Cited By
View all- Low JFung BIqbal F(2023)Of Stances, Themes, and Anomalies in COVID-19 Mask-Wearing TweetsIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2023.329855711(87009-87033)Online publication date: 2023
Analysis of Users Engaged in Online Discussions about Controversial Covid-19 Treatments
Pages 162 - 166
Abstract
The news and stories that people find credible can influence the adoption of public health policies and determine their response to the pandemic, including the reception of controversial treatments. Although we trust people we know or admire, we should ask ourselves if they are sufficiently competent to provide a reliable opinion about medical treatments. In this paper, we try to identify professions, political views and psychological characteristics of Twitter users who shared information about controversial medical treatments by analysing the profile data of tweets published in English during the Covid-19 pandemic. We found that profile descriptions of Twitter users are very heterogeneous, but the major categories of users are Christians, devoted family members, fans of different music or political parties. We proposed an automatic approach for user classification.
References
[1]
Mossaab Bagdouri and Douglas W. Oard. 2015. Profession-Based Person Search in Microblogs: Using Seed Sets to Find Journalists. In Proc. of the 24th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. ACM, 593–602.
[2]
Alexander Beloborodov, Pavel Braslavski, and Marina Driker. 2014. Towards Automatic Evaluation of Health-Related CQA Data. In Information Access Evaluation. Multilinguality, Multimodality, and Interaction. Springer International Publishing, 7–18.
[3]
Alexander Beloborodov, Artem Kuznetsov, and Pavel Braslavski. 2013. Characterizing Health-Related Community Question Answering. In Proc. of the 35th European Conference on Advances in Information Retrieval (Moscow, Russia) (ECIR’13). Springer-Verlag, 680–683.
[4]
Daniel Cer, Yinfei Yang, Sheng-yi Kong, Nan Hua, Nicole Limtiaco, Rhomni St. John, Noah Constant, Mario Guajardo-Cespedes, Steve Yuan, Chris Tar, Brian Strope, and Ray Kurzweil. 2018. Universal Sentence Encoder for English. In Proc. of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations. ACL, 169–174.
[5]
Dina Demner-Fushman, Yassine Mrabet, and Asma Ben Abacha. 2020. Consumer health information and question answering: helping consumers find answers to their health-related information needs. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 27, 2 (2020), 194–201.
[6]
Kiran Garimella, Gianmarco De Francisci Morales, Aristides Gionis, and Michael Mathioudakis. 2018. Quantifying Controversy on Social Media. ACM Trans. on Social Computing 1, 1 (2018), 3:1–3:27.
[7]
Asmelash Teka Hadgu and Robert Jäschke. 2014. Identifying and analyzing researchers on twitter. In Proc. of the 2014 ACM conference on Web science. ACM, 23–32.
[8]
Sujin Kim, Thomas Pinkerton, and Nithya Ganesh. 2012. Assessment of H1N1 questions and answers posted on the Web. American Journal of Infection Control 40, 3 (2012), 211–217.
[9]
Kyumin Lee, Jalal Mahmud, Jilin Chen, Michelle Zhou, and Jeffrey Nichols. 2014. Who Will Retweet This? Automatically Identifying and Engaging Strangers on Twitter to Spread Information. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (Haifa, Israel) (IUI ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1145/2557500.2557502
[10]
Jalal Mahmud, Michelle X. Zhou, Nimrod Megiddo, Jeffrey Nichols, and Clemens Drews. 2014. Optimizing The Selection of Strangers To Answer Questions in Social Media. CoRR abs/1404.2013(2014). arxiv:1404.2013http://arxiv.org/abs/1404.2013
[11]
Robert R. McCrae and Oliver P. John. 1992. An Introduction to the Five-Factor Model and Its Applications. Journal of Personality 60, 2 (1992), 175–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00970.x arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00970.x
[12]
Marianne Noel, Liana Ermakova, Pedro Rammaciotti, Alexis Perrier, and Bilel Benbouzid. 2020. Controverse scientifique. https://dpa.hypotheses.org/controverse-scientifique
[13]
Sanghee Oh and Adam Worrall. 2013. Health answer quality evaluation by librarians, nurses, and users in social Q&A. Library&Information Science Research 35, 4 (2013), 288–298.
[14]
Daniel Preoţiuc-Pietro, Vasileios Lampos, and Nikolaos Aletras. 2015. An analysis of the user occupational class through Twitter content. In Proc. of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing. ACL, 1754–1764.
[15]
Daniel Preoţiuc-Pietro, Ye Liu, Daniel Hopkins, and Lyle Ungar. 2017. Beyond Binary Labels: Political Ideology Prediction of Twitter Users. In Proc. of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. ACL, 729–740.
[16]
Luke Sloan and Jeffrey Morgan. 2015. Who Tweets with Their Location? Understanding the Relationship between Demographic Characteristics and the Use of Geoservices and Geotagging on Twitter. PLOS ONE 10, 11 (2015), e0142209. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0142209
[17]
Yan Zhang. 2010. Contextualizing consumer health information searching: an analysis of questions in a social Q&A community. In Proc. of the 1st ACM International Health Informatics Symposium(IHI ’10). ACM, 210–219.
Index Terms
- Analysis of Users Engaged in Online Discussions about Controversial Covid-19 Treatments
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
Are Mutated Misinformation More Contagious? A Case Study of COVID-19 Misinformation on Twitter
WebSci '22: Proceedings of the 14th ACM Web Science Conference 2022The spread of online misinformation has become a major global risk. Understanding how misinformation propagates on social media is vital. While prior studies suggest that the content factors, such as emotion and topic in texts, are closely related to the ...
Co-spread of Misinformation and Fact-Checking Content During the Covid-19 Pandemic
Social InformaticsAbstractIn the context of the Covid-19 pandemic, the consequences of misinformation are a matter of life and death. Correcting misconceptions and false beliefs are important for injecting reliable information about the outbreak. Fact-checking ...
Analysis of User Diversity-Based Patterns of Public Discourse on Twitter About Mental Health in the Context of Online Learning During COVID-19
HCI International 2023 – Late Breaking PapersAbstractThis work focuses on the analysis of user diversity-based patterns of the public discourse on Twitter about mental health in the context of online learning during COVID-19. Two aspects of user diversity – gender and location are the focus of this ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
June 2021
431 pages
ISBN:9781450383677
DOI:10.1145/3450614
Copyright © 2021 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 22 June 2021
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Short-paper
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
UMAP '21: 29th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization
June 21 - 25, 2021
Utrecht, Netherlands
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 162 of 633 submissions, 26%
Upcoming Conference
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- View Citations1Total Citations
- 79Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)2
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 31 Jan 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
Cited By
View all- Low JFung BIqbal F(2023)Of Stances, Themes, and Anomalies in COVID-19 Mask-Wearing TweetsIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2023.329855711(87009-87033)Online publication date: 2023
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format