Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3543873.3587698acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesthewebconfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

On Cohesively Polarized Communities in Signed Networks

Published: 30 April 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Locating and characterizing polarization is one of the most important issues to enable a healthier web ecosystem. Finding groups of nodes that form strongly stable agreements and participate in collective conflicts with other groups is an important problem in this context. Previous works approach this problem by finding balanced subgraphs, in which the polarity measure is optimized, that result in large subgraphs without a clear notion of agreement or conflict. In real-world signed networks, balanced subgraphs are often not polarized as in the case of a subgraph with only positive edges. To remedy this issue, we leverage the notion of cohesion — we find pairs of cohesively polarized communities where each node in a community is positively connected to nodes in the same community and negatively connected to nodes in the other community. To capture the cohesion along with the polarization, we define a new measure, dichotomy. We leverage the balanced triangles, which model the cohesion and polarization at the same time, to design a heuristic that results in good seedbeds for polarized communities in real-world signed networks. Then, we introduce the electron decomposition which finds cohesively polarized communities with high dichotomy score. In an extensive experimental evaluation, we show that our method finds cohesively polarized communities and outperforms the state-of-the-art methods with respect to several measures. Moreover, our algorithm is more efficient than the existing methods and practical for large-scale networks.

References

[1]
2021. Center for Computational Research, University at Buffalo. http://hdl.handle.net/10477/79221.
[2]
J. Ignacio Alvarez-Hamelin, Alain Barrat, and Alessandro Vespignani. 2006. Large scale networks fingerprinting and visualization using the k-core decomposition. In NIPS. 41–50.
[3]
Albert Angel, Nick Koudas, Nikos Sarkas, and Divesh Srivastava. 2012. Dense subgraph maintenance under streaming edge weight updates for real-time story identification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1203.0060 (2012).
[4]
Samin Aref, Ly Dinh, Rezvaneh Rezapour, and Jana Diesner. 2020. Multilevel structural evaluation of signed directed social networks based on balance theory. Scientific Reports 10, 1 (2020), 1–12.
[5]
Samin Aref and Mark C Wilson. 2018. Measuring partial balance in signed networks. Journal of Complex Networks 6, 4 (2018), 566–595.
[6]
Delia Baldassarri and Peter Bearman. 2007. Dynamics of political polarization. American Sociological Review 72, 5 (2007), 784–811.
[7]
Nikhil Bansal, Avrim Blum, and Shuchi Chawla. 2004. Correlation clustering. Machine Learning 56, 1 (2004), 89–113.
[8]
Phillip Bonacich and Philip Lu. 2012. Introduction to mathematical sociology. Princeton University Press.
[9]
Francesco Bonchi, Edoardo Galimberti, Aristides Gionis, Bruno Ordozgoiti, and Giancarlo Ruffo. 2019. Discovering polarized communities in signed networks. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 961–970.
[10]
Jennifer Brundidge. 2010. Encountering "difference" in the contemporary public sphere: The contribution of the Internet to the heterogeneity of political discussion networks. Journal of Communication 60, 4 (2010), 680–700.
[11]
Jose Cadena, Anil Kumar Vullikanti, and Charu C Aggarwal. 2016. On dense subgraphs in signed network streams. In 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM). IEEE, 51–60.
[12]
Dorwin Cartwright and Frank Harary. 1956. Structural balance: a generalization of Heider’s theory.Psychological review 63, 5 (1956), 277.
[13]
Moses Charikar. 2000. Greedy approximation algorithms for finding dense components in a graph. In International Workshop on Approximation Algorithms for Combinatorial Optimization. Springer, 84–95.
[14]
Zi Chen, Long Yuan, Xuemin Lin, Lu Qin, and Jianye Yang. 2020. Efficient Maximal Balanced Clique Enumeration in Signed Networks. In Proceedings of The Web Conference 2020. 339–349.
[15]
Lingyang Chu, Zhefeng Wang, Jian Pei, Jiannan Wang, Zijin Zhao, and Enhong Chen. 2016. Finding gangs in war from signed networks. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 1505–1514.
[16]
Jonathan Cohen. 2008. Trusses: Cohesive subgraphs for social network analysis. National Security Agency Technical Report 16, 3.1 (2008).
[17]
Tom Coleman, James Saunderson, and Anthony Wirth. 2008. A local-search 2-approximation for 2-correlation-clustering. In European Symposium on Algorithms. Springer, 308–319.
[18]
Patrick Doreian and Andrej Mrvar. 2019. Structural balance and signed international relations. Journal of Social Structure 16, 1 (2019).
[19]
Joan-Maria Esteban and Debraj Ray. 1994. On the measurement of polarization. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society (1994), 819–851.
[20]
Yixiang Fang, Kaiqiang Yu, Reynold Cheng, Laks VS Lakshmanan, and Xuemin Lin. 2019. Efficient algorithms for densest subgraph discovery. PVLDB 12, 11 (2019), 1719–1732.
[21]
Rosa Figueiredo and Yuri Frota. 2013. An improved Branch-and-cut code for the maximum balanced subgraph of a signed graph. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.4345 (2013).
[22]
Rosa Figueiredo and Yuri Frota. 2014. The maximum balanced subgraph of a signed graph: Applications and solution approaches. European Journal of Operational Research 236, 2 (2014), 473–487.
[23]
Eugene Fratkin, Brian T Naughton, Douglas L Brutlag, and Serafim Batzoglou. 2006. MotifCut: regulatory motifs finding with maximum density subgraphs. Bioinformatics 22, 14 (2006), e150–e157.
[24]
Jie Gao, Fei Hao, Geyong Min, and Zhipeng Cai. 2021. Maximal Multipolarized Cliques Search in Signed Networks. In Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 2227–2231.
[25]
Kiran Garimella, Gianmarco De Francisci Morales, Aristides Gionis, and Michael Mathioudakis. 2017. Reducing controversy by connecting opposing views. In Proceedings of the Tenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. 81–90.
[26]
Kiran Garimella, Gianmarco De Francisci Morales, Aristides Gionis, and Michael Mathioudakis. 2018. Quantifying controversy on social media. ACM Transactions on Social Computing 1, 1 (2018), 1–27.
[27]
David Gibson, Ravi Kumar, and Andrew Tomkins. 2005. Discovering large dense subgraphs in massive graphs. In Proceedings of the 31st international conference on Very large data bases. Citeseer, 721–732.
[28]
Aristides Gionis and Charalampos E. Tsourakakis. 2015. Dense Subgraph Discovery: Tutorial. In KDD. 2313–2314.
[29]
Ramanthan Guha, Ravi Kumar, Prabhakar Raghavan, and Andrew Tomkins. 2004. Propagation of trust and distrust. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on World Wide Web. 403–412.
[30]
Frank Harary. 1953. On the notion of balance of a signed graph.Michigan Mathematical Journal 2, 2 (1953), 143–146.
[31]
Fritz Heider. 1946. Attitudes and cognitive organization. The Journal of Psychology 21, 1 (1946), 107–112.
[32]
Xin Huang, Hong Cheng, Lu Qin, Wentao Tian, and Jeffrey Xu Yu. 2014. Querying K-truss Community in Large and Dynamic Graphs. In SIGMOD. 1311–1322.
[33]
Xin Huang, Wei Lu, and Laks V.S. Lakshmanan. 2016. Truss Decomposition of Probabilistic Graphs: Semantics and Algorithms. In SIGMOD. 77–90.
[34]
Alec Kirkley, George T Cantwell, and MEJ Newman. 2019. Balance in signed networks. Physical Review E 99, 1 (2019), 012320.
[35]
Srijan Kumar, William L Hamilton, Jure Leskovec, and Dan Jurafsky. 2018. Community interaction and conflict on the web. In Proceedings of the 2018 world wide web conference. 933–943.
[36]
Jérôme Kunegis. 2013. KONECT: The Koblenz Network Collection(WWW Companion). 1343–1350.
[37]
Mirko Lai, Viviana Patti, Giancarlo Ruffo, and Paolo Rosso. 2018. Stance evolution and twitter interactions in an italian political debate. In International Conference on Applications of Natural Language to Information Systems. Springer, 15–27.
[38]
V. E. Lee, N. Ruan, R. Jin, and C. Aggarwal. 2010. A Survey of Algorithms for Dense Subgraph Discovery. In Managing and Mining Graph Data. Vol. 40.
[39]
Jure Leskovec, Daniel Huttenlocher, and Jon Kleinberg. 2010. Signed networks in social media. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1361–1370.
[40]
Jure Leskovec and Andrej Krevl. 2014. SNAP Datasets: Stanford Large Network Dataset Collection. http://snap.stanford.edu/data.
[41]
Ronghua Li, Qiangqiang Dai, Lu Qin, Guoren Wang, Xiaokui Xiao, Jeffrey Xu Yu, and Shaojie Qiao. 2019. Signed Clique Search in Signed Networks: Concepts and Algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (2019).
[42]
Q. Vera Liao and Wai-Tat Fu. 2014. Can You Hear Me Now? Mitigating the Echo Chamber Effect by Source Position Indicators. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (Baltimore, Maryland, USA) (CSCW ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 184–196. https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531711
[43]
Q Vera Liao and Wai-Tat Fu. 2014. Expert voices in echo chambers: effects of source expertise indicators on exposure to diverse opinions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2745–2754.
[44]
Yelena Mejova, Amy X Zhang, Nicholas Diakopoulos, and Carlos Castillo. 2014. Controversy and sentiment in online news. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.8152 (2014).
[45]
Alfredo Jose Morales, Javier Borondo, Juan Carlos Losada, and Rosa M Benito. 2015. Measuring political polarization: Twitter shows the two sides of Venezuela. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science 25, 3 (2015), 033114.
[46]
Bruno Ordozgoiti, Antonis Matakos, and Aristides Gionis. 2020. Finding large balanced subgraphs in signed networks. In Proceedings of The Web Conference 2020. 1378–1388.
[47]
Ahmet Erdem Sariyuce. 2021. Motif-driven Dense Subgraph Discovery in Directed and Labeled Networks. In Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021. 379–390.
[48]
Ahmet Erdem Sariyuce and Ali Pinar. 2016. Fast Hierarchy Construction for Dense Subgraphs. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment 10, 3 (2016).
[49]
A. Erdem Sarıyüce, C. Seshadhri, A. Pınar, and Ü. V. Çatalyürek. 2015. Finding the Hierarchy of Dense Subgraphs Using Nucleus Decompositions. In WWW (Florence, Italy). 927–937.
[50]
Renjie Sun, Qiuyu Zhu, Chen Chen, Xiaoyang Wang, Ying Zhang, and Xun Wang. 2020. Discovering cliques in signed networks based on balance theory. In International Conference on Database Systems for Advanced Applications. 666–674.
[51]
C. Tsourakakis, F. Bonchi, A. Gionis, F. Gullo, and M. Tsiarli. 2013. Denser Than the Densest Subgraph: Extracting Optimal Quasi-cliques with Quality Guarantees(KDD ’13).
[52]
Ruo-Chun Tzeng, Bruno Ordozgoiti, and Aristides Gionis. 2020. Discovering conflicting groups in signed networks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33 (2020).
[53]
VG Vinod Vydiswaran, ChengXiang Zhai, Dan Roth, and Peter Pirolli. 2015. Overcoming bias to learn about controversial topics. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 66, 8 (2015), 1655–1672.
[54]
Yanping Wu, Renjie Sun, Chen Chen, Xiaoyang Wang, and Qiuyu Zhu. 2020. Maximum Signed (k, r)-Truss Identification in Signed Networks. In Proc. of the 29th ACM International Conf. on Information & Knowledge Management. 3337–3340.
[55]
Han Xiao, Bruno Ordozgoiti, and Aristides Gionis. 2020. Searching for polarization in signed graphs: a local spectral approach. In Proceedings of The Web Conference 2020. 362–372.
[56]
Jun Zhao, Renjie Sun, Qiuyu Zhu, Xiaoyang Wang, and Chen Chen. 2020. Community Identification in Signed Networks: A K-Truss Based Model. In Proc. of the 29th ACM International Conf. on Information & Knowledge Management. 2321–2324.

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Finding Antagonistic Communities in Signed Uncertain GraphsIEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering10.1109/TKDE.2024.349658637:2(655-669)Online publication date: Feb-2025
  • (2024)Scalable Algorithm for Finding Balanced Subgraphs with Tolerance in Signed NetworksProceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining10.1145/3637528.3671674(278-287)Online publication date: 25-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Neural discovery of balance-aware polarized communitiesMachine Learning10.1007/s10994-024-06581-4Online publication date: 9-Jul-2024

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
WWW '23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023
April 2023
1567 pages
ISBN:9781450394192
DOI:10.1145/3543873
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 30 April 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. balance
  2. cohesion
  3. polarized communities
  4. signed networks

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Funding Sources

  • NSF

Conference

WWW '23
Sponsor:
WWW '23: The ACM Web Conference 2023
April 30 - May 4, 2023
TX, Austin, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)49
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
Reflects downloads up to 13 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Finding Antagonistic Communities in Signed Uncertain GraphsIEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering10.1109/TKDE.2024.349658637:2(655-669)Online publication date: Feb-2025
  • (2024)Scalable Algorithm for Finding Balanced Subgraphs with Tolerance in Signed NetworksProceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining10.1145/3637528.3671674(278-287)Online publication date: 25-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Neural discovery of balance-aware polarized communitiesMachine Learning10.1007/s10994-024-06581-4Online publication date: 9-Jul-2024

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media