Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3462204.3481800acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Understanding and Reducing Perception Gaps with Mediated Social Cues when Building Workplace Relationships through CMC

Published: 23 October 2021 Publication History

Abstract

More and more people form and maintain workplace relationships through computer-mediated communication tools nowadays. When all interactions are mediated by technology, people’s impression of each other can be affected by the selective social cues transmitted by media. The way people present themselves through communication technology might not be perceived by their remote counterparts in the same way as they do. The mediated social cues could affect how people interpret the perceived action, further affecting impression formation and relationship maintenance between remote collaborators. It is unclear whether and how such mediated social cues cause perception gaps and how such perception gaps among different social connections play a part in relationship building in remote workplaces. The goal of my doctoral thesis is to identify the perception gap in computer-mediated communication and its impact on workplace relationship building. First, in a mixed-methods study in remote workplaces, I found that people’s perceptions of their strongly and weakly connected colleagues become polarized when their collaboration is mediated by different communication technologies. Next, I specifically focused on relationship building between potential collaborators, which is another type of weakly connected collaborators in workplaces, via videoconferencing. In a controlled online study, I found that ambient cues from virtual backgrounds cause different impacts on first impressions of remote collaborators and perception of self. With this doctoral thesis, I aim to provide design implications on designing social cues to reduce the perception gaps introduced by communication technology in different stages of workplace relationship building.

References

[1]
Ban Al-Ani, Matthew J Bietz, Yi Wang, Erik Trainer, Benjamin Koehne, Sabrina Marczak, David Redmiles, and Rafael Prikladnicki. 2013. Globally distributed system developers: their trust expectations and processes. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work. 563–574.
[2]
Ligia Maria Batrinca, Nadia Mana, Bruno Lepri, Fabio Pianesi, and Nicu Sebe. 2011. Please, tell me about yourself: automatic personality assessment using short self-presentations. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on multimodal interfaces. 255–262.
[3]
Jeremy Birnholtz, Nanyi Bi, and Susan Fussell. 2012. Do you see that I see? Effects of perceived visibility on awareness checking behavior. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1765–1774.
[4]
Nathan Bos, Judy Olson, Darren Gergle, Gary Olson, and Zach Wright. 2002. Effects of four computer-mediated communications channels on trust development. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 135–140.
[5]
Jose Eurico de Vasconcelos Filho, Kori M Inkpen, and Mary Czerwinski. 2009. Image, appearance and vanity in the use of media spaces and video conference systems. In Proceedings of the ACM 2009 international conference on Supporting group work. 253–262.
[6]
Chad Edwards, Brett Stoll, Natalie Faculak, and Sandi Karman. 2015. Social presence on LinkedIn: Perceived credibility and interpersonal attractiveness based on user profile picture. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies 5, 4(2015), 102.
[7]
Kimberly D Elsbach, Dan M Cable, and Jeffrey W Sherman. 2010. How passive ‘face time’affects perceptions of employees: Evidence of spontaneous trait inference. human relations 63, 6 (2010), 735–760.
[8]
Helen Ai He, Naomi Yamashita, Ari Hautasaari, Xun Cao, and Elaine M Huang. 2017. Why did they do that? Exploring attribution mismatches between native and non-native speakers using videoconferencing. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 297–309.
[9]
Sasa Junuzovic, Kori Inkpen, John Tang, Mara Sedlins, and Kristie Fisher. 2012. To see or not to see: a study comparing four-way avatar, video, and audio conferencing for work. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM international conference on Supporting group work. 31–34.
[10]
Benjamin Koehne, Patrick C Shih, and Judith S Olson. 2012. Remote and alone: coping with being the remote member on the team. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. 1257–1266.
[11]
Anastasia Kuzminykh and Sean Rintel. 2020. Low Engagement As a Deliberate Practice of Remote Participants in Video Meetings. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–9.
[12]
Hideaki Kuzuoka, Yuki Kodama, Jianfeng Xu, Emi Myodo, Etsuko Harada, and Hirotaka Osawa. 2018. Telepresence Robot’s Salutations to Trigger Informal Conversation with Teleworkers. In Companion of the 2018 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 233–236.
[13]
Min Kyung Lee and Leila Takayama. 2011. ” Now, i have a body” uses and social norms for mobile remote presence in the workplace. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 33–42.
[14]
William H Macey and Benjamin Schneider. 2008. The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and organizational Psychology 1, 1 (2008), 3–30.
[15]
Matthew K Miller, Regan L Mandryk, Max V Birk, Ansgar E Depping, and Tushita Patel. 2017. Through the looking glass: The effects of feedback on self-awareness and conversational behaviour during video chat. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 5271–5283.
[16]
Sarah Morrison-Smith, Lydia B. Chilton, and Jaime Ruiz. 2020. Facilitating Team Awareness Through Ambient Displays. (August 2020). https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/facilitating-team-awareness-through-ambient-displays/
[17]
Rebecca Walker Naylor. 2007. Nonverbal cues-based first impressions: Impression formation through exposure to static images. Marketing Letters 18, 3 (2007), 165–179.
[18]
Soo Youn Oh, Jeremy Bailenson, Nicole Krämer, and Benjamin Li. 2016. Let the avatar brighten your smile: Effects of enhancing facial expressions in virtual environments. PloS one 11, 9 (2016), e0161794.
[19]
Keita Suzuki, Masanori Yokoyama, Shigeo Yoshida, Takayoshi Mochizuki, Tomohiro Yamada, Takuji Narumi, Tomohiro Tanikawa, and Michitaka Hirose. 2017. Faceshare: Mirroring with pseudo-smile enriches video chat communications. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 5313–5317.
[20]
Catalina L Toma. 2010. Perceptions of trustworthiness online: the role of visual and textual information. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. 13–22.
[21]
Joseph B Walther. 1996. Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication research 23, 1 (1996), 3–43.
[22]
Jeanne M Wilson, Susan G Straus, and Bill McEvily. 2006. All in due time: The development of trust in computer-mediated and face-to-face teams. Organizational behavior and human decision processes 99, 1 (2006), 16–33.
[23]
Jun Zheng, Elizabeth Veinott, Nathan Bos, Judith S Olson, and Gary M Olson. 2002. Trust without touch: jumpstarting long-distance trust with initial social activities. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 141–146.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Pronouns in the Workplace: Developing Sociotechnical Systems for Digitally Mediated Gender ExpressionProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35795167:CSCW1(1-30)Online publication date: 16-Apr-2023

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CSCW '21 Companion: Companion Publication of the 2021 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing
October 2021
370 pages
ISBN:9781450384797
DOI:10.1145/3462204
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 23 October 2021

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Perception gap
  2. computer-mediated communication
  3. misattribution
  4. social cues
  5. workplace relationship

Qualifiers

  • Extended-abstract
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

CSCW '21
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 2,235 of 8,521 submissions, 26%

Upcoming Conference

CSCW '24

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)37
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
Reflects downloads up to 01 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Pronouns in the Workplace: Developing Sociotechnical Systems for Digitally Mediated Gender ExpressionProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35795167:CSCW1(1-30)Online publication date: 16-Apr-2023

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media