research-article

Teacher Tracking with Integrity: What Indoor Positioning Can Reveal About Instructional Proxemics

Authors:

Roberto Martinez-Maldonado,

Katerina Mangaroska,

Jurgen Schulte,

Simon Buckingham ShumAuthors Info & Claims

Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, Volume 4, Issue 1

Article No.: 22, Pages 1 - 27

https://doi.org/10.1145/3381017

Published: 18 March 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Automatic tracking of activity and location in the classroom is becoming increasingly feasible and inexpensive. However, although there is a growing interest in creating classrooms embedded with tracking capabilities using computer vision and wearables, more work is still needed to understand teachers' perceived opportunities and concerns about using indoor positioning data to reflect on their practice. This paper presents results from a qualitative study, conducted across three authentic educational settings, investigating the potential of making positioning traces available to teachers. Positioning data from 28 classes taught by 10 university teachers was captured using sensors in three different collaborative classroom spaces in the disciplines of design, health and science. The contributions of this paper to ubiquitous computing are the documented reflections of teachers from different disciplines provoked by visual representations of their classroom positioning data and that of others. These reflections point to: i) the potential benefit of using these digital traces to support teaching; and ii) concerns to be considered in the design of meaningful analytics systems for instructional proxemics.

References

[1]

Gregory D Abowd. 2012. What next, ubicomp? Celebrating an intellectual disappearing act. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. 31--40. https://doi.org/10.1145/2370216.2370222

Digital Library

[2]

Karan Ahuja, Dohyun Kim, Franceska Xhakaj, Virag Varga, Anne Xie, Stanley Zhang, Jay Eric Townsend, Chris Harrison, Amy Ogan, and Yuvraj Agarwal. 2019. EduSense: Practical classroom sensing at Scale. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 3, 3 (2019), 1--26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3351229

Digital Library

[3]

Abdulrahman Alarifi, AbdulMalik Al-Salman, Mansour Alsaleh, Ahmad Alnafessah, Suheer Al-Hadhrami, Mai A Al-Ammar, and Hend S Al-Khalifa. 2016. Ultra wideband indoor positioning technologies: Analysis and recent advances. Sensors 16, 5 (2016), 707. https://doi.org/10.3390/s16050707

[4]

Anders Albrechtslund and Thomas Ryberg. 2011. Participatory surveillance in the intelligent building. Design Issues 27, 3 (2011), 35--46. https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00089

[5]

Pengcheng An, Saskia Bakker, Sara Ordanovski, Ruurd Taconis, and Berry Eggen. 2018. ClassBeacons: Designing distributed visualization of teachers' physical proximity in the classroom. In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. 357--367. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173225.3173243

Digital Library

[6]

Richard Arends. 2014. Learning to teach. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, New York, NY, USA.

[7]

Mark Bilandzic and Marcus Foth. 2012. A review of locative media, mobile and embodied spatial interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 70, 1 (2012), 66--71.

Digital Library

[8]

Robert Bodily, Judy Kay, Vincent Aleven, Ioana Jivet, Dan Davis, Franceska Xhakaj, and Katrien Verbert. 2018. Open learner models and learning analytics dashboards: a systematic review. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on learning analytics and knowledge. 41--50. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170358.3170409

Digital Library

[9]

Robert Bodily and Katrien Verbert. 2017. Trends and issues in student-facing learning analytics reporting systems research. In Proceedings of the seventh international learning analytics & knowledge conference. 309--318. https://doi.org/10.1145/3027385.3027403

Digital Library

[10]

Nigel Bosch, Caitlin Mills, Jeffrey D Wammes, and Daniel Smilek. 2018. Quantifying classroom instructor dynamics with computer vision. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education. Springer, 30--42.

[11]

Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77--101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

[12]

Linda R Britton and Kenneth A Anderson. 2010. Peer coaching and pre-service teachers: Examining an underutilised concept. Teaching and Teacher Education 26, 2 (2010), 306--314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.03.008

[13]

D Christopher Brooks. 2011. Space matters: The impact of formal learning environments on student learning. British Journal of Educational Technology 42, 5 (2011), 719--726.

[14]

Rachel Buchanan and Amy McPherson. 2019. Teachers and learning in a time of big data. (2019).

