research-article

Problematising Transparency Through LARP And Deliberation

Authors:

Kruakae Pothong,

Larissa Pschetz,

Sarah MeiklejohnAuthors Info & Claims

DIS '21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference

Pages 1682 - 1694

https://doi.org/10.1145/3461778.3462120

Published: 28 June 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Information technology is increasingly designed to increase information transparency as a way to increase trust. However, it can be hard to comprehend and anticipate the social implications of information visibility, people’s competing expectations of transparency versus privacy, and the role of enabling technologies. We devised Live Action Role Play (LARP) as a means for people to explore the potential and consequences of transparency, within a social context of daily transactions related to food, fashion, and finance. Through the process of deliberation, we enabled participants to critically assess their co-created LARP experience and articulate their transparency expectations for design considerations. We report on insights into their expectations and perceived limitations of information technology in delivering transparency, including social measures required to realise the full potential of technology, as well as transparency, while minimising unintended consequences.

References

[1]

Sarah Allen, Srdjan Capkun, Ittay Eyal, Giulia Fanti, Bryan Ford, James Grimmelmann, Ari Juels, Kari Kostiainen, Sarah Meiklejohn, Andrew Miller, Eswar Prasad, Karl Wüst, and Fan Zhang. 2020. Design choices for Central Bank Digital Currency: Policy and technical considerations. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Design-Choices-for-CBDC_Final-for-web.pdf

[2]

Gustavo Almeida, Kate Revoredo, Claudia Cappelli, and Cristiano Maciel. 2018. Improvement of transparency through mining techniques for reclassification of texts: the case of brazilian transparency portal. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data Age(dg.o ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209281.3209332

Digital Library

[3]

Imran Amed, Anita Balchandani, Marco Beltrami, Achim Berg, Saskia Hedrich, and Felix Rölkens. 2019. What radical transparency could mean for the fashion industry. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/retail/our-insights/what-radical-transparency-could-mean-for-the-fashion-industry

[4]

John Carlo Bertot, Paul T. Jaeger, and Justin M. Grimes. 2010. Crowd-sourcing transparency: ICTs, social media, and government transparency initiatives. In Proceedings of the 11th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference on Public Administration Online: Challenges and Opportunities(dg.o ’10). Digital Government Society of North America, Puebla, Mexico, 51–58.

[5]

Mark Blythe. 2017. Research Fiction: Storytelling, Plot and Design. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, Denver, Colorado, USA, 5400–5411. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3026023

Digital Library

[6]

Rainer Böhme, Nicolas Christin, Benjamin Edelman, and Tyler Moore. 2015. Bitcoin: Economics, Technology, and Governance. Journal of Economic Perspectives 29, 2 (2015), 213–238.

[7]

J. Bryant. 2007. Drama theory: dispelling the myths. Journal of the Operational Research Society 58, 5 (May 2007), 602–613. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602239

[8]

James W. Bryant and John Darwin. 2003. Immersive drama: testing health systems. Omega 31, 2 (2003), 127–136. https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v31y2003i2p127-136.html

[9]

Stephen Coleman and John Gøtze. 2001. Bowling Together. Online Public Engagement in Policy Deliberation. Vol. 7. Hansard Society, London. https://www.medra.org/servlet/aliasResolver?alias=iospress&doi=10.3233/IP-2002-0021

[10]

Stephen Coleman, Kruakae Pothong, and Sarah Weston. 2018. Dramatizing Deliberation: A Method for Encouraging Young People to Think About Their Rights. Journal of Public Deliberation 14, 1 (June 2018). https://www.publicdeliberation.net/jpd/vol14/iss1/art2

[11]

Henriette Cramer, Vanessa Evers, Satyan Ramlal, Maarten van Someren, Lloyd Rutledge, Natalia Stash, Lora Aroyo, and Bob Wielinga. 2008. The effects of transparency on trust in and acceptance of a content-based art recommender. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 18, 5 (Aug. 2008), 455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-008-9051-3

Digital Library

[12]

Anne M. Cronin. 2018. Public Relations Capitalism: Promotional Culture, Publics and Commercial Democracy. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72637-3

[13]

Dylan Curran. 2018. Are you ready? This is all the data Facebook and Google have on you. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/mar/28/all-the-data-facebook-google-has-on-you-privacy

[14]

Ella Dagan, Elena Márquez Segura, Ferran Altarriba Bertran, Miguel Flores, and Katherine Isbister. 2019. Designing ’True Colors’: A Social Wearable that Affords Vulnerability. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, Glasgow, Scotland Uk, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300263

Digital Library

[15]

Anca Dobrean and Costina-Ruxandra Păsărelu. 2016. Impact of Social Media on Social Anxiety: A Systematic Review. In New Developments in Anxiety Disorders, Federico Durbano and Barbara Marchesi (Eds.). BoD: Books on Demand. Google-Books-ID: pTCRDwAAQBAJ.

[16]

John S. Dryzek. 2009. Democratization as Deliberative Capacity Building. Comparative Political Studies 42, 11 (Nov. 2009), 1379–1402. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414009332129 Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc.

[17]

Lilian Edwards. 2016. Privacy, Security and Data Protection in Smart Cities: A Critical EU Law Perspective. European Data Protection Law Review (EDPL) 2 (2016), 28–58.

[18]

Lilian Edwards and Michael Veale. 2018. Enslaving the Algorithm: From a ‘Right to an Explanation’ to a ‘Right to Better Decisions’?(2018). https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3052831

[19]

Chris Elsden, Arthi Manohar, Jo Briggs, Mike Harding, Chris Speed, and John Vines. 2018. Making Sense of Blockchain Applications: A Typology for HCI. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, Montreal QC, Canada, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174032

Digital Library

[20]

Motahhare Eslami, Sneha R. Krishna Kumaran, Christian Sandvig, and Karrie Karahalios. 2018. Communicating Algorithmic Process in Online Behavioral Advertising. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, Montreal QC, Canada, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174006

Digital Library

[21]

Heike Felzmann, Eduard Fosch Villaronga, Christoph Lutz, and Aurelia Tamò-Larrieux. 2019. Transparency you can trust: Transparency requirements for artificial intelligence between legal norms and contextual concerns. Big Data & Society 6, 1 (Jan. 2019), 2053951719860542. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719860542 Publisher: SAGE Publications Ltd.

[22]

Xianyi Gao, Gradeigh D. Clark, and Janne Lindqvist. 2016. Of Two Minds, Multiple Addresses, and One Ledger: Characterizing Opinions, Knowledge, and Perceptions of Bitcoin Across Users and Non-Users. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, San Jose, California, USA, 1656–1668. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858049

Digital Library

[23]

Jennifer Golbeck. 2019. Dogs Good, Trump Bad: The Impact of Social Media Content on Sense of Well-Being. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Web Science(WebSci ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, 125–129. https://doi.org/10.1145/3292522.3326009

Digital Library

[24]

Jamie Harper. 2019. Meaningful play: applying game and play design practices to promote agency in participatory performance. International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media 15, 3 (Sept. 2019), 360–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794713.2019.1633148 Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/14794713.2019.1633148.

[25]

J. Tuomas Harviainen, Rafaek Buebua, Simon Brind, Michael Hitchens, Yaraslau I. Kot, Esther MacCallum-Stewart, David W. Simkins, Jaakko Stenros, and Ian Sturrock. 2018. Live-Action Role-Playing Games. In Role-Playing Game Studies: Transmedia Foundations, Sebastian Deterding and José Zagal (Eds.). Routledge. Google-Books-ID: ix9WDwAAQBAJ.

[26]

Florian Hawlitschek, Benedikt Notheisen, and Timm Teubner. 2018. The limits of trust-free systems: A literature review on blockchain technology and trust in the sharing economy. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 29 (May 2018), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2018.03.005

[27]

Dorothy Heathcote. 1970. How does drama serve thinking, talking, and writing?Elementary English 47, 8 (1970), 1077–1081.

[28]

Jonathan L. Herlocker, Joseph A. Konstan, and John Riedl. 2000. Explaining collaborative filtering recommendations. In Proceedings of the 2000 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work(CSCW ’00). Association for Computing Machinery, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, 241–250. https://doi.org/10.1145/358916.358995

Digital Library

[29]

Hannu Jaakkola, Timo Mäkinen, and Anna Eteläaho. 2014. Open data: opportunities and challenges. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies(CompSysTech ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1145/2659532.2659594

Digital Library

[30]

Karim Jabbar and Pernille Bjørn. 2017. Growing the Blockchain Information Infrastructure. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, Denver, Colorado, USA, 6487–6498. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025959

Digital Library

[31]

Hilary Johnson and Peter Johnson. 1993. Explaination Facilities and Interactive Systems. In Proceedings of Intelligent User Interfaces ’93. 159 – 166. https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/169891.169951?casa_token=r5ejTLrd2dsAAAAA:flrnhgEoNngYBQ0VJrORKORDcVxcd4JtfpWHgHuu9vOatev3M0YHuQFhix8HxM0psPqKY90lJNyGVw

Digital Library

[32]

Staffan Jonsson, Markus Montola, Annika Waern, and Martin Ericsson. 2006. Prosopopeia: experiences from a pervasive Larp. In Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGCHI international conference on Advances in computer entertainment technology(ACE ’06). Association for Computing Machinery, Hollywood, California, USA, 23–es. https://doi.org/10.1145/1178823.1178850

Digital Library

[33]

Jesper Juul. 2005. Half-Real: Video Games between Real Rules and Fictional Worlds. MIT Press.

Digital Library

[34]

Paul Kariuki, Jude A. Adeleke, and Lizzy Oluwatoyin Ofusori. 2020. The role of open data in enabling fiscal transparency and accountability in municipalities in Africa: South Africa and Nigeria case studies. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance(ICEGOV 2020). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 410–418. https://doi.org/10.1145/3428502.3428558

Digital Library

[35]

Jofish Kaye, Janet Vertesi, Jennifer Ferreira, Barry Brown, and Mark Perry. 2014. #CHImoney: financial interactions, digital cash, capital exchange and mobile money. In Proceedings of the extended abstracts of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI EA ’14. ACM Press, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 111–114. https://doi.org/10.1145/2559206.2559221

Digital Library

[36]

Rob Kitchin. 2014. The Data Revolution: Big Data, Open Data, Data Infrastructures and Their Consequences. SAGE.

[37]

Jürgen Koenemann and Nicholas J. Belkin. 1996. A Case for Interaction: A Study of Interactive Information Retrieval Behavior and Effectiveness. In Proceedings of the Human Factors in Computing Systems Conference. ACM Press, NY. https://dl.acm.org/doi/fullHtml/10.1145/238386.238487?casa_token=dhlOF8y9P6cAAAAA:maNYeJHp16-nn049V0HhMGkBsns1TuqJ4VPQtvH4pBzo9flSmha9hxI3V5v5D_6olZf88wlbn7kAQA

Digital Library

[38]

Yong Ming Kow and Xianghua Ding. 2016. ”Hey, I know what this is!”: Cultural Affinities and Early Stage Appropriation of the Emerging Bitcoin Technology. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Supporting Group Work(GROUP ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, Sanibel Island, Florida, USA, 213–221. https://doi.org/10.1145/2957276.2957279

Digital Library

[39]

Todd Kulesza, Simone Stumpf, Margaret Burnett, Sherry Yang, Irwin Kwan, and Weng-Keen Wong. 2013. Too much, too little, or just right? Ways explanations impact end users’ mental models. In 2013 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human Centric Computing. 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/VLHCC.2013.6645235 ISSN: 1943-6106.

[40]

Christopher Kuner, Dan Jerker B. Svantesson, Fred H. Cate, Orla Lynskey, and Christopher Millard. 2017. Machine learning with personal data: is data protection law smart enough to meet the challenge?International Data Privacy Law 7, 1 (Feb. 2017), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipx003

[41]

Bruno Latour. 1990. Technology is Society Made Durable. The Sociological Review 38, 1_suppl (May 1990), 103–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1990.tb03350.x Publisher: SAGE Publications Ltd.

[42]

Yuanchun Li, Fanglin Chen, Toby Jia-Jun Li, Yao Guo, Gang Huang, Matthew Fredrikson, Yuvraj Agarwal, and Jason I. Hong. 2017. PrivacyStreams: Enabling Transparency in Personal Data Processing for Mobile Apps. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 1, 3 (Sept. 2017), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3130941

Digital Library

[43]

Joseph Lindley. 2015. Crypto Heater: A Design Fiction. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition(C&C ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, Glasgow, United Kingdom, 355–356. https://doi.org/10.1145/2757226.2757367

Digital Library

[44]

Conor Linehan, Ben J. Kirman, Stuart Reeves, Mark A. Blythe, Joshua G. Tanenbaum, Audrey Desjardins, and Ron Wakkary. 2014. Alternate endings: using fiction to explore design futures. In Proceedings of the extended abstracts of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI EA ’14. ACM Press, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 45–48. https://doi.org/10.1145/2559206.2560472

Digital Library

[45]

James Mansbridge, James Bohman, Simone Chambers, Thomas Christiano, Archon Fung, John Parkinson, Dennis F. Thompson, and Mark E. Warren. 2012. A systemic approach to deliberative democracy. In Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale, John Parkinson and Jane Mansbridge (Eds.). Cambridge University Press. Google-Books-ID: uIUhAwAAQBAJ.

[46]

Elena Márquez Segura, James Fey, Ella Dagan, Samvid Niravbhai Jhaveri, Jared Pettitt, Miguel Flores, and Katherine Isbister. 2018. Designing Future Social Wearables with Live Action Role Play (Larp) Designers. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, Montreal QC, Canada, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174036

Digital Library

[47]

Elena Márquez Segura, Annika Waern, Luis Márquez Segura, and David López Recio. 2016. Playification: The PhySeEar case. In Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play(CHI PLAY ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, Austin, Texas, USA, 376–388. https://doi.org/10.1145/2967934.2968099

Digital Library

[48]

Ricardo Matheus, Manuella M. Ribeiro, José Carlos Vaz, and Cesar A. de Souza. 2010. Using internet to promote the transparency and fight corruption: Latin American transparency portals. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance(ICEGOV ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 391–392. https://doi.org/10.1145/1930321.1930411

Digital Library

[49]

Deborah Maxwell, Chris Speed, and Dug Campbell. 2015. ’Effing’ the ineffable: opening up understandings of the blockchain. In Proceedings of the 2015 British HCI Conference(British HCI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, Lincoln, Lincolnshire, United Kingdom, 208–209. https://doi.org/10.1145/2783446.2783593

Digital Library

[50]

Deborah Maxwell, Chris Speed, and Larissa Pschetz. 2017. Story Blocks: Reimagining narrative through the blockchain. Convergence 23, 1 (Feb. 2017), 79–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856516675263 Publisher: SAGE Publications Ltd.

[51]

Robert R. McCrae and Oliver P. John. 1992. An Introduction to the Five-Factor Model and Its Applications. Journal of Personality 60, 2 (1992), 175–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00970.x

[52]

Jan Niklas Meise, Thomas Rudolph, Peter Kenning, and Diane M. Phillips. 2014. Feed them facts: Value perceptions and consumer use of sustainability-related product information. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 21, 4 (July 2014), 510–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2014.03.013

[53]

Satoshi Nakamoto. 2008. Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf.

[54]

Helen Nicholson. 2014. Applied drama: The gift of theatre. Macmillan International Higher Education.

