research-article

Open access

Development and Evaluation of a Motion-based VR Bicycle Simulator

Authors:

Philipp Wintersberger,

Andrii Matviienko,

Andreas Schweidler,

Florian MichahellesAuthors Info & Claims

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Volume 6, Issue MHCI

Article No.: 210, Pages 1 - 19

https://doi.org/10.1145/3546745

Published: 20 September 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Bicycle simulators are becoming an increasingly used research tool. However, due to the complex cycling dynamics, these simulators have issues of simulator sickness and perceived realism. A potential method to address these issues could be providing a motion-based tilting function. Some bicycle simulators with tilt functionality have already been presented but still lack a systematic evaluation. In this work, we present a motion-based bicycle simulator without centrifugal force simulation and the results from a user study that compared different tilt modes. N=31 participants completed a study in virtual reality with a strong and a weak tilt mode, as well as a baseline condition without movement. We discovered that weak tilting could significantly improve the cycling realism without decreasing cycling performance and simulator sickness. Furthermore, our research suggests that there is a sweet spot for a tilting function, which facilitates a balance between presence/immersion and simulator sickness.

References

[1]

Josh Andres, Julian de Hoog, and Florian 'Floyd' Mueller. 2018. "I Had Super-Powers When EBike Riding" Towards Understanding the Design of Integrated Exertion. In Proceedings of the 2018 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (Melbourne, VIC, Australia) (CHI PLAY '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 19--31. https://doi.org/10.1145/3242671.3242688

Digital Library

[2]

Shani Batcir, Omri Lubovsky, Yaacov G. Bachner, and Itshak Melzer. 2021. The Effects of Bicycle Simulator Training on Anticipatory and Compensatory Postural Control in Older Adults: Study Protocol for a Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. Frontiers in Neurology 11 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.614664

[3]

Simone Benedetto, Régis Lobjois, Vérane Faure, Nguyen-Thong Dang, Marco Pedrotti, and Stéphane Caro. 2014. A comparison of immersive and interactive motorcycle simulator configurations. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 23 (2014), 88--100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2013.12.020

[4]

Carsten Bielmeier. 2012. Thema: Fahrradphysik.

[5]

Greg Byrd. 2015. Cycling through Cyberspace. Computer 48, 8 (2015), 72--75. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2015.220

Digital Library

[6]

Eunhee Chang, Hyun Taek Kim, and Byounghyun Yoo. 2020. Virtual Reality Sickness: A Review of Causes and Measurements. International Journal of Human--Computer Interaction 36, 17 (2020), 1658--1682. https://doi.org/10. 1080/10447318.2020.1778351 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1778351

[7]

Sarah D'Amour, Jelte E. Bos, and Behrang Keshavarz. 2017. The efficacy of airflow and seat vibration on reducing visually induced motion sickness. Experimental Brain Research 235, 9 (Sept. 2017), 2811--2820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221- 017--5009--1

[8]

Raphael de Souza e Almeida, Renato Cherullo, Daniel Radetic, Greis Francy M. Silva-Calpa, and Alberto Barbosa Raposo. 2019. Exploring Motor and Sensory Devices in a Bicycle Simulator. In 2019 21st Symposium on Virtual and Augmented Reality (SVR). IEEE, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 232--241. https://doi.org/10.1109/SVR.2019.00048

[9]

Joshua E. Domeyer, Nicholas D. Cassavaugh, and Richard W. Backs. 2013. The use of adaptation to reduce simulator sickness in driving assessment and research. Accident Analysis & Prevention 53 (2013), 127--132. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.aap.2012.12.039

[10]

L. Dominjon, A. Lecuyer, J.-M. Burkhardt, P. Richard, and S. Richir. 2005. Influence of control/display ratio on the perception of mass of manipulated objects in virtual environments. In IEEE Proceedings. VR 2005. Virtual Reality, 2005. IEEE, Bonn, Germany, 19--25. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2005.1492749

[11]

Marco Dozza and Andre Fernandez. 2014. Understanding Bicycle Dynamics and Cyclist Behavior From Naturalistic Field Data (November 2012). IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 15, 1 (2014), 376--384. https: //doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2013.2279687

Digital Library

[12]

Natalia Duma'ska, Paweł Strojny, and Agnieszka Strojny. 2018. Can Simulator Sickness Be Avoided? A Review on Temporal Aspects of Simulator Sickness. Frontiers in Psychology 9 (2018), 2132. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02132

