Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3362789.3362837acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteemConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Capturing high-level requirements of information dashboards' components through meta-modeling

Published: 16 October 2019 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Information dashboards are increasing their sophistication to match new necessities and adapt to the high quantities of generated data nowadays. These tools support visual analysis, knowledge generation, and thus, are crucial systems to assist decision-making processes. However, the design and development processes are complex, because several perspectives and components can be involved. Tailoring capabilities are focused on providing individualized dashboards without affecting the time-to-market through the decrease of the development processes' time. Among the methods used to configure these tools, the software product lines paradigm and model-driven development can be found. These paradigms benefit from the study of the target domain and the abstraction of features, obtaining high-level models that can be instantiated into concrete models. This paper presents a dashboard meta-model that aims to be applicable to any dashboard. Through domain engineering, different features of these tools are identified and arranged into abstract structures and relationships to gain a better understanding of the domain. The goal of the meta-model is to obtain a framework for instantiating any dashboard to adapt them to different contexts and user profiles. One of the contexts in which dashboards are gaining relevance is Learning Analytics, as learning dashboards are powerful tools for assisting teachers and students in their learning activities. To illustrate the instantiation process of the presented meta-model, a small example within this relevant context (Learning Analytics) is also provided.

    References

    [1]
    Alper Sarikaya, Michael Correll, Lyn Bartram, Melanie Tory, and Danyel Fisher. 2018. What Do We Talk About When We Talk About Dashboards? IEEE Transactions on Visualization Computer Graphics 25, 1, 682--692.
    [2]
    Jeonghyun Kim, Il-Hyun Jo, and Yeonjeong Park. 2016. Effects of learning analytics dashboard: analyzing the relations among dashboard utilization, satisfaction, and learning achievement. Asia Pacific Education Review 17, 1, 13--24.
    [3]
    Andrea Vázquez Ingelmo, Francisco J. García-Peñalvo, and Roberto Therón. 2019. Tailored information dashboards: A systematic mapping of the literature. In Proceedings of the Interacción2019 (Donostia, Spain2019). ACM.
    [4]
    Paul Clements and Linda Northrop. 2002. Software product lines. Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA, USA.
    [5]
    Klaus Pohl, Gunter Böckle, and Frank J. Van Der Linden. 2005. Software Product Line Engineering: Foundations, Principles and Techniques. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., New York, NY, USA.
    [6]
    Andreas Pleuss, Stefan Wollny, and Goetz Botterweck. 2013. Model-driven development and evolution of customized user interfaces. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM SIGCHI symposium on Engineering interactive computing systems ACM, 13--22.
    [7]
    Anneke G Kleppe, Jos Warmer, and Wim Bast. 2003. MDA Explained. The Model Driven Architecture: Practice and Promise Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA.
    [8]
    Themis Palpanas, Pawan Chowdhary, George Mihaila, and Florian Pinel. 2007. Integrated model-driven dashboard development. Information Systems Frontiers 9, 2-3, 195--208.
    [9]
    Maximilien Kintz, Monika Kochanowski, and Falko Koetter. 2017. Creating User-specific Business Process Monitoring Dashboards with a Model-driven Approach. In MODELSWARD, 353--361.
    [10]
    Ivan Logre, Sébastien Mosser, Philippe Collet, and Michel Riveill. 2014. Sensor data visualisation: a composition-based approach to support domain variability. In European Conference on Modelling Foundations and Applications Springer, 101--116.
    [11]
    Andrea Vázquez-Ingelmo, Francisco José García-Peñalvo, and Roberto Therón. 2018. Domain engineering for generating dashboards to analyze employment and employability in the academic context. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (Salamanca, Spain2018).
    [12]
    Andrea Vázquez-Ingelmo, Francisco J. García-Peñalvo, and Roberto Therón. 2019. Taking advantage of the software product line paradigm to generate customized user interfaces for decision-making processes: a case study on university employability. PeerJ Computer Science 5(2019/07/01), e203.
    [13]
    José M Álvarez, Andy Evans, and Paul Sammut. 2001. Mapping between levels in the metamodel architecture. In International Conference on the Unified Modeling Language Springer, 34--46.
    [14]
    Maarit Harsu. 2002. A survey on domain engineering. Citeseer.
    [15]
    Andrea Vázquez Ingelmo, Francisco J. García-Peñalvo, Roberto Therón, and Miguel Ángel Conde González. 2019. Extending a dashboard meta-model to account for users' characteristics and goals for enhancing personalization. In Proceedings of the Learning Analytics Summer Institute (LASI) Spain 2019 (Vigo, Spain2019).
    [16]
    Jock Mackinlay, Pat Hanrahan, and Chris Stolte. 2007. Show me: Automatic presentation for visual analysis. IEEE Transactions on Visualization Computer Graphics 13, 6.
    [17]
    Jock Mackinlay. 1986. Automating the design of graphical presentations of relational information. Acm Transactions On Graphics (Tog) 5, 2, 110--141.
    [18]
    Noah Iliinsky and Julie Steele. 2011. Designing data visualizations: Representing informational Relationships. O'Reilly Media, Inc., Sebastopol, CA, USA.
    [19]
    Tamara Munzner. 2014. Visualization analysis and design. AK Peters/CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
    [20]
    Scott Berinato. 2016. Good charts: The HBR guide to making smarter, more persuasive data visualizations. Harvard Business Review Press, Brighton, MA, US.
    [21]
    Beat A Schwendimann, Maria Jesus Rodriguez-Triana, Andrii Vozniuk, Luis P Prieto, Mina Shirvani Boroujeni, Adrian Holzer, Denis Gillet, and Pierre Dillenbourg. 2017. Perceiving learning at a glance: A systematic literature review of learning dashboard research. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 10, 1, 30--41.
    [22]
    Jessica Hullman, Eytan Adar, and Priti Shah. 2011. The impact of social information on visual judgments. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems ACM, 1461--1470.
    [23]
    Yea-Seul Kim, Katharina Reinecke, and Jessica Hullman. 2018. Data through others' eyes: The impact of visualizing others' expectations on visualization interpretation. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 24, 1, 760--769.
    [24]
    Michael A Bedek, Alexander Nussbaumer, Luca Huszar, and Dietrich Albert. 2018. Methods for Discovering Cognitive Biases in a Visual Analytics Environment. In Cognitive Biases in Visualizations Springer, 61--73.
    [25]
    André Caldero Valdez, Martina Ziefle, and Michael Sedlmair. 2017. A framework for studying biases in visualization research.
    [26]
    Sukwon Lee, Sung-Hee Kim, and Bum Chul Kwon. 2017. Vlat: Development of a visualization literacy assessment test. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 23, 1, 551--560.
    [27]
    Jeremy Boy, Ronald A Rensink, Enrico Bertini, and Jean-Daniel Fekete. 2014. A principled way of assessing visualization literacy. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 20, 12, 1963--1972.
    [28]
    Adam V Maltese, Joseph A Harsh, and Dubravka Svetina. 2015. Data visualization literacy: Investigating data interpretation along the novice--expert continuum. Journal of College Science Teaching 45, 1, 84--90.
    [29]
    Dereck Toker, Cristina Conati, Giuseppe Carenini, and Mona Haraty. 2012. Towards adaptive information visualization: on the influence of user characteristics. In International Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization Springer, Berlin, Germany, 274--285.
    [30]
    Andrew Dillon. 2000. Spatial-semantics: How users derive shape from information space. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 51, 6, 521--528.
    [31]
    Cristina Conati, Giuseppe Carenini, Enamul Hoque, Ben Steichen, and Dereck Toker. 2014. Evaluating the impact of user characteristics and different layouts on an interactive visualization for decision making. In Computer Graphics Forum Wiley Online Library, 371--380.
    [32]
    Lisa Pappas and Lisa Whitman. 2011. Riding the technology wave: Effective dashboard data visualization. In Symposium on Human Interface Springer, 249--258.
    [33]
    Somnath Arjun. 2018. Personalizing data visualization and interaction. In Adjunct Publication of the 26th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization ACM, 199--202.
    [34]
    Jeffrey Heer and Michael Bostock. 2010. Crowdsourcing graphical perception: using mechanical turk to assess visualization design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems ACM, 203--212.
    [35]
    Samuel Silva, Beatriz Sousa Santos, and Joaquim Madeira. 2011. Using color in visualization: A survey. Computers & Graphics 35, 2, 320--333.
    [36]
    William S. Cleveland. 1985. The Elements of Graphing Data Hobart Press.
    [37]
    Carl Edwards. 2017. One easy-to-forget step you need to enhance your data visualizations Yellowfin.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Heuristic Evaluation of MetaViz: Insights and Strategic Recommendations to Elevate User Experience in an Automated Data Visualization PlatformProceedings of the XXIV International Conference on Human Computer Interaction10.1145/3657242.3658676(1-6)Online publication date: 19-Jun-2024
    • (2024)A new frontier in dashboard design: Evaluating an innovative meta‐modelling approach through expert insightsExpert Systems10.1111/exsy.13560Online publication date: 5-Feb-2024
    • (2023)Catalogue Visu: a Tool for Fast Visualization PrototypingProceedings of the 34th Conference on l'Interaction Humain-Machine10.1145/3583961.3583969(1-10)Online publication date: 3-Apr-2023
    • Show More Cited By

