Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Modeling Political Activism around Gun Debate via Social Media

Published: 26 November 2022 Publication History

Abstract

The United States have some of the highest rates of gun violence among developed countries. Yet, there is a disagreement about the extent to which firearms should be regulated. In this study, we employ social media signals to examine the predictors of offline political activism, at both population and individual level. We show that it is possible to classify the stance of users on the gun issue, especially accurately when network information is available. Alongside socioeconomic variables, network information such as the relative size of the two sides of the debate is also predictive of state-level gun policy. On individual level, we build a statistical model using network, content, and psycho-linguistic features that predicts real-life political action, and explore the most predictive linguistic features. Thus, we argue that, alongside demographics and socioeconomic indicators, social media provides useful signals in the holistic modeling of political engagement around the gun debate.

Appendix

A Features

We list all features used for Model 2. Individual March Attendance below.
DemographicsLIWC
perc under 18Total function words (liwc_function)
perc 65 and overTotal pronouns (liwc_pronoun)
perc African AmericanPersonal pronouns (liwc_ppron)
perc Asian1st person singular (liwc_i)
perc Hispanic1st person plural (liwc_we)
perc non Hispanic white2nd person (liwc_you)
perc rural3rd person singular (liwc_shehe)
 3rd person plural (liwc_they)
Socio-EconomicImpersonal pronouns (liwc_ipron)
high school graduation rateArticles (liwc_article)
perc some collegePrepositions (liwc_prep)
perc unemploymentAuxiliary verbs (liwc_auxverb)
income inequality ratioCommon Adverbs (liwc_adverb)
perc uninsuredConjunctions (liwc_conj)
perc single parent householdsNegations (liwc_negate)
perc association rateCommon verbs (liwc_verb)
violent crime rateCommon adjectives (liwc_adj)
perc severe housing problemsComparisons (liwc_compare)
median household incomeInterrogatives (liwc_interrog)
residential segregation black whiteNumbers (liwc_number)
homicide rateQuantifiers (liwc_quant)
 Affective processes (liwc_affect)
HealthPositive emotion (liwc_posemo)
mentally unhealthy daysNegative emotion (liwc_negemo)
perc adult smokingAnxiety (liwc_anx)
perc adult obesityAnger (liwc_anger)
perc excessive drinkingSadness (liwc_sad)
 Social processes (liwc_social)
Politics & Gun CultureFamily (liwc_family)
gun salesFriends (liwc_friend)
firearm fatalities rateFemale references (liwc_female)
perc vote republicanMale references (liwc_male)
Twitter NetworkCognitive processes (liwc_cogproc)
indicator whether in GCC (net_inGCC)Insight (liwc_insight)
 Causation (liwc_cause)
Twitter ContentDiscrepancy (liwc_discrep)
retweet count (con_rt_account)Tentative (liwc_tentat)
retweet entropy (con_rt_entropy)Certainty (liwc_certain)
hashtag count (con_hashtag_count)Differentiation (liwc_differ)
hashtag entropy (con_hashtag_entropy)Perceptual processes (liwc_percept)
vocabulary count (con_voca)See (liwc_see)
vocabulary entropy (con_voca_2)Hear (liwc_hear)
hate word rate (con_hateword)Feel (liwc_feel)
avg sentiment polarity (con_sentiment)Biological processes (liwc_bio
 Body (liwc_body)
Twitter BehaviorHealth (liwc_health)
user followers countSexual (liwc_sexual)
user friends countIngestion (liwc_ingest)
follower/friend ratioDrives (liwc_drives)
account age (twt_accage)Affiliation (liwc_affiliation)
gun tweet rate (twt_guntweetrate)Achievement (liwc_achiev)
all tweet rate (twt_alltweetrate)Power (liwc_power)
gun tweet count (twt_guntweetcnt)Reward (liwc_reward)
English tweet count (twt_engtweetcnt)Risk (liwc_risk)
 Past focus (liwc_focuspast)
 Present focus (liwc_focuspresent)
 Future focus (liwc_focusfuture)
 Relativity (liwc_relativ)
 Motion (liwc_motion)
 Space (liwc_space)
 Time (liwc_time)
 Work (liwc_work)
 Leisure (liwc_leisure)
 Home (liwc_home)
 Money (liwc_money)
 Religion (liwc_relig)
 Death (liwc_death)
 Informal language (liwc_informal)
 Swear words (liwc_swear)
 Netspeak (liwc_netspeak)
 Assent (liwc_assent)
 Nonfluencies (liwc_nonflu)
 Fillers (liwc_filler)

References

[1]
Sofiane Abbar, Yelena Mejova, and Ingmar Weber. 2015. You tweet what you eat: Studying food consumption through twitter. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 3197–3206.
[2]
Jennifer Allen, Baird Howland, Markus Mobius, David Rothschild, and Duncan J. Watts. 2020. Evaluating the fake news problem at the scale of the information ecosystem. Sci. Adv. 6, 14 (2020), eaay3539.
[3]
Jisun An, Haewoon Kwak, Yelena Mejova, Sonia Alonso Saenz De Oger, and Braulio Gomez Fortes. 2016. Are you Charlie or Ahmed? Cultural pluralism in Charlie Hebdo response on Twitter. In Proceedings of the 10th International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.
[4]
Jisun An, Haewoon Kwak, Oliver Posegga, and Andreas Jungherr. 2019. Political discussions in homogeneous and cross-cutting communication spaces. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Vol. 13. 68–79.
[5]
Jisun An and Ingmar Weber. 2015. Whom should we sense in “social sensing”-analyzing which users work best for social media now-casting. EPJ Data Sci. 4, 1 (2015), 1–22. https://epjdatascience.springeropen.com/articles/10.1140/epjds/s13688-015-0058-9#citeas.
[6]
Monica Anderson, Skye Toor, Lee Rainie, and Aaron Smith. 2018. Activism in the Social Media Age. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2018/07/11/activism-in-the-social-media-age/.
[7]
Christopher A. Bail, Lisa P. Argyle, Taylor W. Brown, John P. Bumpus, Haohan Chen, M. B. Fallin Hunzaker, Jaemin Lee, Marcus Mann, Friedolin Merhout, and Alexander Volfovsky. 2018. Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115, 37 (2018), 9216–9221.
[8]
Eytan Bakshy, Solomon Messing, and Lada A. Adamic. 2015. Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science 348, 6239 (2015), 1130–1132.
[9]
Pablo Barberá, John T. Jost, Jonathan Nagler, Joshua A. Tucker, and Richard Bonneau. 2015. Tweeting from left to right: Is online political communication more than an echo chamber? Psychol. Sci. 26, 10 (2015), 1531–1542.
[10]
Pablo Barberá and Gonzalo Rivero. 2015. Understanding the political representativeness of Twitter users. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 33, 6 (2015), 712–729.
[11]
David Barnard-Wills. 2012. Surveillance and Identity: Discourse, Subjectivity and the State. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
[12]
Adrian Benton, Braden Hancock, Glen Coppersmith, John W. Ayers, and Mark Dredze. 2016. After sandy hook elementary: A year in the gun control debate on Twitter. In Proceedings of the Bloomberg Data for Good Exchange Conference (2016).
[13]
Albert Bifet, Gianmarco De Francisci Morales, Jesse Read, Geoff Holmes, and Bernhard Pfahringer. 2015. Efficient online evaluation of big data stream classifiers. In Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD’15). 59–68.
[14]
Vincent D. Blondel, Jean-Loup Guillaume, Renaud Lambiotte, and Etienne Lefebvre. 2008. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. 2008, 10 (2008), P10008. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008/meta.
[15]
Leticia Bode. 2017. Closing the gap: Gender parity in political engagement on social media. Inf. Commun. Soc. 20, 4 (2017), 587–603.
[16]
Robert M. Bond, Christopher J. Fariss, Jason J. Jones, Adam D. I. Kramer, Cameron Marlow, Jaime E. Settle, and James H. Fowler. 2012. A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization. Nature 489, 7415 (2012), 295.
[17]
Shelley Boulianne. 2015. Social media use and participation: A meta-analysis of current research. Inf. Commun. Soc. 18, 5 (2015), 524–538.
[18]
Angus Campbell, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald E. Stokes. 1980. The American Voter. University of Chicago Press.
[19]
Daniele Caramani and Luca Manucci. 2019. National past and populism: The re-elaboration of fascism and its impact on right-wing populism in Western Europe. West Eur. Pol. 42, 6 (2019), 1159–1187.
[20]
Katarzyna Celinska. 2007. Individualism and collectivism in America: The case of gun ownership and attitudes toward gun control. Sociol. Perspect. 50, 2 (2007), 229–247.
[21]
Erwin Chemerinsky. 2004. Putting the gun control debate in social perspective. Fordham L. Rev. 73 (2004), 477.
[22]
Jing Chen, Long Cheng, Xi Yang, Jun Liang, Bing Quan, and Shoushan Li. 2019. Joint learning with both classification and regression models for age prediction. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 1168. IOP Publishing, 032016.
[23]
Anthony Cilluffo and Richard Fry. 2019. Gen Z, Millennials and Gen X Outvoted Older Generations in 2018 Midterms. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/05/29/gen-z-millennials-and-gen-x-outvoted-older-generations-in-2018-midterms/.
[24]
Nate Cohn and Kevin Quealy. 2017. Nothing Divides Voters Like Owning a Gun. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/10/05/upshot/gun-ownership-partisan-divide.html.
[25]
Elanor Colleoni, Alessandro Rozza, and Adam Arvidsson. 2014. Echo chamber or public sphere? Predicting political orientation and measuring political homophily in Twitter using big data. J. Commun. 64, 2 (2014), 317–332.
[26]
Michael D. Conover, Clayton Davis, Emilio Ferrara, Karissa McKelvey, Filippo Menczer, and Alessandro Flammini. 2013. The geospatial characteristics of a social movement communication network. PloS One 8, 3 (2013), e55957.
[27]
Michael D. Conover, Emilio Ferrara, Filippo Menczer, and Alessandro Flammini. 2013. The digital evolution of occupy wall street. PloS One 8, 5 (2013), e64679.
[28]
Michael D. Conover, Jacob Ratkiewicz, Matthew Francisco, Bruno Gonçalves, Filippo Menczer, and Alessandro Flammini. 2011. Political polarization on twitter. In Proceedings of the 5th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.
[29]
Alessandro Cossard, Gianmarco De Francisci Morales, Kyriaki Kalimeri, Yelena Mejova, Daniela Paolotti, and Michele Starnini. 2020. Falling into the echo chamber: The Italian vaccination debate on Twitter. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM’20).
[30]
Wesley Cota, Silvio C. Ferreira, Romualdo Pastor-Satorras, and Michele Starnini. 2019. Quantifying echo chamber effects in information spreading over political communication networks. EPJ Data Science 8, 1 (2019), 1–13.
[31]
Royce Crocker. 1982. Attitudes toward gun control: A survey. In Federal Regulation of Firearms (1982), 229–267. https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/Digitization/89777NCJRS.pdf.
[32]
Aron Culotta, Nirmal Ravi Kumar, and Jennifer Cutler. 2015. Predicting the demographics of twitter users from website traffic data. In Proceedings of the 29th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
[33]
Kareem Darwish, Dimitar Alexandrov, Preslav Nakov, and Yelena Mejova. 2017. Seminar users in the Arabic Twitter sphere. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Social Informatics. Springer, 91–108.
[34]
Clayton Allen Davis, Onur Varol, Emilio Ferrara, Alessandro Flammini, and Filippo Menczer. 2016. Botornot: A system to evaluate social bots. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 273–274.
[35]
Peter Sheridan Dodds, Kameron Decker Harris, Isabel M. Kloumann, Catherine A. Bliss, and Christopher M. Danforth. 2011. Temporal patterns of happiness and information in a global social network: Hedonometrics and Twitter. PLoS One 6, 12 (122011), 1–1.
[36]
Daniel W. Drezner and Henry Farrell. 2004. The power and politics of blogs. In American Political Science Association, Vol. 2.
[37]
Jennifer Earl, Heather McKee Hurwitz, Analicia Mejia Mesinas, Margaret Tolan, and Ashley Arlotti. 2013. This protest will be tweeted. Inf. Commun. Soc. 16, 4 (2013), 459–478.
[38]
Harry Enten. 2017. The U.S. has never been so polarized on guns. FiveThirtyEight. Retrieved from https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-u-s-has-never-been-so-polarized-on-guns/.
[39]
Ali Mert Ertugrul, Yu-Ru Lin, Wen-Ting Chung, Muheng Yan, and Ang Li. 2019. Activism via attention: Interpretable spatiotemporal learning to forecast protest activities. EPJ Data Sci. 8, 1 (2019), 5.
[40]
Ethan Fast, Binbin Chen, and Michael S. Bernstein. 2016. Empath: Understanding topic signals in large-scale text. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 4647–4657.
[41]
Dana R. Fisher. 2019. American Resistance: From the Women’s March to the Blue Wave. Columbia University Press.
[42]
Deen Freelon, Charlton McIlwain, and Meredith Clark. 2018. Quantifying the power and consequences of social media protest. New Media Soc. 20, 3 (2018), 990–1011.
[43]
Kiran Garimella, Gianmarco De Francisci Morales, Aristides Gionis, and Michael Mathioudakis. 2016. Quantifying Controversy in Social Media. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM’16). 33–42.
[44]
Kiran Garimella, Gianmarco De Francisci Morales, Aristides Gionis, and Michael Mathioudakis. 2017. The effect of collective attention on controversial debates on social media. In Proceedings of the ACM on Web Science Conference. ACM, 43–52.
[45]
Kiran Garimella, Gianmarco De Francisci Morales, Aristides Gionis, and Michael Mathioudakis. 2018. Political Discourse on Social Media: Echo Chambers, Gatekeepers, and the Price of Bipartisanship. In Proceedings of the 27th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW’18).
[46]
Kiran Garimella, Gianmarco De Francisci Morales, Aristides Gionis, and Michael Mathioudakis. 2018. Quantifying controversy on social media. ACM Trans. Soc. Comput. 1, 1 (2018), 3.
[47]
Daniel Gayo-Avello. 2012. No, you cannot predict elections with twitter. IEEE Internet Comput. 16, 6 (2012), 91–94.
[48]
Homero Gil de Zúñiga, Nakwon Jung, and Sebastián Valenzuela. 2012. Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. J. Comput.-Med. Commun. 17, 3 (2012), 319–336.
[49]
Sandra González-Bailón, Javier Borge-Holthoefer, Alejandro Rivero, and Yamir Moreno. 2011. The dynamics of protest recruitment through an online network. Sci. Rep. 1 (2011), 197.
[50]
Jeff Goodwin and James M. Jasper. 2006. Emotions and social movements. In Handbook of the Sociology of Emotions. Springer, 611–635.
[51]
Arthur C. Graesser, Danielle S. McNamara, Zhiqang Cai, Mark Conley, Haiying Li, and James Pennebaker. 2014. Coh-Metrix measures text characteristics at multiple levels of language and discourse. Element. School J. 115, 2 (2014), 210–229.
[52]
Arthur C. Graesser, Danielle S. McNamara, Max M. Louwerse, and Zhiqiang Cai. 2004. Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language. Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. 36, 2 (2004), 193–202.
[53]
Mark Granovetter. 1983. The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited.
[54]
Mark Granovetter. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Am. J. Sociol. 91, 3 (1985), 481–510.
[55]
Justin Grimmer, Eitan Hersh, Marc Meredith, Jonathan Mummolo, and Clayton Nall. 2018. Obstacles to estimating voter ID laws’ effect on turnout. J. Pol. 80, 3 (2018), 1045–1051.
[56]
Nir Grinberg, Kenneth Joseph, Lisa Friedland, Briony Swire-Thompson, and David Lazer. 2019. Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Science 363, 6425 (January2019), 374–378.
[57]
Erin Grinshteyn and David Hemenway. 2016. Violent death rates: The US compared with other high-income OECD countries, 2010. Am. J. Med. 129, 3 (2016), 266–273.
[58]
Andrew Guess, Brendan Nyhan, Benjamin Lyons, and Jason Reifler. 2018. Avoiding the echo chamber about echo chambers. Knight Foundation 2 (2018), 1–25. https://kf-site-production.s3.amazonaws.com/media_elements/files/000/000/133/original/Topos_KF_White-Paper_Nyhan_V1.pdf.
[59]
Jurgen Habermas, Jürgen Habermas, and Thomas Mccarthy. 1991. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. MIT Press.
[60]
Zoltan Hajnal, Nazita Lajevardi, and Lindsay Nielson. 2017. Voter identification laws and the suppression of minority votes. J. Pol. 79, 2 (2017), 363–379.
[61]
Daniel Halpern and Jennifer Gibbs. 2013. Social media as a catalyst for online deliberation? Exploring the affordances of Facebook and YouTube for political expression. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29, 3 (2013), 1159–1168.
[62]
Kirk Hawkins and Levente Littvay. 2019. Contemporary US Populism in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge University Press.
[63]
Joanne Hinds, Emma J. Williams, and Adam N. Joinson. 2020. “It wouldn’t happen to me”: Privacy concerns and perspectives following the cambridge analytica scandal. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. (2020), 102498.
[64]
Dirk Hovy. 2015. Demographic factors improve classification performance. In Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers). 752–762.
[65]
Joop J. Hox and Timo M. Bechger. 1998. An introduction to structural equation modeling.
[66]
Rick H. Hoyle. 1995. The structural equation modeling approach: Basic concepts and fundamental issues.
[67]
Li-tze Hu and Peter M. Bentler. 1999. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Eq. Model. 6, 1 (1999), 1–55.
[68]
Robert Huckfeldt. 2009. Interdependence, density dependence, and networks in politics. In American Politics Research. Vol. 37. 921–950.
[69]
Leonie Huddy, Lilliana Mason, and Lene Aarøe. 2015. Expressive partisanship: Campaign involvement, political emotion, and partisan identity. Am. Pol. Sci. Rev. 109, 1 (2015), 1–17.
[70]
Samuel P. Huntington. 1993. The Clash of Civilizations?: The Debate, with responses, F. Ajami et al. (Eds.). A Foreign Affairs Reader.
[71]
Thomas J. Johnson, Shannon L. Bichard, and Weiwu Zhang. 2009. Communication communities or “cyberghettos?”: A path analysis model examining factors that explain selective exposure to blogs. J. Comput.-Med. Commun. 15, 1 (2009), 60–82.
[72]
Andreas Jungherr, Pascal Jürgens, and Harald Schoen. 2012. Why the pirate party won the german election of 2009 or the trouble with predictions: A response to tumasjan, a., sprenger, to, sander, pg, & welpe, im “predicting elections with twitter: What 140 characters reveal about political sentiment.” Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 30, 2 (2012), 229–234.
[73]
Andreas Jungherr, Oliver Posegga, and Jisun An. 2021. Populist supporters on reddit: A comparison of content and behavioral patterns within publics of supporters of Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. (2021), 0894439321996130.
[74]
Bindu Kalesan, Marcos D. Villarreal, Katherine M. Keyes, and Sandro Galea. 2016. Gun ownership and social gun culture. Injury Prevent. 22, 3 (2016), 216–220.
[75]
George Karypis and Vipin Kumar. 1998. A fast and high quality multilevel scheme for partitioning irregular graphs. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 20, 1 (1998), 359–392.
[76]
Gary Kleck. 2017. Point Blank: Guns and Violence in America. Routledge.
[77]
Jens Manuel Krogstad, Luis Noe-Bustamante, and Antonio Flores. 2019. Historic Highs in 2018 Voter Turnout Extended across Racial and Ethnic Groups. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/05/01/historic-highs-in-2018-voter-turnout-extended-across-racial-and-ethnic-groups/.
[78]
Jan E. Leighley. 1990. Social interaction and contextual influences on political participation. Am. Pol. Quart. 18, 4 (1990), 459–475.
[79]
Rob Lever. 2013. Debate flares on ‘Twitter revolutions’, Arab Spring. Retrieved from https://www.dawn.com/news/791757.
[80]
Ro’ee Levy. 2021. Social media, news consumption, and polarization: Evidence from a field experiment. Am. Econ. Rev. 111, 3 (2021), 831–70.
[81]
Wendy Liu and Derek Ruths. 2013. What’s in a name? using first names as features for gender inference in twitter. In Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium Series.
[82]
Gilad Lotan, Erhardt Graeff, Mike Ananny, Devin Gaffney, Ian Pearce, et al. 2011. The Arab Spring| the revolutions were tweeted: Information flows during the 2011 Tunisian and Egyptian revolutions. Int. J. Commun. 5 (2011), 31.
[83]
Robert J. MacCoun and Susannah Paletz. 2009. Citizens’ perceptions of ideological bias in research on public policy controversies. Pol. Psychol. 30, 1 (2009), 43–65.
[84]
Mary Madden, Lee Rainie, Kathryn Zickuhr, Maeve Duggan, and Aaron Smith. 2014. Public perceptions of privacy and security in the post-snowden era. Pew Res. Center 12 (2014).
[85]
Walid Magdy, Kareem Darwish, and Ingmar Weber. 2016. # FailedRevolutions: Using Twitter to study the antecedents of ISIS support. First Monday 21, 2 (2016).
[86]
Yelena Mejova, Padmini Srinivasan, and Bob Boynton. 2013. GOP primary season on Twitter: “Popular” political sentiment in social media. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM’13).
[87]
Yelena Mejova, Ingmar Weber, and Michael W. Macy. 2015. Twitter: A Digital Socioscope. Cambridge University Press.
[88]
Panagiotis Metaxas, Eni Mustafaraj, and Daniel Gayo-Avello. 2011. How (Not) to predict elections. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Social Computing.
[89]
Patrick R. Miller. 2011. The emotional citizen: Emotion as a function of political sophistication. Pol. Psychol. 32, 4 (2011), 575–600.
[90]
A. Mislove, S. Lehmann, Y. Y. Ahn, and J. P. Onnela. 2011. Understanding the demographics of Twitter users. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM’11).
[91]
Burt L. Monroe, Michael P. Colaresi, and Kevin M. Quinn. 2008. Fightin’words: Lexical feature selection and evaluation for identifying the content of political conflict. Pol. Anal. 16, 4 (2008), 372–403.
[92]
Elizabeth Mullen and Linda J. Skitka. 2006. Exploring the psychological underpinnings of the moral mandate effect: Motivated reasoning, group differentiation, or anger? J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 90, 4 (2006), 629.
[93]
Jonathan Mummolo. 2016. News from the other side: How topic relevance limits the prevalence of partisan selective exposure. J. Pol. 78, 3 (2016), 763–773.
[94]
Jacob L. Nelson and James G. Webster. 2017. The myth of partisan selective exposure: A portrait of the online political news audience. Soc. Media+ Soc. 3, 3 (2017), 2056305117729314.
[95]
Rabia Noor. 2017. Citizen journalism vs. mainstream journalism: A study on challenges posed by amateurs. Athens J. Mass Media Commun. 3, 1 (2017), 55–76.
[96]
Alexandra Olteanu, Carlos Castillo, Fernando Diaz, and Emre Kiciman. 2016. Social data: Biases, methodological pitfalls, and ethical boundaries. Methodol. Pitfalls Ethic. Bound. (December 2016).
[97]
Karl-Dieter Opp. 2009. Theories of Political Protest and Social Movements: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, Critique, and Synthesis. Routledge.
[98]
Stephen Owen. 2017. Monitoring social media and protest movements: Ensuring political order through surveillance and surveillance discourse. Soc. Ident. 23, 6 (2017), 688–700.
[99]
Paul M. Reeping, Magdalena Cerdá, Bindu Kalesan, Douglas J. Wiebe, Sandro Galea, and Charles C. Branas. 2019. State gun laws, gun ownership, and mass shootings in the US: cross sectional time series. Br. Med. J. 364 (2019).
[100]
Daniel M. Romero, Brendan Meeder, and Jon Kleinberg. 2011. Differences in the mechanics of information diffusion across topics: Idioms, political hashtags, and complex contagion on twitter. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web. 695–704.
[101]
Matthijs Rooduijn and Brian Burgoon. 2018. The paradox of well-being: Do unfavorable socioeconomic and sociocultural contexts deepen or dampen radical left and right voting among the less well-off? Compar. Pol. Stud. 51, 13 (2018), 1720–1753.
[102]
Roper. 2016. Shootings, Guns and Public Opinion. Center for Public Opinions Research. Retrieved from https://ropercenter.cornell.edu/shootings-guns-and-public-opinion.
[103]
Silvia Russo and Erik Amnå. 2016. The personality divide: Do personality traits differentially predict online political engagement? Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 34, 3 (2016), 259–277.
[104]
Agnieszka Rychwalska, Szymon Talaga, and Karolina Ziembowicz. 2020. Quality in peer production systems–impact of assortativity of communication networks on group efficacy. In Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
[105]
Katherine Schaeffer. 2021. Key Facts about Americans and Guns. Retrieved November 1, 2021 from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/09/13/key-facts-about-americans-and-guns/.
[106]
Dietram A. Scheufele, Matthew C. Nisbet, Dominique Brossard, and Erik C. Nisbet. 2004. Social structure and citizenship: Examining the impacts of social setting, network heterogeneity, and informational variables on political participation. Pol. Commun. 21, 3 (2004), 315–338.
[107]
Marcin Skowron, Marko Tkalčič, Bruce Ferwerda, and Markus Schedl. 2016. Fusing social media cues: Personality prediction from twitter and instagram. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web. 107–108.
[108]
Michael A. Stefanone, Gregory D. Saxton, Michael J. Egnoto, Wayne Wei, and Yun Fu. 2015. Image attributes and diffusion via Twitter: The case of# guncontrol. In Proceedings of the 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE, 1788–1797.
[109]
Michael H. Stone. 2015. Mass murder, mental illness, and men. Violence Gender 2, 1 (2015), 51–86.
[110]
Rebecca Stone and Kelly M. Socia. 2017. Boy with toy or black male with gun: An analysis of online news articles covering the shooting of tamir rice. Race Justice (2017), 2153368716689594.
[111]
Natalie Jomini Stroud. 2008. Media use and political predispositions: Revisiting the concept of selective exposure. Pol. Behav. 30, 3 (2008), 341–366.
[112]
Yan Su and Porismita Borah. 2019. Who is the agenda setter? Examining the intermedia agenda-setting effect between Twitter and newspapers. J. Inf. Technol. Pol. 16, 3 (2019), 236–249.
[113]
Gary Tang and Francis L. F. Lee. 2013. Facebook use and political participation: The impact of exposure to shared political information, connections with public political actors, and network structural heterogeneity. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 31, 6 (2013), 763–773.
[114]
John W. Thibaut and Harold H. Kelley. 1959. The Social Psychology of Groups (1st ed.). Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ, p. O2.
[115]
James D. Thompson. 2003. Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory. Transaction Publishers.
[116]
Zeynep Tufekci and Christopher Wilson. 2012. Social media and the decision to participate in political protest: Observations from tahrir square. J. Commun. 62, 2 (2012), 363–379.
[117]
Andranik Tumasjan, Timm Sprenger, Philipp Sandner, and Isabell Welpe. 2010. Predicting elections with twitter: What 140 characters reveal about political sentiment. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Vol. 4.
[118]
Alec Tyson. 2018. The 2018 Midterm Vote: Divisions by Race, Gender, Education. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/11/08/the-2018-midterm-vote-divisions-by-race-gender-education/.
[119]
Sebastián Valenzuela. 2013. Unpacking the use of social media for protest behavior: The roles of information, opinion expression, and activism. Am. Behav. Sci. 57, 7 (2013), 920–942.
[120]
Sebastián Valenzuela, Teresa Correa, and Homero Gil de Zúñiga. 2018. Ties, likes, and tweets: Using strong and weak ties to explain differences in protest participation across Facebook and Twitter use. Pol. Commun. 35, 1 (2018), 117–134.
[121]
Steven M. Van Hauwaert, Christian H. Schimpf, and Régis Dandoy. 2019. Populist demand, economic development and regional identity across nine European countries: Exploring regional patterns of variance. Eur. Soc. 21, 2 (2019), 303–325.
[122]
Marco Vicente, Fernando Batista, and Joao P. Carvalho. 2019. Gender detection of Twitter users based on multiple information sources. In Interactions between Computational Intelligence and Mathematics Part 2. Springer, 39–54.
[123]
Jessica Vitak, Paul Zube, Andrew Smock, Caleb T. Carr, Nicole Ellison, and Cliff Lampe. 2011. It’s complicated: Facebook users’ political participation in the 2008 election. CyberPsychol. Behav. Soc. Network. 14, 3 (2011), 107–114.
[124]
Emily K. Vraga, Kjerstin Thorson, Neta Kligler-Vilenchik, and Emily Gee. 2015. How individual sensitivities to disagreement shape youth political expression on Facebook. Comput. Hum. Behav. 45 (2015), 281–289.
[125]
Mason Walker and Katerina Eva Matsa. 2021. News Consumption across Social Media in 2021. Retrieved from November 1, 2021 from https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/2021/09/20/news-consumption-across-social-media-in-2021/.
[126]
Alex Hai Wang. 2010. Detecting spam bots in online social networking sites: A machine learning approach. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Data and Applications Security and Privacy (IFIP’10). Springer, 335–342.
[127]
Nan Wang, Blesson Varghese, and Peter D. Donnelly. 2016. A machine learning analysis of Twitter sentiment to the Sandy Hook shootings. In Proceedings of the IEEE 12th International Conference on e-Science (e-Science’16). IEEE, 303–312.
[128]
Zijian Wang, Scott Hale, David Ifeoluwa Adelani, Przemyslaw Grabowicz, Timo Hartman, Fabian Flöck, and David Jurgens. 2019. Demographic inference and representative population estimates from multilingual social media data. In Proceedings of the World Wide Web Conference. 2056–2067.
[129]
Stephan Winter, Miriam J. Metzger, and Andrew J. Flanagin. 2016. Selective use of news cues: A multiple-motive perspective on information selection in social media environments. J. Commun. 66, 4 (2016), 669–693.
[130]
Michael Xenos, Ariadne Vromen, and Brian D. Loader. 2014. The great equalizer? Patterns of social media use and youth political engagement in three advanced democracies. Inf. Commun. Soc. 17, 2 (2014), 151–167.
[131]
Xuyan Yan. 2020. The impact of social media on traditional mainstream media—A case study of people’s daily. In Proceedings of the 4th International Seminar on Education, Management and Social Sciences (ISEMSS’20). Atlantis Press, 479–482.
[132]
Moran Yarchi, Christian Baden, and Neta Kligler-Vilenchik. 2021. Political polarization on the digital sphere: A cross-platform, over-time analysis of interactional, positional, and affective polarization on social media. Pol. Commun. 38, 1-2 (2021), 98–139.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)WallStreetBets: Assessing the Collective Intelligence of Reddit for Investment AdviceACM Transactions on Social Computing10.1145/36607607:1-4(1-23)Online publication date: 2-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Navigating Multidimensional Ideologies with Reddit's Political Compass: Economic Conflict and Social AffinityProceedings of the ACM Web Conference 202410.1145/3589334.3645606(2582-2593)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
  • (2023)Wearing Masks Implies Refuting Trump?: Towards Target-specific User Stance Prediction across Events in COVID-19 and US Election 2020Proceedings of the 15th ACM Web Science Conference 202310.1145/3578503.3583606(23-32)Online publication date: 30-Apr-2023

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Social Computing
ACM Transactions on Social Computing  Volume 5, Issue 1-4
December 2022
103 pages
EISSN:2469-7826
DOI:10.1145/3572823
Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 26 November 2022
Online AM: 29 April 2022
Accepted: 03 April 2022
Revised: 02 February 2022
Received: 17 May 2021
Published in TSC Volume 5, Issue 1-4

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Gun debate
  2. political activism
  3. social media
  4. opinion polarization

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Refereed

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)209
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)19
Reflects downloads up to 26 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)WallStreetBets: Assessing the Collective Intelligence of Reddit for Investment AdviceACM Transactions on Social Computing10.1145/36607607:1-4(1-23)Online publication date: 2-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Navigating Multidimensional Ideologies with Reddit's Political Compass: Economic Conflict and Social AffinityProceedings of the ACM Web Conference 202410.1145/3589334.3645606(2582-2593)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
  • (2023)Wearing Masks Implies Refuting Trump?: Towards Target-specific User Stance Prediction across Events in COVID-19 and US Election 2020Proceedings of the 15th ACM Web Science Conference 202310.1145/3578503.3583606(23-32)Online publication date: 30-Apr-2023

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Full Text

View this article in Full Text.

Full Text

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media