Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article
Open access

Binaural Audio in Hybrid Meetings: Effects on Speaker Identification, Comprehension, and User Experience

Published: 11 November 2022 Publication History

Abstract

In 2020, we have witnessed global experimentation of remote co-working, co-learning, and co-habiting, leading to the re-emergence of a collective search for platforms and paradigms that can optimally coalesce the virtual and physical settings - what has been studied as "hybrid models". In this context, we examine the opportunities that the advances in Spatial Audio techniques can create to improve hybrid meetings. Concretely, we present a controlled study in which 84 participants used an online platform to follow six pre-recorded semi-scripted dialogues. The videos were around two minutes long and each of them simulated a piece of conversation in the physical meeting room among three actors who played the role of co-located attendees. The six videos represented six conditions: three auditive formats, (x2) once co-located attendees wore face masks, and once without masks. We compared the experiences of the participants (remote attendees) in these six conditions. Analyzing three types of data, namely, comprehension/memory test results, self-reported ratings, and eye-tracking, we have found reinforcing evidence that demonstrates the benefits of binaural audio in hybrid settings.

Supplementary Material

ZIP File (v6cscw2279aux.zip)

References

[1]
Emmeke Aarts. 2019. Multilevel HMM tutorial. (2019).
[2]
Jens Ahrens, Matthias Geier, Alexander Raake, and Claudia Schlegel. 2010. Listening and conversational quality of spatial audio conferencing. In Audio Engineering Society Conference: 40th International Conference: Spatial Audio: Sense the Sound of Space. Audio Engineering Society.
[3]
Hamed S Alavi, Elizabeth F Churchill, Mikael Wiberg, Denis Lalanne, Peter Dalsgaard, Ava Fatah Gen Schieck, and Yvonne Rogers. 2019. Introduction to human-building interaction (HBI): Interfacing HCI with architecture and urban design. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), Vol. 26, 2 (2019), 6.
[4]
Ronny Andrade, Melissa J Rogerson, Jenny Waycott, Steven Baker, and Frank Vetere. 2019. Playing Blind: Revealing the World of Gamers with Visual Impairment. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--14.
[5]
Bon Adriel Aseniero, Marios Constantinides, Sagar Joglekar, Ke Zhou, and Daniele Quercia. 2020. MeetCues: Supporting online meetings experience. In 2020 IEEE Visualization Conference (VIS). IEEE, 236--240.
[6]
Jessica J Baldis. 2001 a. Effects of spatial audio on memory, comprehension, and preference during desktop conferences. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 166--173.
[7]
Jessica J. Baldis. 2001 b. Effects of spatial audio on memory, comprehension, and preference during desktop conferences. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '01). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 166--173. https://doi.org/10.1145/365024.365092
[8]
Sara A. Bly, Steve R. Harrison, and Susan Irwin. 1993 a. Media spaces: bringing people together in a video, audio, and computing environment. Commun. ACM, Vol. 36, 1 (Jan. 1993), 28--46. https://doi.org/10.1145/151233.151235
[9]
Sara A Bly, Steve R Harrison, and Susan Irwin. 1993 b. Media spaces: bringing people together in a video, audio, and computing environment. Commun. ACM, Vol. 36, 1 (1993), 28--46.
[10]
Hancheng Cao, Chia-Jung Lee, Shamsi Iqbal, Mary Czerwinski, Priscilla NY Wong, Sean Rintel, Brent Hecht, Jaime Teevan, and Longqi Yang. 2021. Large scale analysis of multitasking behavior during remote meetings. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--13.
[11]
Daniele Castellani, BM Zeeshan Hameed, Yiloren Tanidir, Nithesh Naik, Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh, Milap Shah, Marcelo Langer Wroclawski, Afrah Budnar Kunjibettu, Sufyan Ibrahim, Rodrigo Donalisio da Silva, et al. 2020. Online, face to face and hybrid meetings. What is the new normal in the COVID-19 era? A global collaborative survey by iTRUE group and UroSoMe working group. (2020).
[12]
Chao-Nan Chen, Tung-Kuan Liu, and Yenming J Chen. 2019. Human-Machine Interaction: Adapted Safety Assistance in Mentality Using Hidden Markov Chain and Petri Net. Applied Sciences, Vol. 9, 23 (2019), 5066.
[13]
Jun-Ho Choi, Marios Constantinides, Sagar Joglekar, and Daniele Quercia. 2021. KAIROS: Talking Heads and Moving Bodies for Successful Meetings. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications. 30--36.
[14]
