked data. Int. J. Metadata Semantics Ontol. 3, 1 (2008), 37--52.

Digital Library

[117]

Lorena Otero-Cerdeira, Francisco J. Rodríguez-Martínez, and Alma Gómez-Rodríguez. 2015. Ontology matching: A literature review. Expert Syst. Appl. 42, 2 (2015), 949--971.

Digital Library

[118]

Jeff Pasternack and Dan Roth. 2013. Latent credibility analysis. In Proceedings of the World Wide Web Conference (WWW’13). ACM, 1009--1020.

Digital Library

[119]

Heiko Paulheim. 2017. Knowledge graph refinement: A survey of approaches and evaluation methods. Semantic Web 8, 3 (2017), 489--508.

Digital Library

[120]

Peng Peng, Lei Zou, M Tamer Özsu, Lei Chen, and Dongyan Zhao. 2016. Processing SPARQL queries over distributed RDF graphs. VLDB J. 25, 2 (2016), 243--268.

Digital Library

[121]

Petar Petrovski, Volha Bryl, and Christian Bizer. 2014. Integrating product data from websites offering microdata markup. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 1299--1304.

Digital Library

[122]

B. Quilitz and U. Leser. 2008. Querying distributed RDF data sources with SPARQL. In Proceedings of the European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC’08). Springer, 524--538.

Digital Library

[123]

Erhard Rahm. 2016. The Case for holistic data integration. In Proceedings of the East European Conference on Advances in Databases and Information Systems (ADBIS’16). Springer, 11--27.

[124]

Thomas Rebele, Fabian Suchanek, Johannes Hoffart, Joanna Biega, Erdal Kuzey, and Gerhard Weikum. 2016. YAGO: A multilingual knowledge base from wikipedia, wordnet, and geonames. In Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC’16). Springer, 177--185.

[125]

Theodoros Rekatsinas, Xin Luna Dong, Lise Getoor, and Divesh Srivastava. 2015. Finding quality in quantity: The challenge of discovering valuable sources for integration. In Proceedings of the Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research (CIDR’15).

[126]

L. Rietveld, W. Beek, and S. Schlobach. 2015. LOD lab: Experiments at LOD scale. In Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC’15). Springer, 339--355.

[127]

Petar Ristoski, Christian Bizer, and Heiko Paulheim. 2015. Mining the web of linked data with rapidminer. Web Semantics: Sci. Serv. Agents World Wide Web 35 (2015), 142--151.

Digital Library

[128]

P. Ristoski and H. Paulheim. 2016. Rdf2vec: Rdf graph embeddings for data mining. In Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC’16). Springer, 498--514.

[129]

Muhammad Saleem, Ali Hasnain, and Axel-Cyrille Ngonga Ngomo. 2018. Largerdfbench: A billion triples benchmark for sparql endpoint federation. J. Web Semantics (2018).

[130]

Muhammad Saleem, Yasar Khan, Ali Hasnain, Ivan Ermilov, and Axel-Cyrille Ngonga Ngomo. 2016. A fine-grained evaluation of SPARQL endpoint federation systems. Semantic Web 7, 5 (2016), 493--518.

Digital Library

[131]

Muhammad Saleem and Axel-Cyrille Ngonga Ngomo. 2014. Hibiscus: Hypergraph-based source selection for sparql endpoint federation. In Proceedings of the European Semantic Web Conference. Springer, 176--191.

[132]

Muhammad Saleem, Axel-Cyrille Ngonga Ngomo, Josiane Xavier Parreira, Helena F. Deus, and Manfred Hauswirth. 2013. Daw: Duplicate-aware federated query processing over the web of data. In Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC’13). Springer, 574--590.

Digital Library

[133]

M. Saleem, S. Padmanabhuni, A. N. Ngomo, A. Iqbal, J. S. Almeida, S. Decker, and H. F. Deus. 2014. TopFed: TCGA tailored federated query processing and linking to LOD. J. Biomed. Semantics 5, 1 (2014), 1.

[134]

Cristina Sarasua, Elena Simperl, and Natalya F. Noy. 2012. Crowdmap: Crowdsourcing ontology alignment with microtasks. In Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Springer, 525--541.

Digital Library

[135]

Cristina Sarasua, Steffen Staab, and Matthias Thimm. 2017. Methods for intrinsic evaluation of links in the web of data. In Proceedings of the European Semantic Web Conference. Springer, 68--84.

