Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Design Ethics in Practice - Points of Departure

Published: 22 April 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Recent years have seen an increased interest in ethically responsible design of technology in society at large as well as among design practitioners. While design ethics is a well-established research area, less research has enquired into how design practitioners understand ethics. Through semi-structured interviews we have explored practitioners' approaches to ethics in design. Our findings show noticing, reflecting and reacting as three ways that ethical matters are approached. This ties into dynamic and participatory views on ethics, rather than viewing ethics as a set of formal frameworks and deductive reasoning practices. Practitioners need approaches that tie in to existing work practices. Our results provide practice-led suggestions and points of departure of when and how it might be suitable to infuse design ethics into design practice.

Supplementary Material

ZIP File (v5cscw130aux.zip)
This supplementary material is the trigger material that was used as a visual way to ask questions during interviews. It is translated from the original Swedish.

References

[1]
Shaowen Bardzell. 2010. Feminist HCI: taking stock and outlining an agenda for design. In Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '10 (Atlanta, Georgia, USA). ACM Press, 1301. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753521
[2]
Katherine Coleman Sara Colunga-Santoyo Jeffrey S. Harrison Blackwelder, Britt and Danielle Wozniak. 2016. The Volkswagen Scandal. Case Study. University of Richmond: Robins School of Business. (2016).
[3]
Cennyd Bowles. 2019. Future Ethics. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DfxMv9mIjFU&feature=youtu.be
[4]
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. 3, 2 (2006), 77--101. https: //doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
[5]
Hooper CJ Buie, Elizabeth and Houssian Aaron. 2013. Research-practice interaction: building bridges, closing the gap. https://doi.org/10.1145/2468356.2468813
[6]
Jeffrey K.H. Chan. 2018. Design ethics: Reflecting on the ethical dimensions of technology, sustainability, and responsibility in the Anthropocene. 54 (2018), 184--200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2017.09.005
[7]
Shruthi Sai Chivukula, Chris Rhys Watkins, Rhea Manocha, Jingle Chen, and Colin M. Gray. 2020. Dimensions of UX Practice that Shape Ethical Awareness. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu HI USA, 2020-04-21). ACM, 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376459
[8]
Lucas Colusso, Cynthia L. Bennett, Gary Hsieh, and Sean A. Munson. 2017. Translational Resources: Reducing the Gap Between Academic Research and HCI Practice. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems - DIS '17 (Edinburgh, United Kingdom). ACM Press, 957--968. https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064667
[9]
Rodrigo de Oliveira and Juan Pablo Carrascal. 2014. Towards effective ethical behavior design. In Proceedings of the extended abstracts of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI EA '14 (Toronto, Ontario, Canada). ACM Press, 2149--2154. https://doi.org/10.1145/2559206.2581182
[10]
Daniel Ewerman. 2019. Private messaging on trigger material. (2019).
[11]
Jessica Nihlen Fahlquist, Neelke Doorn, and Ibo van de Poel. 2014. Design for the Value of Responsibility. In Handbook of Ethics, Values, and Technological Design, Jeroen van den Hoven, Pieter E. Vermaas, and Ibo van de Poel (Eds.). Springer Netherlands, 1--15. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6994-6_18-1
[12]
Trine Falbe. 2018. Ethical Design: The Practical Getting-Started Guide. (2018). https://www.smashingmagazine.com/ 2018/03/ethical-design-practical-getting-started-guide/
[13]
Christopher Frauenberger, Marjo Rauhala, and Geraldine Fitzpatrick. 2016. In-Action Ethics. (2016). https://doi.org/ 10.1093/iwc/iww024
[14]
Batya Friedman, Peter H Kahn, and Alan Borning. 2002. Value Sensitive Design: Theory and Methods. (2002), 8.
[15]
Ken Friedman. 2012. Models of Design: Envisioning a Future Design Education. (2012), 22.
[16]
Colin M. Gray and Shruthi Sai Chivukula. 2019. Ethical Mediation in UX Practice. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '19 (Glasgow, Scotland Uk, 2019). ACM Press, 1--11. https: //doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300408
[17]
Hansson, Sven Ove (ed.). 2017. The Ethics of Technology -- Methods and Approaches. Rowman & Littlefield International.
[18]
Tristan Harris, Aza Raskin, and Randima Fernando. 2019. Center for Humane Technology. https://humanetech.com
[19]
Laura Kalbag and Aral Balkan. 2017. Ethical Design Manifesto by ind.ie. https://2017.ind.ie/ethical-design/
[20]
Victor Kaptelinin. 2018. Technology and the Givens of Existence: Toward an Existential Inquiry Framework in HCI Research. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '18 (Montreal QC, Canada, 2018). ACM Press, 1--14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173844
[21]
Kolko, John. 2013. UX Magazine. http://www.jonkolko.com/writingManipulation.php
[22]
Adam D. I. Kramer, Jamie E. Guillory, and Jeffrey T. Hancock. 2014. Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. 111, 24 (2014), 8788--8790. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1320040111 Publisher: National Academy of Sciences _eprint: https://www.pnas.org/content/111/24/8788.full.pdf.
[23]
Kari Kuutti and Liam J. Bannon. 2014. The turn to practice in HCI: towards a research agenda. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '14 (Toronto, Ontario, Canada). ACM Press, 3543--3552. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557111
[24]
Andrew Lakoff and Stephen J. Collier. 2008. On Regimes of Living. In Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
[25]
Ann Light, Irina Shklovski, and Alison Powell. 2017. Design for Existential Crisis. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI EA '17 (Denver, Colorado, USA). ACM Press, 722--734. https://doi.org/10.1145/3027063.3052760
[26]
Sharon Lindberg, Petter Karlström, and Sirkku Männikkö Barbutiu. 2020. Cultivating Ethics -- A perspective from practice. In Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society (NordiCHI '20), October 25-29, 2020 (Tallinn, Estonia). ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/3419249.3420064
[27]
Adriane MacDonald, Amelia Clarke, Eduardo Ordonez-Ponce, Ziqi Chai, and Jordan Andreasen. 2020. Sustainability Managers: The Job Roles and Competencies of Building Sustainable Cities and Communities. Public Performance & Management Review 43, 6 (2020), 1413--1444. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2020.1803091 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2020.1803091
[28]
Sapna Maheshwari. 2017. That Game on Your Phone May Be Tracking What You're Watching on TV. (2017). https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/28/business/media/alphonso-app-tracking.html
[29]
Microsoft Design. 2019. Judgement Call. https://twitter.com/microsoftdesign/status/1093607842928574464
[30]
Mike Monteiro. 2019. Ruined by Design. Mule Design.
[31]
Cosmin Munteanu, Heather Molyneaux, Wendy Moncur, Mario Romero, Susan O'Donnell, and John Vines. 2015. Situational Ethics: Re-thinking Approaches to Formal Ethics Requirements for Human-Computer Interaction. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '15 (Seoul, Republic of Korea, 2015). ACM Press, 105--114. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702481
[32]
John Naughton. 2018. The internet of things has opened up a new frontier of domestic abuse. https://www.theguardian. com/commentisfree/2018/jul/01/smart-home-devices-internet-of-things-domestic-abuse
[33]
Nodder, Chris. 2013. Evil By Design. Wiley.
[34]
Donald A. Norman. 2010. The Research-Practice Gap: The Need for Translational Developers. (2010). https: //doi.org/10.1145/1806491.1806494
[35]
Papanek, Viktor. 1972. Design for the real world; human ecology and social change. https://monoskop.org/images/f/f8/ Papanek_Victor_Design_for_the_Real_World.pdf
[36]
Gauthier Roussilhe. 2017. Ethics for Design. http://ethicsfordesign.com/watch
[37]
Johnny Saldaña. 2015. An Introduction to Codes and Coding. In The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage Publications, 1--31.
[38]
Katie Shilton. 2013. Values Levers: Building Ethics into Design. 38, 3 (2013), 374--397. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0162243912436985
[39]
Katie Shilton and Sara Anderson. [n.d.]. Blended, Not Bossy: Ethics Roles, Responsibilities and Expertise in Design. 29, 1 ([n. d.]), 71--79. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iww002
[40]
Judith Simon. 2015. Distributed Epistemic Responsibility in a Hyperconnected Era. Springer International Publishing, 145--159.
[41]
Spool, Jared. 2017. The Power of Experience Mapping. https://medium.com/@jmspool/the-power-of-experiencemapping-212ba81e5ee
[42]
Norman Makotu Su, Victor Kaptelinin, Jeffrey Bardzell, Shaowen Bardzell, Jed R. Brubaker, Ann Light, and Dag Svanaes. 2019. Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Exploring the Intersection of Philosophy and HCI. http: //dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=3086450.3068259
[43]
Aimee van Wynsberghe and Scott Robbins. 2014. Ethicist as Designer: A Pragmatic Approach to Ethics in the Lab. 20, 4 (2014), 947--961. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-013-9498-4
[44]
Verbeek, Peter-Paul. 2005. What Things Do. Pennsylvania State University Press.
[45]
Verbeek, Peter-Paul. 2011. Moralizing Technology - Understanding and Designing the Morality of Things. University of Chicago Press.
[46]
Kenneth D. Walsh. 2007. On equilibrium: reflections on practice development and the philosophy of John Ralston Saul. 8, 3 (2007), 201--209. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-769X.2007.00314.x

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Languaging Ethics in Technology PracticeACM Journal on Responsible Computing10.1145/36564681:2(1-15)Online publication date: 20-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Who Should Act? Distancing and Vulnerability in Technology Practitioners' Accounts of Ethical ResponsibilityProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36374348:CSCW1(1-27)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Doing Good Business? Design Leaders' Perspectives on Ethics in DesignProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36330678:GROUP(1-22)Online publication date: 21-Feb-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 5, Issue CSCW1
CSCW
April 2021
5016 pages
EISSN:2573-0142
DOI:10.1145/3460939
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 22 April 2021
Published in PACMHCI Volume 5, Issue CSCW1

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. applied ethics
  2. design ethics
  3. design practice
  4. practice-led research

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)174
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)22
Reflects downloads up to 19 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Languaging Ethics in Technology PracticeACM Journal on Responsible Computing10.1145/36564681:2(1-15)Online publication date: 20-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Who Should Act? Distancing and Vulnerability in Technology Practitioners' Accounts of Ethical ResponsibilityProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36374348:CSCW1(1-27)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Doing Good Business? Design Leaders' Perspectives on Ethics in DesignProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36330678:GROUP(1-22)Online publication date: 21-Feb-2024
  • (2024)Building an Ethics-Focused Action Plan: Roles, Process Moves, and TrajectoriesProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642302(1-17)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)Navigating Ethics and Power Dynamics Through Participant-Designer Journey Mapping2024 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology, and Innovation (ICE/ITMC)10.1109/ICE/ITMC61926.2024.10794401(1-9)Online publication date: 24-Jun-2024
  • (2023)IoT Games and Gamified Systems: Summertime Sadness or Lust for Hype?Proceedings of the XXII Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3638067.3638128(1-12)Online publication date: 16-Oct-2023
  • (2023)Wrangling Ethical Design Complexity: Dilemmas, Tensions, and SituationsCompanion Publication of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3563703.3596632(179-183)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2023
  • (2023)Doing responsibilities in entangled worldsHuman–Computer Interaction10.1080/07370024.2023.226993440:1-4(65-88)Online publication date: 30-Oct-2023
  • (2022)Exploring the experience of ethical tensions and the role of community in UX practiceNordic Human-Computer Interaction Conference10.1145/3546155.3546683(1-13)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2022

View Options

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media