[55]

Bettina Nissen, Larissa Pschetz, Dave Murray-Rust, Hadi Mehrpouya, Shaune Oosthuizen, and Chris Speed. 2018. GeoCoin: Supporting Ideation and Collaborative Design with Smart Contracts. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, Montreal QC, Canada, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173737

Digital Library

[56]

Svein Ølnes, Jolien Ubacht, and Marijn Janssen. 2017. Blockchain in government: Benefits and implications of distributed ledger technology for information sharing. Government Information Quarterly 34, 3 (Sept. 2017), 355–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.09.007

[57]

Kruakae Pothong. 2020. Youth Jury Policy Deliberation: Towards a Fair and Responsible Internet - Pothong - 2020 - Children & Society - Wiley Online Library. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/chso.12359

[58]

Larissa Pschetz, Billy Dixon, Kruakae Pothong, Arlene Bailey, Allister Glean, Luis Lourenço Soares, and Jessica A. Enright. 2020. Designing Distributed Ledger Technologies for Social Change: The Case of CariCrop. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, Honolulu, HI, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376364

Digital Library

[59]

Larissa Pschetz, Kruakae Pothong, and Chris Speed. 2019. Autonomous Distributed Energy Systems. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Glasgow, Scotland, UK, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300617

Digital Library

[60]

Larissa Pschetz, Ella Tallyn, Rory Gianni, and Chris Speed. 2017. Bitbarista: Exploring Perceptions of Data Transactions in the Internet of Things. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’17. ACM Press, Denver, Colorado, USA, 2964–2975. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025878

Digital Library

[61]

John N. Reynolds and Edmund Newell. 2011. Ethics in Investment Banking. Palgrave Macmillan.

[62]

Dominik Roeck, Henrik Sternberg, and Erik Hofmann. 2019. Distributed ledger technology in supply chains: a transaction cost perspective. International Journal of Production Research 0, 0 (Aug. 2019), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1657247

[63]

Sara Saberi, Mahtab Kouhizadeh, Joseph Sarkis, and Lejia Shen. 2019. Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research 57, 7 (April 2019), 2117–2135. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1533261 Publisher: Taylor & Francis _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1533261.

[64]

Corina Sas and Irni Eliana Khairuddin. 2015. Exploring Trust in Bitcoin Technology: A Framework for HCI Research. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer Human Interaction(OzCHI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, Parkville, VIC, Australia, 338–342. https://doi.org/10.1145/2838739.2838821

Digital Library

[65]

Corina Sas and Irni Eliana Khairuddin. 2017. Design for Trust: An Exploration of the Challenges and Opportunities of Bitcoin Users. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, Denver, Colorado, USA, 6499–6510. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025886

Digital Library

[66]

David Simkins. 2015. The Arts of LARP: Design, Literacy, Learning and Community in Live-Action Role Play.

[67]

Rashmi Sinha and Kirsten Swearingen. 2002. The role of transparency in recommender systems. In CHI ’02 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’02). Association for Computing Machinery, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, 830–831. https://doi.org/10.1145/506443.506619

Digital Library

[68]

Rebecca Smithers. 2020. Quorn to be first major brand to introduce carbon labelling. https://amp.theguardian.com/environment/2020/jan/09/quorn-to-be-first-major-brand-to-introduce-carbon-labelling

[69]

Jaakko Stenros and Markus Montola (Eds.). 2010. Nordic LARP (1st print ed.). Fea Livia, Stockholm.

[70]

Jaakko Stenros and Markus Montola. 2011. The Making of Nordic Larp: Documenting a Tradition of Ephemeral Co-Creative Play. (2011), 17.

[71]

Lee Taber and Steve Whittaker. 2018. Personality Depends on The Medium: Differences in Self-Perception on Snapchat, Facebook and Offline. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, Montreal QC, Canada, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174181

Digital Library

[72]

Matteo Turilli and Luciano Floridi. 2009. The ethics of information transparency. Ethics and Information Technology 11, 2 (June 2009), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-009-9187-9

[73]

Loïs Vanhée, Elena Márquez Segura, and Katherine Isbister. 2018. Firefly: A social wearable to support physical connection of larpers. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–4.

Digital Library

[74]

J. Patrick Williams, David Kirschner, Nicholas Mizer, Sebastian Deterding, David Kirschner, Nicholas Mizer, and Sebastian Deterding. 2018. Sociology and Role-Playing Games. In Role-Playing Game Studies: Transmedia Foundations, José P. Zagal and Sebastian Deterding (Eds.). Routledge, 227–244. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315637532-12 Publisher: Routledge.

[75]

Robert H. Wortham and Andreas Theodorou. 2017. Robot transparency, trust and utility. Connection Science 29, 3 (July 2017), 242–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540091.2017.1313816 Publisher: Taylor & Francis _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/09540091.2017.1313816.

Digital Library

[76]

Danny Yang, Jack Gavigan, Zooko Wilcox-O’Hearn, and R3 Research. 2016. Survey of Confidentiality and Privacy Preserving Technologies for Blockchains. https://z.cash/wp-content/uploads/static-og/static/R3_Confidentiality_and_Privacy_Report.pdf

Cited By

Johansson KRobinson RBack JBowman SFey JMárquez Segura EWaern AIsbister K(2024)Why Larp? A Synthesis Article on Live Action Roleplay in Relation to HCI Research and PracticeACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/368904531:5(1-35)Online publication date: 2-Sep-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3689045
Samani HLalioti VSerbanescu DChicau JPolydorou DRodosthenous GKnowlson ABakalos YNeale MIndurkhya B(2024)Creative Robotics Theatre: Designing Creative Interactions with Tangible and Embodied InterfacesCompanion Publication of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3656156.3658387(389-391)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3656156.3658387
Light AHouston LCatlow R(2024)Intimate TranslationsDesigning More-than-Human Smart Cities10.1093/9780191980060.003.0016(289-304)Online publication date: 3-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.1093/9780191980060.003.0016
Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Transparency and Accountability After 2015: e-Parliament for Citizens' Engagement in the Ghanaian Environment
ICEGOV '15-16: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance

Beyond providing information, Information and Communication Technology (ICT) really contributes to citizens' participation to public debate. With the use of ICT, Civil societies have played a big role especially in the areas of training, research, ...
Rethinking Transparency as a Communicative Constellation
FAccT '23: Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency

In this paper we make the case for an expanded understanding of transparency. Within the now extensive FAccT literature, transparency has largely been understood in terms of explainability. While this approach has proven helpful in many contexts, it ...
Varieties of transparency: exploring agency within AI systems
Abstract
AI systems play an increasingly important role in shaping and regulating the lives of millions of human beings across the world. Calls for greater transparency from such systems have been widespread. However, there is considerable ambiguity ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

DIS '21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference

June 2021

2082 pages

ISBN:9781450384766

DOI:10.1145/3461778

Editors:
Wendy Ju
Jacobs Technion-Cornell Institute at Cornell Tech
,
Lora Oehlberg
University of Calgary
,
Sean Follmer
Stanford University
,
Sarah Fox
Carnegie Mellon University
,
Stacey Kuznetsov
Arizona State University

Copyright © 2021 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 28 June 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Badges

Honorable Mention

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Funding Sources

EPSRC

Conference

DIS '21

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

DIS '21: Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021

June 28 - July 2, 2021

Virtual Event, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,158 of 4,684 submissions, 25%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

4
Total Citations
View Citations
235
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)46
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

Reflects downloads up to 15 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Johansson KRobinson RBack JBowman SFey JMárquez Segura EWaern AIsbister K(2024)Why Larp? A Synthesis Article on Live Action Roleplay in Relation to HCI Research and PracticeACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/368904531:5(1-35)Online publication date: 2-Sep-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3689045
Samani HLalioti VSerbanescu DChicau JPolydorou DRodosthenous GKnowlson ABakalos YNeale MIndurkhya B(2024)Creative Robotics Theatre: Designing Creative Interactions with Tangible and Embodied InterfacesCompanion Publication of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3656156.3658387(389-391)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3656156.3658387
Light AHouston LCatlow R(2024)Intimate TranslationsDesigning More-than-Human Smart Cities10.1093/9780191980060.003.0016(289-304)Online publication date: 3-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.1093/9780191980060.003.0016
Wolff APässilä AOwens AKantola L(2024)Designing Data Dramas to Build Empathy to Nature through Collective ActsDesigning More-than-Human Smart Cities10.1093/9780191980060.003.0010(167-186)Online publication date: 3-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.1093/9780191980060.003.0010

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents