Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3508352.3561114acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiccadConference Proceedingsconference-collections
invited-talk

Quantum Machine Learning Applications in High-Energy Physics

Published: 22 December 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Some of the most significant achievements of the modern era of particle physics, such as the discovery of the Higgs boson, have been made possible by the tremendous effort in building and operating large-scale experiments like the Large Hadron Collider or the Tevatron. In these facilities, the ultimate theory to describe matter at the most fundamental level is constantly probed and verified. These experiments often produce large amounts of data that require storing, processing, and analysis techniques that continually push the limits of traditional information processing schemes. Thus, the High-Energy Physics (HEP) field has benefited from advancements in information processing and the development of algorithms and tools for large datasets. More recently, quantum computing applications have been investigated to understand how the community can benefit from the advantages of quantum information science. Nonetheless, to unleash the full potential of quantum computing, there is a need to understand the quantum behavior and, thus, scale up current algorithms beyond what can be simulated in classical processors. In this work, we explore potential applications of quantum machine learning to data analysis tasks in HEP and how to overcome the limitations of algorithms targeted for Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices.

References

[1]
Zeeshan et al. Ahmed. 2018. Quantum Sensing for High Energy Physics.
[2]
M. Sohaib Alam et al. 2022. Quantum computing hardware for HEP algorithms and sensing. In 2022 Snowmass Summer Study. arXiv:2204.08605 [quant-ph]
[3]
Christian W. Bauer et al. 2022. Quantum Simulation for High Energy Physics. (4 2022). arXiv:2204.03381 [quant-ph]
[4]
Marcello Benedetti, Delfina Garcia-Pintos, Oscar Perdomo, Vicente Leyton-Ortega, Yunseong Nam, and Alejandro Perdomo-Ortiz. 2019. A generative modeling approach for benchmarking and training shallow quantum circuits. npj Quantum Inf. 5, 45 (2019).
[5]
Ville et al. Bergholm. 2018. PennyLane: Automatic differentiation of hybrid quantum-classical computations.
[6]
M. Cerezo, Akira Sone, Tyler Volkoff, Lukasz Cincio, and Patrick J. Coles. 2021. Cost function dependent barren plateaus in shallow parametrized quantum circuits. Nature Communications 12, 1 (mar 2021).
[7]
Anthony Ciavarella. 2020. Algorithm for quantum computation of particle decays. Phys. Rev. D 102 (Nov 2020), 094505. Issue 9.
[8]
Brian Coyle, Daniel Mills, Vincent Danos, and Elham Kashefi. 2020. The Born supremacy: quantum advantage and training of an Ising Born machine. npj Quantum Information 6, 1 (2020), 1--11.
[9]
Andrea Delgado and Kathleen E. Hamilton. 2022. Unsupervised Quantum Circuit Learning in High Energy Physics. (3 2022). arXiv:2203.03578 [quant-ph]
[10]
Andrea Delgado and Jesse Thaler. 2022. Quantum Annealing for Jet Clustering with Thrust. (5 2022). arXiv:2205.02814 [quant-ph]
[11]
Andrea et al. Delgado. 2022. Quantum Computing for Data Analysis in High-Energy Physics.
[12]
Alessio Gianelle, Patrick Koppenburg, Donatella Lucchesi, Davide Nicotra, Eduardo Rodrigues, Lorenzo Sestini, Jacco de Vries, and Davide Zuliani. 2022. Quantum Machine Learning for b-jet charge identification. JHEP 08 (2022), 014. arXiv:2202.13943 [hep-ex]
[13]
Erik J. Gustafson and Henry Lamm. 2021. Toward quantum simulations of Z2 gauge theory without state preparation. Phys. Rev. D 103, 5 (2021), 054507. arXiv:2011.11677 [hep-lat]
[14]
Zoë Holmes, Kunal Sharma, M. Cerezo, and Patrick J. Coles. 2022. Connecting Ansatz Expressibility to Gradient Magnitudes and Barren Plateaus. PRX Quantum 3 (Jan 2022), 010313. Issue 1.
[15]
Seth Lloyd. 2005. A theory of quantum gravity based on quantum computation.
[16]
Seth Lloyd and Christian Weedbrook. 2018. Quantum Generative Adversarial Learning. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (Jul 2018), 040502. Issue 4.
[17]
Jarrod R. McClean, Sergio Boixo, Vadim N. Smelyanskiy, Ryan Babbush, and Hartmut Neven. 2018. Barren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapes. Nature Communications 9, 1 (nov 2018).
[18]
Shakir Mohamed and Balaji Lakshminarayanan. 2016. Learning in Implicit Generative Models.
[19]
Gregory Quiroz, Lauren Ice, Andrea Delgado, and Travis S. Humble. 2021. Particle track classification using quantum associative memory. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 1010 (2021), 165557. arXiv:2011.11848 [quant-ph]
[20]
Frederic Sauvage, Martin Larocca, Patrick J. Coles, and M. Cerezo. 2022. Building spatial symmetries into parameterized quantum circuits for faster training.
[21]
Samson Wang, Enrico Fontana, M. Cerezo, Kunal Sharma, Akira Sone, Lukasz Cincio, and Patrick J. Coles. 2021. Noise-induced barren plateaus in variational quantum algorithms. Nature Communications 12, 1 (nov 2021).

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
ICCAD '22: Proceedings of the 41st IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design
October 2022
1467 pages
ISBN:9781450392174
DOI:10.1145/3508352
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

In-Cooperation

  • IEEE-EDS: Electronic Devices Society
  • IEEE CAS
  • IEEE CEDA

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 22 December 2022

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. physics
  2. quantum computing
  3. quantum machine learning
  4. unsupervised learning

Qualifiers

  • Invited-talk

Conference

ICCAD '22
Sponsor:
ICCAD '22: IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design
October 30 - November 3, 2022
California, San Diego

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 457 of 1,762 submissions, 26%

Upcoming Conference

ICCAD '24
IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design
October 27 - 31, 2024
New York , NY , USA

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 108
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)33
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 04 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media