Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Augmented Reality Applications to Support the Promotion of Cultural Heritage: The Case of the Basilica of Saint Catherine of Alexandria in Galatina

Published: 16 July 2021 Publication History

Abstract

The intent of this study is to promote and raise awareness of the Basilica of Saint Catherina of Alexandria in Galatina, a church endowed with such beauty as to be defined as astounding.
In this article two technologies were used: Spatial Augmented Reality, better known as videomapping, to valorize the monument and narrate its story through images and sounds; and Augmented Reality, to facilitate the reading and interpretation of the most important frescoes located along all the internal walls of the Basilica. The goal is to create a unique path starting from the Basilica façade and continuing and winding through the interior spaces. One of the most extensive and best conserved cycles of Late Gothic frescoes in all of Europe unfolds on the nave of the church covering every corner, from the keystones down to the floor.
An in-depth bibliographic research confirmed the presence of frescoes also on the exterior of the Basilica façade whose traces, however, are no longer visible today. Pietro Cavoti’ s illustrations give an idea of how the façade has changed over the years, before, during, and after the restorations that permanently removed the already faint traces of frescoes.
The purpose of this research is to demonstrate how the combined use of these technologies can be considered a valid aid to support the enhancement, fruition, and understanding of a monument that is very important for the cultural heritage sector and a reference point for the local and religious community.

References

[1]
February, 2021. I colori dell’Ara. Retrieved from http://www.arapacis.it/it/mostre_ed_eventi/eventi/i_colori_dell_ara.
[2]
February, 2021. Unity3D. Retrieved from https://unity3d.com/.
[3]
February, 2021. Vuforia. Retrieved from https://vuforia.com.
[4]
A. Antonaci. 1966. Gli Affreschi di Galatina. Luigi Maestri editore, Milano, MCMLXVI.
[5]
L. Argyriou, D. Economou, and V. Bouki. 2020. Design methodology for 360 immersive video applications: The case study of a cultural heritage virtual tour. Pers. Ubiq. Comput. 24, 6 (2020), 843–859.
[6]
A. Assila, K. M. De Oliveira, and H. Ezzedine. 2016. Standardized usability questionnaires: Features and quality focus. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol.6 (2016).
[7]
R. T. Azuma. 1997. A survey of augmented reality. Pres.: Teleop. Virt. Environ. 6, 4 (08 1997), 355–385.
[8]
M. K. Bekele, R. Pierdicca, E. Frontoni, E. S. Malinverni, and J. Gain. 2018. A survey of augmented, virtual, and mixed reality for cultural heritage. J. Comput. Cult. Herit. 11, 2 (Mar. 2018).
[9]
O. Bimber and R. Raskar. 2005. Spatial Augmented Reality: Merging Real and Virtual Worlds. A. K. Peters/CRC Press.
[10]
P. G. Blasi. 1934. Galatina e la sua Gemma (Cenni Storici). Galatina, ED. Marra Eugenio.
[11]
C. Bolognesi and D. Aiello. 2019. The secrets of S. Maria Delle Grazie: Virtual fruition of an iconic Milanese architecture. Int. Arch. Photogram., Rem. Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. XLII-2/W15 (2019), 185–192.
[12]
E. Bonacini. 2014. La realtá aumentata e le app culturali in Italia: storie da un matrimonio in mobilitá/Augmented reality and cultural apps in Italy: Stories on a marriage in mobility. Il Capitale Culturale. Stud. Value Cult. Herit. 0, 9 (Jan. 2014), 89–121.
[13]
E. Bonacini. 2020. I Musei e le Forme dello Storytelling Digitale. Ed. Aracne.
[14]
M. C. Botrugno, G. D’Errico, and L. T. De Paolis. 2017. Augmented reality and UAVs in archaeology: Development of a location-based AR application. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS 10325). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 261–270.
[15]
J. Brooke. 1996. SUS—A Quick and Dirty Usability Scale. 1st Edition. CRC Press. (2016).
[16]
G. Bruno. 2012. Atlante delle Emozioni. In Viaggio tra Arte, Architettura e Cinema. Mondadori Bruno.
[17]
R. Casciaro. 2019. La Basilica di Santa Caterina d’Alessandria in Galatina. Mario Congedo Editore, Galatina.
[18]
F. Casotti. 1865. Scritti Inediti e Rari di Diversi Autori Trovati Nella Provincia di Otranto. Napoli.
[19]
J. Čejka, A. Zsíros, and F. Liarokapis. 2020. A hybrid augmented reality guide for underwater cultural heritage sites. Pers. Ubiq. Comput. 24, 6 (2020), 815–828.
[20]
D. Cisternino, C. Gatto, and L. T. De Paolis. 2018. Augmented reality for the enhancement of Apulian archaeological areas. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS 10850). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 370–382.
[21]
D. Cisternino, C. Gatto, G. D’Errico, V. De Luca, M. C. Barba, G. I. Paladini, and L. T. De Paolis. 2019. Virtual portals for a smart fruition of historical and archaeological contexts. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS 11614). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 264–273.
[22]
Bonaventura da Lama. 1724. Cronaca dei Minori Osservanti Riformati della Provincia di S. Nicolò. Vol. II. Lecce.
[23]
F. D. Davis. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart. 13, 3 (Sept. 1989), 319–340.
[24]
C. De Giorgi, N. Petrucciani, and M. Paone. 1975. La Provincia di Lecce: Bozzetti di Viaggio. Rist. anastatica.—Galatina: Congedo - 2 v.: ill.; 25 cm. (Rist. facs. dell’ed.: Lecce; G. Spacciante, 1882–1888).
[25]
L. T. De Paolis. 2013. Walking in a virtual town to understand and learning about the life in the middle ages. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS 7971). Springer, Berlin, 632–645.
[26]
L. T. De Paolis, G. Aloisio, M. G. Celentano, L. Oliva, and P. Vecchio. 2010. A game-based 3D simulation of Otranto in the Middle Ages. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Advances in Computer-human Interactions (ACHI’10). 130–133.
[27]
L. T. De Paolis, G. Aloisio, M. G. Celentano, L. Oliva, and P. Vecchio. 2011. MediaEvo project: A serious game for the edutainment. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Computer Research and Development, Vol. 4. 524–529.
[28]
L. T. De Paolis, V. De Luca, and G. D’Errico. 2018. Augmented reality to understand the Leonardo’s machines. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS 10850). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 320–331.
[29]
Jean Diestro Mandros, Roberto Garcia Mercado, and Sussy Bayona-Oré. 2021. Virtual reality and tourism: Visiting Machu Picchu. In New Perspectives in Software Engineering, Jezreel Mejia, Mirna Muñoz, Álvaro Rocha, and Yadira Quiñonez (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 269–279.
[30]
L. Efrat. 2020. REALational perspectives: Strategies for expanding beyond the here and now in mobile augmented reality (AR) art. Leonardo 53, 4 (2020), 374–379.
[31]
P. M. Faria, S. Cardoso, and R. Morais. 2019. Architecture for video mapping development: The method and the application in NMSPCAM. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Graphics and Interaction. 72–79.
[32]
D. Ferdani, B. Fanini, M. C. Piccioli, F. Carboni, and P. Vigliarolo. 2020. 3D reconstruction and validation of historical background for immersive VR applications and games: The case study of the Forum of Augustus in Rome. J. Cult. Herit. 43 (2020), 129–143.
[33]
K. Finstad. 2010. The usability metric for user experience. Interact. Comput. 22, 5 (Sept. 2010), 323–327.
[34]
Y. Georgiou and E. A. Kyza. 2017. The development and validation of the ARI questionnaire: An instrument for measuring immersion in location-based augmented reality settings. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 98 (2017), 24–37.
[35]
Marc Hassenzahl. 2001. The effect of perceived hedonic quality on product appealingness. Int. J. Hum.-comput. Interact. 13, 4 (2001), 481–499.
[36]
International Organization for Standardization. 2019. ISO 9241-210: Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems. Edition 2.
[37]
C. Lallemand and V. Koenig. 2020. Measuring the contextual dimension of user experience: Development of the user experience context scale (UXCS). In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. New York, NY.
[38]
B. Laugwitz, T. Held, and M. Schrepp. 2008. Construction and evaluation of a user experience questionnaire. In HCI and Usability for Education and Work, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Andreas Holzinger (Ed.), Vol. 5298. Springer, Berlin, 63–76.
[39]
M. F. Leitner. 2017. La Ricostruzione Virtuale dei Buddha di Bamiyan. Lo Sbuffo.
[40]
J. R. Lewis. 2018. Measuring perceived usability: The CSUQ, SUS, and UMUX. Int. J. Hum.-comput. Interact. 34, 12 (Dec. 2018), 1148–1156.
[41]
J. R. Lewis and J. Sauro. 2009. The factor structure of the system usability scale. In Human Centered Design, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Masaaki Kurosu (Ed.). Springer, Berlin, 94–103.
[42]
M. Limoncelli, L. Schepis, C. Germinario, and G. Metcalf. 2017. Virtual Restoration 1. Paintings and Mosaics. L’Erma di Bretschneider (2017).
[43]
A. C. H. Lin, W. D. Fernandez, and S. Gregor. 2012. Understanding web enjoyment experiences and informal learning: A study in a museum context. Decis. Supp. Syst. 53, 4 (2012), 846–858.
[44]
E. Litvak and T. Kuflik. 2020. Enhancing cultural heritage outdoor experience with augmented-reality smart glasses. Pers. Ubiq. Comput. 24, 6 (2020), 873–886.
[45]
A. Luigini, M. Parricchi, A. Basso, and D. Basso. 2019. Immersive and participatory serious games for heritage education, applied to the cultural heritage of South Tyrol. Interact. Des. Archit.43 (2019), 42–67.
[46]
M. Mandolfo, M. Pavlovic, M. Pillan, and L. Lamberti. 2020. Ambient UX research: User experience investigation through multimodal quadrangulation. In Distributed, Ambient and Pervasive Interactions, Norbert Streitz and Shin’ichi Konomi (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 305–321.
[47]
D. Maniello. 2015. Augmented Reality in Public Spaces. Basic Techniques for Video Mapping. Vol. I. Le Penseur.
[48]
D. Maniello. 2016. Michelangelo’s David: An augmented reality application on real scale, using the technique of video mapping. In Lights On... Cultural Heritage and Museums!, P.M. Homem (Ed.). Faculdade de Letras da Universidade do Porto.
[49]
D. Maniello. 2019. Advanced Video Mapping Techniques. Spatial Augmented Reality Applied to Cultural Heritage. Vol. II. Le Penseur.
[50]
D. Maniello. 2019. Augmented cityscape: The GLOWFestival case as valuator of the territory cultural heritage. In Proceedings of the 1st International and Interdisciplinary Conference on Digital Environments for Education, Arts and Heritage, Alessandro Luigini (Ed.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 374–383.
[51]
A. Marto, A. Goncalves, and M. Bessa. 2019. SensiMAR—Designing a multisensory AR system. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Graphics and Interaction. 9–16.
[52]
A. Marto, M. Melo, A. Gonçalves, and M. Bessa. 2021. Development and evaluation of an outdoor multisensory AR system for cultural heritage. IEEE Access 9 (2021), 16419–16434.
[53]
P. Milgram, H. Takemura, and F. Kishino. 1995. Augmented reality: A class of displays on the reality-virtuality continuum. In Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies, Hari Das (Ed.), Vol. 2351. International Society for Optics and Photonics, SPIE, 282–292.
[54]
M. Montagud, P. Orero, and A. Matamala. 2020. Culture 4 all: Accessibility-enabled cultural experiences through immersive VR360 content. Pers. Ubiq. Comput. 24, 6 (2020), 887–905.
[55]
M. Montinari. 1972. Storia di Galatina. Ed. Salentina.
[56]
M. Montinari, M. Montinari, A. De Blasi, and M. Montinari. 1998. Galatina Illustrata. Ed. Panico.
[57]
K. Moustafa, S. Luz, and L. Longo. 2017. Assessment of mental workload: A comparison of machine learning methods and subjective assessment techniques. In Human Mental Workload: Models and Applications, Communications in Computer and Information Science, L. Longo and M. C. Leva (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 30–50.
[58]
W. T. Nakamura, E. H. T. De Oliveira, and T. Conte. 2017. Usability and user experience evaluation of learning management systems a systematic mapping study. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems.
[59]
National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 2010. NASA TLX: Task load index. Planta Med. 35, 4 (2010), 308–315.
[60]
S. Ortese. 2014. Pittura Tardogotica nel Salento con un Saggio di Antonella Cucciniello. Ed. Mario Congedo.
[61]
C. Pirrera. 2016. Roma e l’Antichità. Riaperta la Basilica di Santa Maria Antiqua. Artribune.
[62]
R. Quattrini, R. Pierdicca, E. Frontoni, and P. Clini. 2015. Mobile e realtà aumentata al Palazzo Ducale di Urbino: Il Museo è digitale. Archeomatica 6, 1 (Jan. 2015).
[63]
R. Quattrini, R. Pierdicca, A. Lucidi, F. Di Stefano, and E. S. Malinverni. 2019. The European research night: New ways for communicating science with ICT and videomapping. In ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. Copernicus Publications, 647–654.
[64]
R. Raskar, G. Welch, and H. Fuchs. 1998. Spatially augmented reality. Methods (Nov. 1998), 63–72.
[65]
F. Russo. 2005. La Parola si fa Immagine. Storia e Restauro della Basilica di S. Caterina a Galatina. Marsilio.
[66]
A. Seffah, M. Donyaee, R. B. Kline, and H. K. Padda. 2006. Usability measurement and metrics: A consolidated model. Softw. Qual. J. 14, 2 (June 2006), 159–178.
[67]
L. Solima. 2018. Management per l’Impresa Culturale. Carocci.
[68]
S. Sylaiou, V. Kasapakis, D. Gavalas, and E. Dzardanova. 2020. Avatars as storytellers: Affective narratives in virtual museums. Pers. Ubiq. Comput. 24, 6 (2020), 829–841.
[69]
S. Vosinakis and P. Koutsabasis. 2018. Evaluation of visual feedback techniques for virtual grasping with bare hands using Leap Motion and Oculus Rift. Virt. Real. 22, 1 (Mar. 2018), 47–62.
[70]
I. Vrellis, M. Delimitros, P. Chalki, P. Gaintatzis, I. Bellou, and T. A. Mikropoulos. 2020. Seeing the unseen: User experience and technology acceptance in Augmented Reality science literacy. In Proceedings of the IEEE 20th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT’20). 333–337.
[71]
L. Wadding. 1932. Annales Minorum, Ad Claras Aquas (Quaracchi), ad annum 1383. (cfr. F. Gonzaga, De origine Seraphicae Religionis Franciscanae, Romae 1587).
[72]
A. C. Zay Hta and Y. Lee. 2020. Interactive spatial augmented reality book on cultural heritage of Myanmar. J. Inf. Commun. Converg. Eng. 18, 2 (06 2020), 69–74.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Augmented Reality and Wearable Technology for Cultural Heritage PreservationSustainability10.3390/su1610400716:10(4007)Online publication date: 10-May-2024
  • (2024)Exploring Cultural Preservation and Innovation: Augmented Reality Packaging Prototyping for the Mah Meri Tribe in Malaysia2024 Pacific Neighborhood Consortium Annual Conference and Joint Meetings (PNC)10.23919/PNC63053.2024.10697377(33-38)Online publication date: 29-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Role of Chatbots in Cultural Heritage Tourism: An Empirical Study on Ancient Forts and PalacesJournal of Heritage Management10.1177/245592962412539329:1(9-28)Online publication date: 5-Jun-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Augmented Reality Applications to Support the Promotion of Cultural Heritage: The Case of the Basilica of Saint Catherine of Alexandria in Galatina

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage
      Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage   Volume 14, Issue 4
      December 2021
      328 pages
      ISSN:1556-4673
      EISSN:1556-4711
      DOI:10.1145/3476246
      Issue’s Table of Contents
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 16 July 2021
      Accepted: 01 April 2021
      Revised: 01 February 2021
      Received: 01 September 2020
      Published in JOCCH Volume 14, Issue 4

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Augmented heritage
      2. augmented reality
      3. spatial augmented reality

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)217
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)11
      Reflects downloads up to 16 Oct 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Augmented Reality and Wearable Technology for Cultural Heritage PreservationSustainability10.3390/su1610400716:10(4007)Online publication date: 10-May-2024
      • (2024)Exploring Cultural Preservation and Innovation: Augmented Reality Packaging Prototyping for the Mah Meri Tribe in Malaysia2024 Pacific Neighborhood Consortium Annual Conference and Joint Meetings (PNC)10.23919/PNC63053.2024.10697377(33-38)Online publication date: 29-Aug-2024
      • (2024)Role of Chatbots in Cultural Heritage Tourism: An Empirical Study on Ancient Forts and PalacesJournal of Heritage Management10.1177/245592962412539329:1(9-28)Online publication date: 5-Jun-2024
      • (2024)The Ethics of Mixed Reality GamesGames: Research and Practice10.1145/36758062:3(1-26)Online publication date: 30-Aug-2024
      • (2024)Sacred Spaces in the Digital Age: Perceptions of Lutheran Christian Priests on Augmented Reality at Holy SitesProceedings of the 2024 ACM International Conference on Interactive Media Experiences10.1145/3639701.3656326(256-267)Online publication date: 7-Jun-2024
      • (2024)Still Not a Lot of Research? Re-Examining HCI Research on Religion and SpiritualityExtended Abstracts of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3651058(1-15)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
      • (2024)An augmented reality approach for communicating intangible and architectural heritage through digital characters and scale modelsPersonal and Ubiquitous Computing10.1007/s00779-024-01792-x28:3-4(471-490)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2024
      • (2023)Location-Based Augmented Reality for Cultural Heritage Communication and Education: The Doltso District ApplicationSensors10.3390/s2310496323:10(4963)Online publication date: 22-May-2023
      • (2023)Evaluating Learning Outcomes of Virtual Reality Applications in Education: A Proposal for Digital Cultural HeritageJournal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 10.1145/359343216:2(1-25)Online publication date: 24-Jun-2023
      • (2023)Digital Restoration of Cultural Heritage With Data-Driven Computing: A SurveyIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2023.328063911(53939-53977)Online publication date: 2023
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      Full Access

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format.

      HTML Format

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media