Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article
Open access

Applying Machine Learning in Self-adaptive Systems: A Systematic Literature Review

Published: 18 August 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Recently, we have been witnessing a rapid increase in the use of machine learning techniques in self-adaptive systems. Machine learning has been used for a variety of reasons, ranging from learning a model of the environment of a system during operation to filtering large sets of possible configurations before analyzing them. While a body of work on the use of machine learning in self-adaptive systems exists, there is currently no systematic overview of this area. Such an overview is important for researchers to understand the state of the art and direct future research efforts. This article reports the results of a systematic literature review that aims at providing such an overview. We focus on self-adaptive systems that are based on a traditional Monitor-Analyze-Plan-Execute (MAPE)-based feedback loop. The research questions are centered on the problems that motivate the use of machine learning in self-adaptive systems, the key engineering aspects of learning in self-adaptation, and open challenges in this area. The search resulted in 6,709 papers, of which 109 were retained for data collection. Analysis of the collected data shows that machine learning is mostly used for updating adaptation rules and policies to improve system qualities, and managing resources to better balance qualities and resources. These problems are primarily solved using supervised and interactive learning with classification, regression, and reinforcement learning as the dominant methods. Surprisingly, unsupervised learning that naturally fits automation is only applied in a small number of studies. Key open challenges in this area include the performance of learning, managing the effects of learning, and dealing with more complex types of goals. From the insights derived from this systematic literature review, we outline an initial design process for applying machine learning in self-adaptive systems that are based on MAPE feedback loops.

References

[1]
J. Hellerstein, Y. Diao, S. Parekh, and D. Tilbury. 2004. Feedback Control of Computing Systems. John Wiley and Sons, New York.https://doi.org/10.1002/047166880X
[2]
H. Arabnejad, P. Jamshidi, G. Estrada, N. El Ioini, and C. Pahl. 2016. An auto-scaling cloud controller using fuzzy q-learning-implementation in openstack. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Service-Oriented and Cloud Computing. Springer, 152–167.
[3]
K. Bierzynski, P. Lutskov, and U. Assmann. 2019. Supporting the self-learning of systems at the network edge with microservices. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference and Exhibition on Integration Issues of Miniaturized Systems: Smart Systems Integration. 1–8.
[4]
C. Bishop. 2006. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Springer.
[5]
R. Calinescu, M. Autili, J. Cámara, A. Di Marco, S. Gerasimou, P. Inverardi, A. Perucci, N. Jansen, J.-P. Katoen, M. Kwiatkowska, O. Mengshoel, R. Spalazzese, and M. Tivoli. 2017. Synthesis and Verification of Self-aware Computing Systems. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 337–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47474-8_11
[6]
R. Calinescu, L. Grunske, M. Kwiatkowska, R. Mirandola, and G. Tamburrelli. 2011. Dynamic QoS management and optimization in service-based systems. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 37, 3 (2011), 387–409. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2010.92
[7]
R. Calinescu, R. Mirandola, D. Perez-Palacin, and D. Weyns. 2020. Understanding uncertainty in self-adaptive systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Autonomic Computing and Self-Organizing Systems (ACSOS’20). 242–251. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACSOS49614.2020.00047
[8]
R. Calinescu, Y. Rafiq, K. Johnson, and M. Bakundefinedr. 2014. Adaptive model learning for continual verification of non-functional properties. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM/SPEC International Conference on Performance Engineering (ICPE’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1145/2568088.2568094
[9]
J. Cámara, D. Garlan, G. Moreno, and B. Schmerl. 2017. Analyzing self-adaptation via model checking of stochastic games. In Software Engineering for Self-Adaptive Systems III. Assurances. Springer.
[10]
T. Chen and R. Bahsoon. 2017. Self-adaptive and online qos modeling for cloud-based software services. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 43, 5 (2017), 453–475.
[11]
T. Chen, R. Bahsoon, S. Wang, and X. Yao. 2018. To adapt or not to adapt? technical debt and learning driven self-adaptation for managing runtime performance. In Proceedings of the ACM/SPEC International Conference on Performance Engineering (Berlin, Germany) (ICPE’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1145/3184407.3184413
[12]
B. Cheng, R. de Lemos, H. Giese, P. Inverardi, J. Magee, J. Andersson, B. Becker, N. Bencomo, Y. Brun, B. Cukic, G. Di Marzo Serugendo, S. Dustdar, A. Finkelstein, C. Gacek, K. Geihs, V. Grassi, G. Karsai, H. Kienle, J. Kramer, M. Litoiu, S. Malek, R. Mirandola, H. Müller, S. Park, M. Shaw, M. Tichy, M. Tivoli, D. Weyns, and J. Whittle. 2009. Software engineering for self-adaptive systems: A research roadmap. In Software Engineering for Self-Adaptive Systems. Springer, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02161-9_1
[13]
B. H. C. Cheng, A. Ramirez, and P. K. McKinley. 2013. Harnessing evolutionary computation to enable dynamically adaptive systems to manage uncertainty. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Combining Modelling and Search-Based Software Engineering (CMSBSE’13). 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/CMSBSE.2013.6604427
[14]
L. Cui, S. Yang, F. Chen, Z. Ming, N. Lu, and J. Qin. 2018. A survey on application of machine learning for Internet of Things. Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybernet. 9, 8 (2018), 1399–1417.
[15]
J. Cámara, P. Correia, R. de Lemos, D. Garlan, P. Gomes, B. Schmerl, and R. Ventura. 2016. Incorporating architecture-based self-adaptation into an adaptive industrial software system. J. Syst. Softw. 122 (2016), 507–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2015.09.021
[16]
C. da Silva, J. da Silva, C. Paterson, and R. Calinescu. 2017. Self-adaptive role-based access control for business processes. In Proceedings of the 12th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Software Engineering for Adaptive and Self-Managing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/SEAMS.2017.13
[17]
M. D’Angelo, S. Gerasimou, S. Ghahremani, J. Grohmann, I. Nunes, E. Pournaras, and S. Tomforde. 2019. On learning in collective self-adaptive systems: State of practice and a 3D framework. In Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 14th International Symposium on Software Engineering for Adaptive and Self-Managing Systems (SEAMS’19). 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1109/SEAMS.2019.00012
[18]
D. De Sensi, M. Torquati, and M. Danelutto. 2016. A reconfiguration algorithm for power-aware parallel applications. ACM Trans. Architect. Code Optimiz. 13, 4 (2016), 1–25.
[19]
A. Dhrgam, D. Kim, and L. Lu. 2018. A three-phase decision making approach for self-adaptive systems using web services. Complex Adapt. Syst. Model. 6, 1 (2018), 8.
[20]
P. Domingos. 2012. A few useful things to know about machine learning. Commun. ACM 55, 10 (2012), 78–87. https://doi.org/10.1145/2347736.2347755
[21]
F. Duarte, R. Gil, P. Romano, A. Lopes, and L. Rodrigues. 2018. Learning non-deterministic impact models for adaptation. In Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Software Engineering for Adaptive and Self-Managing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3194133.3194138
[22]
T. Dybå and T. Dingsøyr. 2008. Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review. Info. Softw. Technol. 50, 9–10 (2008), 833–859.
[23]
H. El-Kassabi, M. A. Serhani, S. Bouktif, and A. Benharref. 2019. Multi-model deep learning for cloud resources prediction to support proactive workflow adaptation. In Proceedings of the IEEE Cloud Summit. 78–85.
[24]
I. Elgendi, M. F. Hossain, A. Jamalipour, and K. S. Munasinghe. 2019. Protecting cyber physical systems using a learned MAPE-K model. IEEE Access 7 (2019), 90954–90963. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2927037
[25]
E. Elhamifar and R. Vidal. 2013. Sparse subspace clustering: Algorithm, theory, and applications. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 35, 11 (2013), 2765–2781. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2013.57
[26]
A. Elkhodary, N. Esfahani, and S. Malek. 2010. FUSION: A framework for engineering self-tuning self-adaptive software systems. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1145/1882291.1882296
[27]
I. Epifani, C. Ghezzi, R. Mirandola, and G. Tamburrelli. 2009. Model evolution by run-time parameter adaptation. In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE’09). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, 111–121. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE.2009.5070513
[28]
N. Esfahani, A. Elkhodary, and S. Malek. 2013. A learning-based framework for engineering feature-oriented self-adaptive software systems. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 39, 11 (Nov. 2013), 1467–1493. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2013.37
[29]
D. Feng and C. Germain. 2015. Fault monitoring with sequential matrix factorization. ACM Trans. Auton. Adapt. Syst. 10, 3, Article 20 (Oct. 2015), 25 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2797141
[30]
D. Mendez Fernandez, S. Wagner, M. Kalinowski, M. Felderer, P. Mafra, A. Vetro, T. Conte, M. Christiansson, D. Greer, C. Lassenius, T. Mannisto, M. Nayabi, M. Oivo, B. Penzenstadler, and D. Pfahl. 2016. Naming the pain in requirements engineering. Empir. Softw. Eng. 22 (2016), 2298–2338.
[31]
L. Fernandez Maimo, Angel L. Perales Gomez, F. J. Garcia Clemente, M. Gil Perez, and G. Martinez Perez. 2018. A self-adaptive deep learning-based system for anomaly detection in 5G networks. IEEE Access 6 (2018), 7700–7712. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2803446
[32]
M. Ferroni, A. Corna, A. Damiani, R. Brondolin, J. Kubiatowicz, D. Sciuto, and M. Santambrogio. 2017. MARC: A resource consumption modeling service for self-aware autonomous agents. ACM Trans. Auton. Adapt. Syst. 12, 4 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3127499
[33]
A. Frömmgen, R. Rehner, M. Lehn, and A. Buchmann. 2015. Fossa: Learning ECA rules for adaptive distributed systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Autonomic Computing. 207–210. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAC.2015.37
[34]
Alessio Gambi, Giovanni Toffetti, and Mauro Pezzè. 2013. Assurance of Self-adaptive Controllers for the Cloud. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 311–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36249-1_12
[35]
D. Garlan, S.-W. Cheng, A.-C. Huang, B. Schmerl, and P. Steenkiste. 2004. Rainbow: Architecture-based self-adaptation with reusable infrastructure. Computer 37, 10 (2004), 46–54.
[36]
I. Gerostathopoulos, D. Skoda, F. Plasil, T. Bures, and A. Knauss. 2016. Architectural homeostasis in self-adaptive software-intensive cyber-physical systems. In Software Architecture. Springer.
[37]
S. Ghahremani, C. M. Adriano, and H. Giese. 2018. Training prediction models for rule-based self-adaptive systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Autonomic Computing (ICAC’18). 187–192. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAC.2018.00031
[38]
X. Gu. 2012. IDES: Self-adaptive Software with Online Policy Evolution Extended from Rainbow. Springer, Berlin, 181–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30454-5_13
[39]
F. Heylighen. 2002. The science of self-organization and adaptivity. In Knowledge Management, Organizational Intelligence and Learning, and Complexity: vol. 3, L. D. Kiel (Ed.). EOLSS Publishers.
[40]
H. Ho and E. Lee. 2015. Model-based reinforcement learning approach for planning in self-adaptive software system. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication. https://doi.org/10.1145/2701126.2701191
[41]
U. Iftikhar and D. Weyns. 2014. ActivFORMS: Active formal models for self-adaptation. In Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Software Engineering for Adaptive and Self-Managing Systems (SEAMS’14). https://doi.org/10.1145/2593929.2593944
[42]
A. Ismail and V. Cardellini. 2015. Decentralized planning for self-adaptation in multi-cloud environment. In Advances in Service-Oriented and Cloud Computing, G. Ortiz and C. Tran (Eds.). Springer.
[43]
P. Jamshidi, C. Pahl, and N. C. Mendonca. 2016. Managing uncertainty in autonomic cloud elasticity controllers. IEEE Cloud Comput. 3, 3 (2016), 50–60. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCC.2016.66
[44]
P. Jamshidi, A. Sharifloo, C. Pahl, H. Arabnejad, A. Metzger, and G. Estrada. 2016. Fuzzy self-learning controllers for elasticity management in dynamic cloud architectures. In Proceedings of the 12th International ACM SIGSOFT Conference on Quality of Software Architectures. 70–79. https://doi.org/10.1109/QoSA.2016.13
[45]
P. Jamshidi, A. Sharifloo, C. Pahl, H. Arabnejad, A. Metzger, and G. Estrada. 2016. Fuzzy self-learning controllers for elasticity management in dynamic cloud architectures. In Proceedings of the 12th International ACM SIGSOFT Conference on Quality of Software Architectures (QoSA’16). 70–79. https://doi.org/10.1109/QoSA.2016.13
[46]
P. Jamshidi, M. Velez, C. Kästner, and N. Siegmund. 2018. Learning to sample: Exploiting similarities across environments to learn performance models for configurable systems. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1145/3236024.3236074
[47]
P. Jamshidi, M. Velez, C. Kastner, N. Siegmund, and P. Kawthekar. 2017. Transfer learning for improving model predictions in highly configurable software. In Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 12th International Symposium on Software Engineering for Adaptive and Self-Managing Systems (SEAMS’17). 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1109/SEAMS.2017.11
[48]
D. Julian. 2016. Designing Machine Learning Systems with Python. PACKT. Retrieved from https://www.packtpub.com/product/designing-machine-learning-systems-with-python/9781785882951.
[49]
S. Keele et al. 2007. Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Technical Report. Technical report, Ver. 2.3 EBSE Technical Report. EBSE.
[50]
J. Kephart and D. Chess. 2003. The vision of autonomic computing. Computer1 (2003), 41–50.
[51]
M. A. Khan and H. Tembine. 2017. Meta-learning for realizing self-x management of future networks. IEEE Access 5 (2017), 19072–19083. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2745999
[52]
P. V. Klaine, M. A. Imran, O. Onireti, and R. D. Souza. 2017. A survey of machine learning techniques applied to self-organizing cellular networks. IEEE Commun. Surveys Tutor. 19, 4 (2017), 2392–2431. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2017.2727878
[53]
D. Kramer and W. Karl. 2012. Realizing a proactive, self-optimizing system behavior within adaptive, heterogeneous many-core architectures. In Proceedings of the IEEE 6th International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems. 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1109/SASO.2012.26
[54]
J. Kramer and J. Magee. 2007. Self-managed systems: An architectural challenge. In Proceedings of the Conference on the Future of Software Engineering (FOSE’07). 259–268.
[55]
C. Krupitzer, J. Otto, F. M. Roth, A. Frommgen, and C. Becker. 2017. Adding self-improvement to an autonomic traffic management system. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Autonomic Computing (ICAC’17). 209–214. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAC.2017.16
[56]
C. Krupitzer, M. Pfannemuller, J. Kaddour, and C. Becker. 2018. SATISFy: Towards a self-learning analyzer for time series forecasting in self-improving systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshops on Foundations and Applications of Self Systems.182–189. https://doi.org/10.1109/FAS-W.2018.00045
[57]
A. Kurakin, I. Goodfellow, and S. Bengio. 2017. Adversarial machine learning at scale. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.01236.
[58]
E. Lee, Y.-D. Seo, and Y.-G. Kim. 2019. A Nash equilibrium based decision-making method for internet of things. J. Ambient Intell. Human. Comput. (2019), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-019-01367-2
[59]
T. Liu, C. Yang, C. Hu, H. Wang, L. Li, D. Cao, and F. Wang. 2018. Reinforcement learning-based predictive control for autonomous electrified vehicles. In Proceedings of the IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV’18). 185–190. https://doi.org/10.1109/IVS.2018.8500719
[60]
Y. Liu, D. Bai, and W. Jiao. 2018. Generating adaptation rules of software systems: A method based on genetic algorithm. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Machine Learning and Computing. https://doi.org/10.1145/3195106.3195137
[61]
T. Lorido-Botran, J. Miguel-Alonso, and J. Lozano. 2014. A review of auto-scaling techniques for elastic applications in cloud environments. J. Grid Comput. 12, 4 (2014), 559–592.
[62]
M. Maggio, H. Hoffmann, A. Papadopoulos, J. Panerati, M. Santambrogio, A. Agarwal, and A. Leva. 2012. Comparison of decision-making strategies for self-optimization in autonomic computing systems. ACM Trans. Auton. Adapt. Syst. 7, 4 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1145/2382570.2382572