Digital Library

[136]

Max Schmachtenberg, Christian Bizer, and Heiko Paulheim. 2014. Adoption of the linked data best practices in different topical domains. In Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC’14). Springer, 245--260.

Digital Library

[137]

Michael Schmidt, Olaf Görlitz, Peter Haase, Günter Ladwig, Andreas Schwarte, and Thanh Tran. 2011. Fedbench: A benchmark suite for federated semantic data query processing. In Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC’11). 585--600.

Digital Library

[138]

Falk Scholer, Diane Kelly, and Ben Carterette. 2016. Information retrieval evaluation using test collections. Info. Retrieval J. 19, 3 (2016), 225--229.

Digital Library

[139]

Andreas Schultz, Andrea Matteini, Robert Isele, Pablo N. Mendes, Christian Bizer, and Christian Becker. 2012. LDIF-a framework for large-scale Linked Data integration. In Proceedings of the 21st International World Wide Web Conference, Developers Track (WWW’12).

[140]

Andreas Schwarte, Peter Haase, Katja Hose, Ralf Schenkel, and Michael Schmidt. 2011. Fedx: Optimization techniques for federated query processing on linked data. In Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Springer, 601--616.

Digital Library

[141]

Juan F. Sequeda, Marcelo Arenas, and Daniel P. Miranker. 2012. On directly mapping relational databases to RDF and OWL. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 649--658.

Digital Library

[142]

Juan F. Sequeda, Syed Hamid Tirmizi, Oscar Corcho, and Daniel P. Miranker. 2011. Survey of directly mapping sql databases to the semantic web. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 26, 4 (2011), 445--486.

Digital Library

[143]

Nigel Shadbolt, Tim Berners-Lee, and Wendy Hall. 2006. The semantic web revisited. IEEE Intell. Syst. 21, 3 (2006), 96--101.

Digital Library

[144]

Pavel Shvaiko and Jérôme Euzenat. 2013. Ontology matching: State of the art and future challenges. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 25, 1 (2013), 158--176.

Digital Library

[145]

Karen Smith-Yoshimura. 2018. Analysis of 2018 international linked data survey for implementers. Code {4} lib J. 42 (2018).

[146]

Stefano Spaccapietra and Christine Parent. 1994. View integration: A step forward in solving structural conflicts. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 6, 2 (1994), 258--274.

Digital Library

[147]

Stefano Spaccapietra, Christine Parent, and Yann Dupont. 1992. Model independent assertions for integration of heterogeneous schemas. VLDB J. 1, 1 (1992), 81--126.

Digital Library

[148]

Fabian M. Suchanek, Serge Abiteboul, and Pierre Senellart. 2011. Paris: Probabilistic alignment of relations, instances, and schema. Proc. VLDB Endow. 5, 3 (2011), 157--168.

Digital Library

[149]

Ignacio Traverso, Maria-Esther Vidal, Benedikt Kämpgen, and York Sure-Vetter. 2016. GADES: A graph-based semantic similarity measure. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Semantic Systems. ACM, 101--104.

Digital Library

[150]

Priyansh Trivedi, Gaurav Maheshwari, Mohnish Dubey, and Jens Lehmann. 2017. Lc-quad: A corpus for complex question answering over knowledge graphs. In Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Springer, 210--218.

[151]

Yannis Tzitzikas et al. 2013. Integrating heterogeneous and distributed information about marine species through a top level ontology. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Metadata and Semantics Research (MTSR’13). Springer, 289--301.

[152]

Yannis Tzitzikas, Mary Kampouraki, and Anastasia Analyti. 2013. Curating the specificity of ontological descriptions under ontology evolution. J. Data Semantics (2013), 1--32.

[153]

Yannis Tzitzikas, Nikos Manolis, and Panagiotis Papadakos. 2017. Faceted exploration of RDF/S datasets: A survey. J. Intell. Info. Syst. 48, 2 (2017), 329–364.

Digital Library

[154]

Yannis Tzitzikas, Yannis Marketakis et al. 2017. Towards a global record of stocks and fisheries. In Proceedings of the 8th International HAICTA Conference. 328--340.

[155]

Yannis Tzitzikas and Carlo Meghini. 2003. Ostensive automatic schema mapping for taxonomy-based peer-to-peer systems. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Cooperative Information Agents. Springer, 78--92.

