Has E-government Facilitated the Social-economic Sustainable Development? Empirical Evidence from Global Panel Data
Pages 456 - 466
Abstract
Since the United Nations (UN) adopted the 2030 agenda in 2015, 17 SDGs and 169 specific goals have been acclaimed for their potential global economic, social and environmental influences. The achievement of social-economic development calls for national and governmental systematic support along with international partnerships, which are considered to be aided by the development of ICTs. E-government, as a tool and platform for providing efficient public administration, convenient online services, and social-government interactions, is considered by much of the literature that would both directly and indirectly impose effects on social-economic sustainable development. However, previous literature are mainly focused on the governance efficiency, but shed little light on the macro-level effects of E-government. This study aims to conduct an empirical study based on a global panel data to explore whether e-government development could empower the SDGs performance or not, especially in the social-economic aspects. Differences in the impact of countries with different income levels are also discussed.
References
[1]
Abbas, Hafiz Syed Mohsin, Zahid Hussain Qaisar, Xiaodong Xu, and Chunxia Sun. "Nexus of E-Government, Cybersecurity and Corruption on Public Service (Pss) Sustainability in Asian Economies Using Fixed-Effect and Random Forest Algorithm." Online Information Review 46, no. 4 (Jul 18 2022): 754-70. https://doi.org/10.1108/oir-02-2021-0069.
[2]
Addo, Atta, and P. K. Senyo. "Advancing E-Governance for Development: Digital Identification and Its Link to Socioeconomic Inclusion." Government Information Quarterly 38, no. 2 (Apr 2021): 101568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101568.
[3]
Andrianaivo, M., and K. Kpodar, 2011, ICT, Financial inclusion and growth evidence from African countries, International Monetary Fund working paper 11/73.
[4]
Androniceanu, Armenia, and Inna Georgescu. "E-Government in European Countries, a Comparative Approach Using the Principal Components Analysis." Nispacee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 14, no. 2 (Dec 2021): 65-86. https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2021-0015.
[5]
Astrom, Joachim, Martin Karlsson, Jonas Linde, and Ali Pirannejad. "Understanding the Rise of E-Participation in Non-Democracies: Domestic and International Factors." Government Information Quarterly 29, no. 2 (Apr 2012): 142-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.09.008.
[6]
Bao Jing, Fan Ziteng, Jia Kai. Research on Digital Government Governance Form: Conceptual Analysis and Hierarchical Framework[J] (In Chinese).Electronic Government Affairs,2020(11):2-13.
[7]
Batty, M., Axhausen, K. W., Giannotti, F., Pozdnoukhov, A., Bazzani, A., Wachowicz, M., (2012). Smart cities of the future. The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 214(1), 481–518.
[8]
Calvo A, Garcıa M. 2006. Are we going on vacation? A sociodigital training proposal for the elderly. Santander, Spain: Gobierno de Cantabria.
[9]
Castro, C., & Lopes, C. (2021). Digital Government and Sustainable Development. Journal of the Knowledge Economy.
[10]
Chen, Lijun, and Apetogbo Komlan Aklikokou. "Relating E-Government Development to Government Effectiveness and Control of Corruption: A Cluster Analysis." Journal of Chinese Governance 6, no. 1 (Jan 2 2021): 155-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/23812346.2019.1698693.
[11]
Chen, Y.C., and J.Y. Hsieh. 2009. “Advancing e -governance: Comparing Taiwan and the United States.” Public Administration Review 69 (s1): s151–s158.
[12]
Croissant, A., & Wurster, S. (2013). Performance and persistence of autocracies in comparison: Introducing issues and perspectives. Contemporary Politics, 19(1), 1–18.
[13]
Das, R. K., & Mishra, H. (2018). Smart E-Governance and Sustainable Development: Strategic Alignment Assessment Framework. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, 690–692.
[14]
Dhaoui, Iyad. "E-Government for Sustainable Development: Evidence from Mena Countries." Journal of the Knowledge Economy 13, no. 3 (Sep 2022): 2070-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00791-0.
