Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
article
Free access

Readability formulas have even more limitations than Klare discusses

Published: 01 August 2000 Publication History

Abstract

A literature review reveals many technical weaknesses of readability formulas (when compared to direct usability testing with typical readers): they were developed for children s school books, not adult technical documentation;they ignore between-reader differences and the effects of content, layout, and retrieval aids on text usefulness; they emphasize countable features at the expense of more subtle contributors to text comprehension.

References

[1]
Charrow, R. P. and Charrow, V. R. (1979). Making legal language understandable: A psycholinguistic study of jury instructions. Columbia Law Review, 79, 1306-1374.
[2]
Dumas, J. S. and Redish, J. C. (1999). A Practical Guide to Usability Testing. Exeter, England: Intellect (revised edition); originally published by Ablex, 1993.
[3]
Duffy, T. M. (1985). Readability formulas: What's the use? In T. M. Dully and R. M. Waller (Eds.), Designing Usable Texts (pp. 113-143). NY: Academic Press.
[4]
Holland, V. M. and Campbell, L. J. (1982). Understanding the language of public documents because readability formulas don't. In R. J. Di Pietro (Ed.), Linguistics and the Professions (pp. 157-171). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
[5]
Hughes, M. (1999). Rigor in usability testing. Technical Communication, 46(4), Fourth Quarter, 488-494.
[6]
Jacobson, M. D., Kirkland, C. E., and Selden, R. W. (1978). An examination of the McCall- Crabbs standard test lessons in reading. Journal of Reading, 22, 224-230.
[7]
Klare, G. R. (1979). Readability Standards for Army- Wide Publications. Fort Benjamin Harrison, IN: U. S. Army Administrative Center.
[8]
Klare, G. R. (1976). A second look at the validity of readability formulas. Journal of Reading Behavior, 8, 129-152.
[9]
Klare, G. R. (1963). The Measurement of Readability. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
[10]
Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability Engineering, San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
[11]
Redish, J. C. (1980). Readability. In D. B. Felker (Ed.), Document Design: A Review of the Relevant Research (pp. 69-93). Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.
[12]
Redish, J. C. and Seizer, J. (1985). The place of readability formulas in technical communication. Technical Communication, 32(4), Fourth Quarter, 46-52.
[13]
Rubin, J. (1994). Handbook of Usability Testing. NY: John Wiley & Sons.
[14]
Schriver, K. A. (1997). Dynamics in Document Design. NY: John Wiley & Sons.
[15]
Seizer, J. (1983). What constitutes a "readable" technical style? In E V. Anderson, J. Brockmann, and C. R. Miller (Eds.), New Essays in Technical and Scientific Communication: Research, Theory, and Practice (pp. 71-89). Farmington, NY: Baywood.

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Assessing AI Simplification of Medical Texts: Readability and Content FidelityInternational Journal of Medical Informatics10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105743195(105743)Online publication date: Mar-2025
  • (2025)Readability formulae: Guiding the development of health and medicine informationHealth Literacy in Medicines Use and Pharmacy10.1016/B978-0-12-824407-4.00008-8(139-163)Online publication date: 2025
  • (2024)Development of a New Tool for Writing Research Key Information in Plain LanguageHLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice10.3928/24748307-20240218-018:1Online publication date: Jan-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Journal of Computer Documentation
ACM Journal of Computer Documentation  Volume 24, Issue 3
Aug. 2000
77 pages
ISSN:1527-6805
EISSN:1557-9441
DOI:10.1145/344599
Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 August 2000
Published in JCD Volume 24, Issue 3

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. reliability
  2. text comprehension
  3. usability testing

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)280
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)27
Reflects downloads up to 23 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Assessing AI Simplification of Medical Texts: Readability and Content FidelityInternational Journal of Medical Informatics10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105743195(105743)Online publication date: Mar-2025
  • (2025)Readability formulae: Guiding the development of health and medicine informationHealth Literacy in Medicines Use and Pharmacy10.1016/B978-0-12-824407-4.00008-8(139-163)Online publication date: 2025
  • (2024)Development of a New Tool for Writing Research Key Information in Plain LanguageHLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice10.3928/24748307-20240218-018:1Online publication date: Jan-2024
  • (2024)Empowering inclusivity: improving readability of living kidney donation information with ChatGPTFrontiers in Digital Health10.3389/fdgth.2024.13669676Online publication date: 10-Apr-2024
  • (2024)A Unique Spectrum of Care Tool Provides a Self-Regulated Learning Opportunity and Facilitates Client CommunicationJournal of Veterinary Medical Education10.3138/jvme-2023-0144Online publication date: 23-Jan-2024
  • (2024)How do L2 English readers approach proper names?Language Teaching Research10.1177/13621688241270739Online publication date: 16-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Writing out the Storm: Designing and Evaluating Tools for Weather Risk MessagingProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3641926(1-16)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)Toward Clinical-Grade Evaluation of Large Language ModelsInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.11.012118:4(916-920)Online publication date: Mar-2024
  • (2024)Mistrík’s Readability Metric – an Online LibraryText, Speech, and Dialogue10.1007/978-3-031-70563-2_23(291-302)Online publication date: 9-Sep-2024
  • (2023)Beyond Readability with RateMyPDFProceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law10.1145/3594536.3595146(287-296)Online publication date: 19-Jun-2023
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Full Access

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media