[156]

Y. Tzitzikas, N. Minadakis, Y. Marketakis, P. Fafalios, C. Allocca, M. Mountantonakis, and I. Zidianaki. 2014. Matware: Constructing and exploiting domain specific warehouses by aggregating semantic data. In Proceedings of the European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC’14). Springer, 721--736.

[157]

Yannis Tzitzikas, Nicolas Spyratos, and Panos Constantopoulos. 2005. Mediators over taxonomy-based information sources. VLDB J. 14, 1 (2005), 112--136.

Digital Library

[158]

J. Urbani, S. Kotoulas, J. Maassen, F. Van Harmelen, and H. Bal. 2012. WebPIE: A web-scale parallel inference engine using mapreduce. Web Semantics: Sci. Serv. Agents World Wide Web 10 (2012), 59--75.

Digital Library

[159]

Pierre-Yves Vandenbussche, Jürgen Umbrich, Luca Matteis, Aidan Hogan, and Carlos Buil-Aranda. 2017. SPARQLES: Monitoring public SPARQL endpoints. Semantic Web 8, 6 (2017), 1049--1065.

Digital Library

[160]

Panos Vassiliadis and Timos Sellis. 1999. A survey of logical models for OLAP databases. ACM SIGMOD Rec. 28, 4 (1999), 64--69.

Digital Library

[161]

Julius Volz, Christian Bizer, Martin Gaedke, and Georgi Kobilarov. 2009. Silk—A link discovery framework for the web of data. In Proceedings of the World Wide Web Workshop on Linked Data on the Web.

[162]

D. Vrandečić and M. Krötzsch. 2014. Wikidata: A free collaborative knowledgebase. Commun. ACM 57, 10 (2014), 78--85.

Digital Library

[163]

Andreas Wagner, Peter Haase, Achim Rettinger, and Holger Lamm. 2014. Entity-based data source contextualization for searching the web of data. In Proceedings of the European Semantic Web Conference. Springer, 25--41.

[164]

M. D. Wilkinson, M. Dumontier, I. J. Aalbersberg, G. Appleton, M. Axton, A. Baak, N. Blomberg et al. 2016. The FAIR Guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci. Data 3 (2016).

[165]

Ramana Yerneni, Chen Li, Jeffrey Ullman, and Hector Garcia-Molina. 1999. Optimizing large join queries in mediation systems. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT’99). 348–364. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=645503.656258.

Digital Library

[166]

S. Yumusak, E. Dogdu, H. Kodaz, A. Kamilaris, and P. Vandenbussche. 2017. SpEnD: Linked data SPARQL endpoints discovery using search engines. IEICE Trans. Info. Syst. 100, 4 (2017), 758--767.

[167]

Amrapali Zaveri, Dimitris Kontokostas, Mohamed A. Sherif, Lorenz Bühmann, Mohamed Morsey, Sören Auer, and Jens Lehmann. 2013. User-driven quality evaluation of dbpedia. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Semantic Technologies and Artificial Intelligence (SEMANTiCS’13). ACM, 97--104.

Digital Library

[168]

Amrapali Zaveri, Anisa Rula, Andrea Maurino, Ricardo Pietrobon, Jens Lehmann, and Sören Auer. 2015. Quality assessment for linked data: A survey. Semantic Web 7, 1 (2015), 63--93.

[169]

Linhong Zhu, Majid Ghasemi-Gol, Pedro Szekely, Aram Galstyan, and Craig A. Knoblock. 2016. Unsupervised entity resolution on multi-type graphs. In Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Springer, 649--667.

Cited By

Gaafar HAl-Romeedy B(2024)Data Fusion for Destination SuccessMarketing and Big Data Analytics in Tourism and Events10.4018/979-8-3693-3310-5.ch003(38-60)Online publication date: 3-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-3310-5.ch003
Gu ZCorcoglioniti FLanti DMosca AXiao GXiong JCalvanese D(2024)A systematic overview of data federation systemsSemantic Web10.3233/SW-22320115:1(107-165)Online publication date: 12-Jan-2024
https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-223201
Masmoudi MBen Abdallah Ben Lamine SKarray MArchimede BBaazaoui Zghal H(2024)Semantic Data Integration and Querying: A Survey and ChallengesACM Computing Surveys10.1145/365331756:8(1-35)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3653317
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Large-scale Semantic Integration of Linked Data: A Survey
1. Information systems
  1. Data management systems
    1. Information integration
  2. World Wide Web
    1. Web data description languages
      1. Semantic web description languages
        Resource Description Framework (RDF)

