Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3441852.3476529acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesassetsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Inverse Color Contrast Checker: Automatically Suggesting Color Adjustments that meet Contrast Requirements on the Web

Published: 17 October 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Low contrast between text and background and its effect with low vision is relatively well-understood. Many tools exist for helping web designers check contrast limits. Most of these tools identify contrast problems but give limited advice on how to rectify the problems. Moreover, website accessibility audits reveal that insufficient color contrast still is a recurring issue in practice. A framework was therefore developed that automatically proposes color adjustments to problematic text-background color pairs on web pages. These suggestions adhere to contrast requirements and are aligned with the visual design profile. The framework allows the developers to visually inspect the suggestions and amend color definitions in projects.

Supplementary Material

VTT File (PD1022.vtt)
MP4 File (PD1022.mp4)
Presentation video

References

[1]
Rafael Almeida and Carlos Duarte. 2020. Analysis of automated contrast checking tools. In Proceedings of the 17th International Web for All Conference (W4A '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 18, 1–4.
[2]
Agency for Universal Design of ICT (uu-tilsynet). 2021. Accessibility audit report depository. Retrieved June 16, 2021 from https://www.uutilsynet.no/tilsynsrapporter/tilsynsrapporter/270
[3]
Kristian Brathovde, Mads Brændeland Farner, Fredrik Krag Brun, and Frode Eika Sandnes. 2019. Effectiveness of Color-Picking Interfaces among NonDesigners, In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Cooperative Design, Visualization and Engineering 2019 (CDVE 2019), LNCS vol. 11792, Springer, pp. 181-189.
[4]
Ricardo José de Araújo, Julio Cesar Dos Reis, and Rodrigo Bonacin 2020. Understanding interface recoloring aspects by colorblind people: a user study. Universal Access in the Information Society 19.1 (2020): 81-98.
[5]
Sarah A. Douglas and Arthur E. Kirkpatrick. 1999. Model and representation: the effect of visual feedback on human performance in a color picker interface. ACM Trans. Graph. 18, 2 (April 1999), 96-127.
[6]
Berto Gonzalez and Celine Latulipe. 2011. BiCEP: bimanual color exploration plugin. In CHI '11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1483-1488.
[7]
Massimo Greco, Natale Stucchi, Daniele Zavagno, and Barbara Marino. 2008. On the portability of computer-generated presentations: The effect of text-background color combinations on text legibility. Human factors 50, 5 (2008), 821-833.
[8]
Fredrik Hansen, Josef Jan Krivan, and Frode Eika Sandnes. 2019. Still Not Readable? An Interactive Tool for Recommending Color Pairs with Sufficient Contrast based on Existing Visual Designs. In The 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 636–638.
[9]
Shashank Kumar, JeevithaShree DV, and Pradipta Biswas. 2020. Accessibility evaluation of websites using WCAG tools and Cambridge Simulator. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.06526.
[10]
M. L. Mathews. 1989. Visual performance with coloured CRT displays: research update. Appl. Ergon. 20, 58 (1989), 58. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(89)90011-2
[11]
Barbara J. Meier, Anne Morgan Spalter, and David B. Karelitz. 2004. Interactive color palette tools. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 24, 3 (2004), 64- 72.
[12]
Giovanni Moretti and Paul Lyons. 2002. Tools for the selection of colour palettes. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI-NZ Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction (CHINZ '02). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 13-18.
[13]
Richard Nguyen and Connor Geddes. 2019. Exploring Haptic Colour Identification Aids. In The 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 709–711.
[14]
Lasse Apalnes Pedersen, Svavar Skuli Einarsson, Fredrik Arne Rikheim, and Frode Eika Sandnes. 2020. User Interfaces in Dark Mode During Daytime–Improved Productivity or Just Cool-Looking?. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, Cham. 178-187.
[15]
Gajo Petrovic and Hamido Fujita. 2017. Deep Correct: Deep Learning Color Correction for Color Blindness. SoMeT, pp. 824-834.
[16]
Katharina Reinecke, David R. Flatla, and Christopher Brooks. 2016. Enabling Designers to Foresee Which Colors Users Cannot See. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2693- 2704.
[17]
Luz Rello and Jeffrey P. Bigham. 2017. Good Background Colors for Readers: A Study of People with and without Dyslexia. In Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 72–80.
[18]
Frode Eika Sandnes and Anqi Zhao. 2015. An interactive color picker that ensures WCAG2. 0 compliant color contrast levels. Procedia Computer Science 67 (2015), 87-94.
[19]
Frode Eika Sandnes and Anqi Zhao. 2015. A contrast colour selection scheme for WCAG2.0-compliant web designs based on HSV-half-planes. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC 2015). IEEE, 1233-1237.
[20]
Frode Eika Sandnes. 2016. Understanding WCAG2.0 color contrast requirements through 3D color space visualization. Studies in health technology and informatics 229 (2016), 366-375.
[21]
Frode Eika Sandnes. 2017. On-screen colour contrast for visually impaired readers. In: Information Design: Research and Practice. Alison Black, Paul Luna, Ole Lund and Sue Walker (eds.). Routledge, 405-416.
[22]
Frode Eika Sandnes. 2018. An image-based visual strategy for working with color contrasts during design. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computers Helping People with Special Needs (ICCHP), LNCS Vol. 10896, Springer, Cham, 35-42.
[23]
Garreth W. Tigwell, David R. Flatla, and Neil D. Archibald. 2017. ACE: A Colour Palette Design Tool for Balancing Aesthetics and Accessibility. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 9, 2, Article 5 (January 2017), 32 pages.
[24]
Garreth W. Tigwell, David R. Flatla, and Rachel Menzies. 2018. It's not just the light: understanding the factors causing situational visual impairments during mobile interaction. In Proceedings of the 10th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (NordiCHI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 338–351.
[25]
Garreth W. Tigwell, Rachel Menzies, and David R. Flatla. 2018. Designing for Situational Visual Impairments: Supporting Early-Career Designers of Mobile Content. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 387–399.
[26]
Garreth W. Tigwell. 2021. Nuanced Perspectives Toward Disability Simulations from Digital Designers, Blind, Low Vision, and Color Blind People. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 378, 1–15.
[27]
Luigi Troiano, Cosimo Birtolo, and Maria Miranda. 2008. Adapting palettes to color vision deficiencies by genetic algorithm. In Proceedings of the 10th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation (GECCO '08), Maarten Keijzer (Ed.). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1065-1072.
[28]
W3C, WCAG2.1. Retrieved June 16, 2021 from https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/
[29]
Ken Wakita and Kenta Shimamura. 2005. SmartColor: disambiguation framework for the colorblind. In Proceedings of the 7th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility (Assets '05). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 158–165.
[30]
Montgomery Webster. 2014. Integrating color usability components into design tools. interactions 21, 3 (May 2014), 56-61.
[31]
Xiaojiao Xie, Fanghao Song, Yan Liu, Shurui Wang, and Dong. 2021. Study on the Effects of Display Color Mode and Luminance Contrast on Visual Fatigue. IEEE Access, 9, 35915-35923.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A smart handheld magnifier for reflowing printed text notices in public spacesDisability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology10.1080/17483107.2024.233390419:8(3153-3165)Online publication date: Apr-2024
  • (2024)“Consent notices are obstructing my view”: Viewing sticky elements on responsive websites under the magnifying glassDisplays10.1016/j.displa.2023.10257981(102579)Online publication date: Jan-2024
  • (2024)How Order and Omission of Web Content Can Vary Unintentionally Across User Cohorts: A ReviewUniversal Access in Human-Computer Interaction10.1007/978-3-031-60881-0_6(80-99)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Inverse Color Contrast Checker: Automatically Suggesting Color Adjustments that meet Contrast Requirements on the Web
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    ASSETS '21: Proceedings of the 23rd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility
    October 2021
    730 pages
    ISBN:9781450383066
    DOI:10.1145/3441852
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 17 October 2021

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. WCAG
    2. color contrast
    3. web accessibility
    4. web framework

    Qualifiers

    • Poster
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    ASSETS '21
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    ASSETS '21 Paper Acceptance Rate 36 of 134 submissions, 27%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 436 of 1,556 submissions, 28%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)44
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
    Reflects downloads up to 10 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)A smart handheld magnifier for reflowing printed text notices in public spacesDisability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology10.1080/17483107.2024.233390419:8(3153-3165)Online publication date: Apr-2024
    • (2024)“Consent notices are obstructing my view”: Viewing sticky elements on responsive websites under the magnifying glassDisplays10.1016/j.displa.2023.10257981(102579)Online publication date: Jan-2024
    • (2024)How Order and Omission of Web Content Can Vary Unintentionally Across User Cohorts: A ReviewUniversal Access in Human-Computer Interaction10.1007/978-3-031-60881-0_6(80-99)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2024
    • (2023)Towards Safe Encounters between Pedestrians and Autonomous Driverless Vehicles: Comparing Adults and Children's Perceptions of External Human Machine Interface Design FeaturesProceedings of the 16th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments10.1145/3594806.3594827(165-170)Online publication date: 5-Jul-2023
    • (2023)To wrap or not to wrap? A study of how long words are split when reflowed on magnified web pagesUniversal Access in the Information Society10.1007/s10209-023-01066-yOnline publication date: 11-Nov-2023
    • (2023)Exploring the Usability of the LCH Color Model for Web DesignersCooperative Design, Visualization, and Engineering10.1007/978-3-031-43815-8_5(43-55)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2023
    • (2022)Lost in OCR-Translation: Pixel-based Text Reflow to the RescueProceedings of the 15th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments10.1145/3529190.3534734(500-506)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2022

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media