Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

The Effects of Computer Science Stereotypes and Interest on Middle School Boys’ Career Intentions

Published: 16 June 2020 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Like other STEM fields, computer science (CS) lacks representation of minorities, such as Black and Hispanic individuals, both in the number of bachelor’s degrees obtained and the number of individuals in the CS workforce. Out-of-school CS programs are often designed with the intent to inspire young people to pursue careers in CS. Much of this programming focuses on developing student interest in CS and CS careers. Nevertheless, it is not well understood how the stereotypes that children hold about computer scientists contribute to CS interest and career choice. In this study, we set out to examine the complex relationships between CS interest, held stereotypes, and CS career choice. We surveyed participants in an after-school CS program offered to middle school boys who identified with racial and ethnic minority groups (N = 110). We tested three linear regression models and confirmed that CS interest and socially divergent stereotypes—those that diverged from societal norms—of computer scientists play unique and contrary roles in young boys’ career decision-making process even when controlling for home and school factors. These models suggest educational CS programs should include curriculum to dispel participants’ socially divergent stereotypes about computer scientists rather than targeting CS interest alone, particularly if a goal is to inspire diverse young people to pursue careers in CS.

    References

    [1]
    Adams Nager and Robert D. Atkinson. 2016. The Case for Improving U.S. Computer Science Education. Technical Report May. Information Technology 8 Innovation Foundation, Washington, DC. 1--38 pages. Retrieved from http://www2.itif.org/2016-computer-science-education.pdf.
    [2]
    National Science Board. 2018. Science and Engineering Indicators 2018. Technical Report. National Science Foundation, Alexandria, VA. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/indicators/.
    [3]
    Brigid Barron. 2004. Learning ecologies for technological fluency: Gender and experience differences. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 31, 1 (2004), 1--36.
    [4]
    Lori Carter. 2006. Why students with an apparent aptitude for computer science don’t choose to major in computer science. In Proceedings of the SIGSCE’06. ACM, 27--31.
    [5]
    Billy Wong. 2017. “I’m good, but not that good”: Digitally skilled young people’s identity in computing. Comput. Sci. Educ. 26, 4 (2017), 299--317.
    [6]
    James Paul Gee. 2000. Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Rev. Res. Educ. 25 (2000), 99--125.
    [7]
    Mark J. Graham, Jennifer Frederick, Angela Byars-Winston, Anne-Barrie Hunter, and Jo Handelsman. 2013. Increasing persistence of college students in STEM. Science 341, Sept. (2013), 1455--1456.
    [8]
    Jonathan Mahadeo, Zahra Hazari, Gerhard Sonnert, and Philip M. Sadler. 2020. Developing a computing identity framework: Understanding computer science and information technology career choice. IEEE Trans. Educ. 20, 1 (2020), 7--14.
    [9]
    Sepehr Vakil. 2014. A critical pedagogy approach for engaging urban youth in mobile app development in an after-school program. Equity Excell. Educ. 47, 1 (2014), 31--45.
    [10]
    E. M. Mercier, B. Barron, and K. M. O’Connor. 2006. Images of self and others as computer users: The role of gender and experience. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 22, 5 (2006), 335--348.
    [11]
    Matthias Felleisen and Shriram Krishnamurthi. 2009. Viewpoint: Why computer science doesn’t matter. Commun. ACM 52, 7 (July 2009), 37.
    [12]
    Allen Tucker, Fadi Deek, Jill Jones, Dennis Mccowan, Chris Stephenson, and Anita Verno. 2006. A Model Curriculum for K--12 Computer Science. Technical Report. Asosciation for Computing Machinery, New York, NY. 1--40 pages. Retrieved from https://sgd.cs.colorado.edu/wiki/images/e/ee/CSTA.
    [13]
    John Maloney, Kylie Peppler, Yasmin B. Kafai, Mitchel Resnick, and Natalie Rusk. 2008. Programming by choice: Urban youth learning programming with scratch. In Proceedings of the SIGSCE’08. Association for Computing Machinery.
    [14]
    Emmanuel Schanzer, Kathi Fisler, and Shriram Krishnamurthi. 2013. Bootstrap: Going beyond programming in after-school computer science. In Proceedings of the SPLASH Education Symposium.
    [15]
    Linda Werner, Shannon Campe, and Jill Denner. 2012. Children learning computer science concepts via Alice. In Proceedings of the SIGSCE’12.
    [16]
    Betsy DiSalvo, Sarita Yardi, Mark Guzdial, Tom McKlin, Charles Meadows, Kenneth Perry, and Amy Bruckman. 2011. African American men constructing computing identity. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’11). 2967--2970.
    [17]
    Robert H. Tai, Christine Qi Liu, Adam V. Maltese, and Xitao Fan. 2006. Planning early for careers in science. Science 312 (2006), 1143--1144.
    [18]
    Louis Archer, Jennifer DeWitt, Jonathan Osborne, Justin Dillon, Beatrice Willis, and Billy Wong. 2010. “Doing” science versus “being” a scientist: Examining 10/11-year-old schoolchildren’s construction of science through the lens of identity. Sci. Educ. 94 (2010), 617--239.
    [19]
    National Education Association. 2019. Research Spotlight on Single-Gender Education. Retrieved from http://www.nea.org/tools/17061.htm.
    [20]
    S. L. Rodriguez and K. Lehman. 2017. Developing the next generation of diverse computer scientists: The need for enhanced, intersectional computing identity theory. Comput. Sci. Educ. 27, 3–4 (2017), 229--247.
    [21]
    Sandra D. Simpkins, Chara D. Price, and Krystal Garcia. 2015. Parental support and high school students’ motivation in biology, chemistry, and physics: Understanding differences among latino and caucasian boys and girls. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 52, 10 (2015), 1386--1407.
    [22]
    DataUSA. 2018. Computer Science STEM Major. (2018). Retrieved from https://datausa.io/profile/cip/computer-science-6#demographics.
    [23]
    Lauren Musu-Gillette, Cristobal De Brey, Joel McFarland, William Hussar, William Sonnenberg, and Sidney Wilkinson-Flicker. 2017. Status and trends in the education of racial and ethnic groups 2017. NCES 2017-051. National Center for Education Statistics (2017). Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2017/2017051.pdf.
    [24]
    Schott Foundation for Public Education. 2015. Black Lives Matter: The Schott 50 State Report on Public Education and Black Males. Technical Report. Schott Foundation for Public Education, Quincy, MA. 1--61 pages. Retrieved from http://schottfoundation.org/resources/black-lives-matter-schott-50-state-report-public-education-and-black-males.
    [25]
    Allie Bidwell. 2015. African American Men: The Other STEM Minority. US News. Retrieved from http://www.usnews.com/news/stem-solutions/articles/2015/05/07/african-american-men-the-other-stem-minority.
    [26]
    A. Bandura, C. Barbaranelli, G. V. Caprara, and C. Pastorelli. 2001. Self-efficacy beliefs as shapers of children’s aspirations and career trajectories. Child Dev. 72, 1 (2001), 187--206.
    [27]
    Robert W. Lent, Steven D. Brown, and Gail Hackett. 2002. Social cognitive career theory. Career Choice Dev. 4 (2002), 255--311.
    [28]
    Heidi B. Carlone and Angela Johnson. 2007. Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 44, 8 (2007), 1187--1218.
    [29]
    Iames Paul Gee. 2009. Identity without identification. In Why Writing Matters: Issues of Access and Identity in Writing Research and Pedagogy 12 (2009), 45.
    [30]
    Remy Dou, Zahra Hazari, Katherine Dabney, Gerhard Sonnert, and Philip Sadler. 2019. Early informal STEM experiences and STEM identity: The importance of talking science. Sci. Educ. 103, 3 (2019), 623--637.
    [31]
    Rowhea Elmesky. 2005. “I am science and the world is mine”: Embodied practices as resources for empowerment. School Sci. Math. 105, 7 (2005), 335--342.
    [32]
    Zahra Hazari, Gerhard Sonnert, Philip M. Sadler, and Marie-Claire Shanahan. 2010. Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: A gender study. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 47, 8 (2010), 978--1003.
    [33]
    Angela Calabrese Barton and Edna Tan. 2010. We be burnin’! Agency, identity, and science learning. J. Learn. Sci. 19, 2 (2010), 187--229.
    [34]
    Betsy DiSalvo, Mark Guzdial, Amy Bruckman, and Tom McKlin. 2014. Saving face while geeking out: Video game testing as a justification for learning computer science. J. Learn. Sci. 23, 3 (2014), 272--315.
    [35]
    Robert W. Lent, Steven D. Brown, and Gail Hackett. 1994. Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. J. Vocat. Behav. 45 (1994), 79--122.
    [36]
    Robert W. Lent, Antonio M. Lopez, Frederick G. Lopez, and Hung Bin Sheu. 2008. Social cognitive career theory and the prediction of interests and choice goals in the computing disciplines. J. Vocat. Behav. 73, 1 (2008), 52--62.
    [37]
    Marina Papastergiou. 2008. Are computer science and information technology still masculine fields? High school students’ perceptions and career choices. Comput. Educ. 51, 2 (2008), 594--608.
    [38]
    Google Inc. and Gallup Inc. 2016. Diversity Gaps in Computer Science: Exploring the Underrepresentation of Girls, Blacks and Hispanics. Technical Report. Washington, DC.
    [39]
    Allison Godwin, Geoff Potvin, Zahra Hazari, and Robynne Lock. 2016. Identity, critical agency, and engineering: An affective model for predicting engineering as a career choice. J. Eng. Educ. 105, 2 (2016), 312--340.
    [40]
    Google Inc. and Gallup Inc. 2015. Images of computer science: Perceptions among students, parents and educators in the US. (2015). Retrieved from http://services.google.com/fh/files/misc/images-of-computer-science-report.pdf.
    [41]
    Joanna Goode. 2007. If you build teachers, will students come? The role of teacher in broadening computer science learning for urban youth. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 36, 1 (2007), 65--88.
    [42]
    Alexis Martin, Frieda McAlear, and Allison Scott. 2015. Path Not Found: Disparities in Access to Computer Science Courses in California High Schools. Technical Report. Level Playing Field Institute, Oakland, CA. 1--16 pages.
    [43]
    Joel C. Adams and Calvin College. 2010. Scratching middle schoolers’ creative itch. In Proceedings of the SIGSCE’10. Association for Computing Machinery, 356--360.
    [44]
    Jill Denner, Linda Werner, and Eloy Ortiz. 2012. Computer games created by middle school girls: Can they be used to measure understanding of computer science concepts? Comput. Educ. 58, 1 (2012), 240--249.
    [45]
    Jason Ravitz, Karen Peterson, Kathy Haynie, and Juliet Tiffany-Morales. 2017. Strengthening informal CS education program delivery through evaluation capacity building. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. ACM, 729--729.
    [46]
    J. W. Creswell and D. L. Miller. 2000. Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theor. Pract. 39, 3 (2000), 124--130.
    [47]
    Monique S. Ross, Trina L. Fletcher, Vishodana Thamotharan, and Atalie Garcia. 2018. I lead, therefore I am: The impact of student-mentor leadership opportunities on STEM identity development and sustainability. In Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference 8 Exposition. American Society for Engineering Education. Retrieved from https://peer.asee.org/i-lead-therefore-i-am-the-impact-of-student-mentor-leadership-opportunities-on-stem-identity-development-and-sustainability.pdf.
    [48]
    Geoff Potvin and Zahra Hazari. 2013. The development and measurement of identity across the physical sciences. In Proceedings of the Physics Education Research Conference (PERC’13).
    [49]
    Lisa L. Harlow. 2014. The Essence of Multivariate Thinking: Basic Themes and Methods. Routledge.
    [50]
    Donald B. Rubin. 2004. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. Vol. 81. John Wiley 8 Sons.
    [51]
    James P. Stevens. 2012. Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences. Routledge.
    [52]
    Julie Pallant. 2011. Survival manual. A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using SPSS. Allen 8 Unwin, Crows Nest, Australia.
    [53]
    James Carifio and Rocco Perla. 2008. Resolving the 50-year debate around using and misusing Likert scales. Med. Educ. 42, 12 (2008), 1150--1152.
    [54]
    Billy Wong. 2015. Careers “From” but not “in” science: Why are aspirations to be a scientist challenging for minority ethnic students? J. Res. Sci. Teach. 52, 7 (2015).
    [55]
    Robert W. Lent, Steven D. Brown, and Gail Hackett. 2000. Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis.J. Counsel. Psychol. 47, 1 (2000), 36--49.
    [56]
    Katherine R. Mickley and Elizabeth A. Kensinger. 2008. Emotional valence influences the neural correlates associated with remembering and knowing. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 8, 2 (2008), 143--152.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)A History of BPC: Lessons from Our Past Informing Our Future DirectionsProceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3626252.3630763(833-839)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2024
    • (2024)Is being clever enough? Young people’s construction of the ideal student in computer science educationEducational Review10.1080/00131911.2024.2379430(1-20)Online publication date: 11-Aug-2024
    • (2023)What Emotions do Pre-university Students Feel when Engaged in Computational Thinking Activities?International Journal of Computer Science Education in Schools10.21585/ijcses.v6i2.1806:2Online publication date: 19-Oct-2023
    • Show More Cited By

    Index Terms

    1. The Effects of Computer Science Stereotypes and Interest on Middle School Boys’ Career Intentions

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Information & Contributors

          Information

          Published In

          cover image ACM Transactions on Computing Education
          ACM Transactions on Computing Education  Volume 20, Issue 3
          September 2020
          200 pages
          EISSN:1946-6226
          DOI:10.1145/3406963
          Issue’s Table of Contents
          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          Published: 16 June 2020
          Online AM: 07 May 2020
          Accepted: 01 April 2020
          Revised: 01 February 2020
          Received: 01 July 2019
          Published in TOCE Volume 20, Issue 3

          Permissions

          Request permissions for this article.

          Check for updates

          Author Tags

          1. Computer science
          2. interest
          3. middle school
          4. stereotypes

          Qualifiers

          • Research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed

          Funding Sources

          • Verizon Foundation

          Contributors

          Other Metrics

          Bibliometrics & Citations

          Bibliometrics

          Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)117
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)13
          Reflects downloads up to 10 Aug 2024

          Other Metrics

          Citations

          Cited By

          View all
          • (2024)A History of BPC: Lessons from Our Past Informing Our Future DirectionsProceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3626252.3630763(833-839)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2024
          • (2024)Is being clever enough? Young people’s construction of the ideal student in computer science educationEducational Review10.1080/00131911.2024.2379430(1-20)Online publication date: 11-Aug-2024
          • (2023)What Emotions do Pre-university Students Feel when Engaged in Computational Thinking Activities?International Journal of Computer Science Education in Schools10.21585/ijcses.v6i2.1806:2Online publication date: 19-Oct-2023
          • (2023)CS Teaching and Racial Identities in Interaction: A Case for Discourse Analytic MethodsProceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 110.1145/3568813.3600117(371-380)Online publication date: 7-Aug-2023
          • (2023)The Development and Validation of a Survey to Predict Computing Career IntentionsProceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 110.1145/3568813.3600115(256-269)Online publication date: 7-Aug-2023
          • (2023)Transforming computer science education: exploration of computer science interest and identity of historically underrepresented youthComputer Science Education10.1080/08993408.2023.2292905(1-28)Online publication date: 14-Dec-2023
          • (2022)Solve This! K-12 CS Education Teachers’ Problems of PracticeProceedings of the 22nd Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research10.1145/3564721.3564738(1-13)Online publication date: 17-Nov-2022
          • (2022)Development and Use of Domain-specific Learning Theories, Models, and Instruments in Computing EducationACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/353022123:1(1-48)Online publication date: 29-Dec-2022
          • (2022)What do We Know about Computing Education for K-12 in Non-formal Settings? A Systematic Literature Review of Recent ResearchProceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 110.1145/3501385.3543960(264-281)Online publication date: 3-Aug-2022
          • (2022)Self-efficacy, Interest, and Belongingness – URM Students’ Momentary Experiences in CS1Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 110.1145/3501385.3543958(44-60)Online publication date: 3-Aug-2022
          • Show More Cited By

          View Options

          Get Access

          Login options

          Full Access

          View options

          PDF

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format.

          HTML Format

          Media

          Figures

          Other

          Tables

          Share

          Share

          Share this Publication link

          Share on social media