poster

LEGO® Serious Play® in HRI research: results of a pilot imagining robotic care

Authors:

Stevienna de Saille,

Amanda SharkeyAuthors Info & Claims

CHI EA '22: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts

Article No.: 464, Pages 1 - 7

https://doi.org/10.1145/3491101.3519708

Published: 28 April 2022 Publication History

Abstract

In the last ten years, there have been great efforts to increase automation in the health-social care ecosystem, including the use of robotics to provide practical and social care. However, development of these robots often does not include potential users until late in the design process, so they may not adequately address user expectations or needs. This pilot introduces LEGO Serious Play workshops as design tools to support individuals’ articulation of the potential benefits and consequences of robot care systems. The narratives elicited address key themes in robotics for care, indicating the workshops’ potential use early in design.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (3491101.3519708-talk-video.mp4)

Talk Video

Download
103.74 MB

References

[1]

Jordan Abdi, Ahmed Al-Hindawi, Tiffany Ng, and Marcela P Vizcaychipi. 2018. Scoping review on the use of socially assistive robot technology in elderly care. BMJ open 8, 2 (2018), e018815.

[2]

Roger Bemelmans, Gert Jan Gelderblom, Pieter Jonker, and Luc De Witte. 2012. Socially assistive robots in elderly care: a systematic review into effects and effectiveness. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 13, 2(2012), 114–120.

[3]

Lykke Brogaard Bertel, Dorte Malig Rasmussen, and Ellen Christiansen. 2013. Robots for real: Developing a participatory design framework for implementing educational robots in real-world learning environments. In IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, New York, 437–444.

[4]

Hannah Louise Bradwell, Katie Jane Edwards, Rhona Winnington, Serge Thill, and Ray B Jones. 2019. Companion robots for older people: importance of user-centred design demonstrated through observations and focus groups comparing preferences of older people and roboticists in South West England. BMJ open 9, 9 (2019), e032468.

[5]

Linda Bulmer. 2011. the Use of Lego ® Serious Play in the Engineering Design Classroom. In Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA). CEEA-ACEG, Canada, 6. https://doi.org/10.24908/pceea.v0i0.3699

[6]

David Cameron, Stevienna de Saille, Emily C Collins, Jonathan M Aitken, Hugo Cheung, Adriel Chua, Ee Jing Loh, and James Law. 2021. The effect of social-cognitive recovery strategies on likability, capability and trust in social robots. Computers in Human Behavior 114 (2021), 106561.

Digital Library

[7]

Kathy Charmaz. 2008. Constructionism and the Grounded Theory Method. In Handbook of Constructionist Research, James A. Holstein and Jaber F. Gubrium (Eds.). Guilford Press, New York, 397–412.

[8]

Diego Compagna and Florian Kohlbacher. 2015. The limits of participatory technology development: The case of service robots in care facilities for older people. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 93 (2015), 19–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.07.012

[9]

Nekane Errasti, Neoemi Zabaleta, and Maria Ruiz. 2015. LSP workshop: applicating Lego Serious Play® to concept’s shared understanding. In International Joint Conference on the Learner in Engineering Education (IJCLEE 2015). Mondragon University, Mondragon, Spain, 9.

[10]

Executive Discovery Llc.2002. The Science of LEGO® SERIOUS PLAY™. The LEGO Company, Enfield, CT.

[11]

Department for Business Energy & Industrial Strategy. 2019. Care robots could revolutionise UK care system and provide staff extra support. Technical Report. Uk Ogvernment. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/care-robots-could-revolutionise-uk-care-system-and-provide-staff-extra-support

[12]

Elisabetta Frick, Stefano Tardini, and Lorenzo Cantoni. 2014. Lego Serious Play Applications To Enhance Creativity in Participatory Design. In Creativity in Business. KIE Conference Publications, Turkey, 200–210.

[13]

Volker Grienitz and André-Marcel Schmidt. 2012. Scenario Workshops for Strategic Management With Lego® Serious Play®. Problems of Management in the 21st Century 3, 1 (2012), 26–36. https://doi.org/10.33225/pmc/12.03.26

[14]

PA Hancock, Theresa T Kessler, Alexandra D Kaplan, John C Brill, and James L Szalma. 2020. Evolving trust in robots: specification through sequential and comparative meta-analyses. Human factors 63(2020), 1196–1229.

[15]

Claude P. Heath, Lizzie Coles-Kemp, and Peter A. Hall. 2014. Logical Lego? Co-constructed perspectives on service design. In Proceedings of NordDesign 2014 Conference, NordDesign 2014. Aalto Design Factory, Espoo, Finland, 416–425.

[16]

Lauren Leigh Hinthorne and Katy Schneider. 2012. Playing with purpose: Using serious play to enhance participatory development communication in research. International Journal of Communication 6, 1 (2012), 2801–2824.

[17]

Juuso Hyvönen. 2014. Creating shared understanding with Lego Serious Play. In Data- and Value-Driven Software Engineering with Deep Customer Insight: Proceedings of the Seminar 58314308. University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland, 36–42.

[18]

Bahar Irfan, Aditi Ramachandran, Samuel Spaulding, Dylan F Glas, Iolanda Leite, and Kheng Lee Koay. 2019. Personalization in long-term human-robot interaction. In 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE Press, New York, 685–686.

[19]

Sheila Jasanoff and Sang-Hyun Kim. 2009. Containing the atom: Sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva 47, 2 (2009), 119.

[20]

Hee Rin Lee, Selma Šabanović, Wan-Ling Chang, Shinichi Nagata, Jennifer Piatt, Casey Bennett, and David Hakken. 2017. Steps toward participatory design of social robots: mutual learning with older adults with depression. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction. ACM, New York, 244–253.

Digital Library

[21]

Kok Hoo Lee, Kenny Wei Liang Chua, Danny Shu Ming Koh, and Angela Li Sin Tan. 2018. Team Cognitive Walkthrough: Fusing Creativity and Effectiveness for a Novel Operation. In Congress of the International Ergonomics Association. Springer, New York, 117–126.

[22]

Arne Maibaum, Andreas Bischof, Jannis Hergesell, and Benjamin Lipp. 2021. A critique of robotics in health care. AI & SOCIETY 38(2021), 11.

[23]

SEAN McCusker. 2014. LEGO®, seriously: Thinking through building. International Journal of Knowledge, Innovation and Entrepreneurship 2, 1(2014), 27–37.

[24]

Carmen McLeod, Stevienna de Saille, and Brigitte Nerlich. 2018. Risk in synthetic biology—views from the lab. EMBO reports 19, 7 (2018), 2–5. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201845958

[25]

Stanislava Naneva, Marina Sarda Gou, Thomas L Webb, and Tony J Prescott. 2020. A systematic review of attitudes, anxiety, acceptance, and trust towards social robots. International Journal of Social Robotics 12 (2020), 1179–1201.

[26]

Parliamentary Office of Science & Technology. 2018. Robotics in Social Care. Technical Report. UK Government. https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/POST-PN-0591/POST-PN-0591.pdf

[27]

Dirk J. Primus and Stephan Sonnenburg. 2018. Flow Experience in Design Thinking and Practical Synergies with Lego Serious Play. Creativity Research Journal 30, 1 (2018), 104–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2018.1411574

[28]

Robert Rasmussen. 2006. When You Build in the World, You Build in Your Mind. Design Management Review 17, 3 (2006), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1948-7169.2006.tb00053.x

[29]

Hayley Robinson, Bruce MacDonald, and Elizabeth Broadbent. 2014. The role of healthcare robots for older people at home: A review. International Journal of Social Robotics 6, 4 (2014), 575–591.

[30]

Kasper Rodil, Matthias Rehm, and Antonia Lina Krummheuer. 2018. Co-Designing Social Robots with Cognitively Impaired Citizens. In Proceedings of the 10th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (Oslo, Norway) (NordiCHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 686–690. https://doi.org/10.1145/3240167.3240253

Digital Library

[31]

Emma J Rose and Elin A Björling. 2017. Designing for engagement: using participatory design to develop a social robot to measure teen stress. In Proceedings of the 35th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication. ACM, New York, 1–10.

