Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article
Open access

Governing Online Goods: Maturity and Formalization in Minecraft, Reddit, and World of Warcraft Communities

Published: 11 November 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Building a successful community means governing active populations and limited resources. This challenge often requires communities to design formal governance systems from scratch. But the characteristics of successful institutional designs are unclear. Communities that are more mature and established may have more elaborate formal policy systems (as cause or effect of their success). Alternatively, they may require less formalization precisely because of their maturity: because they have more latitude and capacity to select and acculturate new members, or because their reputations encourage greater self-selection. Indeed, scholars often downplay the role that formal rules relative to unwritten rules, norms, and values. But in a community with formal rules, decisions are more consistent, transparent, and legitimate. To understand the relationship of formal institutions to community maturity and governance style, we conduct a large-scale quantitative analysis applying institutional analysis frameworks of self-governance scholar Elinor Ostrom to 80,000 communities across 3 platforms: the sandbox game Minecraft, the MMO game World of Warcraft, and Reddit. We classify communities' written rules according to several institutional taxonomies in order to test predictors of institutional formalization. From this analysis we extract two major findings. First, institutional formalization, the size and complexity of an online community's governance system, is generally positively associated with maturity, as measured by age, population size, or degree of user engagement. Second, we find that online communities employ similar governance styles across platforms, strongly favoring "weak" norms to "strong" requirements. These findings suggest that designers and founders of online communities converge, to some extent independently, on styles of governance practice that are correlated with successful self-governance. With deeper insights into the patterns of successful self-governance, we can help more communities overcome the challenges of self-governance and create for their members powerful experiences of shared meaning and collective empowerment.?

References

[1]
Afroz, S. et al. 2013. Honor Among Thieves: A Commons Analysis of Cybercrime Economies. 2013 APWG eCrime Researchers Summit (Sep. 2013), 1--11.
[2]
Austin, J.L. 1975. How to Do Things with Words. Clarendon Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
[3]
Baumgartner, J. et al. 2020. The Pushshift Reddit Dataset. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (2020), 830--839.
[4]
Benkler, Y. et al. 2015. Peer Production: A Form of Collective Intelligence. Handbook of Collective Intelligence. M.S. Bernstein and T.W. Malone, eds. MIT Press. 175--204.
[5]
Cardenas, J.-C. et al. 2013. Dynamics of Rules and Resources: Three New Field Experiments on Water, Forests and Fisheries. Handbook on Experimental Economics and the Environment. John A. List and Michael K. Price, ed. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, United Kingdom. 319--345.
[6]
Centivany, A. and Glushko, B. 2016. "Popcorn Tastes Good" Participatory Policymaking and Reddit's. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2016), 1126--1137.
[7]
Chandrasekharan, E. et al. 2019. Crossmod: A Cross-Community Learning-based System to Assist Reddit Moderators. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (New York, NY, USA, Nov. 2019), 1--30.
[8]
Chandrasekharan, E. et al. 2018. The Internet's Hidden Rules: An Empirical Study of Reddit Norm Violations at Micro, Meso, and Macro Scales. Proceedings of the ACM on Human Computer Interaction (New York, NY, USA, Nov. 2018), 1--25.
[9]
Cox, M. et al. 2010. A Review of Design Principles for Community-based Natural Resource Management. Ecology and Society. 15, 4 (2010), 37--56.
[10]
Crawford, S.E.S. and Ostrom, E. 1995. A Grammar of Institutions. The American political science review. 89, 3 (1995), 582--600.
[11]
Crowston, K. and Howison, J. 2005. The Social Structure of Free and Open Source Software Development. First Monday. 10 (Feb. 2005), 2.
[12]
De Filippi, P. et al. 2021. Modular Politics: Toward a Governance Layer for Online Communities. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction. 5, (Apr. 2021), 1--26.
[13]
Fan, J. and Zhang, A.X. 2020. Digital Juries: A Civics-Oriented Approach to Platform Governance. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, Apr. 2020), 1--14.
[14]
Fiesler, C. et al. 2018. Reddit rules! Characterizing an ecosystem of governance. Twelfth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (2018), 72--81.
[15]
Fish, A. et al. 2011. Birds of the Internet. Journal of Cultural Economy. 4, 2 (May 2011), 157--187.
[16]
Forte, A. et al. 2009. Decentralization in Wikipedia Governance. Journal of Management Information Systems. 26, 1 (Jul. 2009), 49--72.
[17]
Frey, S. 2019. Emergence of Complex Institutions in a Large Population of Self-Governing Communities. Emergence of integrated institutions in a large population of self-governing communities. PLoS One.
[18]
Frey, S. et al. 2019. "This Place Does What It Was Built For": Designing Digital Institutions for Participatory Change. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (New York, NY, USA, Nov. 2019), 1--31.
[19]
Frey, S. and Sumner, R.W. 2019. Emergence of Integrated Institutions in a Large Population of Self-governing Communities. PloS one. 14, 7 (Jul. 2019), e0216335.
[20]
Ghosh, A. et al. 2011. Who Moderates the Moderators? Crowdsourcing Abuse Detection in User-generated Content. Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (New York, NY, United States, 2011).
[21]
Grimmelmann, J. 2015. The Virtues of Moderation. Yale JL & Tech. (2015), 42--109.
[22]
Hardin, G. 1968. The Tragedy of the Commons. The Population Problem Has No Technical Solution; It Requires a Fundamental Extension in Morality. Science. 162, 3859 (Dec. 1968), 1243--1248.
[23]
Harrell, F.E., Jr 2015. Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic and Ordinal Regression, and Survival Analysis. Springer.
[24]
Heikkila, T. and Weible, C.M. 2018. A semiautomated approach to analyzing polycentricity. Environmental policy and governance. 28, 4 (Jul. 2018), 308--318.
[25]
Hess, C. 1995. The virtual CPR: the internet as a local and global common pool resource. Reinventing the Commons," the fifth annual conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Property, Bodoe, Norway (1995).
[26]
Hess, C. 1996. Untangling the Web: The Internet as a Commons. Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, Indiana University (1996).
[27]
Hill, B.M. and Shaw, A. 2020. Studying Populations of Online Communities. The Oxford Handbook of Networked Communication. B.F.W.A. González-Bailón, ed. Oxford University Press.
[28]
Hill, B.M. and Shaw, A. 2020. The Hidden Costs of Requiring Accounts: Quasi-Experimental Evidence From Peer Production. Communication Research. 48, 6 (May 2020), 771--795.
[29]
Jhaver, S. et al. 2019. Human-Machine Collaboration for Content Regulation: The Case of Reddit Automoderator. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 26, 5 (Jul. 2019), 1--35.
[30]
Jullien, N. et al. 2015. The rise and fall of an online project: is bureaucracy killing efficiency in open knowledge production? Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Open Collaboration (New York, NY, USA, Aug. 2015), 1--10.
[31]
Kairam, S.R. et al. 2012. The life and death of online groups: predicting group growth and longevity. Proceedings of the 5th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (New York, NY, USA, Feb. 2012), 673--682.
[32]
Kerr, A. and Kelleher, J.D. 2015. The Recruitment of Passion and Community in the Service of Capital: Community Managers in the Digital Games Industry. Critical Studies in Media Communication. 32, 3 (2015), 177--192.
[33]
Kiene, C. et al. 2018. Managing Organizational Culture in Online Group Mergers. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (2018), 1--21.
[34]
Kiene, C. et al. 2019. Technological Frames and User Innovation: Exploring Technological Change in Community Moderation Teams. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, CSCW (Nov. 2019), 1--23.
[35]
Kollock, P. and Smith, M. 1996. Managing the Virtual Commons. Computer-mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social, and Cross-cultural Perspectives. S.C. Herring, ed. John Benjamins Publishing Company. 109--128.
[36]
Kraut, R.E. and Resnick, P. 2012. Building Successful Online Communities: Evidence-Based Social Design. MIT Press.
[37]
Kumar, S. et al. 2017. Antisocial Behavior on the Web: Characterization and Detection. Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion (Republic and Canton of Geneva, CHE, Apr. 2017), 947--950.
[38]
Lampe, C. et al. 2014. Crowdsourcing Civility: A Natural Experiment Examining the Effects of Distributed Moderation in Online Forums. Government Information Quarterly. 31, 2 (Apr. 2014), 317--326.
[39]
Ledyard, J.O. 1994. Public Goods: A Survey of Experimental Research. The Handbook of Experimental Economics. 861 (Feb. 1994), 111--194.
[40]
Lofgren, E.T. and Fefferman, N.H. 2007. The Untapped Potential of Virtual Game Worlds to Shed Light on Real World Epidemics. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 7, 9 (2007), 625--629.
[41]
Lowery, D. et al. 1992. Citizenship in the Empowered Locality. Urban affairs quarterly. 28, 1 (1992), 69--103.
[42]
Marlin-Bennett, R. and Thornton, E.N. 2012. Governance Within Social Media Websites: Ruling New Frontiers. Telecommunications Policy. 36, 6 (Jul. 2012), 493--501.
[43]
Matias, J.N. 2019. The Civic Labor of Volunteer Moderators Online. Social Media Society. 5, 2 (2019).
[44]
McGinnis, M.D. and Indiana University, Bloomington. Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis 1999. Polycentricity and Local Public Economies: Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis. University of Michigan Press.
[45]
Mollinga, P.P. 2001. Water and Politics: Levels, Rational Choice and South Indian Canal Irrigation. Futures. 33, 8 (Oct. 2001), 733--752.
[46]
Müller, S. et al. 2015. HeapCraft Social Tools: Understanding and Improving Player Collaboration in Minecraft. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games (FDG) (2015).
[47]
Müller, S. et al. 2015. Statistical Analysis of Player Behavior in Minecraft. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games (Santa Cruz, CA, USA, Dec. 2015).
[48]
Nardi, B. and Harris, J. 2006. Strangers and Friends. Proceedings of the 2006 20th Anniversary Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (New York, NY, United States, 2006).
[49]
Nebel, S. et al. 2016. Mining learning and crafting scientific experiments: a literature review on the use of minecraft in education and research. British journal of educational technology: journal of the Council for Educational Technology. 19, 2 (2016), 355--366.
[50]
Olson, M. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Harvard University Press.
[51]
Ostrom, E. 2010. Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. The American economic review. 100, 3 (Jun. 2010), 641--672.
[52]
Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press.
[53]
Ostrom, E. 2006. Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton University Press.
[54]
Ostrom, E. and Basurto, X. 2011. Crafting analytical tools to study institutional change. Journal of Institutional Economics. 7, 3 (Sep. 2011), 317--343.
[55]
Panchanathan, K. and Boyd, R. 2004. Indirect reciprocity can stabilize cooperation without the second-order free rider problem. Nature. 432, 7016 (Nov. 2004), 499--502.
[56]
Pedregosa, F. et al. 2011. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. The Journal of Machine Learning Research. 12, (2011), 2825--2830.
[57]
Poor, N. 2005. Mechanisms of an Online Public Sphere: The Website Slashdot. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 10, 2 (2005).
[58]
Poteete, A.R. et al. 2010. Working Together: Collective Action, the Commons, and Multiple Methods in Practice. Princeton University Press.
[59]
Poteete, A.R. and Ostrom, E. 2008. Fifteen Years of Empirical Research on Collective Action in Natural Resource Management: Struggling to Build Large-N Databases Based on Qualitative Research. World development. 36, 1 (Jan. 2008), 176--195.
[60]
Rice, D. et al. 2021. Machine Coding of Policy Texts with the Institutional Grammar. Public administration. 99, 2 (Jan. 2021), 248--262.
[61]
Rolfes, L. and Passig, K. 2019. The Proto-Governance of Minecraft Servers. Journal for Virtual Worlds Research. 12, 3 (2019).
[62]
Ross, T.L. and Collister, L.B. 2014. A Social Scientific Framework for Social Systems in Online Video Games: Building a Better Looking for Raid Loot System in World of Warcraft. Computers in Human Behavior. 36, (Jul. 2014), 1--12.
[63]
Schlüter, M. 2017. Commoning Games? The Case of the World of Warcraft Private Server Nostalrius. Leuphana University.
[64]
Schneider, N. et al. 2021. Modular Politics: Toward a Governance Layer for Online Communities. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (New York, NY, USA, Apr. 2021), 1--26.
[65]
Schweik, C.M. and English, R.C. 2012. Internet Success: A Study of Open-source Software Commons. MIT Press.
[66]
Searle, J.R. 1995. The Construction of Social Reality. Simon and Schuster.
[67]
Seering, J. et al. 2019. Moderator Engagement and Community Development in the Age of Algorithms. New Media & Society. 21, 7 (2019), 1417--1443.
[68]
Seering, J. 2020. Reconsidering Self-Moderation: the Role of Research in Supporting Community-Based Models for Online Content Moderation. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 4, CSCW2 (Oct. 2020), 1--28.
[69]
Shaw, A. and Hill, B.M. 2014. Laboratories of Oligarchy? How the Iron Law Extends to Peer Production. The Journal of communication. 64, 2 (Mar. 2014), 215--238.
[70]
Shrestha, K.K. and Ojha, H.R. 2017. Chapter 2 - Theoretical Advances in Community-Based Natural Resources Management: Ostrom and Beyond. Redefining Diversity & Dynamics of Natural Resources Management in Asia, Volume 1. G.P. Shivakoti et al., eds. Elsevier. 13--40.
[71]
Siddiki, S. et al. 2019. Institutional Analysis with the Institutional Grammar. Policy studies journal: the journal of the Policy Studies Organization. 18, (Jul. 2019), 643.
[72]
Steiger, M. et al. 2021. The Psychological Well-Being of Content Moderators: The Emotional Labor of Commercial Moderation and Avenues for Improving Support. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, May 2021), 1--14.
[73]
Strimling, P. and Frey, S. 2020. Emergent Cultural Differences in Online Communities' Norms of Fairness. Games and Culture. 15, 4 (2020), 394--410.
[74]
Suh, B. et al. 2009. The singularity is not near: slowing growth of Wikipedia. Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration (New York, NY, USA, Oct. 2009), 1--10.
[75]
Viégas, F.B. et al. 2007. The Hidden Order of Wikipedia. Online Communities and Social Computing (2007), 445--454.
[76]
Williams, D. et al. 2006. From Tree House to Barracks. Games and Culture. 1, 4 (2006), 338--361.
[77]
Wilson, D.S. et al. 2013. Generalizing the Core Design Principles for the Efficacy of Groups. Journal of economic behavior & organization. 90, (Jun. 2013), S21--S32.
[78]
Zhang, A.X. et al. 2020. PolicyKit: Building Governance in Online Communities. UIST '20: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Aug. 2020), 365--378.
[79]
Zhong, Q. and Frey, S. 2020. Institutional Similarity Drives Cultural Similarity among Online Communities. arXiv [cs.SI].

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Community Archetypes: An Empirical Framework for Guiding Research Methodologies to Reflect User Experiences of Sense of Virtual Community on RedditProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373108:CSCW1(1-33)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
  • (2024)NLP4Gov: A Comprehensive Library for Computational Policy AnalysisExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3650810(1-8)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)Do We Run How We Say We Run? Formalization and Practice of Governance in OSS CommunitiesProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3641980(1-26)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 6, Issue CSCW2
CSCW
November 2022
8205 pages
EISSN:2573-0142
DOI:10.1145/3571154
Issue’s Table of Contents
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 11 November 2022
Published in PACMHCI Volume 6, Issue CSCW2

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Elinor Ostrom
  2. data science
  3. institutional analysis
  4. moderation
  5. online community
  6. self-governance

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)307
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)53
Reflects downloads up to 01 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Community Archetypes: An Empirical Framework for Guiding Research Methodologies to Reflect User Experiences of Sense of Virtual Community on RedditProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373108:CSCW1(1-33)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
  • (2024)NLP4Gov: A Comprehensive Library for Computational Policy AnalysisExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3650810(1-8)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)Do We Run How We Say We Run? Formalization and Practice of Governance in OSS CommunitiesProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3641980(1-26)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)When does group chat promote cooperation in shared resource governance?Humanities and Social Sciences Communications10.1057/s41599-024-03992-511:1Online publication date: 2-Nov-2024
  • (2023)Evolution of Rules in Reddit CommunitiesCompanion Publication of the 2023 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing10.1145/3584931.3606973(278-282)Online publication date: 14-Oct-2023
  • (2022)Quantifying the Selective, Stochastic, and Complementary Drivers of Institutional Evolution in Online CommunitiesEntropy10.3390/e2409118524:9(1185)Online publication date: 25-Aug-2022
  • (2022)Governing for Free: Rule Process Effects on Reddit Moderator MotivationsHCI International 2022 – Late Breaking Posters10.1007/978-3-031-19682-9_14(97-105)Online publication date: 24-Nov-2022

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Get Access

Login options

Full Access

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media