[15]

Simon Buckingham Shum, Rebecca Ferguson, and Roberto Martinez-Maldonado. 2019. Human-centred learning analytics. Journal of Learning Analytics 6, 2 (2019), 1--9. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2019.62.1

[16]

Ramon Caceres and Adrian Friday. 2011. Ubicomp systems at 20: Progress, opportunities, and challenges. IEEE Pervasive Computing 11, 1 (2011), 14--21. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2011.85

Digital Library

[17]

Jean Camp and Kay Connelly. 2008. Beyond consent: privacy in ubiquitous computing (Ubicomp). na.

[18]

Marta Castañer, Oleguer Camerino, M Teresa Anguera, and Gudberg K Jonsson. 2013. Kinesics and proxemics communication of expert and novice PE teachers. Quality & Quantity 47, 4 (2013), 1813--1829.

[19]

Muhammad Aamir Cheema. 2018. Indoor location-based services: challenges and opportunities. SIGSPATIAL Special 10, 2 (2018), 10--17.

Digital Library

[20]

Heng Buai Chin, Cecilia Cheong Yin Mei, and Fauziah Taib. 2017. Instructional Proxemics and Its Impact on Classroom Teaching and Learning. International Journal of Modern Languages and Applied Linguistics 1, 1 (2017).

[21]

Yi Han Victoria Chua, Justin Dauwels, and Seng Chee Tan. 2019. Technologies for automated analysis of co-located, real-life, physical learning spaces: Where are we now?. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge. 11--20. https://doi.org/10.1145/3303772.3303811

Digital Library

[22]

Sharon Farago Cramer. 1994. Assessing Effectiveness in the Collaborative Classroom. New directions for teaching and learning 59 (1994), 69--81.

[23]

Nele Dael, Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze, Andrea Kleinsmith, and Christine Mohr. 2016. Measuring body movement: Current and future directions in proxemics and kinesics. In APA handbook of nonverbal communication. American Psychological Association, 551--587.

[24]

Vanessa Echeverria, Roberto Martinez-Maldonado, and Simon Buckingham Shum. 2019. Towards collaboration translucence: Giving meaning to multimodal group data. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300269

Digital Library

[25]

Vanessa Echeverria, Roberto Martinez-Maldonado, Tamara Power, Carolyn Hayes, and Simon Buckingham Shum. 2018. Where is the nurse? Towards automatically visualising meaningful team movement in healthcare education. In International conference on artificial intelligence in education. Springer, 74--78.

[26]

Jessica Ellis, Jessica Deshler, and Natasha Speer. 2016. Supporting institutional change: A two-pronged approach related to graduate teaching assistant professional development. In Proc. of the Annual Conf. on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education. 1--7.

[27]

Thomas Erickson, Christine Halverson, Wendy A Kellogg, Mark Laff, and Tracee Wolf. 2002. Social translucence: designing social infrastructures that make collective activity visible. Commun. ACM 45, 4 (2002), 40--44.

Digital Library

[28]

Amanda Careena Fernandes, Jinyan Huang, and Vince Rinaldo. 2011. Does Where A Student Sits Really Matter?-The Impact of Seating Locations on Student Classroom Learning. International Journal of Applied Educational Studies 10, 1 (2011).

[29]

Jeffrey A Fletcher. 2018. Peer observation of teaching: A practical tool in higher education. The Journal of Faculty Development 32, 1 (2018), 51--64.

[30]

David Gerritsen, John Zimmerman, and Amy Ogan. 2018. Towards a framework for smart classrooms that teach instructors to teach. International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc.[ISLS].

[31]

Cole Gleason, Dragan Ahmetovic, Saiph Savage, Carlos Toxtli, Carl Posthuma, Chieko Asakawa, Kris M Kitani, and Jeffrey P Bigham. 2018. Crowdsourcing the installation and maintenance of indoor localization infrastructure to support blind navigation. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 2, 1 (2018), 1--25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3191741

Digital Library

[32]

Michael Goodchild. 2003. Geographic information system (GIS). John Wiley and Sons Ltd.

[33]

Philip L Gunter, Richard E Shores, Susan L Jack, Shirley K Rasmussen, and Julia Flowers. 1995. On the Move Using Teacher/Student Proximity to Improve Students' Behavior. Teaching Exceptional Children 28, 1 (1995), 12--14. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005999502800103

[34]

Mohammad Moslemi Haghighi and Mahmud Mohd Jusan. 2012. Exploring students behavior on seating arrangements in learning environment: a review. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 36 (2012), 287--294.

