research-article

Curiosity Notebook: The Design of a Research Platform for Learning by Teaching

Authors:

Apoorva Chauhan,

Elizabeth Nilsen,

Edith LawAuthors Info & Claims

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Volume 5, Issue CSCW2

Article No.: 394, Pages 1 - 26

https://doi.org/10.1145/3479538

Published: 18 October 2021 Publication History

Abstract

While learning by teaching is a popular pedagogical technique, it is a learning phenomenon that is difficult to study due to variability in the tutor-tutee pairings and learning environments. In this paper, we introduce the Curiosity Notebook, a web-based research infrastructure for studying learning by teaching via the use of a teachable agent. We describe and provide rationale for the set of features that are essential for such a research infrastructure, outline how these features have evolved over two design iterations of the Curiosity Notebook and through two studies---a 4-week field study with 12 elementary school students interacting with a NAO robot and an hour-long online observational study with 41 university students interacting with an agent---demonstrate the utility of our platform for making observations of learning-by-teaching phenomena in diverse learning environments. Based on these findings, we conclude the paper by reflecting on our design evolution and envisioning future iterations of the Curiosity Notebook.

References

[1]

Mehdi Alaimi, Edith Law, Kevin D. Pantasdo, Pierre-Yves Oudeyer, and Hélène Sauzeon. 2020. Pedagogical Agents for Fostering Question-Asking Skills in Children. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376776

Digital Library

[2]

Linda F Annis. 1983. The processes and effects of peer tutoring. Human Learning: Journal of Practical Research & Applications, Vol. 2, 1 (1983), 39--47.

[3]

Safiye Aslan. 2017. Learning by Teaching: Can It Be Utilized to Develop Inquiry Skills?. Journal of Education and Training Studies, Vol. 5, 12 (2017), 190--198.

[4]

Robert K Atkinson. 2002. Optimizing learning from examples using animated pedagogical agents. Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 94, 2 (2002), 416.

[5]

Christoph Bartneck, Dana Kulić, Elizabeth Croft, and Susana Zoghbi. 2008. Measurement Instruments for the Anthropomorphism, Animacy, Likeability, Perceived Intelligence, and Perceived Safety of Robots. International Journal of Social Robotics, Vol. 1, 1 (Nov. 2008), 71--81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-008-0001--3

[6]

Satabdi Basu, Gautam Biswas, and John S. Kinnebrew. 2016. Using Multiple Representations to Simultaneously Learn Computational Thinking and Middle School Science. In Proceedings of the Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Phoenix, Arizona) (AAAI'16). AAAI Press, California, US, 3705--3711.

[7]

Amy L Baylor and Yanghee Kim. 2005. Simulating instructional roles through pedagogical agents. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, Vol. 15, 2 (2005), 95--115.

Digital Library

[8]

Carl A Benware and Edward L Deci. 1984. Quality of Learning With an Active Versus Passive Motivational Set. American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 21, 4 (Jan. 1984), 755--765. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312021004755

[9]

Gautam Biswas, Krittaya Leelawong, Daniel Schwartz, Nancy Vye, and The Teachable Agents Group at Vanderbilt. 2005. Learning by Teaching: A New Agent Paradigm for Educational Software. Applied Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 19, 3--4 (2005), 363--392. https://doi.org/10.1080/08839510590910200

[10]

Cynthia Breazeal, Nick Depalma, Jeff Orkin, Sonia Chernova, and Malte Jung. 2013. Crowdsourcing Human-Robot Interaction: New Methods and System Evaluation in a Public Environment. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, Vol. 2 (03 2013), 82--111. https://doi.org/10.5898/JHRI.2.1.Breazeal

Digital Library

[11]

Jessy Ceha, Nalin Chhibber, Joslin Goh, Corina McDonald, Pierre-Yves Oudeyer, Dana Kulić, and Edith Law. 2019. Expression of Curiosity in Social Robots: Design, Perception, and Effects on Behaviour. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI '19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 406, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300636

Digital Library

[12]

Jessy Ceha, Ken Jen Lee, Elizabeth Nilsen, Joslin Goh, and Edith Law. 2021. Can a Humorous Conversational Agent Enhance Learning Experience and Outcomes? Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445068

Digital Library

[13]

Shruti Chandra, Raul Paradeda, Hang Yin, Pierre Dillenbourg, Rui Prada, and Ana Paiva. 2017. Affect of Robot's Competencies on Children's Perception. In Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems (S ao Paulo, Brazil) (AAMAS '17). International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Richland, SC, 1490--1492.

[14]

Catherine C. Chase, Doris B. Chin, Marily A. Oppezzo, and Daniel L. Schwartz. 2009. Teachable Agents and the Protégé Effect: Increasing the Effort Towards Learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, Vol. 18, 4 (01 Aug 2009), 334--352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-009--9180--4

[15]

Doris B Chin, Ilsa M Dohmen, Britte H Cheng, Marily A Oppezzo, Catherine C Chase, and Daniel L Schwartz. 2010. Preparing students for future learning with teachable agents. Educational Technology Research and Development, Vol. 58, 6 (2010), 649--669.

[16]

Doris B Chin, Ilsa M Dohmen, and Daniel L Schwartz. 2013. Young children can learn scientific reasoning with teachable agents. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, Vol. 6, 3 (2013), 248--257.

Digital Library

[17]

Jacob Cohen. 1992. A power primer. Psychological bulletin, Vol. 112, 1 (1992), 155.

[18]

Peter A Cohen, James A Kulik, and Chen-Lin C Kulik. 1982. Educational outcomes of tutoring: A meta-analysis of findings. American educational research journal, Vol. 19, 2 (1982), 237--248.

[19]

Elaine B. Coleman, Ann L. Brown, and Inna D. Rivkin. 1997. The Effect of Instructional Explanations on Learning From Scientific Texts. Journal of the Learning Sciences, Vol. 6, 4 (Oct. 1997), 347--365. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0604_1

[20]

Pieter M.A. Desmet, Martijn H. Vastenburg, and Natalia Romero. 2016. Mood measurement with Pick-A-Mood: review of current methods and design of a pictorial self-report scale. J. of Design Research, Vol. 14, 3 (2016), 241. https://doi.org/10.1504/jdr.2016.079751

[21]

Pierre Dillenbourg. 1999. What do you mean by collaborative learning? Oxford: Elsevier, Oxford, United Kingdom, 1--19.

[22]

M. Suzanne Donovan and John D. Bransford. 2005. How Students Learn: History, Mathematics, and Science in the Classroom .The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/10126

[23]

David Duran. 2016. Learning-by-teaching. Evidence and implications as a pedagogical mechanism. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, Vol. 54, 5 (Feb. 2016), 476--484. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2016.1156011

[24]

Mona Emara, Ramkumar Rajendran, Gautam Biswas, Mahmod Okasha, and Adel Alsaeid Elbanna. 2018. Do Students' Learning Behaviors Differ when They Collaborate in Open-Ended Learning Environments? Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., Vol. 2, CSCW, Article 49 (Nov. 2018), 19 pages.

Digital Library

[25]

Richard M Felder, Linda K Silverman, et al. 1988. Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering education, Vol. 78, 7 (1988), 674--681.

[26]

Logan Fiorella and Richard E. Mayer. 2013. The relative benefits of learning by teaching and teaching expectancy. Contemporary Educational Psychology, Vol. 38, 4 (Oct. 2013), 281--288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.06.001

[27]

Logan Fiorella and Richard E. Mayer. 2014. Role of expectations and explanations in learning by teaching. Contemporary Educational Psychology, Vol. 39, 2 (April 2014), 75--85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.01.001

[28]

Logan Fiorella and Richard E. Mayer. 2015. Eight Ways to Promote Generative Learning. Educational Psychology Review, Vol. 28, 4 (Nov. 2015), 717--741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015--9348--9

[29]

John H Flavell and Henry M Wellman. 1975. Metamemory., 66 pages.

[30]

Marta Flores and David Duran. 2013. Effects of Peer Tutoring on Reading Self-Concept. IJEP -- International Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 2, 3 (2013), 297--324. https://doi.org/10.4471/ijep.2013.29

[31]

Anton K Formann. 1984. Die latent-class-analyse: Einführung in Theorie und Anwendung .Beltz, Weinheim, Germany.

[32]

Catherine O Fritz, Peter E Morris, and Jennifer J Richler. 2012. Effect size estimates: current use, calculations, and interpretation. Journal of experimental psychology: General, Vol. 141, 1 (2012), 2.

[33]

Luke Fryer and Rollo Carpenter. 2006. Bots as language learning tools. Language Learning & Technology, Vol. 10, 3 (2006), 8--14.

[34]

James J Gallagher and Mary Jane Aschner. 1963. A preliminary report on analyses of classroom interaction. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly of Behavior and Development, Vol. 9, 3 (1963), 183--194.

[35]

Kashinath Garkal, Anjali Shete, et al. 2018. Learning by teaching: Role of??? peer-assisted learning??? in medical education. Journal of Contemporary Mediacal Education, Vol. 9, 1 (2018), 17--20.

[36]

David Griol and Zoraida Callejas. 2013. An Architecture to Develop Multimodal Educative Applications with Chatbots. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, Vol. 10, 3 (Jan. 2013), 175. https://doi.org/10.5772/55791

[37]

Joachim Grzega and Marion Schöner. 2008. The didactic model LdL (Lernen durch Lehren) as a way of preparing students for communication in a knowledge society. Journal of Education for Teaching, Vol. 34, 3 (2008), 167--175.

[38]

Joseph F Hair, William C Black, Barry J Babin, and Rolph E Anderson. 2009. Multivariate Data Analysis .Pearson Education Limited, Harlow, Essex.

[39]

Neil T Heffernan and Ethan A Croteau. 2004. Web-based evaluations showing differential learning for tutorial strategies employed by the Ms. Lindquist tutor. In International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 491--500.

[40]

Kate Hone, Farah Akhtar, and Martin Saffu. 2003. Affective agents to reduce user frustration: the role of agent embodiment. In Proceedings of Human-Computer Interaction (HCI2003) (Bath, UK). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 4.

[41]

Deanna Hood, Séverin Lemaignan, and Pierre Dillenbourg. 2015. When Children Teach a Robot to Write: An Autonomous Teachable Humanoid Which Uses Simulated Handwriting. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Portland, Oregon, USA) (HRI '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 83--90. https://doi.org/10.1145/2696454.2696479

Digital Library

[42]

Vincent Hoogerheide, Sofie M.M. Loyens, and Tamara van Gog. 2014. Effects of creating video-based modeling examples on learning and transfer. Learning and Instruction, Vol. 33 (Oct. 2014), 108--119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.04.005

[43]

Phan Duy Hung, Nguyen Thi Thuy Lien, and Nguyen Duc Ngoc. 2019. Customer Segmentation Using Hierarchical Agglomerative Clustering. In Proceedings of the 2019 2nd International Conference on Information Science and Systems (Tokyo, Japan) (ICISS 2019). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 33--37. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322645.3322677

Digital Library

[44]

Terrence J Keeney, Samuel R Cannizzo, and John H Flavell. 1967. Spontaneous and induced verbal rehearsal in a recall task. Child Development, Vol. 38 (1967), 953--966.

[45]

John W Kinch. 1963. A formalized theory of the self-concept. Amer. J. Sociology, Vol. 68, 4 (1963), 481--486.

[46]

John S Kinnebrew, James R Segedy, and Gautam Biswas. 2014. Analyzing the temporal evolution of students' behaviors in open-ended learning environments. Metacognition and learning, Vol. 9, 2 (2014), 187--215.

[47]

Deanna Kuhn. 2000. Metacognitive development. Current directions in psychological science, Vol. 9, 5 (2000), 178--181.

[48]

Deanna Kuhn and Maria Pease. 2006. Do children and adults learn differently? Journal of cognition and development, Vol. 7, 3 (2006), 279--293.

[49]

Marjan Laal and Seyed Mohammad Ghodsi. 2012. Benefits of collaborative learning. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences, Vol. 31 (2012), 486--490.

[50]

Andreas Lachner, Iris Backfisch, Vincent Hoogerheide, Tamara van Gog, and Alexander Renkl. 2020. Timing matters! Explaining between study phases enhances students' learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 112, 4 (May 2020), 841--853. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000396

[51]

Edith Law, Parastoo Baghaei Ravari, Nalin Chhibber, Dana Kulic, Stephanie Lin, Kevin D. Pantasdo, Jessy Ceha, Sangho Suh, and Nicole Dillen. 2020. Curiosity Notebook: A Platform for Learning by Teaching Conversational Agents. In Extended Abstracts of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Late Breaking Work) (CHI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--8.

Digital Library

[52]

Krittaya Leelawong and Gautam Biswas. 2008. Designing learning by teaching agents: The Betty's Brain system. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, Vol. 18, 3 (2008), 181--208.

Digital Library

[53]

Krittaya Leelawong, Joan Davis, Nancy Vye, Gautam Biswas, Daniel Schwartz, Kadira Belynne, Thomas Katzlberger, and John Bransford. 2002. The effects of feedback in supporting learning by teaching in a teachable agent environment. In The Fifth International Conference of the Learning Sciences. International Society of the Learning Sciences, Boulder, CO, USA, 245--252.

[54]

Lisa Legault. 2017. Self-Determination Theory. In Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, 1--9. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--319--28099--8_1162--1

[55]

Ross B MacDonald. 1991. An analysis of verbal interaction in college tutorials. Journal of Developmental Education, Vol. 15, 1 (1991), 2.

[56]

Noboru Matsuda, Wenting Weng, and Natalie Wall. 2020. The Effect of Metacognitive Scaffolding for Learning by Teaching a Teachable Agent. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, Vol. 30 (2020), 1--37.

[57]

Noboru Matsuda, Evelyn Yarzebinski, Victoria Keiser, Rohan Raizada, William W. Cohen, Gabriel J. Stylianides, and Kenneth R. Koedinger. 2013. Cognitive Anatomy of Tutor Learning: Lessons Learned with SimStudent. Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 105, 4 (2013), 1152--1163. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031955

[58]

Judith E Miller et al. 1994. Group Dynamics: Understanding Group Success and Failure in Collaborative Learning. New directions for teaching and learning, Vol. 59 (1994), 33--44.

[59]

Roxana Moreno, Richard E Mayer, Hiller A Spires, and James C Lester. 2001. The case for social agency in computer-based teaching: Do students learn more deeply when they interact with animated pedagogical agents? Cognition and instruction, Vol. 19, 2 (2001), 177--213.

[60]

Anabil Munshi, Ramkumar Rajendran, Allison Moore, Gautam Biswas, and Jaclyn Ocumpaugh. 2018. Studying the interactions between components of self regulated learning in open ended learning environments. In Proceedings of International Conference of the Learning Sciences, ICLS. International Society of the Learning Sciences, IN, USA, 1691--1692.

[61]

NASA. 2012. Rock Outcrops on Mars and Earth. https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/msl/multimedia/pia16189.html

[62]

David Nichols. 1994. Issues in designing learning by teaching systems. In Proceedings of the East-West International Conference on Computer Technologies in Education, Vol. 1. International Centre for Scientific and Technical Information, Moscow, Russia, 6.

[63]

Amy Ogan, Samantha Finkelstein, Elijah Mayfield, Claudia D'Adamo, Noboru Matsuda, and Justine Cassell. 2012. "Oh dear stacy!" social interaction, elaboration, and learning with teachable agents. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 39--48.

Digital Library

[64]

Sandra Y. Okita and Daniel L. Schwartz. 2013. Learning by Teaching Human Pupils and Teachable Agents: The Importance of Recursive Feedback. Journal of the Learning Sciences, Vol. 22, 3 (July 2013), 375--412. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2013.807263

[65]

Sandra Y. Okita, Selen Turkay, Mihwa Kim, and Yumiko Murai. 2013. Learning by teaching with virtual peers and the effects of technological design choices on learning. Computers & Education, Vol. 63 (April 2013), 176--196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.005

Digital Library

[66]

SeungWon Park and ChanMin Kim. 2015. Boosting learning-by-teaching in virtual tutoring. Computers & Education, Vol. 82 (2015), 129--140.

Digital Library

[67]

John P Powell and Lee W Andresen. 1985. Humour and teaching in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 10, 1 (1985), 79--90.

[68]

Parastoo Baghaei Ravari, Ken Jen Lee, Edith Law, and Dana Kulic. 2021. Effects of an Adaptive Robot Encouraging Teamwork on Students' Learning. In 2021 30th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 8.

Digital Library

[69]

Bart Rienties, Dirk Tempelaar, Piet Van den Bossche, Wim Gijselaers, and Mien Segers. 2009. The role of academic motivation in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 25, 6 (2009), 1195--1206.

Digital Library

[70]

Debbie R Robinson, Janet Ward Schofield, and Katrina L Steers-Wentzell. 2005. Peer and cross-age tutoring in math: Outcomes and their design implications. Educational Psychology Review, Vol. 17, 4 (2005), 327--362.

[71]

Rod D Roscoe. 2014. Self-monitoring and knowledge-building in learning by teaching. Instructional Science, Vol. 42, 3 (2014), 327--351.

[72]

Rod D Roscoe and Michelene TH Chi. 2004. The influence of the tutee in learning by peer tutoring. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Vol. 26. Cognitive Science Society, Austin, TX, 1179--1184.

[73]

Rod D. Roscoe and Michelene T.H. Chi. 2007. Understanding Tutor Learning: Knowledge-building and Knowledge-telling in Peer Tutors' Explanations and Questions. Review of Educational Research, Vol. 77, 4 (2007), 534--574. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307309920

[74]

Peter J Rousseeuw. 1987. Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. Journal of computational and applied mathematics, Vol. 20 (1987), 53--65.

Digital Library

[75]

Richard M Ryan. 1982. Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of personality and social psychology, Vol. 43, 3 (1982), 450.

[76]

James R. Segedy, John S. Kinnebrew, and Gautam Biswas. 2012. Supporting student learning using conversational agents in a teachable agent environment. In 10th International Conference of the Learning Sciences: The Future of Learning, ICLS 2012 - Proceedings. International Society of the Learning Sciences, IN, USA, 5.

[77]

Niral Shah, Colleen Lewis, and Roxane Caires. 2014. Analyzing equity in collaborative learning situations: A comparative case study in elementary computer science. In Learning and Becoming in Practice: The International Conference of the Learning Sciences. International Society of the Learning Sciences, Boulder, CO, USA.

[78]

Ameneh Shamekhi, Q. Vera Liao, Dakuo Wang, Rachel K. E. Bellamy, and Thomas Erickson. 2018. Face Value? Exploring the Effects of Embodiment for a Group Facilitation Agent .Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173965

Digital Library

[79]

Norman A Sprinthall and Jacqueline R Scott. 1989. Promoting psychological development, math achievement, and success attribution of female students through deliberate psychological education. Journal of counseling psychology, Vol. 36, 4 (1989), 440.

[80]

Reema Srivastava and Muhammed Rashid. 2018. Who is at edge--tutors or tutees? Academic, social and emotional elevation through peer tutoring. In Proceedings of 1st MEC TESOL Conference. Arab World English Journal, Texas, USA, 64--77.

[81]

Jason Tan, Gautam Biswas, and Daniel L Schwartz. 2006. Feedback for Metacognitive Support in Learning by Teaching Environments. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Vol. 28 (2006), 828--833.

[82]

Fumihide Tanaka, Kyosuke Isshiki, Fumiki Takahashi, Manabu Uekusa, Rumiko Sei, and Kaname Hayashi. 2015. Pepper Learns Together with Children: Development of an Educational Application. In Proceedings of the IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids '15). IEEE, Whitestone, NY, USA, 270--275. https://doi.org/10.1109/HUMANOIDS.2015.7363546

Digital Library

[83]

Fumihide Tanaka and Shizuko Matsuzoe. 2012. Children Teach a Care-Receiving Robot to Promote Their Learning: Field Experiments in a Classroom for Vocabulary Learning. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, Vol. 1, 1 (2012), 78--95. https://doi.org/10.5898/JHRI.1.1.Tanaka

Digital Library

[84]

Sam Thellman, Annika Silvervarg, Agneta Gulz, and Tom Ziemke. 2016. Physical vs. Virtual Agent Embodiment and Effects on Social Interaction. In Intelligent Virtual Agents. Springer International Publishing AG, Switzerland, 412--415. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--319--47665-0_44

[85]

Robert J Vallerand, Luc G Pelletier, Marc R Blais, Nathalie M Briere, Caroline Senecal, and Evelyne F Vallieres. 1992. The Academic Motivation Scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education. Educational and psychological measurement, Vol. 52, 4 (1992), 1003--1017.

[86]

Suzanne Vossen, Jaap Ham, and Cees Midden. 2009. Social Influence of a Persuasive Agent: The Role of Agent Embodiment and Evaluative Feedback. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology (Claremont, California, USA) (Persuasive '09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 46, 7 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/1541948.1542007

Digital Library

[87]

John Wagster, Jason Tan, Yanna Wu, Gautam Biwas, and Dan Schwartz. 2007. Do learning by teaching environments with metacognitive support help students develop better learning behaviors?. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (Nashville, TN), Vol. 29. Cognitive Science Society, Austin, TX, 695--700.

[88]

M. B. WILK and R. GNANADESIKAN. 1968. Probability plotting methods for the analysis for the analysis of data. Biometrika, Vol. 55, 1 (1968), 1--17. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/55.1.1

[89]

Elmira Yadollahi, Wafa Johal, Ana Paiva, and Pierre Dillenbourg. 2018. When Deictic Gestures in a Robot Can Harm Child-robot Collaboration. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 195--206. https://doi.org/10.1145/3202185.3202743

Digital Library

[90]

Esther Ziegler and Elsbeth Stern. 2014. Delayed benefits of learning elementary algebraic transformations through contrasted comparisons. Learning and Instruction, Vol. 33 (2014), 131--146.

Cited By

Lee JLee BChoi SSeo JChoe E(2024)Identify, Adapt, PersistProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36595858:2(1-21)Online publication date: 15-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3659585
Johansen SBrophy CRittenbruch MDonovan J(2024)Characterising CSCW Research on Human-Robot CollaborationProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36409998:CSCW1(1-31)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3640999
Li XZhou XDong RZhang YWang X(2024)Efficient Bottom-Up Synthesis for Programs with Local VariablesProceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages10.1145/36328948:POPL(1540-1568)Online publication date: 5-Jan-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3632894
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Curiosity Notebook: The Design of a Research Platform for Learning by Teaching
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Interaction design
    1. Empirical studies in interaction design

Recommendations

Curiosity Notebook: A Platform for Learning by Teaching Conversational Agents
CHI EA '20: Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Learning by teaching is an established pedagogical technique; however, the exact process through which learning happens remains difficult to assess, in part due to the variability in the tutor-tutee pairing and interaction. Prior research proposed the ...
Designing Learning by Teaching Agents: The Betty's Brain System

The idea that teaching others is a powerful way to learn is intuitively compelling and supported in the research literature. We have developed computer-based, domain-independent Teachable Agents that students can teach using a visual representation. The ...
What and How You Explain Matters: Inquisitive Teachable Agent Scaffolds Knowledge-Building for Tutor Learning
Artificial Intelligence in Education
Abstract
Students learn by teaching a teachable agent, a phenomenon called tutor learning. Literature suggests that tutor learning happens when students (who tutor the teachable agent) actively reflect on their knowledge when responding to the teachable ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction Volume 5, Issue CSCW2

CSCW2

October 2021

5376 pages

EISSN:2573-0142

DOI:10.1145/3493286

Editor:
Jeff Nichols
Apple Inc., United States

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © 2021 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 18 October 2021

Published in PACMHCI Volume 5, Issue CSCW2

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Funding Sources

University of Waterloo Interdisciplinary Trailblazer Fund
NSERC Discovery Grant

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

26
Total Citations
View Citations
360
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)78
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6

Reflects downloads up to 02 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Lee JLee BChoi SSeo JChoe E(2024)Identify, Adapt, PersistProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36595858:2(1-21)Online publication date: 15-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3659585
Johansen SBrophy CRittenbruch MDonovan J(2024)Characterising CSCW Research on Human-Robot CollaborationProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36409998:CSCW1(1-31)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3640999
Li XZhou XDong RZhang YWang X(2024)Efficient Bottom-Up Synthesis for Programs with Local VariablesProceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages10.1145/36328948:POPL(1540-1568)Online publication date: 5-Jan-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3632894
Figueiredo MAnkrah EPowell JEpstein DChen Y(2024)Powered by AIProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36314147:4(1-24)Online publication date: 12-Jan-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3631414
Cai ZWei S(2024)From Viewers to Teachers: Child-Led Teaching Strategies and Family Participation in YouTube How-TosProceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference10.1145/3628516.3655821(396-407)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3628516.3655821
Liu JYao YAn PWang Q(2024)PeerGPT: Probing the Roles of LLM-based Peer Agents as Team Moderators and Participants in Children's Collaborative LearningExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3651008(1-6)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613905.3651008
Cai ZPark SNixon NDoroudi S(2024)Advancing Knowledge Together: Integrating Large Language Model-based Conversational AI in Small Group Collaborative LearningExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3650868(1-9)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613905.3650868
Choi SLee HLee YKim J(2024)VIVID: Human-AI Collaborative Authoring of Vicarious Dialogues from Lecture VideosProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642867(1-26)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642867
Jin HLee SShin HKim J(2024)Teach AI How to Code: Using Large Language Models as Teachable Agents for Programming EducationProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642349(1-28)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642349
Sharma KNguyen AHong Y(2024)Self‐regulation and shared regulation in collaborative learning in adaptive digital learning environments: A systematic review of empirical studiesBritish Journal of Educational Technology10.1111/bjet.13459Online publication date: 9-Apr-2024
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13459
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Issue’s Table of Contents