Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3460418.3479362acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Towards Designerly Data Donation

Published: 24 September 2021 Publication History

Abstract

In-the-wild research allows the HCI community to gain insights into personal behaviour and characteristics. For designers and researchers, this means having access to rich spatiotemporal insights reflecting user’s characteristics, behaviours, and needs. However, designerly contexts require contextualized and meaningful data, and collecting it in-the-wild involves a great effort. In addition, ethical implications need to be considered. In this paper, we propose designerly data donation, a participatory approach for data collection in-the-wild, as an effective and ethical way to enable data-centric design processes. We present the potential benefits of designerly data donation around three axes: value gain, data contextualization, and roles and relationships. And we introduce the challenges of designerly data donation at the intersection of HCI, UbiComp, and design.

References

[1]
Matthew Bietz, Kevin Patrick, and Cinnamon Bloss. 2019. Data Donation as a Model for Citizen Science Health Research. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 4, 1 (2019), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.178
[2]
Sander Bogers, Joep Frens, Janne Van Kollenburg, Eva Deckers, and Caroline Hummels. 2016. Connected baby bottle: A design case study towards a framework for data-enabled design. In DIS 2016 - Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Fuse. Association for Computing Machinery, Inc, New York, NY, USA, 301–311. https://doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901855
[3]
Sander Bogers, Janne Van Kollenburg, Eva Deckers, Joep Frens, and Caroline Hummels. 2018. A situated exploration of designing for personal health ecosystems through data-enabled design. In DIS 2018 - Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference. Association for Computing Machinery, Inc, New York, NY, USA, 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196769
[4]
Tobias Bornakke and Brian L. Due. 2018. Big–Thick Blending: A method for mixing analytical insights from big and thick data sources. Big Data and Society 5, 1 (2018), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718765026
[5]
Jacky Bourgeois, Gerd Kortuem, and Fahim Kawsar. 2018. Trusted and GDPR-compliant research with the internet of things. In ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3277593.3277604
[6]
Jacky Bourgeois, Janet Van Der Linden, Gerd Kortuem, Blaine A. Price, and Christopher Rimmer. 2014a. Conversations with my washing machine: An in-the-wild study of demand shifting with self-generated energy. In UbiComp 2014 - Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 459–470. https://doi.org/10.1145/2632048.2632106
[7]
J. Bourgeois, J. Van Der Linden, G. Kortuem, B. A. Price, and C. Rimmer. 2014b. Using participatory data analysis to understand social constraints and opportunities of electricity demand-shifting. In ICT for Sustainability 2014, ICT4S 2014. Atlantis Press, Stockholm, Sweden, 392–401. https://doi.org/10.2991/ict4s-14.2014.49
[8]
Barry Brown, Alexandra Weilenmann, Donald Mcmillan, and Airi Lampinen. 2016. Five Provocations for Ethical HCI R esearch. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 852–863. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858313
[9]
Alan Chamberlain and Andy Crabtree. 2020. Research ‘ In the Wild ’. In Into the Wild: Beyond the Design Research Lab. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology, and Rational Ethics., A. Chamberlain and A. Crabtree (eds.) (Ed.). Springer Nature Switzerland AG, Nottingham, Nottingham, UK, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18020-1
[10]
Wen Wei Chang, Elisa Giaccardi, Lin Lin Chen, and Rung Huei Liang. 2017. ”Interview with things:” A first-thing perspective to understand the scooter’s everyday socio-material network in Taiwan. DIS 2017 - Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems 1(2017), 1001–1012. https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064717
[11]
Elizabeth F. Churchill. 2018. Data, design, and ethnography. Interactions 25, 1 (2018), 22–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3172893
[12]
Andy Crabtree, Peter Tolmie, and Alan Chamberlain. 2020. “Research in the Wild”: Approaches to Understanding the Unremarkable as a Resource for Design. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics 48 (2020), 31–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18020-1_3
[13]
Daniel Diethei, Jasmin Niess, Carolin Stellmacher, Evropi Stefanidi, and Johannes Schöning. 2021. Sharing Heartbeats: Motivations of Citizen Scientists in Times of Crises. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2020, April (2021), 15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445665
[14]
Graham Dove, Kim Halskov, Jodi Forlizzi, and John Zimmerman. 2017. UX design innovation: Challenges for working with machine learning as a design material. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings 2017-May (2017), 278–288. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025739
[15]
Sandra Gabriele and Sonia Chiasson. 2020. Understanding Fitness Tracker Users’ Security and Privacy Knowledge, Attitudes and Behaviours. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376651
[16]
GDPR. 2018. General Data Protection Regulation., 88 pages. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/data-protection-factsheet-changes_en.pdf%7D
[17]
Elisa Giaccardi, Nazli Cila, Chris Speed, and Melissa Caldwell. 2016. Thing ethnography: Doing design research with non-humans. In DIS 2016 - Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Fuse. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 377–387. https://doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901905
[18]
Elizabeth Goodman. 2014. Design and ethics in the era of big data. Interactions 21, 3 (2014), 22–24. https://doi.org/10.1145/2598902
[19]
Katerina Gorkovenko, Daniel J Burnett, James K Thorp, Daniel Richards, and Dave Murray-Rust. 2020. Exploring the Future of Data-Driven Product Design. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376560
[20]
Patrik Hummel, Matthias Braun, and Peter Dabrock. 2019. Data Donations as Exercises of Sovereignty. Vol. 137. Springer International Publishing, Cham. 23–54 pages. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04363-6_3
[21]
Hilary Hutchinson, Wendy Mackay, Bosse Westerlund, Benjamin B. Bederson, Allison Druin, Catherine Plaisant, Michel Beaudouin-Lafon, Stéphane Conversy, Helen Evans, Heiko Hansen, Nicolas Roussel, Björn Eiderbäck, Sinna Lindquist, and Yngve Sundblad. 2003. Technology probes: Inspiring design for and with families. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1145/642611.642616
[22]
Kerina H. Jones. 2019. Incongruities and Dilemmas in Data Donation: Juggling Our 1s and 0s. Philosophical Studies Series 137 (2019), 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04363-6_5
[23]
Young Wook Jung, Youn Kyung Lim, and Myung Suk Kim. 2017. Possibilities and limitations of online document tools for design collaboration: The case of Google Docs. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, New York, USA, 1096–1108. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998297
[24]
Jenny Krutzinna and Luciano Floridi. 2019. Ethical Medical Data Donation: A Pressing Issue. Philosophical Studies Series 137 (2019), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04363-6_1
[25]
Jenny Krutzinna, Mariarosaria Taddeo, and Luciano Floridi. 2019. An Ethical Code for Posthumous Medical Data Donation. Philosophical Studies Series 137 (2019), 181–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04363-6_12
[26]
Richard Mortier, Hamed Haddadi, Tristan Henderson, Derek McAuley, and Jon Crowcroft. 2014. Human-Data Interaction: The Human Face of the Data-Driven Society. SSRN Electronic Journal 10 (2014), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2508051
[27]
Helen Nissembaum. 2004. Privacy as Contextual Integrity. Washington Law Review 79, 1 (2004), 101–139.
[28]
Barbara Prainsack. 2019. Data Donation: How to Resist the iLeviathan. Philosophical Studies Series 137 (2019), 9–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04363-6_2
[29]
Tony Salvador, Genevive Bell, and Ken Anderson. 2020. Design Ethnography. Research Methods for Interior Design 10, 617 (2020), 30–47. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429029325-3
[30]
Elizabeth Sanders. 2002. From user-centered to participatory design approaches. Design and the Social Sciences 04 (2002), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203301302.ch1
[31]
Anya Skatova and James Goulding. 2019. Psychology of personal data donation. PLoS ONE 14, 11 (2019), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224240
[32]
Anya Skatova, Kate Shiells, and Andy Boyd. 2019. Attitudes towards transactional data donation and linkage in a longitudinal population study: Evidence from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. Wellcome Open Research 4(2019), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15557.1
[33]
Chris Speed and Jon Oberlander. 2016. Designing from, with and by Data: Introducing the ablative framework. In Proceedings of DRS 2016 International Conference: Future–Focused Thinking. Design Research Society, Brighton, UK, 2991–3004.
[34]
Veronika Strotbaum, Monika Pobiruchin, Björn Schreiweis, Martin Wiesner, and Brigitte Strahwald. 2019. Your data is gold - Data donation for better healthcare?IT - Information Technology 61, 5-6 (2019), 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1515/itit-2019-0024
[35]
Niels Van Berkel, Denzil Ferreira, and Vassilis Kostakos. 2017. The experience sampling method on mobile devices. Comput. Surveys 50, 6 (2017), 40. https://doi.org/10.1145/3123988
[36]
Roberto Verganti, Luca Vendraminelli, and Marco Iansiti. 2020. Innovation and Design in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Product Innovation Management 37, 3 (2020), 212–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12523
[37]
John Wilbanks and Stephen H. Friend. 2016. First, design for data sharing. Nature Biotechnology 34, 4 (2016), 377–379. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3516
[38]
Peter Worthy, Ben Matthews, and Stephen Viller. 2016. Trust me: Doubts and concerns living with the internet of things. In DIS 2016 - Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Fuse. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 427–434. https://doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901890

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Sensitive Data Donation: A Feminist Reframing of Data Practices for Intimate Research ContextsProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661524(2420-2434)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Advocating Values through Meaningful Participation: Introducing a Method to Elicit and Analyze Values for Enriching Data Donation Practices in HealthcareProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36372938:CSCW1(1-32)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Best practices for studies using digital data donationQuality & Quantity10.1007/s11135-024-01983-xOnline publication date: 8-Oct-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
UbiComp/ISWC '21 Adjunct: Adjunct Proceedings of the 2021 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2021 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers
September 2021
711 pages
ISBN:9781450384612
DOI:10.1145/3460418
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 24 September 2021

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Data Donation
  2. Data-Centric Design;
  3. Personal Data

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

UbiComp '21

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 764 of 2,912 submissions, 26%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)235
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)20
Reflects downloads up to 16 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Sensitive Data Donation: A Feminist Reframing of Data Practices for Intimate Research ContextsProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661524(2420-2434)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Advocating Values through Meaningful Participation: Introducing a Method to Elicit and Analyze Values for Enriching Data Donation Practices in HealthcareProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36372938:CSCW1(1-32)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Best practices for studies using digital data donationQuality & Quantity10.1007/s11135-024-01983-xOnline publication date: 8-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Designing with Data, Data-Enabled and Data-Driven DesignHandbook of Human Computer Interaction10.1007/978-3-319-27648-9_40-1(1-32)Online publication date: 18-Apr-2024
  • (2023)Port: A software tool for digital data donationJournal of Open Source Software10.21105/joss.055968:90(5596)Online publication date: Oct-2023
  • (2022)Reconstructing Intimate Contexts through Data Donation: A Case Study in Menstrual Tracking TechnologiesNordic Human-Computer Interaction Conference10.1145/3546155.3546646(1-12)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2022

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Login options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media