[13]

Sebastian Freitag, Dominik Rausch, and Torsten Kuhlen. 2014. Reorientation in virtual environments using interactive portals. In 2014 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI). IEEE, MN, USA, 119--122. https://doi.org/10.1109/3DUI. 2014.6798852

[14]

Germán Gálvez-García, Marion Hay, and Catherine Gabaude. 2015. Alleviating Simulator Sickness with Galvanic Cutaneous Stimulation. Human Factors 57, 4 (2015), 649--657. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720814554948

[15]

Ayah Hamad. 2021. Two Wheelistic: Development of a High-Fidelity Virtual Reality Cycling Simulator for Transportation Safety Research. Ph. D. Dissertation. University of Michigan-Dearborn.

[16]

Jake Harrington, Benjamin Williams, and Christopher Headleand. 2019. A Somatic Approach to Combating Cybersickness Utilising Airflow Feedback. Computer Graphics and Visual Computing (CGVC) -, - (2019), 9 pages. https://doi.org/10.2312/CGVC.20191256

[17]

G. Hernández--Melgarejo, D.A. Flores--Hernández, A. Luviano--Juárez, L.A. Castañeda, I. Chairez, and S. Di Gennaro. 2020. Mechatronic design and implementation of a bicycle virtual reality system. ISA Transactions 97 (2020), 336--351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2019.08.002

[18]

R. Herpers, W. Heiden, M. Kutz, D. Scherfgen, U. Hartmann, J. Bongartz, and O. Schulzyk. 2008. FIVIS Bicycle Simulator: An Immersive Game Platform for Physical Activities. In Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on Future Play: Research, Play, Share (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) (Future Play '08). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 244--247. https://doi.org/10.1145/1496984.1497035

Digital Library

[19]

R. Herpers, W. Heiden, M. Kutz, D. Scherfgen, U. Hartmann, J. Bongartz, and O. Schulzyk. 2008. FIVIS Bicycle Simulator: An Immersive Game Platform for Physical Activities. In Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on Future Play: Research, Play, Share (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) (Future Play '08). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 244--247. https://doi.org/10.1145/1496984.1497035

Digital Library

[20]

Joost Heutink, Minou Broekman, Karel A. Brookhuis, Bart J. M. Melis-Dankers, and Christina Cordes. 2019. The effects of habituation and adding a rest-frame on experienced simulator sickness in an advanced mobility scooter driving simulator. Ergonomics 62, 1 (2019), 65--75. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2018.1518543 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2018.1518543 30185112.

[21]

Sung Hwan Jeong, Yong Jun Piao, Woo Suk Chong, Yong Yook Kim, Sang Min Lee, Tae Kyu Kwon, Chul Un Hong, and Nam Gyun Kim. 2005. The Development of a New Training System for Improving Equilibrium Sense Using a Virtual Bicycle Simulator. In 2005 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference. IEEE, Shanghai, China, 2567--2570. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2005.1616993

[22]

Heather Kaths, Andreas Keler, Jakob Kaths, and Fritz Busch. 2019. Analyzing the behavior of bicyclists using a bicycle simulator with a coupled SUMO and DYNA4 simulated environment., 199--205 pages.

[23]

Robert S. Kennedy, Norman E. Lane, Kevin S. Berbaum, and Michael G. Lilienthal. 1993. Simulator Sickness Questionnaire: An Enhanced Method for Quantifying Simulator Sickness. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology 3, 3 (1993), 203--220. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327108ijap0303_3

[24]

Gwendolin Knappe, Andreas Keinath, Klaus Bengler, and Cristina Meinecke. 2007. Driving simulator as an evaluation tool--assessment of the influence of field of view and secondary tasks on lane keeping and steering performance.

[25]

J.D.G. Kooijman and A.L. Schwab. 2013. A review on bicycle and motorcycle rider control with a perspective on handling qualities. Vehicle System Dynamics 51, 11 (2013), 1722--1764. https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2013.824990 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2013.824990

[26]

Thomas Kosch, Andrii Matviienko, Florian Müller, Jessica Bersch, Christopher Katins, Dominik Schön, and Max Mühlhäuser. 2022. NotiBike: Assessing Target Selection Techniques for Cyclist Notifications in Augmented Reality. In Proceedings of the 24th international conference on Human-Computer interaction with mobile devices and services (MobileHCI '22). ACM, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3546732

Digital Library

[27]

Panagiotis Kourtesis, Simona Collina, Leonidas A. A. Doumas, and Sarah E. MacPherson. 2019. Validation of the Virtual Reality Neuroscience Questionnaire: Maximum Duration of Immersive Virtual Reality Sessions Without the Presence of Pertinent Adverse Symptomatology. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 13 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3389/ fnhum.2019.00417

[28]

Ernst Kruijff, Alexander Marquardt, Christina Trepkowski, Robert W. Lindeman, Andre Hinkenjann, Jens Maiero, and Bernhard E. Riecke. 2016. On Your Feet! Enhancing Vection in Leaning-Based Interfaces through Multisensory Stimuli. In Proceedings of the 2016 Symposium on Spatial User Interaction (Tokyo, Japan) (SUI '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 149--158. https://doi.org/10.1145/2983310.2985759

Digital Library

[29]

Joseph J. LaViola. 2000. A Discussion of Cybersickness in Virtual Environments. SIGCHI Bull. 32, 1 (Jan. 2000), 47--56. https://doi.org/10.1145/333329.333344

Digital Library

[30]

Markus Löchtefeld, Antonio Krüger, and Hans Gellersen. 2016. DeceptiBike: Assessing the Perception of Speed Deception in a Virtual Reality Training Bike System. In Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (Gothenburg, Sweden) (NordiCHI '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 40, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2971485.2971513

Digital Library

[31]

T. Maeda, H. Ando, and M. Sugimoto. 2005. Virtual acceleration with galvanic vestibular stimulation in a virtual reality environment. In IEEE Proceedings. VR 2005. Virtual Reality, 2005. IEEE, Bonn, Germany, 289--290. https: //doi.org/10.1109/VR.2005.1492799

[32]

Andrii Matviienko, Swamy Ananthanarayan, Shadan Sadeghian Borojeni, Yannick Feld, Wilko Heuten, and Susanne Boll. 2018. Augmenting Bicycles and Helmets with Multimodal Warnings for Children. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (Barcelona, Spain) (MobileHCI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 15, 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3229434. 3229479

Digital Library

[33]

Andrii Matviienko, Swamy Ananthanarayan, Stephen Brewster, Wilko Heuten, and Susanne Boll. 2019. Comparing Unimodal Lane Keeping Cues for Child Cyclists. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (Pisa, Italy) (MUM '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 14, 11 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3365610.3365632

Digital Library

[34]

Andrii Matviienko, Swamy Ananthanarayan, Abdallah El Ali, Wilko Heuten, and Susanne Boll. 2019. NaviBike: Comparing Unimodal Navigation Cues for Child Cyclists. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300850

Digital Library

[35]

Andrii Matviienko, Swamy Ananthanarayan, Raphael Kappes, Wilko Heuten, and Susanne Boll. 2020. Reminding Child Cyclists about Safety Gestures. In Proceedings of the 9TH ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (Manchester, United Kingdom) (PerDis '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--7. https: //doi.org/10.1145/3393712.3394120

Digital Library

[36]

Andrii Matviienko, Florian Heller, and Bastian Pfleging. 2021. Quantified Cycling Safety: Towards a Mobile Sensing Platform to Understand Perceived Safety of Cyclists. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI EA '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 262, 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3451678

Digital Library

[37]

Andrii Matviienko, Wilko Heuten, Alan Dix, and Susanne CJ Boll. 2021. Interactive Technology for Cycling - Ideate, Make -- Remote, Together. In Adjunct Publication of the 23rd International Conference on Mobile Human-Computer Interaction. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 29, 4 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 3447527.3474870

Digital Library

[38]

Andrii Matviienko, Damir Mehmedovic, Florian Müller, and Max Mühlhäuser. 2022. "Baby, You can Ride my Bike": Exploring Maneuver Indications of Self-Driving Bicycles using a Tandem Simulator. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Mobile Human-Computer Interaction (Vancouver, Canada) (MobileHCI '22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3546723

Digital Library

[39]

Andrii Matviienko, Florian Müller, Dominik Schön, Paul Seesemann, Sebastian Günther, and Max Mühlhäuser. 2022. BikeAR: Understanding Cyclists' Crossing Decision-Making at Uncontrolled Intersections Using Augmented Reality. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI '22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 366, 15 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517560

Digital Library

[40]

Andrii Matviienko, Florian Müller, Marcel Zickler, Lisa Alina Gasche, Julia Abels, Till Steinert, and Max Mühlhäuser. 2022. Reducing Virtual Reality Sickness for Cyclists in VR Bicycle Simulators. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI '22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 187, 14 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3501959

Digital Library

[41]

Miguel Melo, Tânia Rocha, Luís Barbosa, and Maximino Bessa. 2016. Presence in virtual environments: Objective metrics vs. subjective metrics - A pilot study. In 2016 23rd Portuguese Meeting on Computer Graphics and Interaction (EPCGI). IEEE, Guimarães, Portugal, 1--6. https://doi.org/10.1109/EPCGI.2016.7851200

[42]

Justin Mittelstaedt, Jan Wacker, and Dirk Stelling. 2018. Effects of display type and motion control on cybersickness in a virtual bike simulator. Displays 51 (2018), 43--50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.displa.2018.01.002

[43]

M. Nazemi, M.A.B. van Eggermond, A. Erath, D. Schaffner, M. Joos, and Kay W. Axhausen. 2021. Studying bicyclists' perceived level of safety using a bicycle simulator combined with immersive virtual reality. Accident Analysis & Prevention 151 (2021), 105943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105943

[44]

Steve O'Hern, Jennie Oxley, and Mark Stevenson. 2017. Validation of a bicycle simulator for road safety research. Accident Analysis & Prevention 100 (2017), 53--58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.01.002

[45]

Yi-Hao Peng, Carolyn Yu, Shi-Hong Liu, Chung-Wei Wang, Paul Taele, Neng-Hao Yu, and Mike Y. Chen. 2020. WalkingVibe: Reducing Virtual Reality Sickness and Improving Realism While Walking in VR Using Unobtrusive HeadMounted Vibrotactile Feedback. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--12. https://doi.org/10. 1145/3313831.3376847

Digital Library

[46]

Lisa Rebenitsch and Charles Owen. 2016. Review on cybersickness in applications and visual displays. Virtual Reality 20, 2 (2016), 101--125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-016-0285--9

Digital Library

[47]

Roy A. Ruddle, Ekaterina Volkova, and Heinrich H. Bülthoff. 2011. Walking Improves Your Cognitive Map in Environments That Are Large-Scale and Large in Extent. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 18, 2, Article 10 (July 2011), 20 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/1970378.1970384

Digital Library

[48]

Gian-Luca Savino, Tamara von Sawitzky, Andrii Matviienko, Miriam Sturdee, Paweł W. Wozniak, Markus Löchtefeld, Andrew L. Kun, Andreas Riener, and Jonna Häkkilä. 2021. Cycling@CHI: Towards a Research Agenda for HCI in theBike Lane. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI EA '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 107, 5 pages. https://doi.org/10. 1145/3411763.3441316

Digital Library

[49]

Martin Schrepp, Andreas Hinderks, and Jörg Thomaschewski. 2017. Design and evaluation of a short version of the user experience questionnaire (UEQ-S). International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, 4 (6), 103--108. 6, 4 (2017), 103--108.

[50]

Thomas W Schubert. 2003. The sense of presence in virtual environments: A three-component scale measuring spatial presence, involvement, and realness. Z. für Medienpsychologie 15, 2 (2003), 69--71.

[51]

Amit Shahar, Virginie Dagonneau, Séphane Caro, Isabelle Israël, and Régis Lobjois. 2014. Towards identifying the roll motion parameters of a motorcycle simulator. Applied Ergonomics 45, 3 (2014), 734--740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. apergo.2013.09.013

[52]

Murad M. Shoman and Hocine Imine. 2021. Bicycle Simulator Improvement and Validation. IEEE Access 9 (2021), 55063--55076. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3071214

[53]

Maya Siman-Tov, Irina Radomislensky, Kobi Peleg, H. Bahouth, A. Becker, I. Jeroukhimov, I. Karawani, B. Kessel, Y. Klein, G. Lin, O. Merin, M. Bala, Y. Mnouskin, A. Rivkind, G. Shaked, G. Sivak, D. Soffer, M. Stein, and M. Weiss. 2018. A look at electric bike casualties: Do they differ from the mechanical bicycle? Journal of Transport & Health 11 (2018), 176--182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2018.10.013

[54]

Mel Slater. 2003. A note on presence terminology. Presence connect 3, 3 (2003), 1--5.

[55]

Mel Slater. 2018. Immersion and the illusion of presence in virtual reality. British Journal of Psychology 109, 3 (2018), 431-- 433. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12305 arXiv:https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/bjop.12305

[56]

Kay M. Stanney, Robert S. Kennedy, and Julie M. Drexler. 1997. Cybersickness is Not Simulator Sickness. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 41, 2 (1997), 1138--1142. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 107118139704100292

[57]

Carlos Sun and Zhu Qing. 2018. Design and Construction of a Virtual Bicycle Simulator for Evaluating Sustainable Facilities Design. Advances in Civil Engineering 2018 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5735820

[58]

Léo Terziman, Maud Marchal, Franck Multon, Bruno Arnaldi, and Anatole Lecuyer. 2012. The King-Kong Effects: Improving sensation of walking in VR with visual and tactile vibrations at each step. In 2012 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI). IEEE, Costa Mesa, CA, 19--26. https://doi.org/10.1109/3DUI.2012.6184179

[59]

Daniela Ullmann, Julian Kreimeier, Timo Götzelmann, and Harald Kipke. 2020. BikeVR: A Virtual Reality Bicycle Simulator towards Sustainable Urban Space and Traffic Planning. In Proceedings of the Conference on Mensch Und Computer (Magdeburg, Germany) (MuC '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 511--514. https://doi.org/10.1145/3404983.3410417

Digital Library

[60]

Martin Usoh, Kevin Arthur, Mary C. Whitton, Rui Bastos, Anthony Steed, Mel Slater, and Frederick P. Brooks. 1999. Walking > Walking-in-Place > Flying, in Virtual Environments. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH '99). ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., USA, 359--364. https://doi.org/10.1145/311535.311589

Digital Library

[61]

Tamara von Sawitzky, Philipp Wintersberger, Andreas Löcken, Anna-Katharina Frison, and Andreas Riener. 2020. Augmentation Concepts with HUDs for Cyclists to Improve Road Safety in Shared Spaces. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI EA '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3383022

Digital Library

[62]

Jia Wang and Robert W. Lindeman. 2012. Comparing isometric and elastic surfboard interfaces for leaning-based travel in 3D virtual environments. In 2012 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI). IEEE, Costa Mesa, CA, 31--38. https://doi.org/10.1109/3DUI.2012.6184181

[63]

Séamas Weech, Sophie Kenny, and Michael Barnett-Cowan. 2019. Presence and Cybersickness in Virtual Reality Are Negatively Related: A Review. Frontiers in Psychology 10 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00158

[64]

Séamas Weech, Jae Moon, and Nikolaus F. Troje. 2018. Influence of bone-conducted vibration on simulator sickness in virtual reality. PLOS ONE 13, 3 (03 2018), 1--21. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194137

[65]

Séamas Weech and Nikolaus F. Troje. 2017. Vection Latency Is Reduced by Bone-Conducted Vibration and Noisy Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation. Multisensory Research 30, 1 (2017), 65 -- 90. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134808-00002545

[66]

B. E. Westerhof, E. J. H. de Vries, R. Happee, and Arend Schwab. 2020. Evaluation of a Motorcycle Simulator. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.11744328.v1

[67]

Tetsuji Yamaguchi, Akira Yamada, Takeshi Fujiwara, Ryoichi Takahashi, Tetsuya Shimada, Yuki Ishida, Koichiro Ueda, and Shigeo Kaneda. 2018. Development of Bicycle Simulator with Tilt Angle Control Tilt Angle. Proceedings - International Computer Software and Applications Conference 2 (2018), 247--252. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPSAC. 2018.10238

Cited By

Trefzger MRaschke MFath MEckart J(2024)What does it Take to Test a Bicycle Simulator for Realism? A Discussion of the Challenges and Possible Evaluation MethodsProceedings of Mensch und Computer 202410.1145/3670653.3677491(461-465)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3670653.3677491
Matviienko AAndres JMueller F(2024)Grand challenges in CyclingHCIProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661550(2577-2590)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3661550
Wang YDorfbauer Svan der Spaa LMirnig AMichahelles FWintersberger P(2024)Development and Evaluation of Advanced Cyclist Assistance Systems on a Bicycle SimulatorProceedings of the 16th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications10.1145/3640792.3675721(283-293)Online publication date: 22-Sep-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3640792.3675721
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Development and Evaluation of a Motion-based VR Bicycle Simulator
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)
    1. HCI design and evaluation methods
      1. Laboratory experiments
    2. Interaction paradigms
      1. Virtual reality

Recommendations

What does it mean to cycle in Virtual Reality? Exploring Cycling Fidelity and Control of VR Bicycle Simulators
CHI '23: Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Creating highly realistic Virtual Reality (VR) bicycle experiences can be time-consuming and expensive. Moreover, it is unclear what hardware parts are necessary to design a bicycle simulator and whether a bicycle is needed at all. In this paper, we ...
Investigation of a Pitch Function for Motion-Based VR Bicycle Simulators
CHI EA '23: Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Research on cycling safety and comfort is becoming increasingly relevant in the domain of human-computer interaction. Many studies presented so far have been conducted on static bicycle simulators, which suffer problems of immersion and simulator ...
Reducing Virtual Reality Sickness for Cyclists in VR Bicycle Simulators
CHI '22: Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Virtual Reality (VR) bicycle simulations aim to recreate the feeling of riding a bicycle and are commonly used in many application areas. However, current solutions still create mismatches between the visuals and physical movement, which causes VR ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction Volume 6, Issue MHCI

MHCI

September 2022

852 pages

EISSN:2573-0142

DOI:10.1145/3564624

Editor:
Jeff Nichols
Apple Inc., United States

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © 2022 Owner/Author.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives International 4.0 License.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 20 September 2022

Published in PACMHCI Volume 6, Issue MHCI

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

10
Total Citations
View Citations
972
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)537
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)60

Reflects downloads up to 15 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Trefzger MRaschke MFath MEckart J(2024)What does it Take to Test a Bicycle Simulator for Realism? A Discussion of the Challenges and Possible Evaluation MethodsProceedings of Mensch und Computer 202410.1145/3670653.3677491(461-465)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3670653.3677491
Matviienko AAndres JMueller F(2024)Grand challenges in CyclingHCIProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661550(2577-2590)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3661550
Wang YDorfbauer Svan der Spaa LMirnig AMichahelles FWintersberger P(2024)Development and Evaluation of Advanced Cyclist Assistance Systems on a Bicycle SimulatorProceedings of the 16th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications10.1145/3640792.3675721(283-293)Online publication date: 22-Sep-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3640792.3675721
Al-Taie AWilson GFreeman EPollick FBrewster S(2024)Light it Up: Evaluating Versatile Autonomous Vehicle-Cyclist External Human-Machine InterfacesProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642019(1-20)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642019
Wintersberger PMatviienko AWang YEbel PAl-Taie ABrewster SMichahelles FStuiver A(2023)BikeSimWS: Workshop on Simulators, Scenarios, and Test Standard for Bicycle ResearchProceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia10.1145/3626705.3626707(552-555)Online publication date: 3-Dec-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3626705.3626707
Matviienko ALehé MHeller FPfleging BMühlhäuser M(2023)QuantiBike: Quantifying Perceived Cyclists' Safety via Head Movements in Virtual Reality and OutdoorsProceedings of the 2023 ACM Symposium on Spatial User Interaction10.1145/3607822.3614532(1-12)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3607822.3614532
Al-Taie APöhlmann KGoodge TMatviienko APollick FBrewster SWard JMcGill MMarky K(2023)Cyborgs on the Road: Workshop on Augmenting Road Users to Quantify their BehaviourProceedings of the Augmented Humans International Conference 202310.1145/3582700.3582730(374-378)Online publication date: 12-Mar-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3582700.3582730
von Sawitzky THimmels CLöcken AGrauschopf TRiener A(2023)Investigating Hazard Notifications for Cyclists in Mixed Reality: A Comparative Analysis with a Test Track StudyProceedings of the 15th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications10.1145/3580585.3606282(202-212)Online publication date: 18-Sep-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3580585.3606282
Haasnoot JHappee Rvan der Wijk VSchwab A(2023)Validation of a novel bicycle simulator with realistic lateral and roll motionVehicle System Dynamics10.1080/00423114.2023.226441862:7(1802-1826)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2023
https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2023.2264418
Kosch TMatviienko AMüller FBersch JKatins CSchön DMühlhäuser M(2022)NotiBike: Assessing Target Selection Techniques for Cyclist Notifications in Augmented RealityProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35467326:MHCI(1-24)Online publication date: 20-Sep-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3546732

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents