research-article

Open access

ProcessAR: An augmented reality-based tool to create in-situ procedural 2D/3D AR Instructions

Authors:

Subramanian Chidambaram,

Ana M Villanueva,

Thomas S Redick,

Wolfgang Stuerzlinger,

Karthik RamaniAuthors Info & Claims

DIS '21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference

Pages 234 - 249

https://doi.org/10.1145/3461778.3462126

Published: 28 June 2021 Publication History

All formats PDF

Abstract

Augmented reality (AR) is an efficient form of delivering spatial information and has great potential for training workers. However, AR is still not widely used for such scenarios due to the technical skills and expertise required to create interactive AR content. We developed ProcessAR, an AR-based system to develop 2D/3D content that captures subject matter expert’s (SMEs) environment-object interactions in situ. The design space for ProcessAR was identified from formative interviews with AR programming experts and SMEs, alongside a comparative design study with SMEs and novice users. To enable smooth workflows, ProcessAR locates and identifies different tools/objects through computer vision within the workspace when the author looks at them. We explored additional features such as embedding 2D videos with detected objects and user-adaptive triggers. A final user evaluation comparing ProcessAR and a baseline AR authoring environment showed that, according to our qualitative questionnaire, users preferred ProcessAR.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental files (ProcessAR_yolo_tiny_weights.zip)

Download
30.78 MB

MP4 File (ProcessAR.mp4)

Supplemental video

Download
69.98 MB

References

[1]

Fraser Anderson, Tovi Grossman, Justin Matejka, and George Fitzmaurice. 2013. YouMove: enhancing movement training with an augmented reality mirror. In Proceedings of the 26th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 311–320. https://doi.org/10.1145/2501988.2502045

Digital Library

[2]

Aaron Bangor, Philip Kortum, and James Miller. 2009. Determining what individual SUS scores mean: Adding an adjective rating scale. Journal of usability studies 4, 3 (2009), 114–123. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.5555/2835587.2835589

Digital Library

[3]

James Baumeister, Seung Youb Ssin, Neven AM ElSayed, Jillian Dorrian, David P Webb, James A Walsh, Timothy M Simon, Andrew Irlitti, Ross T Smith, Mark Kohler, 2017. Cognitive cost of using augmented reality displays. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 23, 11(2017), 2378–2388. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2017.2735098

Digital Library

[4]

Bhaskar Bhattacharya and Eliot H Winer. 2019. Augmented reality via expert demonstration authoring (AREDA). Computers in Industry 105 (2019), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2018.04.021

Digital Library

[5]

Boeing. 2019. Boeing: The Boeing Company. Retrived June 2, 2019 from https://www.boeing.com/.

[6]

John Brooke 1996. SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability evaluation in industry 189, 194 (1996), 4–7.

[7]

Techsmith Camtasia. 2019. Camtasia: Screen Recorder and Video Editor. Retrieved September 18, 2019, from https://www.techsmith.com/video-editor.html.

[8]

Yuanzhi Cao, Xun Qian, Tianyi Wang, Rachel Lee, Ke Huo, and Karthik Ramani. 2020. An Exploratory Study of Augmented Reality Presence for Tutoring Machine Tasks. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376688

Digital Library

[9]

Scott Carter, Pernilla Qvarfordt, Matthew Cooper, and Ville Mäkelä. 2015. Creating tutorials with web-based authoring and heads-up capture. IEEE Pervasive Computing 14, 3 (2015), 44–52. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2015.59

Digital Library

[10]

Pei-Yu Chi, Joyce Liu, Jason Linder, Mira Dontcheva, Wilmot Li, and Bjoern Hartmann. 2013. Democut: generating concise instructional videos for physical demonstrations. In Proceedings of the 26th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 141–150. https://doi.org/10.1145/2501988.2502052

Digital Library

[11]

Pei-Yu Peggy Chi, Daniel Vogel, Mira Dontcheva, Wilmot Li, and Björn Hartmann. 2016. Authoring illustrations of human movements by iterative physical demonstration. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 809–820. https://doi.org/10.1145/2984511.2984559

Digital Library

[12]

cognex. 2020. cognex. Retrieved Feb 5, 2021, from https://www.cognex.com/products/machine-vision/3d-machine-vision-systems/in-sight-3d-l4000.

[13]

D’Vera Cohn and Paul Taylor. 2010. Baby Boomers Approach 65 - Glumly. Retrived September 15, 2019 from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2010/12/29/baby-boomers-retire/.

[14]

Dima Damen, Teesid Leelasawassuk, Osian Haines, Andrew Calway, and Walterio W Mayol-Cuevas. 2014. You-Do, I-Learn: Discovering Task Relevant Objects and their Modes of Interaction from Multi-User Egocentric Video. In BMVC, Vol. 2. BMVA Press, Nottingham, UK, 3. https://doi.org/10.5244/C.28.30

[15]

display.land. 2020. display.land. Retrieved May 5, 2020, from https://get.display.land/.

[16]

Daniel Eckhoff, Christian Sandor, Christian Lins, Ulrich Eck, Denis Kalkofen, and Andreas Hein. 2018. TutAR: augmented reality tutorials for hands-only procedures. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGGRAPH International Conference on Virtual-Reality Continuum and its Applications in Industry. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3284398.3284399

Digital Library

[17]

Carmine Elvezio, Mengu Sukan, Ohan Oda, Steven Feiner, and Barbara Tversky. 2017. Remote collaboration in AR and VR using virtual replicas. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2017 VR Village. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1145/3089269.3089281

Digital Library

[18]

Michele Fiorentino, Rafael Radkowski, Christian Stritzke, Antonio E Uva, and Giuseppe Monno. 2013. Design review of CAD assemblies using bimanual natural interface. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) 7, 4(2013), 249–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-012-0179-3

[19]

Markus Funk, Mareike Kritzler, and Florian Michahelles. 2017. HoloCollab: a shared virtual platform for physical assembly training using spatially-aware head-mounted displays. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on the Internet of Things. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3131542.3131559

Digital Library

[20]

Markus Funk, Lars Lischke, Sven Mayer, Alireza Sahami Shirazi, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2018. Teach Me How! Interactive Assembly Instructions Using Demonstration and In-Situ Projection. In Assistive Augmentation. Springer, Cham, 49–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6404-3_4

[21]

GIMP. 2019. GIMP: GNU Image Manipulation Program. Retrieved September 18, 2019, from https://www.gimp.org.

[22]

Oliver Glauser, Shihao Wu, Daniele Panozzo, Otmar Hilliges, and Olga Sorkine-Hornung. 2019. Interactive hand pose estimation using a stretch-sensing soft glove. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 38, 4 (2019), 41. https://doi.org/10.1145/3306346.3322957

Digital Library

[23]

Michihiko Goto, Yuko Uematsu, Hideo Saito, Shuji Senda, and Akihiko Iketani. 2010. Task support system by displaying instructional video onto AR workspace. In 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2010.5643554

[24]

Ankit Gupta, Dieter Fox, Brian Curless, and Michael Cohen. 2012. DuploTrack: a real-time system for authoring and guiding duplo block assembly. In Proceedings of the 25th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1145/2380116.2380167

Digital Library

[25]

Taejin Ha and Woontack Woo. 2007. Graphical tangible user interface for a ar authoring tool in product design environment. In International Symposium on Ubiquitous VR. Citeseer, Gwangju, Korea, 1. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-260/paper20.pdf

[26]

Matthias Haringer and Holger T Regenbrecht. 2002. A pragmatic approach to augmented reality authoring. In Proceedings. International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 237–245. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2002.1115093

[27]

Steven Henderson and Steven Feiner. 2010. Exploring the benefits of augmented reality documentation for maintenance and repair. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 17, 10(2010), 1355–1368. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2010.245

Digital Library

[28]

Inkscape. 2019. Inkscape: Draw Freely. Retrieved September 18, 2019, from https://inkscape.org.

[29]

Deloitte Insights. 2018. Deloitte skills gap and future of work in manufacturing study. Retrieved September 18, 2019, from https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/insights/us/articles/4736_2018-Deloitte-skills-gap-FoW-manufacturing/DI_2018-Deloitte-skills-gap-FoW-manufacturing-study.pdf.

[30]

SAE International. 2019. Formula SAE. Retrieved September 18, 2019, from https://www.sae.org.

[31]

Jarrod Knibbe, Tovi Grossman, and George Fitzmaurice. 2015. Smart makerspace: An immersive instructional space for physical tasks. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Interactive Tabletops & Surfaces. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1145/2817721.2817741

Digital Library

[32]

Taihei Kojima, Atsushi Hiyama, Takahiro Miura, and Michitaka Hirose. 2014. Training archived physical skill through immersive virtual environment. In International Conference on Human Interface and the Management of Information. Springer, Cham, 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07863-2_6

Digital Library

[33]

Thomas Kubitza and Albrecht Schmidt. 2015. Towards a toolkit for the rapid creation of smart environments. In International Symposium on End User Development. Springer, Cham, 230–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18425-8_21

[34]

Suha Kwak, Woonhyun Nam, Bohyung Han, and Joon Hee Han. 2011. Learning occlusion with likelihoods for visual tracking. In 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 1551–1558. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.2011.6126414

Digital Library

[35]

Michael Laielli, James Smith, Giscard Biamby, Trevor Darrell, and Bjoern Hartmann. 2019. LabelAR: A Spatial Guidance Interface for Fast Computer Vision Image Collection. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 987–998. https://doi.org/10.1145/3332165.3347927

Digital Library

[36]

David F Lohman. 1996. Spatial ability and g. Human abilities: Their nature and measurement 97 (1996), 116.

[37]

Michael R Marner, Andrew Irlitti, and Bruce H Thomas. 2013. Improving procedural task performance with augmented reality annotations. In 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR). IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2013.6671762

[38]

Lockheed Martin. 2019. How Lockheed Martin is Using Augmented Reality in Aerospace Manufacturing. Retrived December 12, 2019 https://www.engineering.com/story/how-lockheed-martin-is-using-augmented-reality-in-aerospace-manufacturing.

[39]

Microsoft. 2020. Overview of Dynamics 365 Guides. Retrieved May 5, 2020, from https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dynamics365/mixed-reality/guides/.

[40]

Peter Mohr, Bernhard Kerbl, Michael Donoser, Dieter Schmalstieg, and Denis Kalkofen. 2015. Retargeting technical documentation to augmented reality. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3337–3346. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702490

Digital Library

[41]

Peter Mohr, David Mandl, Markus Tatzgern, Eduardo Veas, Dieter Schmalstieg, and Denis Kalkofen. 2017. Retargeting video tutorials showing tools with surface contact to augmented reality. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 6547–6558. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025688

Digital Library

[42]

Lars Müller, Ilhan Aslan, and Lucas Krüßen. 2013. GuideMe: A mobile augmented reality system to display user manuals for home appliances. In International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology. Springer, Cham, 152–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03161-3_11

[43]

Michael Nebeling, Janet Nebeling, Ao Yu, and Rob Rumble. 2018. ProtoAR: Rapid Physical-Digital Prototyping of Mobile Augmented Reality Applications. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173927

Digital Library

[44]

Oculus. 2019. Oculus Rift Store. Retrieved September 18, 2019, from https://www.oculus.com/experiences/rift.

[45]

Oculus. 2019. Oculus Software Development Kit. Retrieved September 18, 2019, from https://doi.org/10.1145/2807442.2807497.

Digital Library

[46]

Ohan Oda, Carmine Elvezio, Mengu Sukan, Steven Feiner, and Barbara Tversky. 2015. Virtual replicas for remote assistance in virtual and augmented reality. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software & Technology. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 405–415. https://doi.org/10.1145/2807442.2807497

Digital Library

[47]

SK Ong and ZB Wang. 2011. Augmented assembly technologies based on 3D bare-hand interaction. CIRP annals 60, 1 (2011), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2011.03.001

[48]

Nils Petersen and Didier Stricker. 2012. Learning task structure from video examples for workflow tracking and authoring. In 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR). IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2012.6402562

Digital Library

[49]

PTC. 2019. Vuforia Expert Capture. Retrieved May 5, 2020, from https://www.ptc.com/en/products/augmented-reality/vuforia-expert-capture.

[50]

qlone. 2020. qlone. Retrieved May 5, 2020, from https://www.qlone.pro/.

[51]

Rafael Radkowski and Christian Stritzke. 2012. Interactive hand gesture-based assembly for augmented reality applications. In Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions. Citeseer, Valencia, Spain, 303–308. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.469.9714&rep=rep1&type=pdf

[52]

Vijaimukund Raghavan, Jose Molineros, and Rajeev Sharma. 1999. Interactive evaluation of assembly sequences using augmented reality. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 15, 3(1999), 435–449. https://doi.org/10.1109/70.768177

[53]

Joseph Redmon, Santosh Divvala, Ross Girshick, and Ali Farhadi. 2016. You only look once: Unified, real-time object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 779–788. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2016.91

[54]

Joseph Redmon and Ali Farhadi. 2017. YOLO9000: better, faster, stronger. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 7263–7271. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2017.690

[55]

Joseph Redmon and Ali Farhadi. 2018. YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvement. (2018). https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.02767

[56]

Dirk Reiners, Didier Stricker, Gudrun Klinker, and Stefan Müller. 1999. Augmented reality for construction tasks: Doorlock assembly. Proc. Ieee And Acm Iwar 98, 1 (1999), 31–46.

[57]

Nazmus Saquib, Rubaiat Habib Kazi, Li-Yi Wei, and Wilmot Li. 2019. Interactive Body-Driven Graphics for Augmented Video Performance. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 622. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300852

Digital Library

[58]

Eldon Schoop, Michelle Nguyen, Daniel Lim, Valkyrie Savage, Sean Follmer, and Björn Hartmann. 2016. Drill Sergeant: Supporting physical construction projects through an ecosystem of augmented tools. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1607–1614. https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2892429

Digital Library

[59]

Rajeev Sharma and Jose Molineros. 1997. Computer vision-based augmented reality for guiding manual assembly. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 6, 3(1997), 292–317. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1997.6.3.292

Digital Library

[60]

Autodesk Sketchbook. 2019. Autodesk Sketchbook. Retrieved September 18, 2019, from https://sketchbook.com.

[61]

Enox Software. 2019. OpenCV for Unity. Retrieved September 18, 2019, from https://enoxsoftware.com/opencvforunity.

[62]

Maximilian Speicher, Kristina Tenhaft, Simon Heinen, and Harry Handorf. 2015. Enabling industry 4.0 with holobuilder. In INFORMATIK 2015, Douglas W. Cunningham, Petra Hofstedt, Klaus Meer, and Ingo Schmitt (Eds.). Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V., Bonn, 1561–1575. https://dl.gi.de/bitstream/handle/20.500.12116/2141/1561.pdf?sequence=1

[63]

Stereolabs. 2019. Stereolabs ZED - Unity Plugin. Retrieved September 18, 2019, from https://github.com/stereolabs/zed-unity.

[64]

Mengu Sukan, Carmine Elvezio, Ohan Oda, Steven Feiner, and Barbara Tversky. 2014. Parafrustum: Visualization techniques for guiding a user to a constrained set of viewing positions and orientations. In Proceedings of the 27th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 331–340. https://doi.org/10.1145/2642918.2647417

Digital Library

[65]

Anna Syberfeldt, Oscar Danielsson, Magnus Holm, and Lihui Wang. 2015. Visual assembling guidance using augmented reality. Procedia Manufacturing 1(2015), 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.09.068

[66]

Richard Tang, Xing-Dong Yang, Scott Bateman, Joaquim Jorge, and Anthony Tang. 2015. Physio@ Home: Exploring visual guidance and feedback techniques for physiotherapy exercises. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 4123–4132. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702401

Digital Library

[67]

Balasaravanan Thoravi Kumaravel, Fraser Anderson, George Fitzmaurice, Bjoern Hartmann, and Tovi Grossman. 2019. Loki: Facilitating Remote Instruction of Physical Tasks Using Bi-Directional Mixed-Reality Telepresence. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 161–174. https://doi.org/10.1145/3332165.3347872

Digital Library

[68]

Jonathan Wai, David Lubinski, and Camilla P Benbow. 2009. Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance.Journal of Educational Psychology 101, 4 (2009), 817. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016127

[69]

Matt Whitlock, George Fitzmaurice, Tovi Grossman, and Justin Matejka. 2020. AuthAR: Concurrent Authoring of Tutorials for AR Assembly Guidance. In Graphics Interface. CHCCS/SCDHM, University of Toronto,Ontario, Canada, 431 – 439. https://doi.org/10.20380/GI2020.43

[70]

Sang Ho Yoon, Ansh Verma, Kylie Peppler, and Karthik Ramani. 2015. HandiMate: exploring a modular robotics kit for animating crafted toys. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1145/2771839.2771841

Digital Library

Cited By

Chidambaram SWilliams ABai MVirk SHaffner PLease MLi E(2024)Annorama: Enabling Immersive At-Desk Annotation Experiences in Virtual Reality with 3D Point Cloud DioramasProceedings of the 2024 ACM Symposium on Spatial User Interaction10.1145/3677386.3682081(1-13)Online publication date: 7-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3677386.3682081
Liao JVan KXia ZSuzuki R(2024)RealityEffects: Augmenting 3D Volumetric Videos with Object-Centric Annotation and Dynamic Visual EffectsProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661631(1248-1261)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3661631
Stemasov EDemharter SRädler MGugenheimer JRukzio E(2024)pARam: Leveraging Parametric Design in Extended Reality to Support the Personalization of Artifacts for Personal FabricationProceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642083(1-22)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642083
Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Augmented reality as perceptual reality
VSMM'06: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Interactive Technologies and Sociotechnical Systems

As shown in Paul Milgram et al’s Reality-Virtuality Continuum (1994), Augmented Reality occupies a very unique status in the spectrum of Mixed Reality. Unlike Virtual Reality, which is completely made up of the virtual and has been the most important ...
Haptics in Augmented Reality
ICMCS '99: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems - Volume 2

An augmented reality system merges synthetic sensory information into a user's perception of a three-dimensional environment. An important performance goal for an augmented reality system is that the user perceives a single seamless environment. In most ...
Multimodal augmented reality: the norm rather than the exception
MVAR '16: Proceedings of the 2016 workshop on Multimodal Virtual and Augmented Reality

Augmented reality (AR) is commonly seen as a technology that overlays virtual imagery onto a participant's view of the world. In line with this, most AR research is focused on what we see. In this paper, we challenge this focus on vision and make a case ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

DIS '21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference

June 2021

2082 pages

ISBN:9781450384766

DOI:10.1145/3461778

Editors:
Wendy Ju
Jacobs Technion-Cornell Institute at Cornell Tech
,
Lora Oehlberg
University of Calgary
,
Sean Follmer
Stanford University
,
Sarah Fox
Carnegie Mellon University
,
Stacey Kuznetsov
Arizona State University

Copyright © 2021 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 28 June 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Funding Sources

National Science Foundation

Conference

DIS '21

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

DIS '21: Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021

June 28 - July 2, 2021

Virtual Event, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,158 of 4,684 submissions, 25%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

19
Total Citations
View Citations
2,443
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)1,129
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)122

Reflects downloads up to 13 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Chidambaram SWilliams ABai MVirk SHaffner PLease MLi E(2024)Annorama: Enabling Immersive At-Desk Annotation Experiences in Virtual Reality with 3D Point Cloud DioramasProceedings of the 2024 ACM Symposium on Spatial User Interaction10.1145/3677386.3682081(1-13)Online publication date: 7-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3677386.3682081
Liao JVan KXia ZSuzuki R(2024)RealityEffects: Augmenting 3D Volumetric Videos with Object-Centric Annotation and Dynamic Visual EffectsProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661631(1248-1261)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3661631
Stemasov EDemharter SRädler MGugenheimer JRukzio E(2024)pARam: Leveraging Parametric Design in Extended Reality to Support the Personalization of Artifacts for Personal FabricationProceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642083(1-22)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642083
Li SSchieber HCorell NEgger BKreimeier JRoth D(2024)GBOT: Graph-Based 3D Object Tracking for Augmented Reality-Assisted Assembly Guidance2024 IEEE Conference Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR)10.1109/VR58804.2024.00072(513-523)Online publication date: 16-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/VR58804.2024.00072
Bock LBohné TTadeja S(2024)Decision support for augmented reality-based assistance systems deployment in industrial settingsMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-024-19861-xOnline publication date: 13-Aug-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-024-19861-x
Vargas González AWilliamson BLaViola J(2023)Authoring Moving Parts of Objects in AR, VR and the DesktopMultimodal Technologies and Interaction10.3390/mti71201177:12(117)Online publication date: 13-Dec-2023
https://doi.org/10.3390/mti7120117
Li CYu L(2023)Generating Activity Snippets by Learning Human-Scene InteractionsACM Transactions on Graphics10.1145/359209642:4(1-15)Online publication date: 26-Jul-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3592096
Chen CNguyen CHoffswell JHealey JBui TWeibel N(2023)PaperToPlace: Transforming Instruction Documents into Spatialized and Context-Aware Mixed Reality ExperiencesProceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology10.1145/3586183.3606832(1-21)Online publication date: 29-Oct-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3586183.3606832
Liu ZZhu ZJiang EHuang FVillanueva AQian XWang TRamani K(2023)InstruMentAR: Auto-Generation of Augmented Reality Tutorials for Operating Digital Instruments Through Recording Embodied DemonstrationProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581442(1-17)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3544548.3581442
Haltner PGoddy-Worlu RForren JNicholas CReilly D(2023)A Comparative Evaluation of AR Embodiments vs. Videos and Figures for Learning Bead Weaving2023 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR)10.1109/ISMAR59233.2023.00136(1191-1200)Online publication date: 16-Oct-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR59233.2023.00136
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents