Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Report on the first workshop on bias in automatic knowledge graph construction at AKBC 2020

Published: 20 August 2021 Publication History

Abstract

We report on the First Workshop on Bias in Automatic Knowledge Graph Construction (KG-BIAS), which was co-located with the Automated Knowledge Base Construction (AKBC) 2020 conference. Identifying and possibly remediating any sort of bias in knowledge graphs, or in the methods used to construct or query them, has clear implications for downstream systems accessing and using the information in such graphs. However, this topic remains relatively unstudied, so our main aim for organizing this workshop was to bring together a group of people from a variety of backgrounds with an interest in the topic, in order to arrive at a shared definition and roadmap for the future. Through a program that included two keynotes, an invited paper, three peer-reviewed full papers, and a plenary discussion, we have made initial inroads towards a common understanding and shared research agenda for this timely and important topic.

References

[1]
Pinar Barlas, Styliani Kleanthous, Kyriakos Kyriakou, and Jahna Otterbacher. What makes an image tagger fair? In Proceedings of the 27th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization, pages 95--103, 2019.
[2]
Kurt Bollacker, Colin Evans, Praveen Paritosh, Tim Sturge, and Jamie Taylor. Freebase: a collaboratively created graph database for structuring human knowledge. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, pages 1247--1250, 2008.
[3]
Tolga Bolukbasi, Kai-Wei Chang, James Y Zou, Venkatesh Saligrama, and Adam T Kalai. Man is to computer programmer as woman is to homemaker? debiasing word embeddings. In Advances in neural information processing systems, pages 4349--4357, 2016.
[4]
Antoine Bordes, Nicolas Usunier, Alberto Garcia-Duran, Jason Weston, and Oksana Yakhnenko. Translating embeddings for modeling multi-relational data. In Advances in neural information processing systems, pages 2787--2795, 2013.
[5]
Gianluca Demartini. Implicit bias in crowdsourced knowledge graphs. In Companion Proceedings of The 2019 World Wide Web Conference, pages 624--630, 2019.
[6]
Laura Dietz, Alexander Kotov, and Edgar Meij. Utilizing knowledge graphs for text-centric information retrieval. In The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR '18, page 1387--1390, 2018.
[7]
Joseph Fisher, Arpit Mittal, Dave Palfrey, and Christos Christodoulopoulos. Debiasing knowledge graph embeddings. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 7332--7345. Association for Computational Linguistics, November 2020. URL https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/2020.emnlp-main.595.
[8]
Emma J Gerritse, Faegheh Hasibi, and Arjen P de Vries. Bias in conversational search: The double-edged sword of the personalized knowledge graph. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM SIGIR on International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval, pages 133--136, 2020.
[9]
Krzysztof Janowicz, Bo Yan, Blake Regalia, Rui Zhu, and Gengchen Mai. Debiasing knowledge graphs: Why female presidents are not like female popes. In International Semantic Web Conference (P&D/Industry/BlueSky), 2018.
[10]
Kyriakos Kyriakou, Pinar Barlas, Styliani Kleanthous, and Jahna Otterbacher. Fairness in proprietary image tagging algorithms: A cross-platform audit on people images. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, volume 13, pages 313--322, 2019.
[11]
Edgar Meij, Tara Safavi, Chenyan Xiong, Gianluca Demartini, Miriam Redi, and Fatma Özcan. Proceedings of the KG-BIAS Workshop 2020 at AKBC 2020, 2020. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2007.11659.
[12]
Shubhanshu Mishra, Sijun He, and Luca Belli. Assessing demographic bias in named entity recognition, 2020. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2008.03415.
[13]
Maximilian Nickel, Kevin Murphy, Volker Tresp, and Evgeniy Gabrilovich. A review of relational machine learning for knowledge graphs. Proceedings of the IEEE, 104(1):11--33, 2015.
[14]
Tara Safavi and Danai Koutra. Codex: A comprehensive knowledge graph completion benchmark. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2020.
[15]
Joshua Shinavier, Kim Branson, Wei Zhang, Shima Dastgheib, Yuqing Gao, Bogdan Arsintescu, Fatma Özcan, and Edgar Meij. Panel: Knowledge graph industry applications. In Companion Proceedings of The 2019 World Wide Web Conference, pages 676--676, 2019.
[16]
Nikos Voskarides, Edgar Meij, Ridho Reinanda, Abhinav Khaitan, Miles Osborne, Giorgio Stefanoni, Prabhanjan Kambadur, and Maarten de Rijke. Weakly-supervised contextualization of knowledge graph facts. In The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval, pages 765--774, 2018.
[17]
Denny Vrandečić and Markus Krötzsch. Wikidata: a free collaborative knowledgebase. Communications of the ACM, 57(10):78--85, 2014.
[18]
Christine Wolf. From knowledge graphs to knowledge practices: On the need for transparency and explainability in enterprise knowledge graph applications, 2020.
[19]
Chenyan Xiong, Russell Power, and Jamie Callan. Explicit semantic ranking for academic search via knowledge graph embedding. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW '17, page 1271--1279, 2017.
[20]
Jieyu Zhao, Tianlu Wang, Mark Yatskar, Vicente Ordonez, and Kai-Wei Chang. Men also like shopping: Reducing gender bias amplification using corpus-level constraints. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 2979--2989, 2017.
[21]
Jieyu Zhao, Tianlu Wang, Mark Yatskar, Vicente Ordonez, and Kai-Wei Chang. Gender bias in coreference resolution: Evaluation and debiasing methods. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 2 (Short Papers), pages 15--20, 2018a.
[22]
Jieyu Zhao, Yichao Zhou, Zeyu Li, Wei Wang, and Kai-Wei Chang. Learning gender-neutral word embeddings. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 4847--4853, 2018b.
[23]
Jieyu Zhao, Tianlu Wang, Mark Yatskar, Ryan Cotterell, Vicente Ordonez, and Kai-Wei Chang. Gender bias in contextualized word embeddings. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), pages 629--634, 2019.

Index Terms

  1. Report on the first workshop on bias in automatic knowledge graph construction at AKBC 2020
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Information & Contributors

          Information

          Published In

          cover image ACM SIGIR Forum
          ACM SIGIR Forum  Volume 54, Issue 2
          December 2020
          115 pages
          ISSN:0163-5840
          DOI:10.1145/3483382
          Issue’s Table of Contents
          Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          Published: 20 August 2021
          Published in SIGIR Volume 54, Issue 2

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Research-article

          Contributors

          Other Metrics

          Bibliometrics & Citations

          Bibliometrics

          Article Metrics

          • 0
            Total Citations
          • 99
            Total Downloads
          • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
          Reflects downloads up to 08 Feb 2025

          Other Metrics

          Citations

          View Options

          Login options

          View options

          PDF

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          Figures

          Tables

          Media

          Share

          Share

          Share this Publication link

          Share on social media