Digital Library

[32]

Selma Šabanović, Wan-Ling Chang, Casey C Bennett, Jennifer A Piatt, and David Hakken. 2015. A robot of my own: participatory design of socially assistive robots for independently living older adults diagnosed with depression. In International conference on human aspects of it for the aged population. Springer, New York, 104–114.

[33]

Elizabeth B-N Sanders and Pieter Jan Stappers. 2008. Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. Co-design 4, 1 (2008), 5–18.

[34]

Olga Simon, Barbara Neuhofer, and Roman Egger. 2020. Human-robot interaction: Conceptualising trust in frontline teams through LEGO® Serious Play®. Tourism Management Perspectives 35, October 2019 (2020), 100692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2020.100692

[35]

Aarni Tuomi, Iis Tussyadiah, and Jason Steinmetz. 2019. Leveraging LEGO® Serious Play® to Embrace AI and Robots in Tourism. Annals of Tourism Research 81 (2019), 3.

[36]

Yana Wengel, Alison J. McIntosh, and Cheryl Cockburn-Wootten. 2016. Constructing tourism realities through LEGO Serious Play. Annals of Tourism Research 56, December (2016), 161–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2015.11.012

[37]

Sally Whelan, Kathy Murphy, Eva Barrett, Cheryl Krusche, Adam Santorelli, and Dympna Casey. 2018. Factors affecting the acceptability of social robots by older adults including people with dementia or cognitive impairment: a literature review. International Journal of Social Robotics 10, 5 (2018), 643–668.

Cited By

Koike ACagiltay BMutlu B(2024)Tangible Scenography as a Holistic Design Method for Human-Robot InteractionProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661530(459-475)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3661530
Cameron DCollins Ede Saille SEimontaite IGreenwood ALaw J(2023)The Social Triad Model: Considering the Deployer in a Novel Approach to Trust in Human–Robot InteractionInternational Journal of Social Robotics10.1007/s12369-023-01048-316:6(1405-1418)Online publication date: 13-Sep-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-023-01048-3

Recommendations

HRI pioneers workshop 2011
HRI '11: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Human-robot interaction

The 2011 HRI Pioneers Workshop will be conducted in conjunction with the 2011 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). The 2011 HRI Pioneers Workshop will provide a forum for graduate students and postdocs to learn about the ...
HRI pioneers workshop 2010
HRI '10: Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction

The field of human-robot interaction is new but growing rapidly. While there are now several established researchers in the field, many of the current human-robot interaction practitioners are students or recently graduated. This workshop, to be held in ...
HRI and UIST: Designing Socially Engaging Robot Interfaces
UIST Adjunct '24: Adjunct Proceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology

Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) is a field of study that focuses on the understanding, design, and evaluation of interactions between humans and robots. This workshop aims to bring together researchers interested in exploring the intersection of UIST and ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

CHI EA '22: Extended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 2022

3066 pages

ISBN:9781450391566

DOI:10.1145/3491101

Editors:
Simone Barbosa
PUC-Rio, Brazil
,
Cliff Lampe
University of Michigan, USA
,
Caroline Appert
Université Paris-Saclay, France
,
David A. Shamma
Toyota Research Institute, USA

Copyright © 2022 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 28 April 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Poster
Research
Refereed limited

Funding Sources

UKRI Trustworthy Autonomous Systems Hub

Conference

CHI '22

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

CHI '22: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 29 - May 5, 2022

LA, New Orleans, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,164 of 23,696 submissions, 26%

Upcoming Conference

CHI 2025

Sponsor:
sigchi

ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 26 - May 1, 2025

Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

2
Total Citations
View Citations
159
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)34
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

Reflects downloads up to 25 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Koike ACagiltay BMutlu B(2024)Tangible Scenography as a Holistic Design Method for Human-Robot InteractionProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661530(459-475)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3661530
Cameron DCollins Ede Saille SEimontaite IGreenwood ALaw J(2023)The Social Triad Model: Considering the Deployer in a Novel Approach to Trust in Human–Robot InteractionInternational Journal of Social Robotics10.1007/s12369-023-01048-316:6(1405-1418)Online publication date: 13-Sep-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-023-01048-3

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents