Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3544793.3560390acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Feature Relevance Analysis to Explain Concept Drift - A Case Study in Human Activity Recognition

Published: 24 April 2023 Publication History

Abstract

This article studies how to detect and explain concept drift. Human activity recognition is used as a case study together with a online batch learning situation where the quality of the labels used in the model updating process starts to decrease. Drift detection is based on identifying a set of features having the largest relevance difference between the drifting model and a model that is known to be accurate and monitoring how the relevance of these features changes over time. As a main result of this article, it is shown that feature relevance analysis cannot only be used to detect the concept drift but also to explain the reason for the drift when a limited number of typical reasons for the concept drift are predefined. To explain the reason for the concept drift, it is studied how these predefined reasons effect to feature relevance. In fact, it is shown that each of these has an unique effect to features relevance and these can be used to explain the reason for concept drift.

References

[1]
M. Albert, S. Toledo, M. Shapiro, and K. Kording. 2012. Using mobile phones for activity recognition in Parkinson’s patients. Frontiers in neurology 3(2012).
[2]
H. Amrani, D. Micucci, and P. Napoletano. 2021. Personalized Models in Human Activity Recognition using Deep Learning. In 2020 25th ICPR. IEEE, 9682–9688.
[3]
M. Henke, E. Souto, and E. M. dos Santos. 2015. Analysis of the evolution of features in classification problems with concept drift: Application to spam detection. In 2015 IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management (IM). IEEE, 874–877.
[4]
P. Kulkarni and R. Ade. 2014. Incremental learning from unbalanced data with concept class, concept drift and missing features: a review. IJDMTA 4, 6 (2014), 15.
[5]
V. Losing, B. Hammer, and H. Wersing. 2016. Choosing the Best Algorithm for an Incremental On-line Learning Task. In European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks.
[6]
J. Lu, A. Liu, F. Dong, F. Gu, J. Gama, and G. Zhang. 2019. Learning under Concept Drift: A Review. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 31, 12(2019), 2346–2363. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2018.2876857
[7]
A. Mannini and S. Intille. 2018. Classifier Personalization for Activity Recognition using Wrist Accelerometers. IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics (2018).
[8]
A. Mazankiewicz, K. Böhm, and M. Bergés. 2020. Incremental Real-Time Personalization in Human Activity Recognition Using Domain Adaptive Batch Normalization. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 4, 4 (2020), 1–20.
[9]
L. Mo, Z. Feng, and J. Qian. 2016. Human daily activity recognition with wearable sensors based on incremental learning. In Sensing Technology, International Conference on. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSensT.2016.7796224
[10]
S. Ntalampiras and M. Roveri. 2016. An incremental learning mechanism for human activity recognition. In IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/SSCI.2016.7850188
[11]
R. Polikar, L. Upda, S. S Upda, and V. Honavar. 2001. Learn++: An incremental learning algorithm for supervised neural networks. IEEE transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics, part C (applications and reviews) 31, 4 (2001), 497–508.
[12]
M. Saarela and S. Jauhiainen. 2021. Comparison of feature importance measures as explanations for classification models. SN Applied Sciences 3, 2 (2021), 1–12.
[13]
M. Shoaib, S. Bosch, O. D. Incel, H. Scholten, and P. Havinga. 2014. Fusion of Smartphone Motion Sensors for Physical Activity Recognition. Sensors 14, 6 (2014), 10146–10176. https://doi.org/10.3390/s140610146
[14]
P. Siirtola, H. Koskimäki, and J. Röning. 2018. Personalizing human activity recognition models using incremental learning. In ESANN. 627–632.
[15]
P. Siirtola and J. Röning. 2019. Incremental learning to personalize human activity recognition models: the importance of human AI collaboration. Sensors 19, 23 (2019), 5151.
[16]
P. Siirtola and J. Röning. 2021. Context-aware incremental learning-based method for personalized human activity recognition. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing (2021), 1–15.
[17]
Meysam Vakili and Masoumeh Rezaei. 2021. Incremental Learning Techniques for Online Human Activity Recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.09435(2021).
[18]
Z. Wang, M. Jiang, Y. Hu, and H. Li. 2012. An incremental learning method based on probabilistic neural networks and adjustable fuzzy clustering for human activity recognition by using wearable sensors. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 16, 4 (2012), 691–699.
[19]
L. Yang, W. Guo, Q. Hao, A. Ciptadi, A. Ahmadzadeh, X. Xing, and G.Wang. 2021. CADE: Detecting and Explaining Concept Drift Samples for Security Applications. In 30th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 21). USENIX Association, 2327–2344. https://www.usenix.org/conference/usenixsecurity21/presentation/yang-limin

Index Terms

  1. Feature Relevance Analysis to Explain Concept Drift - A Case Study in Human Activity Recognition

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image ACM Conferences
        UbiComp/ISWC '22 Adjunct: Adjunct Proceedings of the 2022 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and the 2022 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers
        September 2022
        538 pages
        ISBN:9781450394239
        DOI:10.1145/3544793
        This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

        Sponsors

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        Published: 24 April 2023

        Check for updates

        Author Tags

        1. Human activity recognition
        2. accelerometer
        3. feature relevence analysis
        4. incremental learning
        5. online learning
        6. personalizing

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Conference

        UbiComp/ISWC '22

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate 764 of 2,912 submissions, 26%

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • 0
          Total Citations
        • 147
          Total Downloads
        • Downloads (Last 12 months)104
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)12
        Reflects downloads up to 10 Nov 2024

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        View Options

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format.

        HTML Format

        Get Access

        Login options

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media