Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3487553.3524632acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswebconfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Context, Prioritization, and Unexpectedness: Factors Influencing User Attitudes About Infographic and Comic Consent

Published: 16 August 2022 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Being asked to agree to data disclosure is a ubiquitous experience in digital services - yet it is rare to encounter a well-designed consent experience. Considering the momentum for a European data space where personal information easily flows across organizations, sectors, and nations, solving the thorny issue of ”how to get consent right” cannot be postponed any further. In this paper, we describe the first findings from a study based on 24 semi-structured interviews investigating participants’ expectations and opinions toward a consent form redesigned as a comic and an infographic in a data-sharing scenario. We found that time, information prioritization, tone, and audience fit are crucial when individuals are invited to disclose their information and the infographic is a better fit in biomedical scenarios.

    References

    [1]
    Anshu Agarwal and Andrew Meyer. 2009. Beyond usability: evaluating emotional response as an integral part of the user experience. In CHI ’09 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2919–2930. https://doi.org/10.1145/1520340.1520420
    [2]
    Jan M Bauer, Regitze Bergstrøm, and Rune Foss-Madsen. 2021. Are you sure, you want a cookie?–The effects of choice architecture on users’ decisions about sharing private online data. Computers in Human Behavior 120 (2021), 106729.
    [3]
    European Data Protection Board. 2020. Guidelines 05/2020 on Consent under Regulation 2016/679.
    [4]
    Maria Wilhelmina Botes and Arianna Rossi. 2021. Visualisation Techniques for Consent: Finding Common Ground in Comic Art with Indigenous Populations. In COnSeNT 2021 - 1st International Workshop on Consent Management in Online Services, Networks and Things. IEEE, Online, 292–297. https://doi.org/10.1109/EuroSPW54576.2021.00037
    [5]
    Scott Brave and Cliff Nass. 2007. EMOTION IN HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION(2 ed.). CRC Press, Stanford,California.
    [6]
    Bundesdruckerei. 2022. Datentreuhänder. https://www.bundesdruckerei.de/de/loesungen/datentreuhaender.
    [7]
    European Commission. 2020. Data Governance Act. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX.
    [8]
    European Commission. 2020. European data strategy Making the EU a role model for a society empowered by data. https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/europe-fit-digital-age/european-data-strategy_en.
    [9]
    European Commission. 2021. European Health Data Space. https://ec.europa.eu/health/ehealth-digital-health-and-care/european-health-data-space_en.
    [10]
    Domenico Consoli. 2010. A New Concept of Marketing: The Emotional Marketing. BRAND. Broad Research in Accounting, Negotiation, and Distribution 1, 11(2010), 52–59.
    [11]
    Matthew E. Falagas, Ioanna P. Korbila, Konstantina P. Giannopoulou, Barbara K. Kondilis, and George Peppas. 2009. Informed consent: how much and what do patients understand?The American Journal of Surgery 198, 3 (Sep 2009), 420–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.02.010
    [12]
    Rebecca A Ferrer, Jennifer Tehan Stanley, Kaitlin Graff, William MP Klein, Nina Goodman, Wendy L Nelson, and Silvia Salazar. 2016. The effect of emotion on visual attention to information and decision making in the context of informed consent process for clinical trials. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 29, 2-3 (2016), 245–253.
    [13]
    Rebecca A. Ferrer, Jennifer Tehan Stanley, Kaitlin Graff, William M. P. Klein, Nina Goodman, Wendy L. Nelson, and Silvia Salazar. 2016. The effect of emotion on visual attention to information and decision making in the context of informed consent process for clinical trials. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 29, 2–3 (2016), 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1871
    [14]
    Paul Graßl, Hanna Schraffenberger, Frederik Zuiderveen Borgesius, and Moniek Buijzen. 2021. Dark and Bright Patterns in Cookie Consent Requests. Journal of Digital Social Research 3, 11 (Feb 2021), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.33621/jdsr.v3i1.54
    [15]
    Louise Gröndahl. 2020. Public knowledge of digital cookies: Exploring the design of cookie consent forms.
    [16]
    Helena Haapio, Robert deRooy, and Thomas D Barton. 2018. New Contract Genres. In Data Protection/LegalTech. Proceedings of the 21th International Legal Informatics Symposium IRIS. Editions Weblaw, Bern, 455–460.
    [17]
    Jack Hardinges, Peter Wells, Alex Blandford, Jeni Tennison, and Anna Scott. 2019. Data trusts: lessons from three pilots. https://docs.google.com/document/d/118RqyUAWP3WIyyCO4iLUT3oOobnYJGibEhspr2v87jg/edit?usp=sharing
    [18]
    Georgios Kampanos and Siamak F Shahandashti. 2021. Accept All: The Landscape of Cookie Banners in Greece and the UK. Springer, Copenhagen, 213–227.
    [19]
    Farzaneh Karegar, John Sören Pettersson, and Simone Fischer-Hübner. 2020. The dilemma of user engagement in privacy notices: Effects of interaction modes and habituation on user attention. ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security (TOPS) 23, 1 (2020), 1–38.
    [20]
    Juergen Kuehling, Florian Sackmann, and Hilmar Schneider. 2020. Datenschutzrechtliche Dimensionen Datentreuhänder.
    [21]
    Célestin Matte, Nataliia Bielova, and Cristiana Santos. 2020. Do Cookie Banners Respect my Choice?: Measuring Legal Compliance of Banners from IAB Europe’s Transparency and Consent Framework. In 2020 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP). IEEE, San Francisco, US - Online, 791–809. https://doi.org/10.1109/SP40000.2020.00076
    [22]
    Thomas Mejtoft, Erik Frängsmyr, Ulrik Söderström, and Ole Norberg. 2021. Deceptive Design: Cookie Consent and Manipulative Patterns. In 34th Bled eConference Digital Support from Crisis to Progressive Change: Conference Proceedings. University of Maribor Press, Bled, Slovenia, 393–404. https://doi.org/10.18690/978-961-286-485-9.29
    [23]
    Midas Nouwens, Ilaria Liccardi, Michael Veale, David Karger, and Lalana Kagal. 2020. Dark Patterns after the GDPR: Scraping Consent Pop ups and Demonstrating their Influence. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Hawaii - Online, 1–13.
    [24]
    Article 29 Data Protection Working Party. 2018. Guidelines on Transparency under Regulation 2016/679, 17/EN WP260 rev.01. https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/article29/redirection/document/51025 Published: Online at.
    [25]
    Stefania Passera. 2017. Beyond the wall of contract text. Visualizing contracts to foster understanding and collaboration within and across organizations. Ph. D. Dissertation. Aalto University. https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/bitstream/handle/123456789/27292/isbn9789526075280.pdf
    [26]
    Robert Plutchik. 2001. The Nature of Emotions: Human emotions have deep evolutionary roots, a fact that may explain their complexity and provide tools for clinical practice. American Scientist 89, 4 (2001), 344–350.
    [27]
    Marie Potel-Seville and Elisabeth Talbourdet. 2021. Empowering children to understand and exercise their personal data rights. Ledizioni, Italy, 253–276.
    [28]
    Arianna Rossi, Rossana Ducato, Helena Haapio, and Stefania Passera. 2019. When Design Met Law: Design Patterns for Information Transparency. Droit de la Consommation Consumenterecht : DCCR 122–123 (2019), 79–121.
    [29]
    Arianna Rossi and Gabriele Lenzini. 2020. Transparency by design in data-informed research: A collection of information design patterns. Computer Law & Security Review 37, 105402 (2020), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2020.105402
    [30]
    Arianna Rossi and Gabriele Lenzini. 2021. Which Properties Has an Icon? A Critical Discussion on Data Protection Iconography. In Socio-Technical Aspects in Security and Trust(Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Thomas Großand Theo Tryfonas (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55958-8_12
    [31]
    Arianna Rossi and Monica Palmirani. 2020. Can Visual Design Provide Legal Transparency? The Challenges for Successful Implementation of Icons for Data Protection. MIT Press Design Issues 36, 3 (2020), 82–96.
    [32]
    Arianna Rossi and Monica Palmirani. 2020. What’s in an Icon? Promises and Pitfalls of Data Protection Iconography. Hart publishing, UK, 59–92.
    [33]
    Cristiana Santos, Arianna Rossi, Lorena Sanchez Chamorro, Kerstin Bongard-Blanchy, and Ruba Abu-Salma. 2021. Cookie Banners, What’s the Purpose? Analyzing Cookie Banner Text Through a Legal Lens. In Proceedings of the 20th Workshop on Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society. IEEE, South Korea - online, 187–194.
    [34]
    KA Schriver and J Frascara. 2015. The rhetoric of redesign in bureaucratic settings. Common Ground Publishing LLC, Champaign, IL, 173–184.
    [35]
    Annika Selzer and Ingo J. Timm. 2021. Gestaltung eines Systems zum anonymen Datenaustausch – Gewährleistung angemessener Schutzmaßnahmen. Datenschutz und Datensicherheit-DuD 45, 12 (2021), 826–830.
    [36]
    Annika Selzer and Ingo J. Timm. 2021. Potenziale anonymer Datenverarbeitungen nutzen – Ein Vorschlag für Smart Cities. Datenschutz und Datensicherheit-DuD 45, 12 (2021), 816–820.
    [37]
    Wilhelmina Maria Botes Steenberg. 2017. Visual communication as a legal-ethical tool for informed consent in genome research involving the San community of South Africa. Ph. D. Dissertation. University of South Africa.
    [38]
    Ronald K. Taylor. 2000. MARKETING STRATEGIES: GAINING A COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE THROUGH THE USE OF EMOTION. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal 10, 2 (Jan 2000), 146–152. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb046407
    [39]
    Governance Team. 2019. The Elements of Informed Consent. A Toolkit V2.0. https://doi.org/10.1145/3319535.3354212.
    [40]
    Christine Utz, Martin Degeling, Sascha Fahl, Florian Schaub, and Thorsten Holz. 2019. (Un)informed Consent: Studying GDPR Consent Notices in the Field. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security. ACM, London United Kingdom, 973–990. https://doi.org/10.1145/3319535.3354212
    [41]
    Rob Waller. 2011. What makes a good document? The Criteria We Use.
    [42]
    Zezhong Wang, Shunming Wang, Matteo Farinella, Dave Murray-Rust, Nathalie Henry Riche, and Benjamin Bach. 2019. Comparing Effectiveness and Engagement of Data Comics and Infographics. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Glasgow Scotland Uk, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300483
    [43]
    Cornelia Wermuth. 2016. Creativity in the translation of medical comics. Aracne, Naples, Italy, 1–15.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Comparing Attitudes Toward Different Consent Mediums: Semistructured Qualitative StudyJMIR Human Factors10.2196/5311311(e53113)Online publication date: 30-Apr-2024
    • (2024)Infographics in Educational Settings: A Literature ReviewIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2023.334808312(1633-1649)Online publication date: 2024

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    WWW '22: Companion Proceedings of the Web Conference 2022
    April 2022
    1338 pages
    ISBN:9781450391306
    DOI:10.1145/3487553
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 16 August 2022

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. comics
    2. consent UX
    3. data governance
    4. health data sharing
    5. transparency
    6. visualizations

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Funding Sources

    • Luxembourg National Research Fund (FNR)
    • European Union's Horizon 2020 Innovative Training Networks

    Conference

    WWW '22
    Sponsor:
    WWW '22: The ACM Web Conference 2022
    April 25 - 29, 2022
    Virtual Event, Lyon, France

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)238
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)28

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Comparing Attitudes Toward Different Consent Mediums: Semistructured Qualitative StudyJMIR Human Factors10.2196/5311311(e53113)Online publication date: 30-Apr-2024
    • (2024)Infographics in Educational Settings: A Literature ReviewIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2023.334808312(1633-1649)Online publication date: 2024

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Get Access

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media