Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3428690.3429175acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmommConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Screening for refractive error with low-quality smartphone images

Published: 19 January 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Uncorrected refractive errors can lead to permanent debilitating eye conditions if not corrected in a timely manner. Contemporary diagnostic methods rely on the professional acumen of optometrists and the use of expensive devices, which may not be easily accessible to all. According to the optical principle of photorefraction, refractive error can be estimated based on a relative pupil and crescent size of an eye image taken by a camera from a specified working distance. A low-cost approach would be to leverage smartphones with cameras for this purpose. However, the poor image quality generated from basic smartphones poses a challenge for the current approach as they often fail to accurately distinguish the crescent from the iris. We propose a novel method to detect and accurately measure the iris and crescent from smartphone photos. Based on this method, we further propose a set of features for machine learning to build our refractive error estimation model. The performance of our models are evaluated in an in-depth experiment.

References

[1]
R. W Arnold, J. W O'Neil, K. L Cooper, D. I Silbert, and S. P Donahue. 2018. evaluation of a smartphone photoscreening app to detect refractive amblyopia risk factors in children aged 1-6 years. Clinical Ophthalmology (Auckland, NZ) 12 (2018), 1533.
[2]
WR Bobier and OJ Braddick. 1985. Eccentric photorefraction: optical analysis and empirical measures. American journal of optometry and physiological optics 62, 9 (1985), 614--620.
[3]
Patrick Caroline. 2016. The Effect of Corneal Diameter on Soft Lens Fitting. Global Insight (2016).
[4]
O. YC Chan, M. Edwards, and B. Brown. 1996. Calibration and validity of an eccentric photorefractor. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 16, 3 (1996), 203--210.
[5]
Jaehyeong Chun, Youngjun Kim, Kyoung Yoon Shin, Sun Hyup Han, Sei Yeul Oh, Tae-Young Chung, Kyung-Ah Park, and Dong Hui Lim. 2020. Deep Learning-Based Prediction of Refractive Error Using Photorefraction Images Captured by a Smartphone: Model Development and Validation Study. JMIR Medical Informatics 8, 5 (2020), e16225.
[6]
J. Daugman. 2009. How iris recognition works. In The essential guide to image processing. Elsevier, 715--739.
[7]
Goktug Demirci, Banu Arslan, Mustafa Özsütçü, Mustafa Eliaçik, and Gokhan Gulkilik. 2014. Comparison of photorefraction, autorefractometry and retinoscopy in children. International ophthalmology 34, 4 (2014), 739--746.
[8]
D Deshpande Jayant and K Malathi. 2011. Prevalence of ocular morbidities among school children in rural area of North Maharashtra in India. Natl J Community Med 2, 2 (2011), 302--4.
[9]
M. A Fischler and R. C Bolles. 1981. Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Commun. ACM 24, 6 (1981), 381--395.
[10]
Blake D Forcina, M Millicent Peterseim, M Edward Wilson, Edward W Cheeseman, Samuel Feldman, Amanda L Marzolf, Bethany J Wolf, and Rupal H Trivedi. 2017. Performance of the Spot Vision Screener in Children Younger Than 3 Years of Age. American journal of ophthalmology 178 (June 2017), 79--83.
[11]
Huseyin Gursoy, Hikmet Basmak, Yetkin Yaz, and Ertugrul Colak. 2013. Vision screening in children entering school: Eskisehir, Turkey. Ophthalmic epidemiology 20, 4 (2013), 232--238.
[12]
Hassan Hashemi, Akbar Fotouhi, Abbasali Yekta, Reza Pakzad, Hadi Ostadimoghaddam, and Mehdi Khabazkhoob. 2018. Global and regional estimates of prevalence of refractive errors: systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of current ophthalmology 30, 1 (2018), 3--22.
[13]
Z. He, T. Tan, Z. Sun, and X. Qiu. 2008. Toward accurate and fast iris segmentation for iris biometrics. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 31, 9 (2008), 1670--1684.
[14]
Howard C Howland. 1985. Optics of photoretinoscopy: results from ray tracing. American journal of optometry and physiological optics 62, 9 (1985), 621--625.
[15]
Howard C. Howland, Velma Dobson, and Nancy Sayles. 1987. Accommodation in infants as measured by photorefraction. Vision Research 27, 12 (1987), 2141 -- 2152.
[16]
D. S. Jeong, J. W. Hwang, B. J. Kang, K. R. Park, C. S. Won, D. K. Park, and J. Kim. 2010. A new iris segmentation method for non-ideal iris images. Image and vision computing 28, 2 (2010), 254--260.
[17]
Kari Kaakinen. 1979. A simple method for screening of children with strabismus, anisometropia or ametropia by simultaneous photography of the corneal and the fundus reflexes. Acta ophthalmologica 57, 2 (1979), 161--171.
[18]
Teruko KUBO, Chiaki TAMURA, Hiroaki HIRAI, Hiroshi UOZATO, and Mototsugu SAISHIN. 1991. Clinical Application of Photorefractor PR-1000 for Screening of Refractive Anomalies in Infants. JAPANESE ORTHOPTIC JOURNAL 19 (1991), 69--73.
[19]
T. C. K. Kwok, N. C. M. Shum, G. Ngai, H. V. Leong, G. A. Tseng, H. Choi, K. Mak, and C. Do. 2015. Democratizing Optometric Care: A Vision-Based, Data-Driven Approach to Automatic Refractive Error Measurement for Vision Screening. In 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia (ISM). 7--12.
[20]
C. Lam, C. H. Lam, S. Chi-Kwan Cheng, and L. Chan. 2012. Prevalence of myopia among Hong Kong Chinese schoolchildren: Changes over two decades. Ophthalmic physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) 32 (01 2012), 17--24.
[21]
L. Ma, Y. Wang, and T. Tan. 2002. Iris recognition using circular symmetric filters. In Object recognition supported by user interaction for service robots, Vol. 2. IEEE, 414--417.
[22]
Maples, L. T Sinnott, S. A Cotter, and Jones-Jordan. 2003. Visual factors that significantly impact academic performance. OPTOMETRY-ST LOUIS-74, 1 (2003), 35--49.
[23]
AC Molteno, J Hoare-Nairne, JC Parr, Anne Simpson, IJ Hodgkinson, NE O'Brien, and SD Watts. 1983. The Otago photoscreener, a method for the mass screening of infants to detect squint and refractive errors. Transactions of the Ophthalmological Society of New Zealand 35 (1983), 43--49.
[24]
D. M Monro, S. Rakshit, and D. Zhang. 2007. DCT-based iris recognition. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis & Machine Intelligence 4 (2007), 586--595.
[25]
Minnesota Department of Health. 2017. Vision Screening Procedures for Infancy, Childhood and School Age Children. MDH CTC website (www.health.state.mn.us) (2017).
[26]
N. Otsu. 1979. A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics 9, 1 (1979), 62--66.
[27]
Donatella Pascolini and Silvio Paolo Mariotti. 2012. Global estimates of visual impairment: 2010. British Journal of Ophthalmology 96, 5 (2012), 614--618.
[28]
M M. W Peterseim, R. S Rhodes, R. N Patel, M E. Wilson, L. E Edmondson, S. A Logan, E. W Cheeseman, E. Shortridge, and R. H Trivedi. 2018. Effectiveness of the GoCheck Kids vision screener in detecting amblyopia risk factors. American journal of ophthalmology 187 (2018), 87--91.
[29]
M. X Repka, R. T Kraker, J. M Holmes, A. I Summers, S. R Glaser, C. N Barnhardt, and D. R Tien. 2014. Atropine vs patching for treatment of moderate amblyopia: follow-up at 15 years of age of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA ophthalmology 132, 7 (2014), 799--805.
[30]
Frank Schaeffel, Howard C Howland, and Leslie Farkas. 1986. Natural accommodation in the growing chicken. Vision Research 26, 12 (1986), 1977--1993.
[31]
BH Shekar and S. S Bhat. 2017. Multi-Patches iris based person authentication system using particle swarm optimization and fuzzy C-means clustering. The International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 42 (2017), 243.
[32]
Pallavi Shukla, Praveen Vashist, Suraj Senjam Singh, Vivek Gupta, Noopur Gupta, Meenakshi Wadhwani, Amit Bharadwaj, and Lakshya Arora. 2018. Assessing the inclusion of primary school children in vision screening for refractive error program of India. Indian journal of ophthalmology 66, 7 (2018), 935.
[33]
A. J Smola and B. Schölkopf. 2004. A tutorial on support vector regression. Statistics and computing 14, 3 (2004), 199--222.
[34]
N. F Soliman, E. Mohamed, F. Magdi, F. E A. El-Samie, and M AbdElnaby. 2017. Efficient iris localization and recognition. Optik 140 (2017), 469--475.
[35]
Biometrics Ideal Test. 2010. CASIA Iris Image Database. http://biometrics.idealtest.org/.
[36]
T. Thomas, A. George, and KP I. Devi. 2016. Effective iris recognition system. Procedia Technology 25 (2016), 464--472.
[37]
R. P Wildes. 1997. Iris recognition: an emerging biometric technology. Proc. IEEE 85, 9 (1997), 1348--1363.
[38]
Y. Yin, L. Liu, and X. Sun. 2011. SDUMLA-HMT: a multimodal biometric database. In Chinese Conference on Biometric Recognition. Springer, 260--268.
[39]
K. Zadnik, L. T Sinnott, S. A Cotter, L. A Jones-Jordan, R. N Kleinstein, R. E Manny, J D. Twelker, and D. O Mutti. 2015. Prediction of juvenile-onset myopia. JAMA ophthalmology 133, 6 (2015), 683--689.
[40]
R Zimmerman. 2002. Procedures for the vision screening program for Pennsylvania School-Age population. Pennsylvania2002 (2002).

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Deep Learning Method for Accessible Eccentric Photorefraction2024 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI)10.1109/ISBI56570.2024.10635744(1-5)Online publication date: 27-May-2024
  • (2022)Towards Automating Retinoscopy for Refractive Error DiagnosisProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/35502836:3(1-26)Online publication date: 7-Sep-2022

Index Terms

  1. Screening for refractive error with low-quality smartphone images

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    MoMM '20: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Advances in Mobile Computing & Multimedia
    November 2020
    239 pages
    ISBN:9781450389242
    DOI:10.1145/3428690
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 19 January 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. compute-aided diagnosis
    2. heathcare
    3. machine learning
    4. photorefraction
    5. vision screening

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    MoMM '20

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)39
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
    Reflects downloads up to 26 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Deep Learning Method for Accessible Eccentric Photorefraction2024 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI)10.1109/ISBI56570.2024.10635744(1-5)Online publication date: 27-May-2024
    • (2022)Towards Automating Retinoscopy for Refractive Error DiagnosisProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/35502836:3(1-26)Online publication date: 7-Sep-2022

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media