[35]

Edward Twitchell Hall. 1966. The hidden dimension. Vol. 609. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

[36]

Edward T Hall, Ray L Birdwhistell, Bernhard Bock, Paul Bohannan, A Richard Diebold Jr, Marshall Durbin, Munro S Edmonson, JL Fischer, Dell Hymes, Solon T Kimball, et al. 1968. Proxemics [and comments and replies]. Current anthropology 9, 2/3 (1968), 83--108. https://doi.org/10.1086/200975

[37]

Steve Higgins, Elaine Hall, Kate Wall, Pam Woolner, and Caroline McCaughey. 2005. The impact of school environments: A literature review. London: Design Council (2005).

[38]

Cédric Honnet and Gonçalo Lopes. 2019. HiveTracker: 3D positioning for ubiquitous embedded systems. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers. 288--291. https://doi.org/10.1145/3341162.3349295

Digital Library

[39]

Sarah K Howard, Jie Yang, Jun Ma, Chrisian Ritz, Jiahong Zhao, and Kylie Wynne. 2018. Using Data Mining and Machine Learning Approaches to Observe Technology-Enhanced Learning. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE). IEEE, 788--793.

[40]

Yiqing Hu, Yan Xiong, Wenchao Huang, Xiang-Yang Li, Panlong Yang, Yanan Zhang, and Xufei Mao. 2018. Lightitude: Indoor positioning using uneven light intensity distribution. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 2, 2 (2018), 1--25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3214270

Digital Library

[41]

Zengshi Huang, Naijie Gu, Jianlin Hao, and Jie Shen. 2018. 3DLoc: 3D features for accurate indoor positioning. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 1, 4 (2018), 1--26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3161409

Digital Library

[42]

Fredric H Jones, Patrick Jones, and Jo Lynne Talbott Jones. 2007. Tools for teaching: Discipline, instruction, motivation. Fredric H Jones Assocs, Santa Cruz, CA, USA.

[43]

Kirsty Kitto and Simon Knight. 2019. Practical ethics for building learning analytics. British Journal of Educational Technology 50, 6 (2019), 2855--2870. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12868

[44]

Konstantin Klipp, Helge Rosé, Jonas Willaredt, Oliver Sawade, and Ilja Radusch. 2018. Rotation-invariant magnetic features for inertial indoor-localization. In 2018 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN). IEEE, 1--10. https://doi.org/10.1109/IPIN.2018.8533842

[45]

Joyce HL Koh and Theodore W Frick. 2009. Instructor and student classroom interactions during technology skills instruction for facilitating preservice teachers' computer self-efficacy. Journal of Educational Computing Research 40, 2 (2009), 211--228. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.40.2.d

[46]

Evdokimos I Konstantinidis, Antonis S Billis, L Plotegher, G Conti, and PD Bamidis. 2016. Indoor location iot analytics "in the wild": active and healthy ageing cases. In XIV Mediterranean Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing 2016. Springer, 1231--1236. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32703-7_237

[47]

Roland Leser, Arnold Baca, and Georg Ogris. 2011. Local positioning systems in (game) sports. Sensors 11, 10 (2011), 9778--9797.

[48]

Fei Victor Lim, Kay L O'Halloran, and Alexey Podlasov. 2012. Spatial pedagogy: Mapping meanings in the use of classroom space. Cambridge journal of education 42, 2 (2012), 235--251. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2012.676629

[49]

Xiaomu Luo, Tong Liu, Baihua Shen, Liwen Gao, Xiaoyan Luo, et al. 2016. Human indoor localization based on ceiling mounted pir sensor nodes. In 2016 13th IEEE Annual Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC). IEEE, 868--874. https://doi.org/10.1109/CCNC.2016.7444903

Digital Library

[50]

Kalpani Manathunga, Davinia Hernández-Leo, Jaime Caicedo, Jhon Jairo Ibarra, Francisco Martinez-Pabon, and Gustavo Ramirez-Gonzalez. 2015. Collaborative learning orchestration using smart displays and personal devices. In Design for Teaching and Learning in a Networked World. Springer, 596--600. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24258-3_67

[51]

Katerina Mangaroska and Michail Giannakos. 2018. Learning analytics for learning design: A systematic literature review of analytics-driven design to enhance learning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 12, 4 (2018), 516--534. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2018.2868673

Digital Library

[52]

Gabriele Marini. 2019. Towards indoor localisation analytics for modelling flows of movements. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers. 377--382. https://doi.org/10.1145/3341162.3349306

Digital Library

[53]

Roberto Martinez-Maldonado. 2019. " I Spent More Time with that Team" Making Spatial Pedagogy Visible Using Positioning Sensors. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge. 21--25.

Digital Library

[54]

Roberto Martinez-Maldonado, Vanessa Echeverria, Olga C Santos, Augusto Dias Pereira Dos Santos, and Kalina Yacef. 2018. Physical learning analytics: A multimodal perspective. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge. 375--379. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170358.3170379

Digital Library

[55]

Roberto Martinez-Maldonado, Doug Elliott, Carmen Axisa, Tamara Power, Vanessa Echeverria, and Simon Buckingham Shum. 2020. Designing translucent learning analytics with teachers: an elicitation process. Interactive Learning Environments (2020), 1--15.

[56]

John Mcarthur. 2008. Instructional Proxemics: Creating a place for space in instructional communication discourse. (2008).

[57]

John A McArthur. 2015. Matching Instructors and Spaces of Learning: The Impact of Space on Behavioral, Affective and Cognitive Learning. Journal of Learning Spaces 4, 1 (2015), 1--16.

[58]

Nora McDonald, Sarita Schoenebeck, and Andrea Forte. 2019. Reliability and Inter-rater Reliability in Qualitative Research: Norms and Guidelines for CSCW and HCI Practice. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (2019), 1--23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359174

Digital Library

[59]

Masanari Nakamura, Takayuki Akiyama, Masanori Sugimoto, and Hiromichi Hashizume. 2014. 3d fdm-pam: rapid and precise indoor 3d localization using acoustic signal for smartphone. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct Publication. 123--126. https://doi.org/10.1145/2638728.2638758

Digital Library

[60]

Rajalakshmi Nandakumar, Swati Rallapalli, Krishna Chintalapudi, Venkata N Padmanabhan, Lili Qiu, Aishwarya Ganesan, Saikat Guha, Deepanker Aggarwal, and Aakash Goenka. 2013. Physical analytics: A new frontier for (indoor) location research. Redmond, WA, USA (2013).

[61]

Karin Niemantsverdriet, Mendel Broekhuijsen, Harm van Essen, and Berry Eggen. 2016. Designing for multi-user interaction in the home environment: implementing social translucence. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. 1303--1314.

Digital Library

[62]

Xavier Ochoa. 2017. Multimodal learning analytics. The Handbook of Learning Analytics 1 (2017), 129--141.

[63]

Veljo Otsason, Alex Varshavsky, Anthony LaMarca, and Eyal De Lara. 2005. Accurate GSM indoor localization. In International conference on ubiquitous computing. Springer, 141--158. https://doi.org/10.1007/11551201_9

Digital Library

[64]

Niall O'Mahony, Sean Campbell, Anderson Carvalho, Suman Harapanahalli, Gustavo Adolfo Velasco-Hernández, Daniel Riordan, and Joseph Walsh. 2019. Adaptive Multimodal Localisation Techniques for Mobile Robots in Unstructured Environments: A Review. In 2019 IEEE 5th World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT). IEEE, 799--804. https://doi.org/10.1109/WF-IoT.2019.8767330

[65]

Charith Perera, Saeed Aghaee, Ramsey Faragher, Robert Harle, and Alan F Blackwell. 2018. Contextual Location in the Home using Bluetooth Beacons. IEEE Systems Journal 13, 3 (2018), 2720--2723. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2018.2878837

[66]

Andrew Petrosoniak, Rodrigo Almeida, Laura Danielle Pozzobon, Christopher Hicks, Mark Fan, Kari White, Melissa McGowan, and Patricia Trbovich. 2019. Tracking workflow during high-stakes resuscitation: the application of a novel clinician movement tracing tool during in situ trauma simulation. BMJ Simulation and Technology Enhanced Learning 5, 2 (2019), 78--84. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjstel-2017-000300

[67]

Luis Pablo Prieto, Kshitij Sharma, Łukasz Kidzinski, María Jesús Rodríguez-Triana, and Pierre Dillenbourg. 2018. Multimodal teaching analytics: Automated extraction of orchestration graphs from wearable sensor data. Journal of computer assisted learning 34, 2 (2018), 193--203. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12232

[68]

Aveek Purohit, Zheng Sun, Shijia Pan, and Pei Zhang. 2013. SugarTrail: Indoor navigation in retail environments without surveys and maps. In 2013 IEEE International Conference on Sensing, Communications and Networking (SECON). IEEE, 300--308. https://doi.org/10.1109/SAHCN.2013.6644999

[69]

Mirko Raca, Lukasz Kidzinski, and Pierre Dillenbourg. 2015. Translating head motion into attention-towards processing of student's body-language. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on educational data mining.

