Analytical Hierarchy Process Method to Engineering Companies Selection for Remaining Life Assessment of Oil and Gas Equipment and Installation in Indonesia
Pages 350 - 354
Abstract
Oil and gas industry has an important role in receiving state revenues and national energy endurance. Equipment and installations are the main components of the oil and gas processing. Safety, security and reliability of equipment and installation guarantees must be maintained to realize safe, effective, efficient and reliable.
Safety inspection of operating equipment and installations can be conducted periodically based on a certain period or the results of a risk analysis. ESDM Regulation No. 18 of 2018 concerning Safety Inspection of Installation and Equipment in Oil and Gas Business Activities, states that equipment and installations that have exceeded the design life span can still be used after evaluating the remaining life assessment and are declared to have extended service life. The evaluation of the remaining life assessment can be carried out by the Engineering companies which already has a permit from the Director General of Oil and Gas.
This research uses the AHP method to determine which engineering companies will be selected to carry out work the remaining life assessment of oil and gas equipment and insulation. Criteria and sub-criteria are taken from journal references which are then validated by experts from inspection service companies, associations, academics and oil and gas companies.
References
[1]
Ignboanugo, A.C, Ogbeide, O.O. 2014. A Factorial Study of Contractor Selection Criteria in Oil Industry. Nigerian Journal of Technology (NIJOTECH) Vol. 33 No. 4, October 2014, pp 537--546. www.nijotech.com. http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/njt.v33i4.14
[2]
Ristono Agus, Pratikto, Budi Santoso Purnomo, Pambudi Tama Ishardita. 2018. A Literature Review of Design of Criteria for Supplier Selection. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management. JIEM, 2018 - 11(4): 680--696 -Online ISSN: 2013-0953 - Print ISSN: 20138423. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.2203
[3]
Donaldson, Bill. 1994. Supplier selection criteria on the service dimension. European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management. Vol 1, No 4, pp. 209--217
[4]
Weber, Charles A, . Current John R and W.C. Benton. 1991. Vendor selection criteria and methods. EuropeanJournal of OperationalResearch50 (1991) 2--18
[5]
Nan Wang, Chia, Tien Tsai, Hsiung, Thanh-Phong Ho, Van-Thanh Nguyen and Ying-Fang Huang (2019). Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Model for Supplier Evaluation and Selection for Oil Production Projects in Vietnam. Processes; www.mdpi.com/journal/processe
[6]
Nan Wang, Chia, Huang, Ying-Fang, Cheng, I-Fang, and Nguyen, Van Thanh. 2018. A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) Approach Using Hybrid SCOR Metrics, AHP, and TOPSIS for Supplier Evaluation and Selection in the Gas and Oil Industry. Processes 2018, 6, 252; www.mdpi.com/journal/processes.
[7]
Liu, Dahai. 2005. Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process as a Tool for Assessing Service Quality. ResearhGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255586406
[8]
De Felice1, Fabio, Deldoost, Mostafa H., Faizollahi, Mohsen and Petrillo, Antonella. 2015. Performance Measurement Model for the Supplier Selection Based on AHP. International Journal of Engineering Business Management. Int J Eng Bus Manag,|
[9]
Helmi Hendradi Cahyo & Udi Subakti Ciptomulyono. 2016. The Use of AHP and TOPSIS in Supplier Selection: Suplier of Vessel Services in TEPX as a Case Study. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Manajemen Teknologi XXIV. ISBN: 978-602 70604-3-2
[10]
Gallego, Laura Vírseda. 2011. Review of existing methods, models and tools for supplier evaluation. Linköpings Universitet, ute of Technology, Department of Management and Engineering.
[11]
Benyoucef, Lyès, Ding, Hongwei, Xie, Xiaolan. 2003. Supplier Selection Problem: Selection Criteria and Methods. HAL Id: inria-00071860. https://hal.inria.fr/inria-00071860
[12]
Nathavat Sivapornpunlerd, Siri-on Setamanit. 2014. Supplier Performance Evaluation: A Case Study of Thai Offshore Oil & Gas Exploration and Production Company. ASBBS Annual Conference: Las Vegas. Volume 21 Number 1
[13]
Nguyen Thi Duc Nguyen, Chinh, Le Tran. 2019. 3PL Provider Selection in Oil and Gas Industry Using The aAalytic Hierarchy Process: Case Study in Oil-Field Services Company X. Journal of Science Ho Chi Minh City Open University, 9(1), 47--64A.
[14]
Bayazita Ozden, Karpakb Birsen. 2005. An AHP Application in Vendor Selection. ISAHP 2005, Honolulu, Hawaii, July 8-10
[15]
Pichipoo, Pandian; Venkumar, Ponnusamy; Rajakarunakaran, Sivaprakasam. 2013. Modeling and development of a decision support system for supplier selection in the process industry. Journal of Industrial Engineering International, ISSN 2251-712X, Springer, Heidelberg, Vol. 9, pp. 1--15, http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2251-712X-9-23
[16]
Kurniawan, Rifki, Hasibuan, Sawarni dan Nugroho, Rosalendro Eddy. 2017. Analisis Kriteria Dan Proses Seleksi Kontraktor Chemical Sektor Hulu Migas: Aplikasi Metode Delphi- AHP. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319463376
[17]
Prabhakar Shobhendu. 2017. Due Diligence Dimensions and Ranking Methodologies for Supplier Selection Process on Oil and Gas Projects. International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT) - Volume 47 Number 4 May 2017. http://www.ijettjournal.org. ISSN: 2231-5381
[18]
Musaeus Simon Wolfgang. 2014. Prioritizing Offshore Vendor Selection Criteria for the North American Geospatial Industry. Walden University. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations
[19]
Gonçalo Thomas, Morais Danielle C. 2018. Supplier selection model for a Brazilian oil company based on a multi-criteria group decision approach. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328464294
[20]
Nispeling Thomas. 2015. Multi-Criteria Supplier Selection in the Edible Oil Industry. Delft University of Technology. Master Thesis
[21]
Vani Haridasan, Sudharsan M. 2018. Vendor Rating Using Analytical Hierarchical Process - Insights from Indian Engineering Construction Industry. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management (IJSRM). Volume 06 Issue 03 Pages EM-2018-113-121. Website: www.ijsrm.in ISSN (e): 2321--3418
[22]
Stević Željko, Tanackov Ilija, Vasiljević Marko, Rikalović Aleksandar. 2017. Supplier Evaluation Criteria: Ahp Rough Approach. XVII International Scientific Conference on Industrial Systems (IS'17). http://www.iim.ftn.uns.ac.rs/is17
[23]
Saaty, Thomas L., G. Vargas, Luis. 2012. Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Second edition, Springer.
[24]
Triantaphyllou, Evangelos, H. Mann, Stuart. 1995. Using The Analytic Hierarchy Process For Decision Making In Engineering Applications: Some Challenges. Inter'l Journal of Industrial Engineering: Applications and Practice, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 35--44.
[25]
Khan, Riaz, et al. 2019. Maintenance Management of Aging Oil and Gas Facilities.
[26]
M. Chima, Christopher. 2007. Supply-Chain Management Issues In The Oil And Gas Industry. Journal of Business & Economics Research - June 2007 Volume 5, Number 6
[27]
ESDM Regulation No. 18 of 2018 concerning Safety of Installation and Equipment Safety in Oil and Gas Business Activities.
[28]
Republic of Indonesia Law No. 22 of 2001 concerning Oil and Gas.
[29]
Dirjen Pajak, 2016. Modul Dasar Pemeriksaan, Pertambangan Minyak dan Gas Bumi, page 17.
[30]
Iqbal, Hasan, Haidar Husnain, Tesfamariam, Solomon, Sadeq Rehan. 2016. Inspection and maintenance of oil & gas pipelines: a review of policies. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304041364
[31]
Saaty, L Thomas. 2008. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Services Sciences, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2008
Index Terms
- Analytical Hierarchy Process Method to Engineering Companies Selection for Remaining Life Assessment of Oil and Gas Equipment and Installation in Indonesia
Recommendations
Gate to Gate Life Cycle Assessment Coal Power Plant in Indonesia
APCORISE '20: Proceedings of the 3rd Asia Pacific Conference on Research in Industrial and Systems EngineeringGlobal electricity is mainly supplied by coal as the main fuel, representing about 40%. Even the renewable energy portion is increasing in a developing country. Coal is still the majority as the main fuel of power plant because of abundant availability ...
Application of the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) for landslide susceptibility mapping: A case study from the Tinau watershed, west Nepal
Landslide problems are abundant in the mountainous areas of Nepal due to a unique combination of adverse geological conditions, abundant rainfall and anthropogenic factors, which leads to enormous loss of life and property every year. To control such ...
A method of production carbon footprint analysis in a supply chain based on life cycle assessment
As global warming becomes increasingly severe, environmental consciousness has become critical in the design and operation of globally integrated supply chain networks. Product Carbon Footprint is defined as the life cycle Greenhouse Gas GHG emissions ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
June 2020
410 pages
ISBN:9781450376006
DOI:10.1145/3400934
Copyright © 2020 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 25 August 2020
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
APCORISE 2020
APCORISE 2020: 3rd Asia Pacific Conference on Research in Industrial and Systems Engineering 2020
June 16 - 17, 2020
Depok, Indonesia
Acceptance Rates
APCORISE '20 Paper Acceptance Rate 68 of 110 submissions, 62%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 68 of 110 submissions, 62%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 46Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)5
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 15 Jan 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in