Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3526113.3545616acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesuistConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Social Simulacra: Creating Populated Prototypes for Social Computing Systems

Published: 28 October 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Social computing prototypes probe the social behaviors that may arise in an envisioned system design. This prototyping practice is currently limited to recruiting small groups of people. Unfortunately, many challenges do not arise until a system is populated at a larger scale. Can a designer understand how a social system might behave when populated, and make adjustments to the design before the system falls prey to such challenges? We introduce social simulacra, a prototyping technique that generates a breadth of realistic social interactions that may emerge when a social computing system is populated. Social simulacra take as input the designer’s description of a community’s design—goal, rules, and member personas—and produce as output an instance of that design with simulated behavior, including posts, replies, and anti-social behaviors. We demonstrate that social simulacra shift the behaviors that they generate appropriately in response to design changes, and that they enable exploration of “what if?” scenarios where community members or moderators intervene. To power social simulacra, we contribute techniques for prompting a large language model to generate thousands of distinct community members and their social interactions with each other; these techniques are enabled by the observation that large language models’ training data already includes a wide variety of positive and negative behavior on social media platforms. In evaluations, we show that participants are often unable to distinguish social simulacra from actual community behavior and that social computing designers successfully refine their social computing designs when using social simulacra.

References

[1]
Mark S. Ackerman. 2000. The Intellectual Challenge of CSCW: The Gap between Social Requirements and Technical Feasibility. Human-Computer Interaction 15, 2 (sep 2000), 179–203. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327051HCI1523_5
[2]
Yavuz Akbulut, Yusuf Levent Sahin, and Bahadir Eristi. 2010. Cyberbullying victimization among Turkish online social utility members. Journal of Educational Technology & Society 13, 4 (2010), 192–201.
[3]
Michel Beaudouin-Lafon and Wendy Mackay. 2002. Prototyping Tools and Techniques. L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., USA, 1006–1031.
[4]
Michael S. Bernstein, Mark S. Ackerman, Ed H. Chi, and Robert C. Miller. 2011. The Trouble with Social Computing Systems Research. In CHI ’11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (CHI EA ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 389–398. https://doi.org/10.1145/1979742.1979618
[5]
Rishi Bommasani, Drew A Hudson, Ehsan Adeli, Russ Altman, Simran Arora, Sydney von Arx, Michael S Bernstein, Jeannette Bohg, Antoine Bosselut, Emma Brunskill, 2021. On the opportunities and risks of foundation models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.07258(2021).
[6]
Tom Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared D Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, 2020. Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in neural information processing systems 33 (2020), 1877–1901.
[7]
Marion Buchenau and Jane Fulton Suri. 2000. Experience prototyping. In Proceedings of the 3rd conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques. 424–433.
[8]
Zoya Bylinskii, Nam Wook Kim, Peter O’Donovan, Sami Alsheikh, Spandan Madan, Hanspeter Pfister, Fredo Durand, Bryan Russell, and Aaron Hertzmann. 2017. Learning visual importance for graphic designs and data visualizations. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology. 57–69.
[9]
Stevie Chancellor, Zhiyuan (Jerry) Lin, and Munmun De Choudhury. 2016. ”This Post Will Just Get Taken Down”: Characterizing Removed Pro-Eating Disorder Social Media Content. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1157–1162. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858248
[10]
Eshwar Chandrasekharan, Umashanthi Pavalanathan, Anirudh Srinivasan, Adam Glynn, Jacob Eisenstein, and Eric Gilbert. 2017. You can’t stay here: The efficacy of reddit’s 2015 ban examined through hate speech. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 1, CSCW(2017), 1–22.
[11]
Eshwar Chandrasekharan, Mattia Samory, Shagun Jhaver, Hunter Charvat, Amy Bruckman, Cliff Lampe, Jacob Eisenstein, and Eric Gilbert. 2018. The Internet’s Hidden Rules: An Empirical Study of Reddit Norm Violations at Micro, Meso, and Macro Scales. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2, CSCW, Article 32 (nov 2018), 25 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274301
[12]
Eshwar Chandrasekharan, Mattia Samory, Anirudh Srinivasan, and Eric Gilbert. 2017. The bag of communities: Identifying abusive behavior online with preexisting internet data. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 3175–3187.
[13]
Justin Cheng, Michael Bernstein, Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, and Jure Leskovec. 2017. Anyone Can Become a Troll: Causes of Trolling Behavior in Online Discussions. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (Portland, Oregon, USA) (CSCW ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1217–1230. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998213
[14]
Justin Cheng, Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, and Jure Leskovec. 2015. Antisocial behavior in online discussion communities. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Vol. 9. 61–70.
[15]
Joan Donovan. 2019. How hate groups’ secret sound system works. The Atlantic 17(2019). https://doi.org/10. 1145/1188913.1188915
[16]
Daniel Drew, Julie L Newcomb, William McGrath, Filip Maksimovic, David Mellis, and Björn Hartmann. 2016. The toastboard: Ubiquitous instrumentation and automated checking of breadboarded circuits. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 677–686.
[17]
Casey Fiesler, Joshua McCann, Kyle Frye, Jed R Brubaker, 2018. Reddit rules! characterizing an ecosystem of governance. In Twelfth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.
[18]
Susan T Fiske. 2022. Twitter manipulates your feed: Ethical considerations.
[19]
Catherine Flick. 2016. Informed consent and the Facebook emotional manipulation study. Research Ethics 12, 1 (2016), 14–28.
[20]
Bill Gaver, Tony Dunne, and Elena Pacenti. 1999. Design: cultural probes. interactions 6, 1 (1999), 21–29.
[21]
Samuel Gehman, Suchin Gururangan, Maarten Sap, Yejin Choi, and Noah A. Smith. 2020. RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language Models. CoRR abs/2009.11462(2020). arXiv:2009.11462https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.11462
[22]
Catherine Grevet and Eric Gilbert. 2015. Piggyback prototyping: Using existing, large-scale social computing systems to prototype new ones. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 4047–4056.
[23]
Jonathan Grudin. 1994. Groupware and social dynamics: Eight challenges for developers. Commun. ACM 37, 1 (1994), 92–105.
[24]
Aaron Halfaker, R Stuart Geiger, Jonathan T Morgan, and John Riedl. 2013. The rise and decline of an open collaboration system: How Wikipedia’s reaction to popularity is causing its decline. American Behavioral Scientist 57, 5 (2013), 664–688.
[25]
Blake Hallinan, Jed R Brubaker, and Casey Fiesler. 2020. Unexpected expectations: Public reaction to the Facebook emotional contagion study. New Media & Society 22, 6 (2020), 1076–1094.
[26]
Claire Hardaker. 2010. Trolling in asynchronous computer-mediated communication: From user discussions to academic definitions. Journal of Politeness Research 6 (2010), 215J242.
[27]
Björn Hartmann, Leith Abdulla, Manas Mittal, and Scott R Klemmer. 2007. Authoring sensor-based interactions by demonstration with direct manipulation and pattern recognition. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 145–154.
[28]
Björn Hartmann, Scott R Klemmer, Michael Bernstein, Leith Abdulla, Brandon Burr, Avi Robinson-Mosher, and Jennifer Gee. 2006. Reflective physical prototyping through integrated design, test, and analysis. In Proceedings of the 19th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. 299–308.
[29]
Björn Hartmann, Meredith Ringel Morris, Hrvoje Benko, and Andrew D. Wilson. 2009. Augmenting Interactive Tables with Mice & Keyboards. In Proceedings of the 22Nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Victoria, BC, Canada) (UIST ’09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 149–152. https://doi.org/10.1145/1622176.1622204
[30]
Björn Hartmann, Loren Yu, Abel Allison, Yeonsoo Yang, and Scott R. Klemmer. 2008. Design as Exploration: Creating Interface Alternatives through Parallel Authoring and Runtime Tuning. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Monterey, CA, USA) (UIST ’08). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1145/1449715.1449732
[31]
Björn Hartmann, Loren Yu, Abel Allison, Yeonsoo Yang, and Scott R. Klemmer. 2008. Design as Exploration: Creating Interface Alternatives through Parallel Authoring and Runtime Tuning. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Monterey, CA, USA) (UIST ’08). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1145/1449715.1449732
[32]
Dan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou, Mantas Mazeika, Dawn Song, and Jacob Steinhardt. 2020. Measuring massive multitask language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.03300(2020).
[33]
Stephanie Houde and Charles Hill. 1997. What do prototypes prototype?In Handbook of human-computer interaction(second ed.). Elsevier, 367–381.
[34]
Wenlong Huang, Pieter Abbeel, Deepak Pathak, and Igor Mordatch. 2022. Language Models as Zero-Shot Planners: Extracting Actionable Knowledge for Embodied Agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.07207(2022).
[35]
Rohan Jagtap. 2021. GPT-3 Explained. Retrieved March 2, 2005 from https://towardsdatascience.com/gpt-3-explained-19e5f2bd3288
[36]
Ellen Jiang, Kristen Olson, Edwin Toh, Alejandra Molina, Aaron Donsbach, Michael Terry, and Carrie J Cai. 2022. PromptMaker: Prompt-based Prototyping with Large Language Models. In CHI ’22 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
[37]
Ellen Jiang, Edwin Toh, Alejandra Molina, Aaron Donsbach, Carrie J Cai, and Michael Terry. 2021. Genline and genform: Two tools for interacting with generative language models in a code editor. In The Adjunct Publication of the 34th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 145–147.
[38]
Joseph M Kayany. 1998. Contexts of uninhibited online behavior: Flaming in social newsgroups on Usenet. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 49, 12(1998), 1135–1141.
[39]
John F Kelley. 1983. An empirical methodology for writing user-friendly natural language computer applications. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 193–196.
[40]
John F Kelley. 1984. An iterative design methodology for user-friendly natural language office information applications. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 2, 1 (1984), 26–41.
[41]
Charles Kiene, Andrés Monroy-Hernández, and Benjamin Mako Hill. 2016. Surviving an” Eternal September” How an Online Community Managed a Surge of Newcomers. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1152–1156.
[42]
Aniket Kittur, Bongwon Suh, Bryan A. Pendleton, and Ed H. Chi. 2007. He Says, She Says: Conflict and Coordination in Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI ’07). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 453–462. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240698
[43]
Ron Kohavi, Alex Deng, Brian Frasca, Roger Longbotham, Toby Walker, and Ya Xu. 2012. Trustworthy Online Controlled Experiments: Five Puzzling Outcomes Explained(KDD ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 786–794. https://doi.org/10.1145/2339530.2339653
[44]
Adam DI Kramer, Jamie E Guillory, and Jeffrey T Hancock. 2014. Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111, 24(2014), 8788–8790.
[45]
Robert E Kraut and Paul Resnick. 2012. Building successful online communities: Evidence-based social design. MIT Press.
[46]
James A. Landay. 1996. SILK: Sketching Interfaces like Krazy. In Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada) (CHI ’96). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 398–399. https://doi.org/10.1145/257089.257396
[47]
Mike Lewis, Denis Yarats, Yann N Dauphin, Devi Parikh, and Dhruv Batra. 2017. Deal or no deal? end-to-end learning for negotiation dialogues. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.05125(2017).
[48]
Jiacheng Liu, Alisa Liu, Ximing Lu, Sean Welleck, Peter West, Ronan Le Bras, Yejin Choi, and Hannaneh Hajishirzi. 2021. Generated knowledge prompting for commonsense reasoning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.08387(2021).
[49]
Pengfei Liu, Weizhe Yuan, Jinlan Fu, Zhengbao Jiang, Hiroaki Hayashi, and Graham Neubig. 2021. Pre-train, prompt, and predict: A systematic survey of prompting methods in natural language processing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.13586(2021).
[50]
Yao Lu, Max Bartolo, Alastair Moore, Sebastian Riedel, and Pontus Stenetorp. 2021. Fantastically ordered prompts and where to find them: Overcoming few-shot prompt order sensitivity. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.08786(2021).
[51]
J. Marks, B. Andalman, P. A. Beardsley, W. Freeman, S. Gibson, J. Hodgins, T. Kang, B. Mirtich, H. Pfister, W. Ruml, K. Ryall, J. Seims, and S. Shieber. 1997. Design Galleries: A General Approach to Setting Parameters for Computer Graphics and Animation. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques(SIGGRAPH ’97). ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., USA, 389–400. https://doi.org/10.1145/258734.258887
[52]
M. Lynne Markus. 1987. Toward a “Critical Mass” Theory of Interactive Media. Communication Research 14 (1987), 491 – 511.
[53]
Nathan J. Matias. 2019. Preventing harassment and increasing group participation through social norms in 2,190 online science discussions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116, 20(2019), 9785–9789.
[54]
Peter O’Donovan, Aseem Agarwala, and Aaron Hertzmann. 2015. Designscape: Design with interactive layout suggestions. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems. 1221–1224.
[55]
Joon Sung Park, Joseph Seering, and Michael S. Bernstein. 2022. Measuring the Prevalence of Anti-Social Behavior in Online Communities. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer InteractionCSCW (2022).
[56]
Gordon Pennycook, Adam Bear, Evan T Collins, and David G Rand. 2020. The implied truth effect: Attaching warnings to a subset of fake news headlines increases perceived accuracy of headlines without warnings. Management Science 66, 11 (2020), 4944–4957.
[57]
Nicholas Proferes, Naiyan Jones, Sarah Gilbert, Casey Fiesler, and Michael Zimmer. 2021. Studying Reddit: A Systematic Overview of Disciplines, Approaches, Methods, and Ethics. Social Media + Society 7, 2 (2021), 20563051211019004. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211019004 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211019004
[58]
Prolific. 2022. Prolific: Quickly find research participants you can trust. https://www.prolific.co/
[59]
Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, Rewon Child, David Luan, Dario Amodei, Ilya Sutskever, 2019. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI blog 1, 8 (2019), 9.
[60]
Jack W Rae, Sebastian Borgeaud, Trevor Cai, Katie Millican, Jordan Hoffmann, Francis Song, John Aslanides, Sarah Henderson, Roman Ring, Susannah Young, 2021. Scaling language models: Methods, analysis & insights from training gopher. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.11446(2021).
[61]
Aditya Ramesh, Mikhail Pavlov, Gabriel Goh, Scott Gray, Chelsea Vos, Alec Radford, Mark Chen, and Ilya Sutskever. 2021. Zero-Shot Text-to-Image Generation. Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning (2021).
[62]
Reddit. 2021. Reddit by the Numbers. https://www.redditinc.com/
[63]
Marc Rettig. 1994. Prototyping for tiny fingers. Commun. ACM 37, 4 (1994), 21–27.
[64]
Horst WJ Rittel and Melvin M Webber. 1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy sciences 4, 2 (1973), 155–169.
[65]
David Rolf. 2015. The fight for $15: The right wage for a working America. New Press, The.
[66]
Matthew J. Salganik, Peter Sheridan Dodds, and Duncan J. Watts. 2006. Experimental Study of Inequality and Unpredictability in an Artificial Cultural Market. Science 311, 5762 (2006), 854–856. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1121066 arXiv:https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1121066
[67]
Valkyrie Savage, Colin Chang, and Björn Hartmann. 2013. Sauron: embedded single-camera sensing of printed physical user interfaces. In Proceedings of the 26th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. 447–456.
[68]
Timo Schick and Hinrich Schütze. 2020. Few-shot text generation with pattern-exploiting training. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.11926(2020).
[69]
D.A. Schön. 1984. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think In Action. Basic Books, Vol. 5126. Basic Books.
[70]
Reinhard Sefelin, Manfred Tscheligi, and Verena Giller. 2003. Paper prototyping-what is it good for? A comparison of paper-and computer-based low-fidelity prototyping. In CHI’03 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. 778–779.
[71]
Carolyn Snyder. 2003. Paper prototyping: The fast and easy way to design and refine user interfaces. Morgan Kaufmann.
[72]
Sara Owsley Sood, Elizabeth F. Churchill, and Judd Antin. 2012. Automatic Identification of Personal Insults on Social News Sites. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 63, 2 (feb 2012), 270–285. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21690
[73]
Don Tapscott and Art Caston. 1992. Paradigm shift: The new promise of information technology. McGraw-Hill, Inc.
[74]
Nathan TeBlunthuis, Aaron Shaw, and Benjamin Mako Hill. 2018. Revisiting” The rise and decline” in a population of peer production projects. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–7.
[75]
David Thomas. 2006. A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data. American Journal of Evaluation27 (2006).
[76]
Johan Ugander, Brian Karrer, Lars Backstrom, and Jon Kleinberg. 2013. Graph cluster randomization: Network exposure to multiple universes. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. 329–337.
[77]
Emily A Vogels. 2021. The state of online harassment. Pew Research Center 13(2021).
[78]
Alex Wang, Yada Pruksachatkun, Nikita Nangia, Amanpreet Singh, Julian Michael, Felix Hill, Omer Levy, and Samuel Bowman. 2019. Superglue: A stickier benchmark for general-purpose language understanding systems. Advances in neural information processing systems 32 (2019).
[79]
Laura Weidinger, John Mellor, Maribeth Rauh, Conor Griffin, Jonathan Uesato, Po-Sen Huang, Myra Cheng, Mia Glaese, Borja Balle, Atoosa Kasirzadeh, 2021. Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.04359(2021).
[80]
Tongshuang Wu, Ellen Jiang, Aaron Donsbach, Jeff Gray, Alejandra Molina, Michael Terry, and Carrie J Cai. 2022. PromptChainer: Chaining Large Language Model Prompts through Visual Programming. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.06566(2022).
[81]
Tongshuang Wu, Michael Terry, and Carrie J Cai. 2021. AI Chains: Transparent and Controllable Human-AI Interaction by Chaining Large Language Model Prompts. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.01691(2021).
[82]
Anbang Xu, Shih-Wen Huang, and Brian Bailey. 2014. Voyant: generating structured feedback on visual designs using a crowd of non-experts. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing. 1433–1444.
[83]
Ya Xu, Nanyu Chen, Addrian Fernandez, Omar Sinno, and Anmol Bhasin. 2015. From infrastructure to culture: A/B testing challenges in large scale social networks. In Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 2227–2236.
[84]
Indi Young. 2016. Describing Personas. Retrieved July 19, 2022 from https://medium.com/inclusive-software/describing-personas-af992e3fc527
[85]
Rowan Zellers, Ari Holtzman, Hannah Rashkin, Yonatan Bisk, Ali Farhadi, Franziska Roesner, and Yejin Choi. 2019. Defending against neural fake news. Advances in neural information processing systems 32 (2019).
[86]
Zihao Zhao, Eric Wallace, Shi Feng, Dan Klein, and Sameer Singh. 2021. Calibrate before use: Improving few-shot performance of language models. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, PMLR, 12697–12706.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Ethical Considerations for Generative AI in Social Science ResearchGenerative AI and Implications for Ethics, Security, and Data Management10.4018/979-8-3693-8557-9.ch006(155-207)Online publication date: 21-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Large language models for whole-learner support: opportunities and challengesFrontiers in Artificial Intelligence10.3389/frai.2024.14603647Online publication date: 15-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Digital cloning of online social networks for language-sensitive agent-based modeling of misinformation spreadPLOS ONE10.1371/journal.pone.030488919:6(e0304889)Online publication date: 21-Jun-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Social Simulacra: Creating Populated Prototypes for Social Computing Systems

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    UIST '22: Proceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology
    October 2022
    1363 pages
    ISBN:9781450393201
    DOI:10.1145/3526113
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 28 October 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. prototyping
    2. social computing

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    UIST '22

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 561 of 2,567 submissions, 22%

    Upcoming Conference

    UIST '25
    The 38th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology
    September 28 - October 1, 2025
    Busan , Republic of Korea

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)3,685
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)503
    Reflects downloads up to 30 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Ethical Considerations for Generative AI in Social Science ResearchGenerative AI and Implications for Ethics, Security, and Data Management10.4018/979-8-3693-8557-9.ch006(155-207)Online publication date: 21-Aug-2024
    • (2024)Large language models for whole-learner support: opportunities and challengesFrontiers in Artificial Intelligence10.3389/frai.2024.14603647Online publication date: 15-Oct-2024
    • (2024)Digital cloning of online social networks for language-sensitive agent-based modeling of misinformation spreadPLOS ONE10.1371/journal.pone.030488919:6(e0304889)Online publication date: 21-Jun-2024
    • (2024)Large language models are able to downplay their cognitive abilities to fit the persona they simulatePLOS ONE10.1371/journal.pone.029852219:3(e0298522)Online publication date: 13-Mar-2024
    • (2024)CERN for AI: a theoretical framework for autonomous simulation-based artificial intelligence testing and alignmentEuropean Journal of Futures Research10.1186/s40309-024-00238-012:1Online publication date: 24-Aug-2024
    • (2024)Can Large Language Models Transform Computational Social Science?Computational Linguistics10.1162/coli_a_0050250:1(237-291)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2024
    • (2024)C.A.L.Y.P.S.O.: Designing Gameplay Features for Improving Player's Cybersecurity Self-EfficacyCompanion Proceedings of the 2024 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play10.1145/3665463.3678832(372-377)Online publication date: 14-Oct-2024
    • (2024)Evaluation of Code Generation for Simulating Participant Behavior in Experience Sampling Method by Iterative In-Context Learning of a Large Language ModelProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36611438:EICS(1-19)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2024
    • (2024)Second Workshop on Engineering Interactive Systems Embedding AI TechnologiesCompanion Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering Interactive Computing Systems10.1145/3660515.3662837(103-107)Online publication date: 24-Jun-2024
    • (2024)Synthetic Students: A Comparative Study of Bug Distribution Between Large Language Models and Computing StudentsProceedings of the 2024 on ACM Virtual Global Computing Education Conference V. 110.1145/3649165.3690100(137-143)Online publication date: 5-Dec-2024
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media