Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3565472.3595614acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesumapConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Toward Changing Users behavior with Emotion-based Adaptive Systems

Published: 19 June 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Interactive computer systems’ designers emphasize the importance of considering humans, their emotions, and behaviors as first-class entities. Emotions are integral parts of human nature, and ignoring that can lead the interactive systems to failure, low quality, or discomfort. User interfaces (UIs) are increasingly becoming adaptive to users’ various characteristics, intending to improve users’ satisfaction, performance, and decisions. However, the previous approaches proposed for supervising such adaptations are not effectively adopted in real-life problems. This paper proposes the novel approach to adapting UIs to users’ emotions using Model-Free Reinforcement Learning (MFRL). The approach aims to maximize applying the essential adaptations and minimize the unnecessary ones towards users’ task completion and satisfaction. We chose emergency evacuation training as a suitable evaluation domain since people experience intense emotions in potential danger. We performed experiments with a mobile application we developed that acts as a recommender system in emergency training. By taking contextual input of the users’ basic emotions from face recognition, the application intelligently adapts its UI to quickly lead people to safe areas while arousing target emotions. The research includes literature analysis, surveys, and further adopting an iterative process in implementation and experimentation. The evaluation process confirms the efficiency and effectiveness of the MFRL in iterations, as well as compared to other possible UI adaptation techniques, i.e., rule-based and sequential adaptation.

References

[1]
Mina Alipour, Sophie Dupuy-Chessa, and Eric Céret. 2021. An emotion-oriented problem space for ui adaptation: From a literature review to a conceptual framework. In 2021 9th International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII). IEEE, 1–8.
[2]
Mina Alipour, Sophie Dupuy-Chessa, and Eline Jongmans. 2020. Disaster mitigation using interface adaptation to emotions: a targeted literature review. In 10th International Conference on the Internet of Things Companion. 1–15.
[3]
Reem Alnanih, Olga Ormandjieva, and Thiruvengadam Radhakrishnan. 2013. Context-based and rule-based adaptation of mobile user interfaces in mHealth. Procedia Computer Science 21 (2013), 390–397.
[4]
Claudio Arbib, Davide Arcelli, Julie Dugdale, Mahyar T Moghaddam, and Henry Muccini. 2019. Real-time emergency response through performant IoT architectures. In International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management (ISCRAM).
[5]
Claudio Arbib, Mahyar T Moghaddam, and Henry Muccini. 2019. Iot flows: a network flow model application to building evacuation. A View of Operations Research Applications in Italy, 2018 (2019), 115–131.
[6]
Claudio Arbib, Henry Muccini, and Mahyar Tourchi Moghaddam. 2018. Applying a network flow model to quick and safe evacuation of people from a building: a real case.RSFF 18 (2018), 50–61.
[7]
Jonathan S Barnhoorn, Erwin Haasnoot, Bruno R Bocanegra, and Henk van Steenbergen. 2015. QRTEngine: An easy solution for running online reaction time experiments using Qualtrics. Behavior research methods 47, 4 (2015), 918–929.
[8]
Margaret M Bradley and Peter J Lang. 1994. Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry 25, 1 (1994), 49–59.
[9]
Tobias Brosch, David Sander, Gilles Pourtois, and Klaus R Scherer. 2008. Beyond fear: Rapid spatial orienting toward positive emotional stimuli. Psychological science 19, 4 (2008), 362–370.
[10]
Hartmut Dieterich, Uwe Malinowski, Thomas Kühme, and Matthias Schneider-Hufschmidt. 1993. State of the art in adaptive user interfaces. Human factors in information technology 10 (1993), 13–13.
[11]
Julie Dugdale, Mahyar T Moghaddam, and Henry Muccini. 2020. Human behaviour centered design: developing a software system for cultural heritage. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Society. 85–94.
[12]
Paul Ekman. 1993. Facial expression and emotion.American psychologist 48, 4 (1993), 384.
[13]
Paul Ekman. 1999. Basic emotions. Handbook of cognition and emotion 98, 45-60 (1999), 16.
[14]
Paul Ekman, Wallace V Friesen, Maureen O’sullivan, Anthony Chan, Irene Diacoyanni-Tarlatzis, Karl Heider, Rainer Krause, William Ayhan LeCompte, Tom Pitcairn, Pio E Ricci-Bitti, 1987. Universals and cultural differences in the judgments of facial expressions of emotion.Journal of personality and social psychology 53, 4 (1987), 712.
[15]
Sergio Firmenich, Alejandra Garrido, Fabio Paternò, and Gustavo Rossi. 2019. User interface adaptation for accessibility. In Web Accessibility. Springer, 547–568.
[16]
Julián Andrés Galindo, Sophie Dupuy-Chessa, Nadine Mandran, and Eric Céret. 2018. Using user emotions to trigger UI adaptation. In 2018 12th International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS). IEEE, 1–11.
[17]
Jose Maria Garcia-Garcia, Victor MR Penichet, and Maria D Lozano. 2017. Emotion detection: a technology review. In Proceedings of the XVIII international conference on human computer interaction. 1–8.
[18]
Jan Gläscher, Nathaniel Daw, Peter Dayan, and John P O’Doherty. 2010. States versus rewards: dissociable neural prediction error signals underlying model-based and model-free reinforcement learning. Neuron 66, 4 (2010), 585–595.
[19]
Donald Glowinski, Antonio Camurri, Gualtiero Volpe, Nele Dael, and Klaus Scherer. 2008. Technique for automatic emotion recognition by body gesture analysis. In 2008 IEEE Computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops. IEEE, 1–6.
[20]
Brad Hardin and Dave McCool. 2015. BIM and construction management: proven tools, methods, and workflows. John Wiley & Sons.
[21]
Sabina Hunziker, Laura Laschinger, Simone Portmann-Schwarz, Norbert K Semmer, Franziska Tschan, and Stephan Marsch. 2011. Perceived stress and team performance during a simulated resuscitation. Intensive care medicine 37, 9 (2011), 1473–1479.
[22]
Jeffrey O Kephart and David M Chess. 2003. The vision of autonomic computing. Computer 36, 1 (2003), 41–50.
[23]
Yanal Mahmoud Kilani. 2021. SMART Business Role in Supporting Marketing Strategies among Telecommunication Organizations Injordan. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT) 12, 6 (2021), 4568–4582.
[24]
Paul R Kleinginna and Anne M Kleinginna. 1981. A categorized list of emotion definitions, with suggestions for a consensual definition. Motivation and emotion 5, 4 (1981), 345–379.
[25]
Amit Konar and Aruna Chakraborty. 2015. Emotion recognition: A pattern analysis approach. John Wiley & Sons.
[26]
Jonathan Lazar, Jinjuan Heidi Feng, and Harry Hochheiser. 2017. Research methods in human-computer interaction. Morgan Kaufmann.
[27]
Baihan Lin, Guillermo Cecchi, Djallel Bouneffouf, Jenna Reinen, and Irina Rish. 2019. A story of two streams: Reinforcement learning models from human behavior and neuropsychiatry. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.11286 (2019).
[28]
David Lindlbauer, Anna Maria Feit, and Otmar Hilliges. 2019. Context-aware online adaptation of mixed reality interfaces. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology. 147–160.
[29]
Tiago V Maia and Michael J Frank. 2011. From reinforcement learning models to psychiatric and neurological disorders. Nature neuroscience 14, 2 (2011), 154–162.
[30]
Christian Märtin, Sanim Rashid, and Christian Herdin. 2016. Designing responsive interactive applications by emotion-tracking and pattern-based dynamic user interface adaptation. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 28–36.
[31]
Elizabeth Martin. 2006. Survey questionnaire construction. Survey methodology 13 (2006), 2006.
[32]
Sascha Meudt, Miriam Schmidt-Wack, Frank Honold, Felix Schüssel, Michael Weber, Friedhelm Schwenker, and Günther Palm. 2016. Going further in affective computing: how emotion recognition can improve adaptive user interaction. In Toward Robotic Socially Believable Behaving Systems-Volume I. Springer, 73–103.
[33]
Nesrine Mezhoudi. 2013. User interface adaptation based on user feedback and machine learning. In Proceedings of the companion publication of the 2013 international conference on Intelligent user interfaces companion. 25–28.
[34]
Mahyar T Moghaddam, Mina Alipour, and Mikkel Baun Kjærgaard. 2023. User Interface and Architecture Adaption Based on Emotions and Behaviors. In 2023 IEEE 20th International Conference on Software Architecture Companion (ICSA-C). IEEE, 101–105.
[35]
Mahyar T Moghaddam, Henry Muccini, and Julie Dugdale. 2022. Intelligent Building Evacuation: From Modeling Systems to Behaviors. In Disaster Management and Information Technology: Professional Response and Recovery Management in the Age of Disasters. Springer, 111–129.
[36]
Mahyar T Moghaddam, Henry Muccini, Julie Dugdale, and Mikkel Baun Kjægaard. 2022. Designing Internet of Behaviors Systems. In 2022 IEEE 19th International Conference on Software Architecture (ICSA). IEEE, 124–134.
[37]
Patricia Moravec, Lu Lucy Yan, and Alfonso Pedraza Martinez. 2021. Wildfire Response Operations: Intentional Fear Reduction through Social Media Updates. Kelley School of Business Research Paper2021-05 (2021).
[38]
Vivian Genaro Motti and Jean Vanderdonckt. 2013. A computational framework for context-aware adaptation of user interfaces. In IEEE 7th International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS). IEEE, 1–12.
[39]
Henry Muccini, Romina Spalazzese, Mahyar T Moghaddam, and Mohammad Sharaf. 2018. Self-adaptive IoT architectures: An emergency handling case study. In Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Software Architecture: Companion Proceedings. 1–6.
[40]
Daniel M Oppenheimer, Tom Meyvis, and Nicolas Davidenko. 2009. Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of experimental social psychology 45, 4 (2009), 867–872.
[41]
Jonathan Posner, James A Russell, and Bradley S Peterson. 2005. The circumplex model of affect: An integrative approach to affective neuroscience, cognitive development, and psychopathology. Development and psychopathology 17, 3 (2005), 715–734.
[42]
Roger Pressman and Bruce Maxim. 2019. ISE Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach (9 ed.). McGraw-Hill Education, Columbus, OH.
[43]
Arman Savran, Koray Ciftci, Guillaume Chanel, Javier Mota, Luong Hong Viet, Blent Sankur, Lale Akarun, Alice Caplier, and Michele Rombaut. 2006. Emotion detection in the loop from brain signals and facial images. (2006).
[44]
Annett Schirmer and Ralph Adolphs. 2017. Emotion perception from face, voice, and touch: comparisons and convergence. Trends in cognitive sciences 21, 3 (2017), 216–228.
[45]
Hanan Shteingart and Yonatan Loewenstein. 2014. Reinforcement learning and human behavior. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 25 (2014), 93–98.
[46]
Jean-Sébastien Sottet, Gaëlle Calvary, Jean-Marie Favre, Joëlle Coutaz, Alexandre Demeure, and Lionel Balme. 2006. Towards Model Driven Engineering of Plastic User Interfaces. In Satellite Events at the MoDELS 2005 Conference, Jean-Michel Bruel (Ed.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 191–200.
[47]
Jean-Sébastien Sottet, Vincent Ganneau, Gaëlle Calvary, Joëlle Coutaz, Alexandre Demeure, Jean-Marie Favre, and Rachel Demumieux. 2007. Model-driven adaptation for plastic user interfaces. In IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 397–410.
[48]
Hamed Taherdoost. 2016. How to design and create an effective survey/questionnaire; A step by step guide. International Journal of Academic Research in Management (IJARM) 5, 4 (2016), 37–41.
[49]
Kashyap Todi, Gilles Bailly, Luis Leiva, and Antti Oulasvirta. 2021. Adapting user interfaces with model-based reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13.
[50]
Christopher JCH Watkins and Peter Dayan. 1992. Q-learning. Machine learning 8, 3-4 (1992), 279–292.
[51]
Danny Weyns, Bradley Schmerl, Vincenzo Grassi, Sam Malek, Raffaela Mirandola, Christian Prehofer, Jochen Wuttke, Jesper Andersson, Holger Giese, and Karl M Göschka. 2013. On patterns for decentralized control in self-adaptive systems. In Software Engineering for Self-Adaptive Systems II. Springer, 76–107.
[52]
Timothy D Wilson and Daniel T Gilbert. 2003. Affective forecasting. (2003).
[53]
Eldad Yechiam, Jerome R Busemeyer, Julie C Stout, and Antoine Bechara. 2005. Using cognitive models to map relations between neuropsychological disorders and human decision-making deficits. Psychological science 16, 12 (2005), 973–978.
[54]
Enes Yigitbas, André Hottung, Sebastian Mansfield Rojas, Anthony Anjorin, Stefan Sauer, and Gregor Engels. 2019. Context-and data-driven satisfaction analysis of user interface adaptations based on instant user feedback. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, EICS (2019), 1–20.
[55]
Mao Zheng, Qian Xu, and Hao Fan. 2016. Modeling The Adaption Rule in Context-aware Systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.01614 (2016).

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
UMAP '23: Proceedings of the 31st ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization
June 2023
333 pages
ISBN:9781450399326
DOI:10.1145/3565472
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 19 June 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Emergency.
  2. Emotions
  3. Reinforcement Learning
  4. Self-adaptation
  5. User Interface

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Funding Sources

  • Innovation Fund Denmark

Conference

UMAP '23
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 162 of 633 submissions, 26%

Upcoming Conference

UMAP '25

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 219
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)99
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)13
Reflects downloads up to 27 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media