[15]
Dobrolyubova, Elena. “Measuring Outcomes of Digital Transformation in Public Administration: Literature Review and Possible Steps Forward.” Durkiewicz, 14, no. 1 (June 1, 2021): 61–86. https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2021-0003.
[16]
Durkiewicz, Jaromir, and Tomasz Janowski. “Is Digital Government Advancing Sustainable Governance? A Study of OECD/EU Countries.” Sustainability 13, no. 24 (December 9, 2021): 13603. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413603.
[17]
El Hilali, Wail, and Abdellah El Manouar. “Towards a Sustainable World through a SMART Digital Transformation.” In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Networking, Information Systems & Security - NISS19, 1–8. Rabat, Morocco: ACM Press, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1145/3320326.3320364.
[18]
ElMassah, Suzanna, and Mahmoud Mohieldin. "Digital Transformation and Localizing the Sustainable Development Goals (Sdgs) (Vol 169, 106490, 2020)." Ecological Economics 171 (May 2020): 106604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106604.
[19]
Estevez, Elsa, and Tomasz Janowski. “Electronic Governance for Sustainable Development — Conceptual Framework and State of Research.” Government Information Quarterly 30 (January 2013): S94–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.11.001.
[20]
Gasova, Katarina, and Katarina Stofkova. “E-Government as a Quality Improvement Tool for Citizens’ Services.” Procedia Engineering 192 (2017): 225–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.06.039.
[21]
Ge Xiaomin, Xu Shaoya. Research on the development path of e-government from the perspective of smart government [J] (In Chinese). China Management Informatization, 2020,23(24):198-200.
[22]
Gupta, Joyeeta, and Courtney Vegelin. “Sustainable Development Goals and Inclusive Development.” International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 16, no. 3 (June 2016): 433–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-016-9323-z.
[23]
Gupta, R., & Pal, S. K. (2020). Effective inclusion of citizens through e-Governance services: case study of direct benefit transfer in India.
[24]
Hofmann, S., Oslashstergaard Madsen, C., & Distel, B. (2020). Developing an Analytical Framework for Analyzing and Comparing National E-government Strategies.
[25]
Hooda, Apeksha, and Ankur Hooda. “COVID-19: An Unexpected Thrust for E-Governance Adoption – A Protection Motivation Theory-Based Research.” International Journal of Electronic Government Research 17, no. 3 (July 2021): 44–70. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEGR.2021070103.
[26]
Hu Weiwei, Chen Jianping, Zhao Xiaofeng. How does technological empowerment become technological negative energy? ——The Generation and Dissolution of “Intelligent Bureaucracy”[J] (In Chinese). E-Government, 2021(04):58-67.
[27]
Johnstone, Christopher J. “Conceptualising Inclusive Development by Identifying Universality, Plurality, Sociality, and Relationality.” Journal of International Development, January 13, 2022, jid.3622. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3622.
[28]
Juknevciene, V., & Krateivaite, R. (2012). Good governance as the instrument for the implementation of sustainable development's conception. Social Research Nr, 3(28), 28–42.
[29]
Khan, F. N., & Majeed, M. T. (2019). ICT and E-government as the Sources of Economic Growth in Information Age: Empirical Evidence from South Asian Economies. South Asian Studies - A Research Journal of South Asian Studies, 34(1), 227–249.
[30]
Koirala, Bishwa S., and Gyan Pradhan. "Determinants of Sustainable Development: Evidence from 12 Asian Countries." Sustainable Development 28, no. 1 (Jan-Feb 2020): 39-45. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1963.
[31]
Lal, Tarsem. “Impact of Financial Inclusion on Economic Development of Marginalized Communities through the Mediation of Social and Economic Empowerment.” International Journal of Social Economics 48, no. 12 (October 28, 2021): 1768–93. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-12-2020-0830.
[32]
Lappi, Teemu Mikael, Kirsi Aaltonen, and Jaakko Kujala. “Project Governance and Portfolio Management in Government Digitalization.” Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy 13, no. 2 (May 20, 2019): 159–96. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-11-2018-0068.
[33]
Lin, Yanliu. "A Comparison of Selected Western and Chinese Smart Governance: The Application of Ict in Governmental Management, Participation and Collaboration." Telecommunications Policy 42, no. 10 (Nov 2018): 800-09. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2018.07.003.
[34]
Lincoln, N. D., C. Travers, P. Ackers, and A. Wilkinson. "The Meaning of Empowerment: The Interdisciplinary Etymology of a New Management Concept." International Journal of Management Reviews 4, no. 3 (Sep 2002): 271-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2370.00087.
[35]
Ma Liang. National Governance,Administrative Burden and Citizens’ Happiness——Taking “Internet + Government Services” as an Example[J](In Chinese).Journal of South China University of Technology,2019,21(01):77-84.
[36]
Majeed, Muhammad Tariq, and Amina Malik (2016). E-government, financial development and economic growth. Pakistan Journal of Applied Economics, 26(2), 107–128.
[37]
Manfreda, Anton, "e-Government in a connected society: a friend or a foe (32)" (2017). UK Academy for Information Systems Conference Proceedings 2017. 90. https://aisel.aisnet.org/ukais2017/90
[38]
Marthandan, Govindan, and Chun Meng Tang. “Information Technology Evaluation: Issues and Challenges.” Journal of Systems and Information Technology 12, no. 1 (February 2, 2010): 37–55. https://doi.org/10.1108/13287261011032643.
[39]
Martin, Christopher, James Evans, Andrew Karvonen, Krassimira Paskaleva, Dujuan Yang, and Trond Linjordet. “Smart-Sustainability: A New Urban Fix?” Sustainable Cities and Society 45 (February 2019): 640–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.11.028.
[40]
Naidoo, R., & Fisher, B. (n.d.). Sustainable Development Goals: Pandemic reset. 4.
[41]
Niaz, Muhammad Umer. “Socio-Economic Development and Sustainable Development Goals: A Roadmap from Vulnerability to Sustainability through Financial Inclusion.” Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, October 18, 2021, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2021.1989319.
[42]
Palanisamy, Ramaraj. “Issues and Challenges in E-Governance Planning.” Electronic Government, an International Journal 1, no. 3 (2004): 253. https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2004.005551.
[43]
Parpart, J.L.; Rai, S.M.; Staudt, K.A. Rethinking Empowerment: Gender and Development in a Global/Local World; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2003.
[44]
Peterson, N. A., J. B. Lowe, M. L. Aquilino, and J. E. Schneider. "Linking Social Cohesion and Gender to Intrapersonal and Interactional Empowerment: Support and New Implications for Theory." Journal of Community Psychology 33, no. 2 (Mar 2005): 233-44. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20047.
[45]
Petrenko, E. S., & Shevyakova, A. L. (2019). Features and Perspectives of Digitization in Kazakhstan. In E. G. Popkova (Ed.), Ubiquitous Computing and the Internet of Things: Prerequisites for the Development of ICT (Vol. 826, pp. 889–899). Springer International Publishing.
[46]
Prattipati, S.N. (2003) ‘Adoption of e-governance: differences between countries in the use of online’, Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge, Vol. 3, Nos. 1–2, pp.386–391.
[47]
Rakotonirina, Voahangy, and Harilanto Raoelson. (2018). E-government: Factor of public administration efficiency and effectiveness. Case of the Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research in Madagascar. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, 165–174.
[48]
Revinova, S., and Chavarry D. P. Galvez. (2020). E-government and government support for the digital economy in Latin America and the Caribbean[C]//Proceedings of the 2nd international scientific and practical conference on modern management trends and the digital economy: From regional development to global economic growth (MTDE 2020). 2020: 1003-1011.
[49]
Sandoval-Almazan, Rodrigo, and J. Ramon Gil-Garcia. “Are Government Internet Portals Evolving towards More Interaction, Participation, and Collaboration? Revisiting the Rhetoric of e-Government among Municipalities.” Government Information Quarterly 29 (January 2012): S72–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.09.004.
[50]
Sassi, Seifallah, and Mohamed Goaied. "Financial Development, Ict Diffusion and Economic Growth: Lessons from Mena Region." Telecommunications Policy 37, no. 4-5 (May-Jun 2013): 252-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2012.12.004.
[51]
Sharma, Rajesh, Rajhans Mishra, and Abhishek Mishra. “Determinants of Satisfaction among Social Entrepreneurs in E-Government Services.” International Journal of Information Management 60 (October 2021): 102386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102386.
[52]
Silal, Prakrit, and Debashis Saha. “Impact of National E-Participation Levels on Inclusive Human Development and Environmental Performance: The Mediating Role of Corruption Control.” Government Information Quarterly 38, no. 4 (October 2021): 101615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101615.
[53]
Spangenberg, Joachim H. “Hot Air or Comprehensive Progress? A Critical Assessment of the SDGs: Hot Air or Comprehensive Progress? A Critical Assessment of the SDGs.” Sustainable Development 25, no. 4 (July 2017): 311–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1657.
[54]
ElMassah, S. & Mohieldin, M. (2020). Digital transformation and localizing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), Ecological Economics, vol. 169(C).
[55]
UN, The 17 Sustainable Goals, https://sdgs.un.org/goals
[56]
UNDESA (2016) UN E-government Development Survey 2016, https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/UN-E-Government-Survey-2016
[57]
UNDESA (2018), UN E-government Development Survey 2018, https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/UN-E-Government-Survey-2018
[58]
UNDESA (2020), UN E-government Development Survey 2020, https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/UN-E-Government-Survey-2020
[59]
UNWCED (1987). Our common future: World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford University Press.
[60]
Uyar, Ali, Khalil Nimer, Cemil Kuzey, Muhammad Shahbaz, and Friedrich Schneider. “Can E-Government Initiatives Alleviate Tax Evasion? The Moderation Effect of ICT.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 166 (May 2021): 120597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120597.
[61]
Valentin, Anke, and Joachim H Spangenberg. “A Guide to Community Sustainability Indicators.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 20, no. 3 (June 2000): 381–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(00)00049-4.
[62]
Worldbank, World Development Report 2016: Digital Dividends, https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/wdr2016
[63]
Ye, Lisha, and Huiqin Yang. “From Digital Divide to Social Inclusion: A Tale of Mobile Platform Empowerment in Rural Areas.” Sustainability 12, no. 6 (March 19, 2020): 2424. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062424.
Index Terms
- Has E-government Facilitated the Social-economic Sustainable Development? Empirical Evidence from Global Panel Data
Recommendations
Electronic governance for sustainable development: how EGOV solutions contribute to SD goals?
dg.o '13: Proceedings of the 14th Annual International Conference on Digital Government ResearchThe application of Electronic Governance (EGOV) -- how to apply Information and Communication Technology (ICT) to transform the working of government and its interaction with the public, to Sustainable Development (SD) -- how to balance socio-economic ...
Convergence in rural e-governance services for sustainable development: a model driven study in Indian context
ICEGOV '14: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic GovernanceInnovations in rendering rural e-governance services have remained a challenging area. Though globally e-governance is fast attaining maturity in the life cycle, there are pitfalls to fully garner the benefits of technology driven solutions aimed at ...
E-governance and millennium development goals: sustainable development perspective in rural India
ICEGOV '12: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic GovernanceThe year 2015 is fast approaching for the countries and the United Nations pursuing Millennium Development Goals (MDG). In the United Nation (UN) Millennium Summit 2000, 191 countries adopted the Millennium declaration. Information and Communication ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
October 2022
623 pages
ISBN:9781450396356
DOI:10.1145/3560107
Copyright © 2022 Owner/Author.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 18 November 2022
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Funding Sources
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
- National Social Science Foundation of China
Conference
ICEGOV 2022
ICEGOV 2022: 15th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance
October 4 - 7, 2022
Guimarães, Portugal
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 350 of 865 submissions, 40%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 152Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)94
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)30
Reflects downloads up to 13 Nov 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML FormatGet Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in