Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3500868.3559441acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Facilitating Continuous Text Messaging in Online Romantic Encounters by Expanded Keywords Enumeration

Published: 08 November 2022 Publication History

Abstract

An increasing number of people are looking for romantic partners online. Many of them first converse online before deciding whether or not to meet in-person. However, it is often challenging to have smooth and continuous conversations online with someone who they have never met in person. To handle this problem, we built a proof-of-concept system, Tomi, that dynamically suggests various conversation topic seeds related to the latest received messages in real-time. It selects a keyword from an incoming message and returns five contextually relevant topic seeds. In a qualitative study with eight dyads that simulated the common setting of online match-making, users could continue their conversations either by directly or indirectly utilizing the suggested topic seeds. Also, our system boosted their confidence during the chat. Lastly, we analyzed the trade-offs between several design alternatives and presented our reflections on a system supporting continuous conversations with diverse topics.

References

[1]
S.P. Abney, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics, and Philosophy. 1983. The English Noun Phrase in Its Sentential Aspect. MIT Department of Linguistics and Philosophy.
[2]
Paul André, m.c. schraefel, Jaime Teevan, and Susan T. Dumais. 2009. Discovery is Never by Chance: Designing for (Un)Serendipity. In Proceedings of the Seventh ACM Conference on Creativity and Cognition (Berkeley, California, USA) (C&C ’09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 305–314. https://doi.org/10.1145/1640233.1640279
[3]
Eric P.S. Baumer, Xiaotong Xu, Christine Chu, Shion Guha, and Geri K. Gay. 2017. When Subjects Interpret the Data: Social Media Non-use As a Case for Adapting the Delphi Method to CSCW. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (Portland, Oregon, USA) (CSCW ’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1527–1543. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998182
[4]
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
[5]
Clyde Cash. 2009. List of OkCupid Answers. https://sonichu.com/cwcki/List_of_OkCupid_Answers.
[6]
Elizabeth Clark, Anne Spencer Ross, Chenhao Tan, Yangfeng Ji, and Noah A. Smith. 2018. Creative Writing with a Machine in the Loop: Case Studies on Slogans and Stories. In 23rd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (Tokyo, Japan) (IUI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 329–340. https://doi.org/10.1145/3172944.3172983
[7]
Simon De Deyne, Danielle J. Navarro, Amy Perfors, Marc Brysbaert, and Gert Storms. 2019. The “Small World of Words” English word association norms for over 12,000 cue words. Behavior Research Methods 51, 3 (01 Jun 2019), 987–1006. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1115-7
[8]
R. Diestel. 2006. Graph Theory. Springer.
[9]
Jennifer L Gibbs, Nicole B Ellison, and Chih-Hui Lai. 2011. First Comes Love, Then Comes Google: An Investigation of Uncertainty Reduction Strategies and Self-Disclosure in Online Dating. Communication Research 38, 1 (2011), 70–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210377091
[10]
Joey Chiao-Yin Hsiao and Tawanna R. Dillahunt. 2017. People-Nearby Applications: How Newcomers Move Their Relationships Offline and Develop Social and Cultural Capital. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (Portland, Oregon, USA) (CSCW ’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 26–40. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998280
[11]
Julie S. Hui, Darren Gergle, and Elizabeth M. Gerber. 2018. IntroAssist: A Tool to Support Writing Introductory Help Requests. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 22, 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173596
[12]
Ryan Kelly, Daniel Gooch, Bhagyashree Patil, and Leon Watts. 2017. Demanding by Design: Supporting Effortful Communication Practices in Close Personal Relationships. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (Portland, Oregon, USA) (CSCW ’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 70–83. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998184
[13]
Ryan Kelly, Daniel Gooch, and Leon Watts. 2015. Is ‘Additional’ Effort Always Negative?: Understanding Discretionary Work in Interpersonal Communications. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference Companion on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (CSCW’15 Companion). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 191–194. https://doi.org/10.1145/2685553.2699004
[14]
Ryan Kelly, Daniel Gooch, and Leon Watts. 2018. ’It’s More Like a Letter’: An Exploration of Mediated Conversational Effort in Message Builder. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2, CSCW, Article 87 (Nov. 2018), 23 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274356
[15]
Joongyum Kim, Taesik Gong, Kyungsik Han, Juho Kim, JeongGil Ko, and Sung-Ju Lee. 2020. Messaging Beyond Texts with Real-Time Image Suggestions. In 22nd International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (Oldenburg, Germany) (MobileHCI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 28, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3379503.3403553
[16]
Taewook Kim, Jung Soo Lee, Zhenhui Peng, and Xiaojuan Ma. 2019. Love in Lyrics: An Exploration of Supporting Textual Manifestation of Affection in Social Messaging. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, CSCW, Article 79 (Nov. 2019), 27 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359181
[17]
Igor Kotlyar and Dan Ariely. 2013. The effect of nonverbal cues on relationship formation. Computers in Human Behavior 29, 3 (2013), 544 – 551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.020
[18]
Lucian Leahu, Steve Schwenk, and Phoebe Sengers. 2008. Subjective Objectivity: Negotiating Emotional Meaning. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (Cape Town, South Africa) (DIS ’08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 425–434. https://doi.org/10.1145/1394445.1394491
[19]
Christopher Manning, Mihai Surdeanu, John Bauer, Jenny Finkel, Steven Bethard, and David McClosky. 2014. The Stanford CoreNLP Natural Language Processing Toolkit. In Proceedings of 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations. Association for Computational Linguistics, Baltimore, Maryland, 55–60. https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/P14-5010
[20]
Jean-Bernard Martens. 2019. Interpreting the Diversity in Subjective Judgments. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI ’19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 219, 11 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300449
[21]
Christina Masden and W. Keith Edwards. 2015. Understanding the Role of Community in Online Dating. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (CHI ’15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 535–544. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702417
[22]
Tien T. Nguyen, Duyen T. Nguyen, Shamsi T. Iqbal, and Eyal Ofek. 2015. The Known Stranger: Supporting Conversations Between Strangers with Personalized Topic Suggestions. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (CHI ’15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 555–564. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702411
[23]
Michael J. Rosenfeld, Reuben J. Thomas, and Sonia Hausen. 2019. Disintermediating your friends: How online dating in the United States displaces other ways of meeting. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116, 36(2019), 17753–17758. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1908630116
[24]
Iulian V. Serban, Alessandro Sordoni, Yoshua Bengio, Aaron Courville, and Joelle Pineau. 2016. Building End-to-end Dialogue Systems Using Generative Hierarchical Neural Network Models. In Proceedings of the Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Phoenix, Arizona) (AAAI’16). AAAI Press, 3776–3783. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3016387.3016435
[25]
T. Shibata, T. Tashima, and K. Tanie. 1999. Subjective interpretation of emotional behavior through physical interaction between human and robot. In IEEE SMC’99 Conference Proceedings. 1999 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (Cat. No.99CH37028), Vol. 2. 1024–1029 vol.2. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSMC.1999.825403
[26]
Shaomei Wu, Lindsay Reynolds, Xian Li, and Francisco Guzmán. 2019. Design and Evaluation of a Social Media Writing Support Tool for People with Dyslexia. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI ’19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 516, 14 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300746
[27]
Jennie Zhang and Taha Yasseri. 2016. What Happens After You Both Swipe Right: A Statistical Description of Mobile Dating Communications. CoRR abs/1607.03320(2016). arxiv:1607.03320http://arxiv.org/abs/1607.03320
[28]
Doug Zytko, Sukeshini Grandhi, and Quentin (Gad) Jones. 2016. The Coaches Said...What?: Analysis of Online Dating Strategies Recommended by Dating Coaches. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Supporting Group Work (Sanibel Island, Florida, USA) (GROUP ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 385–397. https://doi.org/10.1145/2957276.2957287
[29]
Douglas Zytko, Sukeshini A. Grandhi, and Quentin Jones. 2014. Impression Management Struggles in Online Dating. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Supporting Group Work (Sanibel Island, Florida, USA) (GROUP ’14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1145/2660398.2660410
[30]
Douglas Zytko, Victor Regalado, Nicholas Furlo, Sukeshini A. Grandhi, and Quentin Jones. 2020. Supoorting Women in Online Dating with a Messaging Interface that Improves their Face-to-Face Meeting Decisions. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 4, CSCW, Article 137 (Oct. 2020), 30 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3415208

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A Taxonomy for Human-LLM Interaction Modes: An Initial ExplorationExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3650786(1-11)Online publication date: 11-May-2024

Index Terms

  1. Facilitating Continuous Text Messaging in Online Romantic Encounters by Expanded Keywords Enumeration

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CSCW'22 Companion: Companion Publication of the 2022 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing
      November 2022
      318 pages
      ISBN:9781450391900
      DOI:10.1145/3500868
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 08 November 2022

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Chatting
      2. Interpersonal communication
      3. Romantic relationships
      4. Text messaging
      5. Topic suggestion

      Qualifiers

      • Extended-abstract
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Funding Sources

      • ASPIRE League Partnership Seed Fund

      Conference

      CSCW '22
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 2,235 of 8,521 submissions, 26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CSCW '25

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)50
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
      Reflects downloads up to 28 Jan 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)A Taxonomy for Human-LLM Interaction Modes: An Initial ExplorationExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3650786(1-11)Online publication date: 11-May-2024

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format.

      HTML Format

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media