Antoine Coutrot and Nathalie Guyader. 2013. Toward the introduction of auditory information in dynamic visual attention models. In 2013 14th International Workshop on Image Analysis for Multimedia Interactive Services (WIAMIS). IEEE, 1--4.
[15]
Antoine Coutrot and Nathalie Guyader. 2014. How saliency, faces, and sound influence gaze in dynamic social scenes. Journal of vision, Vol. 14, 8 (2014), 5--5.
[16]
Antoine Coutrot, Nathalie Guyader, Gelu Ionescu, and Alice Caplier. 2012. Influence of soundtrack on eye movements during video exploration. Journal of Eye Movement Research, Vol. 5, 4 (2012), 2.
[17]
Antoine Coutrot, Janet H Hsiao, and Antoni B Chan. 2018. Scanpath modeling and classification with hidden Markov models. Behavior research methods, Vol. 50, 1 (2018), 362--379.
[18]
Steven Davies, Stuart Cunningham, and Rich Picking. 2017. A Comparison of Audio Models for Virtual Reality Video. In 2017 International Conference on Cyberworlds (CW). IEEE, 150--153.
[19]
Anthony DeVincenzi, Lining Yao, Hiroshi Ishii, and Ramesh Raskar. 2011. Kinected Conference: Augmenting Video Imaging with Calibrated Depth and Audio. In Proceedings of the ACM 2011 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (Hangzhou, China) (CSCW '11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 621--624. https://doi.org/10.1145/1958824.1958929
[20]
Christina Dicke, Shaleen Deo, Mark Billinghurst, Nathan Adams, and Juha Lehikoinen. 2008. Experiments in mobile spatial audio-conferencing: key-based and gesture-based interaction. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Human computer interaction with mobile devices and services. 91--100.
[21]
Susan T Dumais, Georg Buscher, and Edward Cutrell. 2010. Individual differences in gaze patterns for web search. In Proceedings of the third symposium on Information interaction in context. 185--194.
[22]
Carmen Egido. 1988. Video Conferencing as a Technology to Support Group Work: A Review of Its Failures. In Proceedings of the 1988 ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (Portland, Oregon, USA) (CSCW '88). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 13--24. https://doi.org/10.1145/62266.62268
[23]
Dalia El Badawy, Ivan Dokmanić, and Martin Vetterli. 2017. Acoustic DoA estimation by one unsophisticated sensor. In International Conference on Latent Variable Analysis and Signal Separation. Springer, 89--98.
[24]
embody.co. 2021. Personalised spatial audio: Empowering musicians, game developers and gamers to create, watch and play immersive content. https://embody.co/
[25]
Sukru Eraslan, Yeliz Yesilada, and Simon Harper. 2016. Eye tracking scanpath analysis techniques on web pages: A survey, evaluation and comparison. Journal of Eye Movement Research, Vol. 9, 1 (2016).
[26]
Giovanni Federico, Francc ois Osiurak, and Maria A Brandimonte. 2021. Hazardous tools: the emergence of reasoning in human tool use. Psychological Research (2021), 1--11.
[27]
Matthias Geier, Jens Ahrens, and Sascha Spors. 2008. The SoundScape Renderer: A unified spatial audio reproduction framework for arbitrary rendering methods. In In 124 th AES Conv. Citeseer.
[28]
Chris Greenhalgh and Steven Benford. 1995. MASSIVE: A collaborative virtual environment for teleconferencing. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), Vol. 2, 3 (1995), 239--261.
[29]
Amin Haji-Abolhassani and James J Clark. 2014. An inverse Yarbus process: Predicting observers' task from eye movement patterns. Vision research, Vol. 103 (2014), 127--142.
[30]
Jörg Hauber, Holger Regenbrecht, Mark Billinghurst, and Andy Cockburn. 2006. Spatiality in videoconferencing: trade-offs between efficiency and social presence. In Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative work. 413--422.
[31]
Christian Heath and Paul Luff. 1991. Collaborative activity and technological design: Task coordination in London Underground control rooms. In Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work ECSCW'91. Springer, 65--80.
[32]
Lotta Hirvenkari, Johanna Ruusuvuori, Veli-Matti Saarinen, Maari Kivioja, Anssi Perakyla, and Riitta Hari. 2013. Influence of turn-taking in a two-person conversation on the gaze of a viewer. PloS one, Vol. 8, 8 (2013), e71569.
[33]
Jim Hollan and Scott Stornetta. 1992. Beyond being there. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 119--125.
[34]
Yizhen Huang. 2018. Learning from Teacher's Eye Movement: Expertise, Subject Matter and Video Modeling. Ph.,D. Dissertation.
[35]
Wijnand A IJsselsteijn, Huib De Ridder, Jonathan Freeman, and Steve E Avons. 2000. Presence: concept, determinants, and measurement. In Human vision and electronic imaging V, Vol. 3959. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 520--529.