Recommendations

A domain independent framework for extracting linked semantic data from tables
Search Computing

Vast amounts of information is encoded in tables found in documents, on the Web, and in spreadsheets or databases. Integrating or searching over this information benefits from understanding its intended meaning and making it explicit in a semantic ...
Read More
Semantic Integration of Structured Data Powered by Linked Open Data
WIMS '15: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics

Recent advances in open data have resulted in vast amounts of tabular datasets containing valuable, actionable information to several stakeholders. However, information pertaining to any given entity is fragmented across several arbitrarily structured ...
Read More
Cancer data integration and querying with genetegra
DILS'12: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Data Integration in the Life Sciences

We present the GeneTegra system, an ontology-based information integration environment. We show its ability to query multiple data sources, and we evaluate the relative performance of different data repositories. GeneTegra uses Semantic Web standards to ...
Read More

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Computing Surveys

ACM Computing Surveys Volume 52, Issue 5

September 2020

791 pages

ISSN:0360-0300

EISSN:1557-7341

DOI:10.1145/3362097

Editor:
Sartaj Sahni
Department of Computer and Information Science and Engineering

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © 2019 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 13 September 2019

Accepted: 01 July 2019

Revised: 01 May 2019

Received: 01 July 2018

Published in CSUR Volume 52, Issue 5

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Survey
Research
Refereed

Funding Sources

Hellenic Foundation for Research and Innovation (HFRI) and the General Secretariat for Research and Technology (GSRT)

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

62
Total Citations
View Citations
1,402
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)151
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Gaafar HAl-Romeedy B(2024)Data Fusion for Destination SuccessMarketing and Big Data Analytics in Tourism and Events10.4018/979-8-3693-3310-5.ch003(38-60)Online publication date: 3-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-3310-5.ch003
Gu ZCorcoglioniti FLanti DMosca AXiao GXiong JCalvanese D(2024)A systematic overview of data federation systemsSemantic Web10.3233/SW-22320115:1(107-165)Online publication date: 12-Jan-2024
https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-223201
Masmoudi MBen Abdallah Ben Lamine SKarray MArchimede BBaazaoui Zghal H(2024)Semantic Data Integration and Querying: A Survey and ChallengesACM Computing Surveys10.1145/365331756:8(1-35)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3653317
Alamhmoud ABassam Kurdy M(2024)A Semantic Analysis Prototype for Distributed Syrian Government Data2024 ASU International Conference in Emerging Technologies for Sustainability and Intelligent Systems (ICETSIS)10.1109/ICETSIS61505.2024.10459400(692-697)Online publication date: 28-Jan-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICETSIS61505.2024.10459400
Franciscatto MErpen de Bona LTrois CDidonet Del FabroFabro MDamasceno Lima J(2024)Situational Data Integration in Question Answering systems: a survey over two decadesKnowledge and Information Systems10.1007/s10115-024-02136-0Online publication date: 18-Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-024-02136-0
Sy MRoman BKerrien SMendez DGenet HWajerowicz WDupont MLavriushev IMachon JPirman KNeela Mana DStafeeva NKaufmann ALu HLurie JFonta PMartinez AUlbrich ALindqvist CJimenez SRotenberg DMarkram HHill S(2023)Blue Brain Nexus: An open, secure, scalable system for knowledge graph management and data-driven scienceSemantic Web10.3233/SW-22297414:4(697-727)Online publication date: 24-Apr-2023
https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-222974
Ahmed ASherif MNgomo A(2023)NELLIE: Never-Ending Linking for Linked Open DataIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2023.330069411(84957-84973)Online publication date: 2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3300694
Van Assche DDelva THaesendonck GHeyvaert PDe Meester BDimou A(2023)Declarative RDF graph generation from heterogeneous (semi-)structured dataWeb Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web10.1016/j.websem.2022.10075375:COnline publication date: 1-Jan-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.websem.2022.100753
Le Guillarme NThuiller W(2023)A practical approach to constructing a knowledge graph for soil ecological researchEuropean Journal of Soil Biology10.1016/j.ejsobi.2023.103497117(103497)Online publication date: Jul-2023
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2023.103497
Abelló ACheney J(2023)Eris: efficiently measuring discord in multidimensional sourcesThe VLDB Journal10.1007/s00778-023-00810-333:2(399-423)Online publication date: 20-Sep-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00778-023-00810-3
Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents