Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3421537.3421555acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesbdiotConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Salience & Motion State Based Quality Adjustment for 360-Degree Video Transmission

Published: 05 October 2020 Publication History

Abstract

The rapid development of Virtual Reality technology and the video sharing market of VOD (video-on-demand) stream nowadays makes online 360-degree video a new form of internet media. In the past few years, many 360-degree video delivery schemes are proposed. Yet, high fps requires a very high network band, otherwise will suffer from significant video quality drop. In this paper, we are focusing on using salient object detection and frame motion state detection for quality adjustment to reset 360-degree image quality of salient foreground and unimportant background. The system predicts the salient portion of video and then separate one frame in to foreground frame and back ground frame. Then by combining MS SSIM (Modified Structural Similarity of Images) algorithm, it also detects important frames and estimate the motion state of each view. The following procedure includes methods which lower the quality of dynamic background view and meanwhile maintain the high quality of foreground. This stage separates a 360-degree video into two videos with a much smaller file size of the background video. The core contribution of the scheme is that it is able to detect salient foreground and less noticed dynamic background of VR graphics. As a result in the transmission of the VR graphics, the network can execute a parallel transmission of a foreground and a economized background, costing less network resources.The results prove that this proposed scheme can effectively reduce global transmission bandwidth of the network with a wide adaptation of all genres of 360-degree videos.

References

[1]
Ming Tang, Vincent W.S. Wong. Online Bitrate Selection for Viewport Adaptive 360-Degree Video Streaming. arXiv:2005.02479(cs.NI), 2020.
[2]
Te-Yuan Huang, Ramesh Johari, Nick McKeown, Matthew Trunnell, and Mark Watson. A buffer-based approach to rate adaptation: Evidence from a large video streaming service. ACM SIGCOMM, 2014.
[3]
Yuhang Song, Mai Xu, Jianyi Wang, Minglang Qiao, Liangyu Huo. Predicting Head Movement in Panoramic Video: A Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach. arXiv: 1710.10755 [cs.CV], IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Jul 24, 2018.
[4]
Mu Mu, Murtada Dohan, Alison Goodyear, Gary Hill, Cleyon Johns, Andreas Mauthe. User Attention and Behaviour in Virtual Reality Art Encounter. arXiv:2005.10161 [cs.HC], 2020.
[5]
Shuang Li, Peter Mathews. Can Image Retrieval help Visual Saliency Detection?. arXiv: 1709.08172 [cs.CV], 2017.
[6]
Ninh Dang Tran, Hans-Jürgen Zepernick. Spherical Lightweight Data Hiding in 360-Degree Videos With Equirectangular. In IEEE International Conference on Advanced Technologies for Communications, Hanoi, Vietnam, 2019.
[7]
Wei Zeng, Mingqiang Yang, and Zhenxing Cui, "Ultra-Low Bit Rate Facial Coding Hybrid Model Based on Saliency Detection," Journal of Image and Graphics, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 25--29, June 2015.
[8]
Nian Liu, Junwei Han, Ming-Hsuan Yang. PiCANet: Learning Pixel-wise Contextual Attention for Saliency Detection. arXiv: 1708.06433 [cs.CV], 2018.
[9]
Xuebin Qin, Zichen Zhang, Chenyang Huang, Chao Gao, Masood Dehghan, Martin Jagersand. BASNet: Boundary-Aware Salient Object Detection. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Long Beach, CA, USA, 2019.
[10]
Zhe Wu, Li Su, Qingming Huang. Stacked Cross Refinement Network for Edge-Aware Salient Object Detection. In IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Seoul, Korea, 2019.
[11]
Yusra Al-Najjar. Comparison of Image Quality Assessment: PSNR, HVS, SSIM, UIQI. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 2012.
[12]
Zhou Wang, Alan Bovik, Hamid Rahim Sheikh, Eero P. Simoncelli. Image Quality Assessment: From Error Visibility to Structural Similarity. In IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 13(4):600--612, May 2004.
[13]
Z. Wang, E.P. Simoncelli, A.C. Bovik. Multiscale structural similarity for image quality assessment. In the Thrity-Seventh Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems & Computers, IEEE, Pacific Grove, CA, USA, 2003.
[14]
Yi Zhang, Lu Zhang, Wassim Hamidouche, Olivier Deforges. A FIXATION-BASED 360° BENCHMARK DATASET FOR SALIENT OBJECT DETECTION. In ICIP 2020. arXiv:2001.07960 [cs.CV], 2020.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
BDIOT '20: Proceedings of the 2020 4th International Conference on Big Data and Internet of Things
August 2020
108 pages
ISBN:9781450375504
DOI:10.1145/3421537
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 05 October 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. 360-degree image
  2. Deep learning
  3. Network optimization
  4. Salient object detection
  5. Structural similarity index
  6. Virtual Reality

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

BDIOT 2020

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 75 of 136 submissions, 55%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 49
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 12 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media