[36]
Kori Inkpen, Rajesh Hegde, Mary Czerwinski, and Zhengyou Zhang. 2010. Exploring spatialized audio & video for distributed conversations. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW '10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 95--98. https://doi.org/10.1145/1718918.1718936
[37]
Hiroshi Ishii, Minoru Kobayashi, and Jonathan Grudin. 1992. Integration of Inter-Personal Space and Shared Workspace: ClearBoard Design and Experiments. In Proceedings of the 1992 ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) (CSCW '92). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 33--42. https://doi.org/10.1145/143457.143459
[38]
Young-Min Jang, Rammohan Mallipeddi, and Minho Lee. 2014. Identification of human implicit visual search intention based on eye movement and pupillary analysis. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, Vol. 24, 4 (2014), 315--344.
[39]
Ghazaleh Khodabandelou, Charlotte Hug, Rebecca Deneckere, and Camille Salinesi. 2014. Supervised vs. unsupervised learning for intentional process model discovery. In Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling. Springer, 215--229.
[40]
Jeannine Kilbride. 2020. IBM Study: COVID-19 Is Significantly Altering U.S. Consumer Behavior and Plans Post-Crisis. IBM. https://newsroom.ibm.com/2020-05-01-IBM-Study-COVID-19-Is-Significantly-Altering-U-S-Consumer-Behavior-and-Plans-Post-Crisis
[41]
Ryan Kilgore, Mark H Chignell, and Paul W Smith. 2003. Spatialized audioconferencing: what are the benefits?. In CASCON. 135--144.
[42]
SeungJun Kim and Anind K Dey. 2016. Augmenting human senses to improve the user experience in cars: applying augmented reality and haptics approaches to reduce cognitive distances. Multimedia Tools and Applications, Vol. 75, 16 (2016), 9587--9607.
[43]
Thomas C Kübler, Colleen Rothe, Ulrich Schiefer, Wolfgang Rosenstiel, and Enkelejda Kasneci. 2017. SubsMatch 2.0: Scanpath comparison and classification based on subsequence frequencies. Behavior research methods, Vol. 49, 3 (2017), 1048--1064.
[44]
Anastasia Kuzminykh and Sean Rintel. 2020. Classification of functional attention in video meetings. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--13.
[45]
Kate Lister. 2020. Work-At-Home After Covid-19-Our Forecast. Global Workplace Analytics. https://globalworkplaceanalytics.com/work-at-home-after-covid-19-our-forecast
[46]
Logitech. 2020. Logitech MeetUp and Rally ConferenceCams Enable Hybrid Meetings for Radisson Customers. https://www.logitech.com/en-ch/video-collaboration/resources/case-study/radisson-hotel-group.html
[47]
Mark McGill, Stephen Brewster, David McGookin, and Graham Wilson. 2020. Acoustic transparency and the changing soundscape of auditory mixed reality. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--16.
[48]
Raphael Menges, Sophia Kramer, Stefan Hill, Marius Nisslmueller, Chandan Kumar, and Steffen Staab. 2020. A visualization tool for eye tracking data analysis in the web. In ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications. 1--5.
[49]
Pauli Minnaar, Søren Krarup Olesen, Flemming Christensen, and Henrik Møller. 2001. Localization with binaural recordings from artificial and human heads. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, Vol. 49, 5 (2001), 323--336.
[50]
Madhumitha Murali and Arzu cC öltekin. 2021. Conducting eye tracking studies online. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Adaptable Research Methods for Empirical Research with Map Users, Virtual Workshop, Vol. 6.
[51]
Eliya Nachmani, Yossi Adi, and Lior Wolf. 2020. Voice separation with an unknown number of multiple speakers. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 7164--7175.
[52]
Karin Niemantsverdriet and Thomas Erickson. 2017. Recurring meetings: An experiential account of repeating meetings in a large organization. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 1, CSCW (2017), 1--17.
[53]
Rieks op den Akker, Dennis Hofs, Hendri Hondorp, Harm op den Akker, Job Zwiers, and Anton Nijholt. 2009. Supporting engagement and floor control in hybrid meetings. In Cross-Modal Analysis of Speech, Gestures, Gaze and Facial Expressions. Springer, 276--290.
[54]
Blas Payri and Ramón Rodr'iguez Mari no. 2016. Perceptual comparison of localization with Soundman binaural microphones vs HRTF post-processing. In Audio Engineering Society Convention 140. Audio Engineering Society.
[55]
Ana Cristina Pires, Sebastian Marichal, Fernando Gonzalez-Perilli, Ewelina Bakala, Bruno Fleischer, Gustavo Sansone, and Tiago Guerreiro. 2019. A tangible math game for visually impaired children. In The 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. 670--672.
[56]
Alexander Raake and Claudia Schlegel. 2008. Auditory assessment of conversational speech quality of traditional and spatialized teleconferences. In ITG Conference on Voice Communication [8. ITG-Fachtagung]. VDE, 1--4.
[57]
Alexander Raake and Hagen Wierstorf. 2020. Binaural Evaluation of Sound Quality and Quality of Experience. In The Technology of Binaural Understanding. Springer, 393--434.
[58]
realeye.io. 2020. RealEye.io. https://www.realeye.io/.
[59]
Christian H Ritz, Muawiyath Shujau, Xiguang Zheng, Bin Cheng, Eva Cheng, and Ian S Burnett. 2011. Backward compatible spatialized teleconferencing based on squeezed recordings. Advances in Sound Localization, published in Croatia (2011), 363--384.
[60]
Judy Robertson and Maurits Kaptein. 2016. Modern statistical methods for HCI. Springer.
[61]
Patrick Ruediger, Jan Spilski, Nûjin Kartal, Sebastian Gsuck, Nils Ove Beese, Sabine Schlittmeier, Thomas Lachmann, and Achim Ebert. 2019. Cognitive indicators for acoustic source localization and presence in a vivid 3D scene. Universitatsbibliothek der RWTH Aachen.
[62]
Banu Saatcc i, Kaya Akyüz, Sean Rintel, and Clemens Nylandsted Klokmose. 2020. (Re) Configuring Hybrid Meetings: Moving from User-Centered Design to Meeting-Centered Design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), Vol. 29, 6 (2020), 769--794.
[63]
Banu Saatcc i, Roman Radle, Sean Rintel, Kenton O'Hara, and Clemens Nylandsted Klokmose. 2019. Hybrid Meetings in the Modern Workplace: Stories of Success and Failure. In International Conference on Collaboration and Technology. Springer, 45--61.
[64]
Harvey Sacks, Emanuel A Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1978. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking for conversation. In Studies in the organization of conversational interaction. Elsevier, 7--55.
[65]
Samiha Samrose, Daniel McDuff, Robert Sim, Jina Suh, Kael Rowan, Javier Hernandez, Sean Rintel, Kevin Moynihan, and Mary Czerwinski. 2021. MeetingCoach: An Intelligent Dashboard for Supporting Effective & Inclusive Meetings. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--13.
[66]
Ashutosh Saxena and Andrew Y Ng. 2009. Learning sound location from a single microphone. In 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. IEEE, 1737--1742.
[67]
Abigail Sellen, Bill Buxton, and John Arnott. 1992. Using spatial cues to improve videoconferencing. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 651--652.
[68]
Abubakr Siddig, Alessandro Ragano, Hamed Z Jahromi, and Andrew Hines. 2019. Fusion confusion: exploring ambisonic spatial localisation for audio-visual immersion using the mcgurk effect. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM Workshop on Immersive Mixed and Virtual Environment Systems. 28--33.
[69]
Carole B Sox, Tena B Crews, and Sheryl F Kline. 2014. Virtual and hybrid meetings for generation X: using the Delphi method to determine best practices, opportunities, and barriers. In Journal of Convention & Event Tourism, Vol. 15. Taylor & Francis, 150--169.
[70]
Leila Takayama and Janet Go. 2012. Mixing Metaphors in Mobile Remote Presence. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (Seattle, Washington, USA) (CSCW '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 495--504. https://doi.org/10.1145/2145204.2145281
[71]
Tuul Triyason, Anuchart Tassanaviboon, and Prasert Kanthamanon. 2020. Hybrid Classroom: Designing for the New Normal after COVID-19 Pandemic. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Advances in Information Technology. 1--8.
[72]
J. Valin. 2018. A hybrid DSP/deep learning approach to real-time full-band speech enhancement. In 2018 IEEE 20th international workshop on multimedia signal processing (MMSP). IEEE, Vancouver, BC, 1--5. https://doi.org/10.1109/MMSP.2018.8547084
[73]
Nachiappan Valliappan, Na Dai, Ethan Steinberg, Junfeng He, Kantwon Rogers, Venky Ramachandran, Pingmei Xu, Mina Shojaeizadeh, Li Guo, Kai Kohlhoff, et al. 2020. Accelerating eye movement research via accurate and affordable smartphone eye tracking. Nature communications, Vol. 11, 1 (2020), 1--12.
[74]
Betsy Van Dijk, Job Zwiers, Rieks op den Akker, Olga Kulyk, Hendri Hondorp, Dennis Hofs, and Anton Nijholt. 2011. Conveying directional gaze cues to support remote participation in hybrid meetings. In Toward Autonomous, Adaptive, and Context-Aware Multimodal Interfaces. Theoretical and Practical Issues. Springer, 412--428.
[75]
Yolanda Vazquez-Alvarez and Stephen A Brewster. 2011. Eyes-free multitasking: the effect of cognitive load on mobile spatial audio interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2173--2176.
[76]
Roel Vertegaal, Ivo Weevers, Changuk Sohn, and Chris Cheung. 2003. Gaze-2: conveying eye contact in group video conferencing using eye-controlled camera direction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 521--528.
[77]
MinJuan Wang, Sus Lundgren Lyckvi, Chenhui Chen, Palle Dahlstedt, and Fang Chen. 2017. Using Advisory 3D Sound Cues to Improve Drivers' Performance and Situation Awareness. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2814--2825.
[78]
Ryan Wedoff, Lindsay Ball, Amelia Wang, Yi Xuan Khoo, Lauren Lieberman, and Kyle Rector. 2019. Virtual showdown: An accessible virtual reality game with scaffolds for youth with visual impairments. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--15.
[79]
Michael Winter, Rüdiger Pryss, Thomas Probst, and Manfred Reichert. 2021. Applying Eye Movement Modeling Examples to Guide Novices' Attention in the Comprehension of Process Models. Brain Sciences, Vol. 11, 1 (2021), 72.
[80]
Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2021. Statistical Analysis and Reporting in R. http://depts.washington.edu/acelab/proj/Rstats/Rstats.pdf
[81]
Bin Xu, Jason Ellis, and Thomas Erickson. 2017. Attention from afar: simulating the gazes of remote participants in hybrid meetings. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. 101--113.
[82]
Y. Xu, J. Du, L. Dai, and C. Lee. 2015. A Regression Approach to Speech Enhancement Based on Deep Neural Networks. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, Vol. 23, 1 (2015), 7--19. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASLP.2014.2364452
[83]
Nicole Yankelovich, Jonathan Kaplan, Joe Provino, Mike Wessler, and Joan Morris DiMicco. 2006. Improving audio conferencing: are two ears better than one?. In Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative work. 333--342.
[84]
Nicole Yankelovich, Nigel Simpson, Jonathan Kaplan, and Joe Provino. 2007. Porta-person: Telepresence for the connected conference room. In CHI'07 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. 2789--2794.
[85]
Nicole Yankelovich, William Walker, Patricia Roberts, Mike Wessler, Jonathan Kaplan, and Joe Provino. 2004. Meeting central: making distributed meetings more effective. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. 419--428.
[86]
Lining Yao, Anthony DeVincenzi, Anna Pereira, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2013. Focalspace: multimodal activity tracking, synthetic blur and adaptive presentation for video conferencing. In Proceedings of the 1st symposium on Spatial user interaction. 73--76.
[87]
Ye Zhang, Diego Frassinelli, Jyrki Tuomainen, Jeremy I Skipper, and Gabriella Vigliocco. 2020. More than words: Word predictability, prosody, gesture and mouth movements in natural language comprehension. BioRxiv (2020).
[88]
zoom.us. 2020. Zoom. https://zoom.us/.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Auptimize: Optimal Placement of Spatial Audio Cues for Extended RealityProceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology10.1145/3654777.3676424(1-14)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
  • (2023)DUET combined with HRTF mask2023 Immersive and 3D Audio: from Architecture to Automotive (I3DA)10.1109/I3DA57090.2023.10289288(1-5)Online publication date: 5-Sep-2023

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 6, Issue CSCW2
CSCW
November 2022
8205 pages
EISSN:2573-0142
DOI:10.1145/3571154
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 11 November 2022
Published in PACMHCI Volume 6, Issue CSCW2

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. binaural sound
  2. eye-tracking
  3. home-office
  4. human-building interaction
  5. hybrid meeting
  6. video-conferencing

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)240
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)33
Reflects downloads up to 09 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Auptimize: Optimal Placement of Spatial Audio Cues for Extended RealityProceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology10.1145/3654777.3676424(1-14)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
  • (2023)DUET combined with HRTF mask2023 Immersive and 3D Audio: from Architecture to Automotive (I3DA)10.1109/I3DA57090.2023.10289288(1-5)Online publication date: 5-Sep-2023

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Get Access

Login options

Full Access

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media