research-article

A conceptual scheme to support the identification of consolidation requirements in open design

Authors:

Deógenes P. da Silva Junior,

Roberto PereiraAuthors Info & Claims

IHC '20: Proceedings of the 19th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Article No.: 3, Pages 1 - 10

https://doi.org/10.1145/3424953.3426625

Published: 23 December 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Consolidation is an important process to transform design objects from various sources into a coherent whole. In Open Design, the diversity of activities, design objects and participants involved implies in a rich context for Consolidation practice, but a challenging one in terms of features to support it. This paper presents a Conceptual Scheme created to help understanding and identifying Consolidation requirements for Open Design settings. The Scheme was evaluated with eight Open Design professionals in an exploratory case study, resulting in 49 requirements for an Open Design platform under development. In a Focus Group, professionals discussed the Scheme usage, its positive points and opportunities for improvements. Results suggest the Scheme was relevant for the professionals to understand Consolidation as a defined, comprehensive and applicable process in an Open Design context, and was useful to guide them from understanding Consolidation to identifying requirements to support it in a technical system.

References

[1]

Paolo Arcaini and Catia Trubiani. 2017. Collaborative Development of Feature Models and Evaluation of Performance Bounds. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Applied Computing (Marrakech, Morocco) (SAC '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1162--1167.

Digital Library

[2]

Paul Atkinson. 2011. Orchestral manoeuvres in design. In Open design now: Why design cannot remain exclusive, Bas Van Abel, Lucas Evers, Peter Troxler, and Roel Klaassen (Eds.). Bis Publishers, 24--31.

[3]

Simone Barbosa and Bruno Silva. 2010. Interação Humano-Computador. Elsevier Brasil. https://books.google.com.br/books?id=qk0skwr_cewC

[4]

Greg Brunet, Marsha Chechik, Steve Easterbrook, Shiva Nejati, Nan Niu, and Mehrdad Sabetzadeh. 2006. A Manifesto for Model Merging. In Proceedings of the 2006 International Workshop on Global Integrated Model Management (Shanghai, China) (GaMMa '06). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 5--12.

Digital Library

[5]

Juliet M Corbin and Anselm Strauss. 1990. Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative sociology 13, 1 (1990), 3--21.

[6]

José Valderlei da Silva, Roberto Pereira, Elaine C. S. Hayashi, and M. Cecília C. Baranauskas. 2018. Design Practices and the SAwD Tool: Towards the Open-design Concept. In Digitalisation, Innovation, and Transformation, Kecheng Liu, Keiichi Nakata, Weizi Li, and Cecilia Baranauskas (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 208--217.

[7]

Steve Easterbrook and Marsha Chechik. 2001. A framework for multi-valued reasoning over inconsistent viewpoints. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Software Engineering. ICSE 2001. IEEE Computer Society, 411--420.

Digital Library

[8]

Natalie Ebenreuter. 2009. Working towards an Open Source Design Approach for the Development of Collaborative Design Projects. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the Australian Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group: Design: Open 24/7 (Melbourne, Australia) (OZCHI '09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 285--288.

Digital Library

[9]

Ebba Thora Hvannberg, Effie L.-C. Law, and Gyda Halldorsdottir. 2019. Argumentation Models for Usability Problem Analysis in Individual and Collaborative Settings. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 35, 3 (2019), 256--273.

[10]

Yi Jiang, Shijun Wang, Kai Fu, Wei Zhang, and Haiyan Zhao. 2016. A Collaborative Conceptual Modeling Tool Based on Stigmergy Mechanism. In Proceedings of the 8th Asia-Pacific Symposium on Internetware (Beijing, China) (Internetware '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 11--18.

Digital Library

[11]

Deógenes Silva Junior and Roberto Pereira. 2020. Consolidation in Collaborative Design: An Exploratory Case Study. In Anais do V Workshop sobreAspectos Sociais, Humanos e Econômicos de Software (Cuiabá). SBC, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil, 11--20.

[12]

Marouane Kessentini, Wafa Werda, Philip Langer, and Manuel Wimmer. 2013. Search-Based Model Merging. In Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation (Amsterdam, The Netherlands) (GECCO '13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1453--1460.

Digital Library

[13]

Benjamin Klatt and Martin Küster. 2013. Improving Product Copy Consolidation by Architecture-Aware Difference Analysis. In Proceedings of the 9th International ACM Sigsoft Conference on Quality of Software Architectures (Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada) (QoSA '13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 117--122.

Digital Library

[14]

Maximilian Koegel, Helmut Naughton, Jonas Helming, and Markus Herrmannsdoerfer. 2010. Collaborative Model Merging. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference Companion on Object Oriented Programming Systems Languages and Applications Companion (Reno/Tahoe, Nevada, USA) (OOPSLA '10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 27--34.

Digital Library

[15]

Effie Lai-Chong Law and Ebba Thora Hvannberg. 2008. Consolidating Usability Problems with Novice Evaluators. In Proceedings of the 5th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Building Bridges (Lund, Sweden) (NordiCHI '08). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 495--498.

Digital Library

[16]

Jonathan Lazar, Jinjuan Heidi Feng, and Harry Hochheiser. 2017. Research methods in human-computer interaction. Morgan Kaufmann, Boston.

Digital Library

[17]

Akhil Mehra, John Grundy, and John Hosking. 2005. A Generic Approach to Supporting Diagram Differencing and Merging for Collaborative Design. In Proceedings of the 20th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (Long Beach, CA, USA) (ASE '05). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 204--213.

Digital Library

[18]

David L Morgan. 1996. Focus groups as qualitative research. Vol. 16. Sage publications, Thousand Oaks, California.

[19]

Jonathan P. Munson and Prasun Dewan. 1994. A Flexible Object Merging Framework. In Proceedings of the 1994 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA) (CSCW '94). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 231--242.

Digital Library

[20]

Shiva Nejati. 2005. Formal Support for Merging and Negotiation. In Proceedings of the 20th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (Long Beach, CA, USA) (ASE '05). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 456--460.

Digital Library

[21]

Shiva Nejati, Mehrdad Sabetzadeh, Marsha Chechik, Steve Easterbrook, and Pamela Zave. 2007. Matching and merging of statecharts specifications. In Proceedings of the 29th international conference on Software Engineering (ICSE'07). IEEE Computer Society, 54--64.

Digital Library

[22]

Stefan Oppl. 2015. Articulation of Subject-Oriented Business Process Models. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Subject-Oriented Business Process Management (Kiel, Germany) (S-BPM ONE '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 2, 11 pages.

Digital Library

[23]

Dennis Pagano and Bernd Brügge. 2013. User Involvement in Software Evolution Practice: A Case Study. In Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Software Engineering (San Francisco, CA, USA) (ICSE '13). IEEE Press, 953--962.

Digital Library

[24]

Roberto Pereira and Maria Cecília Calani Baranauskas. 2014. Value Pie: A Culturally Informed Conceptual Scheme for Understanding Values in Design. In Human-Computer Interaction. Theories, Methods, and Tools (HCII'14), Masaaki Kurosu (Ed.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 122--133.

Digital Library

[25]

Shaun Phillips, Jonathan Sillito, and Rob Walker. 2011. Branching and Merging: An Investigation into Current Version Control Practices. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering (Waikiki, Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHASE '11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 9--15.

Digital Library

[26]

Francisco Queiroz and Rejane Spitz. 2016. Position Paper: Collaborative Gamification Design for Scientific Software. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 1686. CEUR-WS. org, 7.

[27]

Yvonne Rogers, Helen Sharp, and Jennifer Preece. 2013. Design de Interação. Bookman Editora.

[28]

Julia Rubin and Marsha Chechik. 2013. N-Way Model Merging. In Proceedings of the 2013 9th Joint Meeting on Foundations of Software Engineering (Saint Petersburg, Russia) (ESEC/FSE 2013). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 301--311.

Digital Library

[29]

Mehrdad Sabetzadeh, Shiva Nejati, Steve Easterbrook, and Marsha Chechik. 2007. A Relationship-Driven Framework for Model Merging. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Modeling in Software Engineering. IEEE Computer Society, 2.

Digital Library

[30]

Deogenes P. Silva, Emerson André Fedechen, Maria Cecília Calani Baranauskas, and Roberto Pereira. 2019. Open Design: A Systematic Mapping. In Proceedings of the 18th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Vitória, Espírito Santo, Brazil) (IHC '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 36, 11 pages.

Digital Library

[31]

Deógenes P. Silva Junior. 2020. Consolidação em Open Design: uma abordagem sociotécnica. Master's thesis. Universidade Federal do Paraná.

[32]

Geovanna Evelyn Espinoza Taype and Maria Cecilia Baranauskas Calani. 2020. Extending Persuasive System Design Frameworks: An Exploratory Study. In Information Technology and Systems, Álvaro Rocha, Carlos Ferrás, Carlos Enrique Montenegro Marin, and Víctor Hugo Medina García (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 35--45.

[33]

Sebastian Uchitel and Marsha Chechik. 2004. Merging Partial Behavioural Models. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGSOFT Twelfth International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering (Newport Beach, CA, USA) (SIGSOFT '04/FSE-12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 43--52.

Digital Library

[34]

Sue Wilkinson. 1998. Focus group methodology: a review. International journal of social research methodology 1, 3 (1998), 181--203.

[35]

Claes Wohlin, Per Runeson, Martin Höst, Magnus C Ohlsson, Björn Regnell, and Anders Wesslén. 2012. Experimentation in software engineering. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin, Heidelberg.

[36]

Zaidah Zainal. 2007. Case study as a research method. Jurnal Kemanusiaan 5, 1 (2007), 6.

Cited By

da Silva Junior DAlves DCarneiro NMatos EBaranauskas MMendoza Y(2024)GranDIHC-BR 2025-2035 - GC1: New Theoretical and Methodological Approaches in HCI✱Proceedings of the XXIII Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3702038.3702054(1-31)Online publication date: 7-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3702038.3702054

Index Terms

A conceptual scheme to support the identification of consolidation requirements in open design
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Collaborative and social computing
    1. Collaborative and social computing systems and tools
      1. Open source software
2. Software and its engineering
  1. Software creation and management
    1. Designing software
      1. Requirements analysis

Recommendations

Performance Analysis for Pareto-Optimal Green Consolidation Based on Virtual Machines Live Migration

Huge energy requirement of cloud data centers is prime concern. Dynamic Virtual Machine VM consolidation based on VM live migration to switched-off or put some of the under-loaded host Physical Machines PMs into a low power consumption mode can ...
Efficient consolidation-aware VCPU scheduling on multicore virtualization platform

Multicore processors are widely used in today's computer systems. Multicore virtualization technology provides an elastic solution to more efficiently utilize the multicore system. However, the Lock Holder Preemption (LHP) problem in the virtualized ...
Working towards an open source design approach for the development of collaborative design projects
OZCHI '09: Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the Australian Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group: Design: Open 24/7

At its core the act of designing begins with an idea that develops over time to shape the creation of a product or service that meets a distinct purpose. Characteristically, a select group of designers, key stakeholders and possibly end-users of a ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences

IHC '20: Proceedings of the 19th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems

October 2020

519 pages

ISBN:9781450381727

DOI:10.1145/3424953

General Chairs:
Caroline Queiroz Santos
UFVJM
,
Maria Lúcia Bento Villela
UFVJM
,
Program Chairs:
Isabela Gasparini
Santa Catarina State University & Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil & Telecom & Management SudParis, France
,
Tayana Uchôa Conte
Federal University of Amazonas & Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Copyright © 2020 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

In-Cooperation

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 23 December 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Funding Sources

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES)

Conference

IHC '20

IHC '20: XIX Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems

October 26 - 30, 2020

Diamantina, Brazil

Acceptance Rates

IHC '20 Paper Acceptance Rate 60 of 155 submissions, 39%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 331 of 973 submissions, 34%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

1
Total Citations
View Citations
56
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)3
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 26 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

da Silva Junior DAlves DCarneiro NMatos EBaranauskas MMendoza Y(2024)GranDIHC-BR 2025-2035 - GC1: New Theoretical and Methodological Approaches in HCI✱Proceedings of the XXIII Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3702038.3702054(1-31)Online publication date: 7-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3702038.3702054

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten