research-article

“I normally wouldn’t talk with strangers”: Introducing a Socio-Spatial Interface for Fostering Togetherness Between Strangers

Authors:

Keith Evan GreenAuthors Info & Claims

CHI '23: Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Article No.: 272, Pages 1 - 20

https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581325

Published: 19 April 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Interacting with strangers can be beneficial but also challenging. Fortunately, these challenges can lead to design opportunities. In this paper, we present the design and evaluation of a socio-spatial interface, SocialStools, that leverages the human propensity for embodied interaction to foster togetherness between strangers. SocialStools is an installation of three responsive stools on caster wheels that generate sound and imagery in the near environment as three strangers sit on them, move them, and rotate them relative to each other. In our study with 12 groups of three strangers, we found a sense of togetherness emerged through interaction, evidenced by different patterns of socio-spatial movements, verbal communication, non-verbal behavior, and interview responses. We present our findings, articulate reasons for the cultivation of togetherness, consider the unique social affordances of our spatial interface in shifting attention during interpersonal communication, and provide design implications. This research contributes insights toward designing cyber-physical interfaces that foster interaction and togetherness among strangers at a time when cultivating togetherness is especially critical.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (3544548.3581325-talk-video.mp4)

Pre-recorded Video Presentation

Download
50.00 MB

MP4 File (3544548.3581325-video-preview.mp4)

Video Preview

Download
50.68 MB

MP4 File (3544548.3581325-video-figure.mp4)

Video Figure

Download
149.69 MB

References

[1]

Michael Argyle and Janet Dean. 1965. Eye-contact, distance and affiliation. Sociometry (1965), 289–304.

[2]

Arthur Aron, Elaine N Aron, and Danny Smollan. 1992. Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of personality and social psychology 63, 4 (Oct. 1992), 596–612. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596

[3]

Robert Freed Bales, Stephen P. Cohen, and Stephen A. Williamson. 1979. Symlog: A system for the multiple level observation of groups. Free Press.

[4]

Pollie Barden, Rob Comber, David Green, Daniel Jackson, Cassim Ladha, Tom Bartindale, Nick Bryan-Kinns, Tony Stockman, and Patrick Olivier. 2012. Telematic dinner party: designing for togetherness through play and performance. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom) (DIS ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2317964

Digital Library

[5]

Zygmunt Bauman. 1995. Life in Fragments: Essays in Postmodern Morality. Blackwell. https://philpapers.org/rec/BAULIF

[6]

Roy F Baumeister and Mark R Leary. 1995. The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological bulletin 117, 3 (1995), 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497

[7]

Tine Bech, Deqing Sun, Peiqi Su, David-Alexandre Chanel, Romain Constant, Anthony Rowe, Liam Birtles, Chris Bennewith, and Oliver Bown. 2017. Demo hour. Interactions 24, 2 (Feb. 2017), 10–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3044536

Digital Library

[8]

Talja Blokland and Julia Nast. 2014. From public familiarity to comfort zone: The relevance of absent ties for belonging in Berlin’s mixed neighbourhoods. International journal of urban and regional research 38, 4 (July 2014), 1142–11 59. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12126

[9]

Erin Bradner, Wendy A Kellogg, and Thomas Erickson. 1999. The adoption and use of ‘babble’: A field study of chat in the workplace. In ECSCW’ 99. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4441-4_8

[10]

Darren David Chadwick and Tracey Platt. 2018. Investigating humor in social interaction in people with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review of the literature. Frontiers in psychology 9 (2018), 1745.

[11]

A Criminisi, I Reid, and A Zisserman. 1999. A plane measuring device. Image and vision computing 17, 8 (June 1999), 625–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0262-8856(98)00183-8

[12]

Alessandro D’Ausilio, Giacomo Novembre, Luciano Fadiga, and Peter E Keller. 2015. What can music tell us about social interaction?Trends in cognitive sciences 19, 3 (March 2015), 111–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.01.005

[13]

Paul Dourish. 2004. Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. MIT Press. https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=-TRWc0PA9e4C

[14]

Nicholas Epley and Juliana Schroeder. 2014. Mistakenly seeking solitude. Journal of experimental psychology. General 143, 5 (Oct. 2014), 1980–1999. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037323

[15]

Patrick Tobias Fischer and Eva Hornecker. 2012. Urban HCI: spatial aspects in the design of shared encounters for media facades. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Austin, Texas, USA) (CHI ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 307–316. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2207719

Digital Library

[16]

Maiken Hillerup Fogtmann, Peter Gall Krogh, and Thomas Markussen. 2011. Spatial sharing: Designing computational artifacts as architecture. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces. 1–9. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Peter-Krogh/publication/221148249_Spatial_Computing_and_Spatial_Practices/links/5620de7308aed8dd19411f60/Spatial-Computing-and-Spatial-Practices.pdf

[17]

Alberto Gallace and Charles Spence. 2010. The science of interpersonal touch: An overview. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 34 (2010), 246–259.

[18]

William Gaver. 2002. Designing for homo ludens. I3 Magazine 12, June (2002), 2–6. https://www.academia.edu/download/5252009/10.1.1.118.2688.pdf

[19]

Raymond W Gibbs and Herbert L Colston. 1995. The cognitive psychological reality of image schemas and their transformations. 6, 4 (Jan. 1995), 347–378. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1995.6.4.347

[20]

Emily Grenader, Danilo Gasques Rodrigues, Fernando Nos, and Nadir Weibel. 2015. The VideoMob Interactive Art Installation Connecting Strangers through Inclusive Digital Crowds. ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst. 5, 2 (July 2015), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/2768208

Digital Library

[21]

Gul Gunaydin, Hazal Oztekin, Deniz Hazal Karabulut, and Selin Salman-Engin. 2021. Minimal Social Interactions with Strangers Predict Greater Subjective Well-Being. Journal of happiness studies 22, 4 (April 2021), 1839–1853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-020-00298-6

[22]

Ge Guo, Gilly Leshed, Trevor Pinch, and Keith Evan Green. 2022. SocialStools: A Playful, Socio-Spatial Interface for Fostering Togetherness Across Strangers. In Extended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI EA ’22, Article 173). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491101.3519877

Digital Library

[23]

Edmund T Hall and Edward Twitchell Hall. 1966. The Hidden Dimension. Doubleday. https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=rvs_DtXv47EC

[24]

Matthew J Hertenstein, Julie M Verkamp, Alyssa M Kerestes, and Rachel M Holmes. 2006. The communicative functions of touch in humans, nonhuman primates, and rats: a review and synthesis of the empirical research. Genetic, social, and general psychology monographs 132, 1(2006), 5–94.

[25]

Luke Hespanhol, Martin Tomitsch, Oliver Bown, and Miriama Young. 2014. Using embodied audio-visual interaction to promote social encounters around large media façades. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (DIS ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 945–954. https://doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2598568

Digital Library

[26]

Mads Hobye and Jonas Löwgren. 2011. Touching a Stranger: Designing for Engaging Experience in Embodied Interaction. International Journal of Design 5 (2011).

[27]

Julianne Holt-Lunstad. 2021. The Major Health Implications of Social Connection. Current directions in psychological science 30, 3 (June 2021), 251–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721421999630

[28]

Richard Hovey and Helen Massfeller. 2012. Exploring the relational aspects of patient and doctor communication. Journal of medicine and the person 10, 2 (Aug. 2012), 81–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12682-012-0123-0

[29]

Jörn Hurtienne and Johann Habakuk Israel. 2007. Image schemas and their metaphorical extensions: intuitive patterns for tangible interaction. In Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Tangible and embedded interaction (Baton Rouge, Louisiana) (TEI ’07). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 127–134. https://doi.org/10.1145/1226969.1226996

Digital Library

[30]

Hiroshi Ishii and Brygg Ullmer. 1997. Tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in computing systems (Atlanta, Georgia, USA) (CHI ’97). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 234–241. https://doi.org/10.1145/258549.258715

Digital Library

[31]

Chiara Jongerius, Roy S Hessels, Johannes A Romijn, Ellen M A Smets, and Marij A Hillen. 2020. The Measurement of Eye Contact in Human Interactions: A Scoping Review. Journal of nonverbal behavior 44, 3 (Sept. 2020), 363–389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-020-00333-3

[32]

Martin Kaltenbrunner, Till Bovermann, Ross Bencina, Enrico Costanza, 2005. TUIO: A protocol for table-top tangible user interfaces. In Proc. of the The 6th Int’l Workshop on Gesture in Human-Computer Interaction and Simulation. 1–5.

[33]

Viirj Kan, Katsuya Fujii, Judith Amores, Chang Long Zhu Jin, Pattie Maes, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2015. Social Textiles: Social Affordances and Icebreaking Interactions Through Wearable Social Messaging. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Stanford, California, USA) (TEI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 619–624. https://doi.org/10.1145/2677199.2688816

Digital Library

[34]

"KAOSSILATOR". 2022. "The KAOSSILATOR". https://www.korg.com/us/products/dj/kaossilator_pro_plus/

[35]

Seungki Kim, Jiwoo Hong, Jaeyeon Lee, Hyun-Sook Choi, Geehyuk Lee, and Woohun Lee. 2018. TouchBranch: Understanding Interpersonal Touches in Interactive Installation. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Hong Kong, China) (DIS ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 535–546. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196740

Digital Library

[36]

C L Kleinke. 1986. Gaze and eye contact: a research review. Psychological bulletin 100, 1, 78–100. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ /3526377

[37]

Peter Gall Krogh, Marianne Graves Petersen, Kenton O’Hara, and Jens Emil Groenbaek. 2017. Sensitizing Concepts for Socio-spatial Literacy in HCI. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 6449–6460. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025756

Digital Library

[38]

George Lakoff and Mark Johnson. 2008. Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago press.

[39]

Young Suk Lee. 2018. Thou and I: Exploring Expressive Digital Interaction with Interactive Characteristic Wigs. In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Stockholm, Sweden) (TEI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 581–585. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173225.3173311

Digital Library

[40]

Paul Marshall, Yvonne Rogers, and Nadia Pantidi. 2011. Using F-formations to analyse spatial patterns of interaction in physical environments. In Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative work (Hangzhou, China) (CSCW ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 445–454. https://doi.org/10.1145/1958824.1958893

Digital Library

[41]

J McCarthy. 2002. Using public displays to create conversation opportunities. In Workshop at CSCW.

[42]

Malcolm McCullough. 2004. Digital Ground: Architecture, Pervasive Computing, and Environmental Knowing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.5555/983677

Digital Library

[43]

Stanley Milgram. 1977. The familiar stranger: An aspect of urban anonymity., 51–53 pages.

[44]

Stanley Milgram, John Ed Sabini, and Maury Ed Silver. 1992. The individual in a social world: Essays and experiments. Mcgraw-Hill Book Company.

[45]

William J Mitchell. 1999. e-topia: Urban Life, Jim#But Not As We Know It. MIT Press. https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=C-zuCwAAQBAJ

[46]

Tien T Nguyen, Duyen T Nguyen, Shamsi T Iqbal, and Eyal Ofek. 2015. The Known Stranger: Supporting Conversations between Strangers with Personalized Topic Suggestions. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (CHI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 555–564. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702411

Digital Library

[47]

Miyo Okada, Laura Lugaresi, Dingding Zheng, Roshan Peiris, Katrin Wolf, Cristian Norlin, Mikael Anneroth, Kai Kunze, and Masa Inakage. 2018. AURA: Urban Personal Projection to Initiate the Communication. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM International Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces (Tokyo, Japan) (ISS ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 397–399. https://doi.org/10.1145/3279778.3281758

Digital Library

[48]

Susanna Paasovaara, Ekaterina Olshannikova, Pradthana Jarusriboonchai, Aris Malapaschas, and Thomas Olsson. 2016. Next2You: a proximity-based social application aiming to encourage interaction between nearby people. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia. 81–90.

Digital Library

[49]

Susanna Paasovaara, Kaisa Väänänen, Aris Malapaschas, Ekaterina Olshannikova, Thomas Olsson, Pradthana Jarusriboonchai, Jiří Hošek, and Pavel Mašek. 2018. Playfulness and progression in technology-enhanced social experiences between nearby strangers. In Proceedings of the 10th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. 537–548.

Digital Library

[50]

Eric Paulos and Elizabeth Goodman. 2004. The familiar stranger: anxiety, comfort, and play in public places. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 223–230.

Digital Library

[51]

Peter Peltonen, Esko Kurvinen, Antti Salovaara, Giulio Jacucci, Tommi Ilmonen, John Evans, Antti Oulasvirta, and Petri Saarikko. 2008. It’s Mine, Don’t Touch! interactions at a large multi-touch display in a city centre. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Florence, Italy) (CHI ’08). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1285–1294. https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357255

Digital Library

[52]

Deborah A Prentice and Dale T Miller. 1996. Pluralistic Ignorance and the Perpetuation of Social Norms by Unwitting Actors. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Mark P Zanna (Ed.). Vol. 28. Academic Press, 161–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60238-5

[53]

Fabian Ramseyer and Wolfgang Tschacher. 2011. Nonverbal synchrony in psychotherapy: coordinated body movement reflects relationship quality and outcome. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology 79, 3 (June 2011), 284–295. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023419

[54]

"reacTIVision". 2022. "a toolkit for tangible multi-touch surfaces". http://reactivision.sourceforge.net/

[55]

Michal Rinott and Noam Tractinsky. 2022. Designing for interpersonal motor synchronization. Human–Computer Interaction 37, 1 (Jan. 2022), 69–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2021.1912608

[56]

Gillian M Sandstrom and Erica J Boothby. 2021. Why do people avoid talking to strangers? A mini meta-analysis of predicted fears and actual experiences talking to a stranger. Self and identity: the journal of the International Society for Self and Identity 20, 1 (Jan. 2021), 47–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2020.1816568

[57]

Gillian M Sandstrom and Elizabeth W Dunn. 2014. Social Interactions and Well-Being: The Surprising Power of Weak Ties. Personality & social psychology bulletin 40, 7 (July 2014), 910–922. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214529799

[58]

Juliana Schroeder, Donald Lyons, and Nicholas Epley. 2022. Hello, stranger? Pleasant conversations are preceded by concerns about starting one. Journal of experimental psychology. General 151, 5 (May 2022), 1141–1153. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001118

[59]

Natalie Sebanz and Guenther Knoblich. 2009. Prediction in Joint Action: What, When, and Where., 353–367 pages. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01024.x

[60]

Mel Slater, Bernhard Spanlang, Maria V. Sanchez-Vives, and Olaf Blanke. 2010. First Person Experience of Body Transfer in Virtual Reality. PloS one 5 (05 2010), e10564. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010564

[61]

Dave Smallen. 2021. Experiences of meaningful connection in the first weeks of the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of social and personal relationships 38, 10 (Oct. 2021), 2886–2905. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211040221

[62]

Sherry Turkle. 2017. Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Hachette UK.

[63]

Paul A M Van Lange and Simon Columbus. 2021. Vitamin S: Why Is Social Contact, Even With Strangers, So Important to Well-Being?Current directions in psychological science 30, 3 (June 2021), 267–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214211002538

[64]

Paul A M Van Lange, Arie W Kruglanski, and E Tory Higgins. 2011. Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology: Collection: Volumes 1 & 2. SAGE. https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=0QuyCwAAQBAJ

[65]

Jacquie D Vorauer and Rebecca K Ratner. 1996. Who’s Going to Make the First Move? Pluralistic Ignorance as an Impediment to Relationship Formation. Journal of social and personal relationships 13, 4 (Nov. 1996), 483–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407596134001

[66]

James R Wallace, Nancy Iskander, and Edward Lank. 2016. Creating Your Bubble: Personal Space On and Around Large Public Displays. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2087–2092. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858118

Digital Library

[67]

Marc Weiser. 1994. The world is not a desktop. Interactions 1, 1 (Jan. 1994), 7–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/174800.174801

Digital Library

[68]

Andrea Stevenson Won, Jeremy Bailenson, Jimmy Lee, and Jaron Lanier. 2015. Homuncular Flexibility in Virtual Reality. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 20, 3 (01 2015), 241–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12107 arXiv:https://academic.oup.com/jcmc/article-pdf/20/3/241/19492300/jjcmcom0241.pdf

Digital Library

[69]

Jennifer Yoon, Jun Oishi, Jason Nawyn, Kazue Kobayashi, and Neeti Gupta. 2004. FishPong: encouraging human-to-human interaction in informal social environments. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (Chicago, Illinois, USA) (CSCW ’04). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 374–377. https://doi.org/10.1145/1031607.1031669

Digital Library

[70]

John Zimmerman, Jodi Forlizzi, and Shelley Evenson. 2007. Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI ’07). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 493–502. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240704

Digital Library

Cited By

Pohl H(2024)Body-Based Augmented Reality Feedback During ConversationsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36764918:MHCI(1-22)Online publication date: 24-Sep-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3676491
Patibanda ROverdevest NNisal SSaini AElvitigala DKnibbe JVan Den Hoven EMueller F(2024)Shared Bodily Fusion: Leveraging Inter-Body Electrical Muscle Stimulation for Social PlayProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3660723(2088-2106)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3660723
Freire RMartinez-Missir VReed CStrohmeier PCiolfi LHogan TDöring TJenkins Tvan Dijk JHuron SLi ZCoyle DSigner B(2024)RaveNET: Connecting People and Exploring Liminal Space through Wearable Networks in Music PerformanceProceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction10.1145/3623509.3635270(1-8)Online publication date: 11-Feb-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3623509.3635270
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

“I normally wouldn’t talk with strangers”: Introducing a Socio-Spatial Interface for Fostering Togetherness Between Strangers
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)
    1. Interaction paradigms
      1. Mixed / augmented reality
  2. Ubiquitous and mobile computing
    1. Ubiquitous and mobile computing design and evaluation methods
    2. Ubiquitous and mobile computing systems and tools

Recommendations

SocialStools: A Playful, Socio-Spatial Interface for Fostering Togetherness Across Strangers
CHI EA '22: Extended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Leveraging the human propensity for embodied interaction, SocialStools is a socio-spatial interface that facilitates playful social interactions across strangers in a physical space, fostering togetherness. Three stools on caster wheels generate sound ...
Applying the theory of planned behavior to adolescents' acceptance of online friendship requests sent by strangers

The majority of adolescents have at least one unknown person as friend on SNSs.Subjective norm is the most important determinant of accepting strangers as friends.Prevention strategies of random friending should incorporate subjective norm.Adolescents ...
From strangers to partners: examining convergence within a longitudinal study of task-oriented dialogue
SIGDIAL '12: Proceedings of the 13th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue

Convergence is thought to be an important phenomenon in dialogue through which interlocutors adapt to each other. Yet, its mechanisms and relationship to dialogue outcomes are not fully understood. This paper explores convergence in textual task-...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

CHI '23: Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 2023

14911 pages

ISBN:9781450394215

DOI:10.1145/3544548

Editors:
Albrecht Schmidt
LMU Munich, Germany60028717
,
Kaisa Väänänen
Tampere University, Finland60011170
,
Tesh Goyal
Google Research, USA60006191
,
Per Ola Kristensson
University of Cambridge, UK60031101
,
Anicia Peters
University of Namibia, Namibia60072704
,
Stefanie Mueller
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA60022195
,
Julie R. Williamson
University of Glasgow, UK60001490
,
Max L. Wilson
University of Nottingham, UK60015138

Copyright © 2023 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 19 April 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Badges

Honorable Mention

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Conference

CHI '23

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

CHI '23: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 23 - 28, 2023

Hamburg, Germany

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

Upcoming Conference

CHI 2025

Sponsor:
sigchi

ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 26 - May 1, 2025

Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

6
Total Citations
View Citations
1,356
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)745
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)95

Reflects downloads up to 06 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Pohl H(2024)Body-Based Augmented Reality Feedback During ConversationsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36764918:MHCI(1-22)Online publication date: 24-Sep-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3676491
Patibanda ROverdevest NNisal SSaini AElvitigala DKnibbe JVan Den Hoven EMueller F(2024)Shared Bodily Fusion: Leveraging Inter-Body Electrical Muscle Stimulation for Social PlayProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3660723(2088-2106)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3660723
Freire RMartinez-Missir VReed CStrohmeier PCiolfi LHogan TDöring TJenkins Tvan Dijk JHuron SLi ZCoyle DSigner B(2024)RaveNET: Connecting People and Exploring Liminal Space through Wearable Networks in Music PerformanceProceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction10.1145/3623509.3635270(1-8)Online publication date: 11-Feb-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3623509.3635270
Sayffaerth CRasch JMüller F(2024)“Tele” Me More: Using Telepresence Charades to Connect Strangers and Exhibits in Different MuseumsExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3650834(1-8)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613905.3650834
Feng YWang ZYao YLi HDiao YPeng YMi H(2024)Co-designing the Collaborative Digital Musical Instruments for Group Music TherapyProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642649(1-18)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642649
Muresan GMititelu SAndres Jschraefel m(2024)“Should I Introduce myself?”International Journal of Human-Computer Studies10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103279188:COnline publication date: 1-Aug-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103279

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Full Text

View this article in Full Text.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View full text|Download PDF

View Table of Contents