[63]
S. Mahdavi-Hezavehi, V. Durelli, D. Weyns, and P. Avgeriou. 2017. A systematic literature review on methods that handle multiple quality attributes in architecture-based self-adaptive systems. Info. Softw. Technol. 90 (2017), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2017.03.013
[64]
M. Masdari and A. Khoshnevis. 2019. A survey and classification of the workload forecasting methods in cloud computing. Cluster Comput. 23 (2019), 1–26.
[65]
T. M. Mitchell. 1997. Machine Learning. McGraw-Hill. 97007692 Retrieved from https://books.google.be/books?id=EoYBngEACAAJ.
[66]
M. Moghadam, M.d Saadatmand, M.s Borg, M. Bohlin, and B. Lisper. 2018. Adaptive runtime response time control in plc-based real-time systems using reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Software Engineering for Adaptive and Self-Managing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3194133.3194153
[67]
A. Pandey, B. Schmerl, and D. Garlan. 2017. Instance-based learning for hybrid planning. In Proceedings of the IEEE 2nd International Workshops on Foundations and Applications of Self* Systems (FAS*W’17). 64–69. https://doi.org/10.1109/FAS-W.2017.122
[68]
D. Papamartzivanos, F. Gomez Marmol, and G. Kambourakis. 2019. Introducing deep learning self-adaptive misuse network intrusion detection systems. IEEE Access 7 (2019), 13546–13560. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2893871
[69]
Van Dyke Parunak and S. Brueckner. 2015. Software engineering for self-organizing systems. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 30, 4 (2015), 419–434. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269888915000089
[70]
A. Pelaez, A. Quiroz, and M. Parashar. 2016. Dynamic adaptation of policies using machine learning. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing (CCGrid’16). IEEE, 501–510.
[71]
L. Prechelt, D. Graziotin, and D. Mendez Fernandez. 2018. A community’s perspective on the status and future of peer review in software engineering. Info. Softw. Technol. 95 (2018), 75–85.
[72]
W. Qian, X. Peng, B. Chen, J. Mylopoulos, H. Wang, and W. Zhao. 2015. Rationalism with a dose of empiricism: Combining goal reasoning and case-based reasoning for self-adaptive software systems. Require. Eng. 20, 3 (2015), 233–252.
[73]
X. Qin, W. Wang, W. Zhang, J. Wei, X. Zhao, and T. Huang. 2012. Elasticat: A load rebalancing framework for cloud-based key-value stores. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on High Performance Computing. 1–10.
[74]
X. Qin, W. Wang, W. Zhang, J. Wei, X. Zhao, H. Zhong, and T. Huang. 2014. PRESC: Efficient self-reconfiguration of cache strategies for elastic caching platforms. Computing 96, 5 (2014), 415–451.
[75]
F. Quin, D. Weyns, T. Bamelis, S. Buttar, and S. Michiels. 2019. Efficient analysis of large adaptation spaces in self-adaptive systems using machine learning. In Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Software Engineering for Adaptive and Self-Managing Systems. IEEE Press. https://doi.org/10.1109/SEAMS.2019.00011
[76]
G. S. Blair, N. Bencomo, and R. France. 2009. Models@ run.time. Computer 42 (11 2009), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2009.326
[77]
F. Salfner and M. Malek. 2010. Architecting Dependable Systems with Proactive Fault Management. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17245-8_8
[78]
T. R. D. Saputri and S. W. Lee. 2020. The application of machine learning in self-adaptive systems: A systematic literature review. IEEE Access 8 (2020), 205948–205967. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3036037
[79]
Burr Settles. 2009. Active learning literature survey. Technical Report. University of Wisconsin-Madison Department of Computer Sciences.
[80]
S. Shalev-Shwartz and S. Ben-David. 2014. Understanding Machine Learning: From Theory to Algorithms. Cambridge University Press.
[81]
A. M. Sharifloo, A. Metzger, C. Quinton, L. Baresi, and K. Pohl. 2016. Learning and evolution in dynamic software product lines. In Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 11th International Symposium on Software Engineering for Adaptive and Self-Managing Systems (SEAMS’16). 158–164. https://doi.org/10.1109/SEAMS.2016.026
[82]
S. Sheikhi and S. Babamir. 2018. Using a recurrent artificial neural network for dynamic self-adaptation of cluster-based web-server systems. Appl. Intell. 48, 8 (2018), 2097–2111.
[83]
S. Shevtsov, M. Berekmeri, D. Weyns, and M. Maggio. 2018. Control-theoretical software adaptation: A systematic literature review. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 44, 8 (Aug. 2018), 784–810. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2017.2704579
[84]
K. Skałkowski and K. Zieliński. 2013. Automatic adaptation of SOA systems supported by machine learning. In Technological Innovation for the Internet of Things. Springer.
[85]
M. Sommer, S. Tomforde, J. Hahner, and D. Auer. 2015. Learning a dynamic re-combination strategy of forecast techniques at runtime. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Autonomic Computing. 261–266. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAC.2015.70
[86]
A. Stein, S. Tomforde, A. Diaconescu, J. Hahner, and C. Muller-Schloer. 2018. A concept for proactive knowledge construction in self-learning autonomous systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE 3rd International Workshops on Foundations and Applications of Self* Systems (FAS*W’18). 204–213. https://doi.org/10.1109/FAS-W.2018.00048
[87]
A. Strauss and J. Corbin. 1990. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. SAGE.
[88]
D. Sykes, D. Corapi, J. Magee, J. Kramer, A. Russo, and K. Inoue. 2013. Learning revised models for planning in adaptive systems. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering. IEEE Press.
[89]
Z. Tang, W. Wang, L. Sun, Y. Huang, H. Wu, J. Wei, and T. Huang. 2018. IO dependent SSD cache allocation for elastic Hadoop applications. Sci. China Info. Sci. 61, 5 (2018), 050104.
[90]
G. Tesauro, N. Jong, R. Das, and M. Bennani. 2007. On the use of hybrid reinforcement learning for autonomic resource allocation. Cluster Comput. 10, 3 (2007), 287–299.
[91]
S. Thrun and T. Mitchell. 1995. Lifelong robot learning. Robot. Auton. Syst. 15, 1–2 (1995), 25–46.
[92]
R. Van Solingen, V. Basili, G. Caldiera, and D. Rombach. 2002. Goal question metric (GQM) approach. Encyclopedia of Software Engineering. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
[93]
N. Villegas, H. Müller, G. Tamura, L. Duchien, and R. Casallas. 2011. A framework for evaluating quality-driven self-adaptive software systems. In Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Software Engineering for Adaptive and Self-Managing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 80–89. https://doi.org/10.1145/1988008.1988020
[94]
M. Vollstedt and S. Rezat. 2019. An Introduction to Grounded Theory with a Special Focus on Axial Coding and the Coding Paradigm. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15636-7_4
[95]
J. Wan, Q. Li, L. Wang, L. He, and Y. Li. 2017. A self-adaptation framework for dealing with the complexities of software changes. In Proceedings of the 8th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering and Service Science (ICSESS’17). 521–524. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSESS.2017.8342969
[96]
D. Weyns. 2019. Software engineering of self-adaptive systems. In Handbook of Software Engineering. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 399–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00262-6_11
[97]
D. Weyns. 2020. Introduction to Self-adaptive Systems: A Contemporary Software Engineering Perspective. Wiley.
[98]
D. Weyns and T. Ahmad. 2013. Claims and evidence for architecture-based self-adaptation: a systematic literature review. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Software Architecture. Springer, 249–265.
[99]
D. Weyns and U. Iftikhar. 2016. Model-based simulation at runtime for self-adaptive systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Autonomic Computing (ICAC’16). 364–373. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAC.2016.67
[100]
D. Weyns, U. Iftikhar, D. Hughes, and N. Matthys. 2018. Applying architecture-based adaptation to automate the management of internet-of-things. In Software Architecture, C. Cuesta, D. Garlan, and J. Pérez (Eds.). Springer, 49–67.
[101]
D. Weyns, U. Iftikhar, D. Hughes, and N. Matthys. 2018. Applying architecture-based adaptation to automate the management of internet-of-things. In Software Architecture, C. Cuesta, D. Garlan, and J. Pérez (Eds.). Springer, 49–67.
[102]
D. Weyns, S. Malek, and J. Andersson. 2012. FORMS: Unifying reference model for formal specification of distributed self-adaptive systems. ACM Trans. Auton. Adapt. Syst. 7, 1 (2012), 8.
[103]
Bin Xiao. 2017. Self-evolvable knowledge-enhanced IoT data mobility for smart environment. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Internet of Things and Machine Learning. 1–14.
[104]
Satoru Yamagata, Hiroyuki Nakagawa, Yuichi Sei, Yasuyuki Tahara, and Akihiko Ohsuga. 2019. Self-adaptation for heterogeneous client-server online games. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligence Science. Springer, 65–79.
[105]
C. Zannier, G. Melnik, and F. Maurer. 2006. On the success of empirical studies in the international conference on software engineering. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Software Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1145/1134285.1134333
[106]
S. Žapčević and P. Butala. 2013. Adaptive process control based on a self-learning mechanism in autonomous manufacturing systems. Int. J. Adv. Manufactur. Technol. 66, 9–12 (2013), 1725–1743.
[107]
T. Zhao, W. Zhang, H. Zhao, and Z. Jin. 2017. A reinforcement learning-based framework for the generation and evolution of adaptation rules. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Autonomic Computing (ICAC’17). 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAC.2017.47
[108]
X. Zuo, G. Zhang, and W. Tan. 2014. Self-adaptive learning pso-based deadline constrained task scheduling for hybrid IAAS cloud. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 11, 2 (2014), 564–573. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2013.2272758

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Control and Intelligent Optimization of a Photovoltaic (PV) Inverter System: A ReviewEnergies10.3390/en1707157117:7(1571)Online publication date: 26-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Machine Learning-Based Forecasting of Temperature and Solar Irradiance for Photovoltaic SystemsEnergies10.3390/en1705112417:5(1124)Online publication date: 27-Feb-2024
  • (2024)The IDEA of Us: An Identity-Aware Architecture for Autonomous SystemsACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology10.1145/365443933:6(1-38)Online publication date: 28-Jun-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems
ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems  Volume 15, Issue 3
September 2020
88 pages
ISSN:1556-4665
EISSN:1556-4703
DOI:10.1145/3475940
Issue’s Table of Contents
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike International 4.0 License.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 18 August 2021
Accepted: 01 June 2021
Revised: 01 February 2021
Received: 01 October 2020
Published in TAAS Volume 15, Issue 3

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. MAPE-K
  2. Self-adaptation
  3. feedback loops

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed

Funding Sources

  • KU Leuven / Université de Lille

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)1,903
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)224
Reflects downloads up to 02 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Control and Intelligent Optimization of a Photovoltaic (PV) Inverter System: A ReviewEnergies10.3390/en1707157117:7(1571)Online publication date: 26-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Machine Learning-Based Forecasting of Temperature and Solar Irradiance for Photovoltaic SystemsEnergies10.3390/en1705112417:5(1124)Online publication date: 27-Feb-2024
  • (2024)The IDEA of Us: An Identity-Aware Architecture for Autonomous SystemsACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology10.1145/365443933:6(1-38)Online publication date: 28-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Dealing with Drift of Adaptation Spaces in Learning-based Self-Adaptive Systems Using Lifelong Self-AdaptationACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems10.1145/363642819:1(1-57)Online publication date: 14-Feb-2024
  • (2024)Deep-Reinforcement-Learning-Based Distributed Dynamic Spectrum Access in Multiuser Multichannel Cognitive Radio Internet of Things NetworksIEEE Internet of Things Journal10.1109/JIOT.2024.335927711:10(17495-17509)Online publication date: 15-May-2024
  • (2024)Reimagining Self-Adaptation in the Age of Large Language Models2024 IEEE 21st International Conference on Software Architecture Companion (ICSA-C)10.1109/ICSA-C63560.2024.00036(171-174)Online publication date: 4-Jun-2024
  • (2024)The State of the Art of Emergent Software SystemsIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.336990312(31808-31823)Online publication date: 2024
  • (2024)A Survey on Forensics and Compliance Auditing for Critical Infrastructure ProtectionIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2023.334855212(2409-2444)Online publication date: 2024
  • (2024)Adaptive generative adjustable electric fence method and internal obstacle detectionTransportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies10.1016/j.trc.2024.104601162(104601)Online publication date: May-2024
  • (2024)HADESJournal of Network and Computer Applications10.1016/j.jnca.2023.103764221:COnline publication date: 14-Mar-2024
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Get Access

Login options

Full Access

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media