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    TEEM'19: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality
    October 2019
    1085 pages
    ISBN:9781450371919
    DOI:10.1145/3362789
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    In-Cooperation

    • University of Salamanca: University of Salamanca

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 16 October 2019

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Domain engineering
    2. High-level requirements
    3. Information Dashboards
    4. Meta-modeling

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    TEEM'19

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 496 of 705 submissions, 70%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)29
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
    Reflects downloads up to 09 Aug 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Heuristic Evaluation of MetaViz: Insights and Strategic Recommendations to Elevate User Experience in an Automated Data Visualization PlatformProceedings of the XXIV International Conference on Human Computer Interaction10.1145/3657242.3658676(1-6)Online publication date: 19-Jun-2024
    • (2024)A new frontier in dashboard design: Evaluating an innovative meta‐modelling approach through expert insightsExpert Systems10.1111/exsy.13560Online publication date: 5-Feb-2024
    • (2023)Catalogue Visu: a Tool for Fast Visualization PrototypingProceedings of the 34th Conference on l'Interaction Humain-Machine10.1145/3583961.3583969(1-10)Online publication date: 3-Apr-2023
    • (2022)A Process Model for Dashboard OnboardingComputer Graphics Forum10.1111/cgf.1455841:3(501-513)Online publication date: 29-Jul-2022
    • (2022)MetaViz – A graphical meta-model instantiator for generating information dashboards and visualizationsJournal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences10.1016/j.jksuci.2022.09.01534:10(9977-9990)Online publication date: Nov-2022
    • (2021)Towards a Technological Ecosystem to Provide Information Dashboards as a Service: A Dynamic Proposal for Supplying Dashboards Adapted to Specific ScenariosApplied Sciences10.3390/app1107324911:7(3249)Online publication date: 5-Apr-2021
    • (2021)Proof‐of‐concept of an information visualization classification approach based on their fine‐grained featuresExpert Systems10.1111/exsy.1287240:1Online publication date: 5-Nov-2021
    • (2021)A Preliminary Model of Learning Analytics to Explore Data Visualization on Educator’s Satisfaction and Academic Performance in Higher EducationAdvances in Visual Informatics10.1007/978-3-030-90235-3_3(27-40)Online publication date: 16-Nov-2021
    • (2021)A Meta-modeling Approach to Take into Account Data Domain Characteristics and Relationships in Information VisualizationsTrends and Applications in Information Systems and Technologies10.1007/978-3-030-72651-5_54(570-580)Online publication date: 29-Mar-2021
    • (2020)A Meta-Model Integration for Supporting Knowledge Discovery in Specific Domains: A Case Study in HealthcareSensors10.3390/s2015407220:15(4072)Online publication date: 22-Jul-2020
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media