Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3398329.3398347acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescniotConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Complex Network Model for Credit and Debt Relationships Analysis of Bank-Firm System

Published: 31 May 2020 Publication History

Abstract

We construct a complex network model of the bank-firm system. Based on the bank-firm balance sheets and their evolution behaviors, the interbank lending relationships, interfirm guarantee relationships and bank-firm lending relationships were established. Simulation results indicate that the complex network model displays a core-periphery structure and maintains the characteristic of the scale-free network. The purpose of this paper is that we propose a complex network of bank-firm system to explain the formation mechanism of bank-firm complex networks which is closer to reality. To maintain the stability of the bankfirm system, this paper has a certain guiding significance.

References

[1]
S. Chen, D. Zhuang (2020). Evolution and Evaluation of the Guangzhou Metro Network Topology Based on an Integration of Complex Network Analysis and GIS. Sustainability, 12(2), 1--18.
[2]
W. Qiang, S. Niu, X. Wang, C. Zhang, A. Liu (2019). Cheng, S. Evolution of the Global Agricultural Trade Network and Policy Implications for China. Sustainability, 12(1), 1--16.
[3]
L. Wang, S. Li, T. Chen (2019). Investor behavior, information disclosure strategy and counterparty credit risk contagion. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 119, 37--49.
[4]
A. Palmieri, F. Parola, D. W Song (2019). Baglieri, E. Integrating firms in a complex network: evidence from maritime logistics, International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 22 (1), 64--77.
[5]
M. Boss, H. Elsinger, M. Summer, S. Thurner (2004). Network topology of the interbank market, Quantitative finance, 4 (6), 677--684.
[6]
H. Inaoka, H. Takayasu, T. Shimizu, T. Ninomiya, K. Taniguchi (2004). Self-similarity of banking network, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 339 (3), 621--634.
[7]
R. Cont, A. Moussa (2010). Network structure and systemic risk in banking systems, Edson Bastos e, Network Structure and Systemic Risk in Banking Systems, 621--634.
[8]
A.V. Leonidov; E.L. Rumyantsev (2016). Default contagion risks in Russian interbank market, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 451, 36--48.
[9]
K. Soramäki, M. L. Bech, J. Arnold, R. J. Glass, W. E. Beyeler (2007). T he topology of interbank payment flows. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 379 (1), 317--333.
[10]
C. Becher, S. Millard, K. Soramäki (2008). The network topology of CHAPS Sterling, Bank of England. Quarterly Bulletin, 48 (4), 417.
[11]
H. Degryse, G. Nguyen (2007). Interbank exposures: An empirical examination of contagion risk in the Belgian banking system, International Journal of Central Banking, 3 (2), 123--171.
[12]
I. Lelyveld (2014). Finding the core: Network structure in interbank markets, Journal of Banking & Finance, 49, 27--40.
[13]
H. Watanabe, H. Takayasu, M. Takayasu (2012). Biased diffusion on the Japanese inter-firm trading network: estimation of sales from the network structure, New Journal of Physics, 14(4), 043034.
[14]
T. Mizuno, W. Souma, T. Watanabe (2014). The structure and evolution of buyer-supplier networks, PLOS ONE, 9 (7), e100712.
[15]
N. Golo, G. Kelman, D.S. Bree, L. Usher, M. Lamieri, S.Solomon (2015). Many-to-one contagion of economic growth rate across trade credit network of firms, arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.01734.
[16]
T. Mizuno, T. Ohnishi, T. Watanabe (2016). Structure of global buyer-supplier networks and its implications for conflict minerals regulations, EPJ Data Science, 1 (5), 1--15.
[17]
T. Ohnishi, H. Takayasu, M. Takayasu (2010). Network motifs in an inter-firm network. Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, 5 (2), 171--180.
[18]
Y. Fujiwara, H. Aoyama (2010). Large-scale structure of a nation-wide production network, T he European Physical Journal B, 77 (4), 565--580.
[19]
W. Miura, H. Takayasu, M. Takayasu (2012). The origin of asymmetric behavior of money flow in the business firm network, The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 212 (1), 65--75.
[20]
K. Tamura, W. Miura, M. Takayasu, H. Takayasu, S. Kitajima, H. Goto (2012). Estimation of flux between interacting nodes on huge inter-firm networks, In International Journal of Modern Physics: Conference Series, 16, 93--104.
[21]
G. Masi. Y. Fujiwara, M. Gallegati (2011). Greenwald, B.; Stiglitz, J. E. An analysis of the Japanese credit network, Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, 7 (2), 209--232.
[22]
L. Marotta, S. Miccichè, Y. Fujiwara, H. Iyetomi, H. Aoyama, M. Gallegati, R.N. Mantegna (2015). Bank-Firm Credit Network in Japan: An Analysis of a Bipartite Network, PLOS ONE, 10(5), e0123079.
[23]
R. Miranda, B. Tabak (2013). Contagion risk within firm-bank bivariate networks, Central Bank of Brazil, Research Department.
[24]
C. Freund (2017). Bipartite Clustering in Bank-Firm Networks, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2986341.
[25]
S. Li, X.Sui, Q.Ma (2016). An endogenous network model of banking systems, Complexity, 21(S1), 512--520.
[26]
X. Sui, L. Li (2018). Guarantee network model and risk contagion, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 106, 323--329.
[27]
J. He, X. Sui, S. Li (2016). An endogenous model of the credit network, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 441, 1--14.
[28]
M. Zhang, J. He, S. Li (2018). Interbank lending, network structure and default risk contagion, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 493, 203--209.
[29]
J. I. Ozaki, K. Tamura, H. Takayasu, M. Takayasu (2019). Modeling and simulation of Japanese inter-firm network, Artificial Life and Robotics, 24(2), 257--261.
[30]
T. Lux (2016). A model of the topology of the bank--firm credit network and its role as channel of contagion, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 66, 36--53.
[31]
L. Bargigli, G. Iasio, L. Infante, F. Lillo, F. Pierobon (2015). The multiplex structure of interbank networks, Quantitative Finance, 15(4), 673--691.
[32]
M. Domenico, C. Granell, M.A. Porter, A. Arenas (2016). The physics of spreading processes in multilayer networks, Nature Physics, 12 (10), 901--906.
[33]
A.C. Hüser, G. Hałaj, C. Kok, C. Perales, A. Kraaij (2018). The systemic implications of bail-in: a multi-layered network approach, Journal of Financial Stability, 38, 81--97.
[34]
C.P. Georg (2013). The effect of the interbank network structure on contagion and common shocks. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(7), 2216--2228.
[35]
D. Fricke, T. Lux (2015). Core--periphery structure in the overnight money market: evidence from the e-mid trading platform, Computational Economics, 45(3), 359--395.
[36]
O. Kwon, S.G. Yun, S.H. Han, Y.H. Chung, D.H. Lee (2018). Network topology and systemically important firms in the interfirm credit network, Computational Economics, 51(4), 847--864.
[37]
L. Li, Q. Ma, J. He, X. Sui (2018). Co-Loan Network of Chinese Banking System Based on Listed Companies' Loan Data, Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2018, 1--7.

Index Terms

  1. A Complex Network Model for Credit and Debt Relationships Analysis of Bank-Firm System

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    CNIOT '20: Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Computing, Networks and Internet of Things
    April 2020
    234 pages
    ISBN:9781450377713
    DOI:10.1145/3398329
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    In-Cooperation

    • University of Salamanca: University of Salamanca
    • The University of Adelaide, Australia
    • Edinburgh Napier University, UK: Edinburgh Napier University, UK
    • University of Sydney Australia

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 31 May 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Bank-Firm System
    2. Complex Network
    3. Core-Periphery Structure
    4. Scale-Free Network

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    CNIOT2020

    Acceptance Rates

    CNIOT '20 Paper Acceptance Rate 39 of 82 submissions, 48%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 39 of 82 submissions, 48%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 84
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 16 Oct 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media