[70]

Nazmus Saquib, Ayesha Bose, Dwyane George, and Sepandar Kamvar. 2018. Sensei: Sensing Educational Interaction. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 1, 4 (2018), 1--27. https://doi.org/10.1145/3161172

Digital Library

[71]

Beat A Schwendimann, Maria Jesus Rodriguez-Triana, Andrii Vozniuk, Luis P Prieto, Mina Shirvani Boroujeni, Adrian Holzer, Denis Gillet, and Pierre Dillenbourg. 2016. Perceiving learning at a glance: A systematic literature review of learning dashboard research. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 10, 1 (2016), 30--41. https://doi.org/110.1109/TLT.2016.2599522

Digital Library

[72]

Jim Scrivener. 2005. Learning teaching.

[73]

Sue Shortland. 2004. Peer observation: A tool for staff development or compliance? Journal of further and higher education 28, 2 (2004), 219--228. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877042000206778

[74]

Sharon Thompson. 2012. The applications of proxemics and territoriality in designing efficient layouts for interior design studios and a prototype design studio. Ph.D. Dissertation. California State University, Northridge.

[75]

Dina Tsybulsky. 2019. The team teaching experiences of pre-service science teachers implementing PBL in elementary school. Journal of Education for Teaching 45, 3 (2019), 244--261. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2019.1599505

[76]

Petri Vesikivi, Minna Lakkala, Jaana Holvikivi, and Hanni Muukkonen. 2019. Team teaching implementation in engineering education: teacher perceptions and experiences. European Journal of Engineering Education 44, 4 (2019), 519--534. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2018.1446910

[77]

Jo Wake, Fredrik Heimsæter, Edvard Bjørgen, Barbara Wasson, and Cecilie Hansen. 2016. Supporting firefighter training by visualising indoor positioning, motion detection, and time use: A multimodal approach. and provide timely personalised feedback to students (Page 10) 6. Khalil, M: The Unbearable Lightness of Consent: An Eye on Learning Analytics and MOOCs (Page 13) 7. Minard, M. S: Learning Analytics from a Student Perspective (Page 15) (2016), 33.

[78]

Rachel Wannarka and Kathy Ruhl. 2008. Seating arrangements that promote positive academic and behavioural outcomes: A review of empirical research. Support for learning 23, 2 (2008), 89--93.

[79]

Eiji Watanabe, Takashi Ozeki, and Takeshi Kohama. 2018. Analysis of interactions between lecturers and students. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge. 370--374.

Digital Library

[80]

O Michael Watson and Theodore D Graves. 1966. Quantitative Research in Proxemic Behavior 1. American Anthropologist 68, 4 (1966), 971--985.

[81]

Karl E Weick. 1995. Sensemaking in organizations. Vol. 3. Sage.

[82]

Chenshu Wu, Jingao Xu, Zheng Yang, Nicholas D Lane, and Zuwei Yin. 2017. Gain without pain: Accurate WiFi-based localization using fingerprint spatial gradient. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 1, 2 (2017), 1--19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3090094

Digital Library

[83]

Jiang Xiao, Zimu Zhou, Youwen Yi, and Lionel M Ni. 2016. A survey on wireless indoor localization from the device perspective. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 49, 2 (2016), 1--31. https://doi.org/10.1145/2933232

Digital Library

[84]

Huatao Xu, Dong Wang, Run Zhao, and Qian Zhang. 2019. AdaRF: Adaptive RFID-based Indoor Localization Using Deep Learning Enhanced Holography. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 3, 3 (2019), 1--22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3351271

Digital Library

[85]

Faheem Zafari, Athanasios Gkelias, and Kin K Leung. 2019. A survey of indoor localization systems and technologies. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 21, 3 (2019), 2568--2599.

Cited By

Kitto KGibson A(2024)Places to intervene in complex learning systemsProceedings of the 14th Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference10.1145/3636555.3636938(929-935)Online publication date: 18-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3636555.3636938
Ngoon TSushil SStewart ALee UVenkatraman SThawani NMitra PClarke SZimmerman JOgan A(2024)ClassInSight: Designing Conversation Support Tools to Visualize Classroom Discussion for Personalized Teacher Professional DevelopmentProceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642487(1-15)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642487
Marini GGoncalves JVelloso EJurdak RKostakos V(2024)A toolkit for localisation queriesPervasive and Mobile Computing10.1016/j.pmcj.2024.101946103(101946)Online publication date: Oct-2024
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmcj.2024.101946
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Teacher Tracking with Integrity: What Indoor Positioning Can Reveal About Instructional Proxemics
1. Applied computing
  1. Education
2. Human-centered computing
  1. Ubiquitous and mobile computing
    1. Ubiquitous and mobile computing systems and tools

Recommendations

How do Teachers Use Open Learning Spaces? Mapping from Teachers’ Socio-spatial Data to Spatial Pedagogy
LAK22: LAK22: 12th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference

Teacher’s in-class positioning and interaction patterns (termed spatial pedagogy) are an essential part of their classroom management and orchestration strategies that can substantially impact students’ learning. Yet, effective management of teachers’ ...
Effects of Learning Analytics on Students' Self-Regulated Learning in Flipped Classroom

The present article is aimed at analyzing the effects of learning analytics on students' self-regulated learning in a flipped classroom. An experiment was conducted with 96 engineering students, enrolled in a subject offered in the Flipped Classroom ...
Using learning analytics to explore help-seeking learner profiles in MOOCs
LAK '17: Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference

In online learning environments, learners are often required to be more autonomous in their approach to learning. In scaled online learning environments, like Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs), there are differences in the ability of learners to ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies

Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies Volume 4, Issue 1

March 2020

1006 pages

EISSN:2474-9567

DOI:10.1145/3388993

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © 2020 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 18 March 2020

Published in IMWUT Volume 4, Issue 1

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

25
Total Citations
View Citations
704
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)72
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5

Reflects downloads up to 11 Aug 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Kitto KGibson A(2024)Places to intervene in complex learning systemsProceedings of the 14th Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference10.1145/3636555.3636938(929-935)Online publication date: 18-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3636555.3636938
Ngoon TSushil SStewart ALee UVenkatraman SThawani NMitra PClarke SZimmerman JOgan A(2024)ClassInSight: Designing Conversation Support Tools to Visualize Classroom Discussion for Personalized Teacher Professional DevelopmentProceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642487(1-15)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642487
Marini GGoncalves JVelloso EJurdak RKostakos V(2024)A toolkit for localisation queriesPervasive and Mobile Computing10.1016/j.pmcj.2024.101946103(101946)Online publication date: Oct-2024
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmcj.2024.101946
Chu SGarcia BRani N(2023)Research on wearable technologies for learning: a systematic reviewFrontiers in Education10.3389/feduc.2023.12703898Online publication date: 9-Nov-2023
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1270389
Ngoon TKovalev DPatidar PHarrison CAgarwal YZimmerman JOgan A(2023)"An Instructor is [already] able to keep track of 30 students": Students’ Perceptions of Smart Classrooms for Improving Teaching & Their Emergent Understandings of Teaching and LearningProceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3563657.3596079(1277-1292)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3563657.3596079
Repiso EGarrell ASanfeliu A(2023)Real-Life Experiment Metrics for Evaluating Human-Robot Collaborative Navigation Tasks2023 32nd IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)10.1109/RO-MAN57019.2023.10309529(660-667)Online publication date: 28-Aug-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN57019.2023.10309529
Wang MLong TChen ZWu XShi YXu L(2023)Investigating the Interaction Types and Instructional Proxemics in Information Technology Enhanced Exemplary LessonsThe Asia-Pacific Education Researcher10.1007/s40299-023-00714-433:1(129-141)Online publication date: 16-Feb-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-023-00714-4
Jiang GZhu JLi YAn PWang Y(2023)NaMemo2: Facilitating Teacher-Student Interaction with Theory-Based Design and Student Autonomy ConsiderationEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-023-12059-y29:6(7259-7279)Online publication date: 12-Aug-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12059-y
Schneider BHassan JSung G(2022)Augmenting Social Science Research with Multimodal Data Collection: The EZ-MMLA ToolkitSensors10.3390/s2202056822:2(568)Online publication date: 12-Jan-2022
https://doi.org/10.3390/s22020568
Fernandez-Nieto GAn PZhao JBuckingham Shum SMartinez-Maldonado R(2022)Classroom Dandelions: Visualising Participant Position, Trajectory and Body Orientation Augments Teachers’ SensemakingProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3517736(1-17)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3491102.3517736
Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents