Modelling strategic planning practices considering socially vulnerable groups in smart cities
Authors: 
Manuel Pedro Rodríguez Bolívar, Laura Alcaide Muñoz, Cristina Alcaide MuñozAuthors Info & Claims
Manuel Pedro Rodríguez Bolívar, Laura Alcaide Muñoz, Cristina Alcaide MuñozAuthors Info & ClaimsPages 440 - 448
Abstract
Governments have continuously undertaken enormous efforts in adopting of smart projects based on the intensive use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) to reform city governance model into a more collaborative and participative ones. Multiple style of smart initiatives has been developed, many of them lack clear strategic planning processes and effective planning tools leading to produce operational inefficiency and fragmented services. All this could harm the achievement of a more inclusive society which is one of the key ambitions of the information society policy. In this respect, this paper identifies patters of public strategies in the strategic initiative approaches in SCs using inequalities attributes as drivers of the process. To achieve this aim, this research is focused on the Spanish context and concretely on 1,635 smart initiatives disclosed on internet by 12 Spanish SCs. Finding reveals that formal strategic planning processes are undertaken in smart cities with greater inclusion profile.
References
[1]
Zhang, X., & Li, H. (2018). Urban resilience and urban sustainability: What we know and what do not know?. Cities, 72, 141-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.08.009
[2]
Meijer, A., & Rodríguez Bolívar, M.P. (2016). Governing the smart city: A review of literature on smart urban governance. International Review of Administrative Science, 82(2), 392–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314564308
[3]
Giffinger, R., & Gudrun, H. (2010). Smart cities ranking: an effective instrument for the positioning of the cities?. ACE: Architecture, City and Environment, UPCommons, Barcelona, 4(12), 7-26. https://doi.org/ 10.5821/ace.v4i12.2483
[4]
Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P. (2019, January). In the search for the ‘Smart’ Source of the Perception of Quality of Life in European Smart Cities. In Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2019.401
[5]
OECD (2019), Measuring the Digital Transformation: A Roadmap for the Future, OECD Publishing, Paris. Available at https://www.oecd.org/publications/measuring-the-digital-transformation-9789264311992-en.htm (accessed 25th April 2020).
[6]
Alcaide Muñoz, L. & Rodríguez Bolívar, M.P. (2021). Different Level of Smart and Sustainable Cities Construction Using e-Participation Tools in European and Central Asian Countries. Sustainability, 13(6), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063561
[7]
United Nations (UN) (2021a). Technology and Innovation Report 2021. Catching technological waves Innovation with equity. New York: United Nations. Available at https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/tir2020_en.pdf (accessed 30th April 2022).
[8]
Dameri, R. P., Benevolo, C., Veglianti, E., & Li, Y. (2019). Understanding smart cities as a global strategy: A comparison between Italy and China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 142, 26-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.025
[9]
Korachi, Z., & Bounabat, B. (2019). Integrated methodological framework for digital transformation strategy building (IMFDS). Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl, 10(12), 242-250. https://doi.org//10.14569/IJACSA.2019.0101234
[10]
Soe, R. M. (2018). Smart cities: From silos to cross-border approach. International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), 7(2), 70-88. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEPR.2018040105
[11]
Rodríguez-Bolívar, M. P., Alcaide-Muñoz, C., & Alcaide-Muñoz, L. (2020, September). Characterising smart initiatives' planning in Smart Cities: an empirical analysis in Spanish Smart Cities. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (pp. 585-595). https://doi.org/10.1145/3428502.3428590
[12]
Fitzgibbons, J., & Mitchell, C. L. (2021). Inclusive resilience: Examining a case study of equity-centred strategic planning in Toronto, Canada. Cities, 108, 102997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102997
[13]
Weerakkody, V., Dwivedi, Y. K., El-Haddadeh, R., Almuwil, A., & Ghoneim, A. (2012). Conceptualizing e-inclusion in Europe: An explanatory study. Information Systems Management, 29(4), 305-320. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2012.716992
[14]
United Nations (UN) (2015). Transforming Our World, The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. General Assembly Resolution A/RES/70/1. Available at https://sdgs.un.org/#goal_section (accessed 17th March 2022).
[15]
European Union (EU) (2021). Special Eurobarometer 517. Future of Europe. Available at https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/2554 (accessed 1st May 2022)
[16]
Negreiro, M. (2015). Bridging the digital divide in the EU. Briefing. European Parliamentary Research Service. Available at https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2015/573884/EPRS_BRI(2015)573884_EN.pdf (accessed 1st May 2022)
[17]
Alam, K., & Imran, S. (2015). The digital divide and social inclusion among refugee migrants: A case in regional Australia. Information Technology & People, 28(2), 344-365. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-04-2014-0083
[18]
Hua, J. (2021). Digital inclusion user insights—Former refugees and migrants with English as a second language. Department of Internal Affairs. Available at https://www.digital.govt.nz/dmsdocument/196∼ digital-inclusion-user-insights-former-refugees-and-migrants-with-english-as-a-second-language/html (accessed 20th April 2022).
[19]
Skeldon, R. (2013). Global migration: Demographic aspects and its relevance for development. New York: United Nations.
[20]
De Freitas, J. P. T. C. (2018). Strategic Planning in Europe: Connecting Cities, Migrants and Migration. Policy Report. Institute of Globalization, Culture and Mobility, United Nations University.
[21]
Heino, H., & Jauhiainen, J. S. (2020). Immigration in the Strategies of Municipalities in Finland. Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 10(3), 73-89. https://doi.org/10.33134/njmr.345
[22]
McMullin, C. (2021). Migrant integration services and coping with the digital divide: challenges and opportunities of the COVID-19 pandemic. Voluntary Sector Review, 12(1), 129-136. https://doi.org/10.1332/204080520X16076177287917
[23]
Collins, A., Leonard, A., Cox, A., Greco, S. And Torrisi, G. (2017). Report on Urban Policies for Building Smart Cities. Project Perception and Evaluation of Regional and Cohesion Policies by Europeans and Identification with the Values of Europe. Deliverable 4.1. https://doi.org/10.6092/unibo/amsacta/5518
[24]
Spanish Statistical Institute (SSI) (2022a). Immigrant population as of 31st December 2021. Available at https://www.ine.es/jaxiT3/Tabla.htm?t=24388&L=0 (accessed 3rd May 2022).
[25]
Spanish Statistical Institute (SSI) (2022b). Unemployment figures as of first trimester 2022. Available at https://www.ine.es/dyngs/INEbase/es/operacion.htm?c=Estadistica_C&cid=1254736176918&menu=ultiDatos&idp=1254735976595 (accessed 3rd May 2022).
[26]
European Energy Research Alliance (2018). EERA Joint Programme on Smart Cities: storyline, facts and figures. Journal of Technology for Architecture and Environment, Special issue 1, 16-25. https://doi.org/10.13128/Techne-23566
[27]
Alcaide Muñoz, C., Alcaide Muñoz, L., & Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P. (2022). Strategic alignment of open government initiatives in Andalusia. International Review of Administrative Sciences, (April 2022), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523221086125
[28]
Alcaide Muñoz, C., Bello Pintado, A., and Merino de Cerio, J. (2018). Manufacturing strategy process: the role of shop-floor commnication. Management Decision 56 (7): 1581-1597. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-01-2017-0085
[29]
Komninos, N., Kakderi, C., Panori, A., & Tsarchopoulos, P. (2019). Smart city planning from an evolutionary perspective. Journal of Urban Technology, 26(2), 3-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2018.1485368
[30]
Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2015). Designing and implementing cross‐sector collaborations: Needed and challenging. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 647-663. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12432
[31]
Innes, J.E., & Booher, D.E. (2018). Planning with complexity: An introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203864302
[32]
Criado, J.L. and Gil-García, J.R. (2019). Creating public value through smart technologies and strategies. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 32, 438-450. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-07-2019-0178
[33]
Rodríguez Bolívar, M.P. and Alcaide Muñoz, L. (2018) (Eds.). E-Participation in Smart Cities: Technologies and Models of Governance for Citizen Engagement. Public Administration and Information Technology, vol. 34. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89474-4
[34]
Cortés-Cediel, M.E., Cantador, I. and Rodríguez Bolívar, M.P. (2019). Analyzing citizen participation and engagement in European Smart Cities. Social Science Computer Review, 39(4), 592-626. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0894439319877478
[35]
Kopackova, H., Komarkova, J. and Horak, O. (2022). Enhancing the diffusion of e-participation tools in smart cities. Cities, 125, 103640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103640
[36]
Leite, E. (2022). Innovation networks for social impact: An empirical study on multi-actor collaboration in projects for smart cities. Journal of Business Research, 139, 325-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.09.072
[37]
Alcaraz-Quiles, F. J., Navarro-Galera, A., & Ortiz-Rodríguez, D. (2014). Factors influencing the transparency of sustainability information in regional governments: An empirical study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 82, 179-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.086
[38]
Angelidou, M. (2014). Smart city policies: A spatial approach. Cities, 41(1), S3-S11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2014.06.007
[39]
Yigitcanlar, T. 2018. Smart city policies revisited: Considerations for a truly smart and sustainable urbanism practice. World Technopolis Rev, 7, 97-112. https://doi.org/10.7165/wtr18a1121.19
[40]
Ai, C & Norton, E.C. (2003). Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Economic Letter, 80(1), 123-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(03)00032-6
[41]
Giffinger, R., Fertner, C., Kramar, H., Kalasek, R., Pichler-Milanovic, N., and Meijers, E. (2007). Smart cities. Ranking of European medium-sized cities, Final Report, Centre of Regional Science, Vienna UT.
[42]
Tsui, A.S., Ashford, S.J., St. Clair, L. and Xin, K.R. (1995). Dealing with discrepant expectation: Response strategies and managerial effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 38(6), 1515-1543. https://doi.org/10.5465/256842
[43]
Neter, J., Kutner, M., Wasserman, W., & Nachtsheim, C. (1996). Applied linear statistical models: regression, analysis of variance, and experimental designs (4th ed.). Chicago, Illinois, USA: Irwin.
[44]
United Nations (UN) (2022). Digital Strategy 2022-2025. United Nations Development Program. New York: United Nations. Available at https://digitalstrategy.undp.org/documents/Digital-Strategy-2022-2025-Full-Document.pdf (accessed 7th May 2022).
[45]
United Nations (UN) (2021b). Integrating Migration into Governance Interventions. A Toolkit for International Cooperation and Development Actors. Brussels: International Organization for Migration (IOM) and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). Available at https://eea.iom.int/sites/g/files/tmzbdl666/files/mmicd/toolkit-integrating-migration-governance-interventions.pdf (accessed 7th May 2022).
[46]
Schwab, C., Bouckaert, G., and Kuhlmann, S. (2017, March), Autonomy, Performance, Participation: Lessons from the Comparative Study of Local Public Sector Reforms, in Schwab, C., Bouckaert, G., and Kuhlmann, S. (Eds.), The Future of Local Government in Europe, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, pp. 11-22.
[47]
Dirks, S., & Keeling, M. (2009). A vision of smarter cities: How cities can lead the way into a prosperous and sustainable future. IBM Institute for business Value, IBM Global Business Services Government Executive Report. Available at: https://www.ibm.com/downloads/cas/2JYLM4ZA (accessed 8th May 2022).
Recommendations
Characterising smart initiatives' planning in Smart Cities: an empirical analysis in Spanish Smart Cities
ICEGOV '20: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic GovernanceCity governments around the world are turning cities into smart ecosystems, undertaking a great bulk of smart initiatives in different domains with the aim at improving efficiency in public services and making city governments more transparent and ...
Governing Smart Cities
Smart cities SCs are a recent but emerging phenomenon, aiming at using high technology and especially information and communications technology ICT to implement better living conditions in large metropolises, to involve citizens in city government, and ...
Smart governance in the context of smart cities: A literature review
Special issue on Evidence-based Government: Secure, Transparent and Responsible Digital GovernanceThis literature review has focused on smart governance as an emerging domain of study that attracts significant scientific and policy attention. More specifically, this paper aims to provide more insight in the definitions of and relationships ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
October 2022
623 pages
ISBN:9781450396356
DOI:10.1145/3560107
Copyright © 2022 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 18 November 2022
Check for updates
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Funding Sources
- Government of Andalusia
- Centre of Andalusian Studies
- Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities
- Regional Government of Andalusia
Conference
ICEGOV 2022
ICEGOV 2022: 15th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance
October 4 - 7, 2022
Guimarães, Portugal
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 350 of 865 submissions, 40%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 59Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)25
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
Reflects downloads up to 13 Nov 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format