research-article

Open access

Design Principles for Robot-Assisted Feeding in Social Contexts

Authors:

Patricia Alves-Oliveira,

Ethan K. Gordon,

Siddhartha S. SrinivasaAuthors Info & Claims

HRI '23: Proceedings of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

Pages 24 - 33

https://doi.org/10.1145/3568162.3576988

Published: 13 March 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Social dining, i.e., eating with/in company, is replete with meaning and cultural significance. Unfortunately, for the 1.8 million Americans with motor impairments who cannot eat without assistance, challenges restrict them from enjoying this pleasant social ritual. In this work, we identify the needs of participants with motor impairments during social dining and how robot-assisted feeding can address them. Using speculative videos that show robot behaviors within a social dining context, we interviewed participants to understand their preferences. Following a community-based participatory research method, we worked with a community researcher with motor impairments throughout this study. We contribute (a) insights into how a robot can help overcome challenges in social dining, (b) design principles for creating robot-assisted feeding systems, (c) and an implementation guide for future research in this area. Our key finding is that robots' unique assistive qualities can address challenges people with motor impairments face during social dining, promoting empowerment and belonging.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (HRI23-fp1132.mp4)

Social dining, i.e., eating with/in company, is replete with meaning and cultural significance. Unfortunately, for the 1.8 million Americans with motor impairments who cannot eat without assistance, challenges restrict them from enjoying this pleasant social ritual. In this work, we identify the needs of participants with motor impairments during social dining and how robot-assisted feeding can address them. Using speculative videos that show robot behaviors within a social dining context, we interviewed participants to understand their preferences. Following a community-based participatory research method, we worked with a community researcher with motor impairments throughout this study. We contribute (a) insights into how a robot can help overcome challenges in social dining, (b) design principles for creating robot-assisted feeding systems, (c) and an implementation guide for future research in this area.

Download
211.41 MB

References

[1]

2004. Beeson Automaddak Feeder. https://larimer.co.networkofcare.org/aging/ assistive/detail.aspx?id=18902&cid=797&cn=Feeders&org=

[2]

2020. The Mealtime Partner Dining System Description. https://www.mealtimepartners.com/dining/mealtime-partner-dining-device.htm

[3]

2021. Bestic. https://web.archive.org/web/20220120094337/https://www.camanio. com/us/products/bestic/

[4]

2022. Meal buddy. https://www.performancehealth.com/meal-buddy-systems

[5]

2022. Meet Obi. https://meetobi.com/

[6]

2022. My Spoon. https://web.archive.org/web/20210510063115/http://www. secom.co.jp/english/myspoon/

[7]

2022. Neater Eater Robotic. https://www.neater.co.uk/neater-eater-robotic

[8]

Patrícia Alves-Oliveira, Matthew Bavier, Samrudha Malandkar, Ryan Eldridge, Julie Sayigh, Elin A Björling, and Maya Cakmak. 2022. FLEXI: A robust and fexible social robot embodiment kit. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 1177--1191.

Digital Library

[9]

Patrícia Alves-Oliveira, Maria Luce Lupetti, Michal Luria, Diana Löfer, Mafalda Gamboa, Lea Albaugh, Waki Kamino, Anastasia K. Ostrowski, David Puljiz, Pedro Reynolds-Cuéllar, et al. 2021. Collection of metaphors for human-robot interaction. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021. 1366--1379.

[10]

Patrícia Alves-Oliveira, Amal Nanavati, Tyler Schrenk, Ethan Gordon, Maya Cakmak, and Siddhartha S Srinivasa. 2022. Design Principles for Robot-Assisted Feeding in Social Contexts (Supplementary Materials). https://doi.org/10.17605/ OSF.IO/392HP

[11]

S. Belkhale, E.K. Gordon, Y. Chen, S. S. Srinivasa, T. Bhattacharjee, and D. Sadigh. 2022. Balancing Efciency and Comfort in Robot-Assisted Bite Transfer. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[12]

Jeanette Bell and Tuck Wah Leong. 2019. Collaborative futures: Co-designing research methods for younger people living with dementia. In Proceedings of the 2019 chi conference on human factors in computing systems. 1--13.

Digital Library

[13]

Tapomayukh Bhattacharjee, Maria E Cabrera, Anat Caspi, Maya Cakmak, and Siddhartha S Srinivasa. 2019. A community-centered design framework for robot-assisted feeding systems. In The 21st international ACM SIGACCESS conference on computers and accessibility. 482--494.

Digital Library

[14]

Tapomayukh Bhattacharjee, Ethan K Gordon, Rosario Scalise, Maria E Cabrera, Anat Caspi, Maya Cakmak, and Siddhartha S Srinivasa. 2020. Is more autonomy always better? exploring preferences of users with mobility impairments in robot- assisted feeding. In 2020 15th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 181--190.

[15]

Eli Blevis, Sabrina Hauser, and William Odom. 2015. Sharing the hidden treasure in pictorials. interactions 22, 3 (2015), 32--43.

[16]

Gerard Canal, Guillem Alenyà, and Carme Torras. 2016. Personalization frame- work for adaptive robotic feeding assistance. In International conference on social robotics. Springer, 22--31.

[17]

Dorota Chapko, Pedro Andrés Andrés Pérez Rothstein, Lizzie Emeh, Pino Frumiento, Donald Kennedy, David McNicholas, Ifeoma Orjiekwe, Michaela Overton, Mark Snead, Robyn Steward, et al. 2021. Supporting Remote Survey Data Analysis by Co-researchers with Learning Disabilities through Inclusive and Creative Prac- tices and Data Science Approaches. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021. 1668--1681.

[18]

Dorota Chapko, Pino Frumiento, Nalini Edwards, Lizzie Emeh, Donald Kennedy, David McNicholas, Michaela Overton, Mark Snead, Robyn Steward, Jenny M Sutton, et al. 2020. "We have been magnifed for years-Now you are under the microscope!": Co-researchers with Learning Disabilities Created an Online Survey to Challenge Public Understanding of Learning Disabilities. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--17.

Digital Library

[19]

Kevin Charras and Michèle Frémontier. 2010. Sharing meals with institutionalized people with dementia: a natural experiment. Journal of Gerontological Social Work 53, 5 (2010), 436--448.

[20]

Albert M Cook and Janice Miller Polgar. 2014. Assistive technologies-e-book: principles and practice. Elsevier Health Sciences.

[21]

Lilian de Greef, Dominik Moritz, and Cynthia Bennett. 2021. Interdependent Variables: Remotely Designing Tactile Graphics for an Accessible Workfow. In The 23rd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. 1--6.

Digital Library

[22]

Cee W de Jong, Klaus Klemp, Erik Mattie, and Donald Goodwin. 2017. Ten Principles for Good Design: Dieter Rams: The Jorrit Maan Collection. Munich: Prestel, [2017].

[23]

Johanna Drucker. 2014. Graphesis: Visual forms of knowledge production. Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA.

[24]

Daniel Gallenberger, Tapomayukh Bhattacharjee, Youngsun Kim, and Siddhartha S Srinivasa. 2019. Transfer depends on acquisition: Analyzing manipulation strategies for robotic feeding. In 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 267--276.

[25]

D Randy Garrison, Martha Cleveland-Innes, Marguerite Koole, and James Kappelman. 2006. Revisiting methodological issues in transcript analysis: Negotiated coding and reliability. The internet and higher education 9, 1 (2006), 1--8.

[26]

Cliford Geertz et al. 1973. The interpretation of cultures. Vol. 5019. Basic books.

[27]

Karen Glanz, Jessica J Metcalfe, Sara C Folta, Alison Brown, and Barbara Fiese. 2021. Diet and health benefts associated with in-home eating and sharing meals at home: A systematic review. International journal of environmental research and public health 18, 4 (2021), 1577.

[28]

Ethan K Gordon, Xiang Meng, Tapomayukh Bhattacharjee, Matt Barnes, and Siddhartha S Srinivasa. 2020. Adaptive robot-assisted feeding: An online learning framework for acquiring previously unseen food items. In 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, 9659--9666.

Digital Library

[29]

Karen Hacker. 2013. Community-based participatory research. Sage publications.

[30]

Amanda W Harrist and Ralph M Waugh. 2002. Dyadic synchrony: Its structure and function in children's development. Developmental review 22, 4 (2002), 555--592.

[31]

Laura V Herlant. 2018. Algorithms, implementation, and studies on eating with a shared control robot arm. (2018).

[32]

Richard P Hermann, Anna C Phalangas, Richard M Mahoney, and Micheala Alexander. 1999. Powered feeding devices: an evaluation of three models. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 80, 10 (1999), 1237--1242.

[33]

Marius Hoggenmüller, Wen-Ying Lee, Luke Hespanhol, Malte Jung, and Martin Tomitsch. 2021. Eliciting New Perspectives in RtD Studies through Annotated Portfolios: A Case Study of Robotic Artefacts. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021. 1875--1886.

Digital Library

[34]

Kat Holmes. 2020. Mismatch: How inclusion shapes design. Mit Press.

[35]

Rick H Hoyle, Monica J Harris, and Charles M Judd. 2002. Research methods in social relations. (2002).

[36]

Sumio Ishii, Shinji Tanaka, and Fumiaki Hiramatsu. 1995. Meal assistance robot for severely handicapped people. In Proceedings of 1995 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Vol. 2. IEEE, 1308--1313.

[37]

Simeon Keates, P John Clarkson, Lee-Anne Harrison, and Peter Robinson. 2000. Towards a practical inclusive design approach. In Proceedings on the 2000 conference on Universal Usability. 45--52.

Digital Library

[38]

Hyun K Kim, Heejin Jeong, Jangwoon Park, Jaehyun Park, Won-Seok Kim, Nahyeong Kim, Subin Park, and Nam-Jong Paik. 2022. Development of a Comprehensive Design Guideline to Evaluate the User Experiences of Meal-Assistance Robots considering Human-Machine Social Interactions. International Journal of Human--Computer Interaction (2022), 1--14.

[39]

Klaus Krippendorf. 2009. The content analysis reader. Sage.

[40]

Raja S Kushalnagar and Christian Vogler. 2020. Teleconference accessibility and guidelines for deaf and hard of hearing users. In The 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. 1--6.

Digital Library

[41]

Joseph La Delfa, Mehmet Aydin Baytas, Rakesh Patibanda, Hazel Ngari, Rohit Ashok Khot, and Florian'Floyd' Mueller. 2020. Drone chi: Somaesthetic human-drone interaction. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--13.

Digital Library

[42]

Matthew V Law, JiHyun Jeong, Amritansh Kwatra, Malte F Jung, and Guy Hofman. 2019. Negotiating the creative space in human-robot collaborative design. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 645--657.

Digital Library

[43]

David Lee. 2014. The Origins of an Everyday Behavior: Why do People Share Meals? Ph. D. Dissertation. The University of Mississippi.

[44]

Dennis Maciuszek, Johan Aberg, and Nahid Shahmehri. 2005. What help do older people need? Constructing a functional design space of electronic assistive technology applications. In Proceedings of the 7th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility. 4--11.

[45]

Herbert L Meiselman. 2000. Dimensions of the meal: Science, culture, business, art.

[46]

Meredith Minkler and Nina Wallerstein. 2011. Community-based participatory research for health: From process to outcomes. John Wiley & Sons.

[47]

Ivica Mitrović. 2015. An introduction to speculative design practice. An Intro- duction to Speculative Design-Eutropia, a Case Study Practice, Croatian Designers Association, Department for Visual Communications Design, Arts Academy, University of Split (2015), 8--23.

[48]

Lorenza Mondada. 2009. The methodical organization of talking and eating: Assessments in dinner conversations. Food quality and preference 20, 8 (2009), 558--571.

[49]

Anne Murcott. 1982. The cultural signifcance of food and eating. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 41, 2 (1982), 203--210.

[50]

Maia Naftali and Leah Findlater. 2014. Accessibility in context: understanding the truly mobile experience of smartphone users with motor impairments. In Proceedings of the 16th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers & accessibility. 209--216.

Digital Library

[51]

Amal Nanavati, Patrícia Alves-Oliveira, Tyler Schrenk, Ethan Gordon, Maya Cakmak, and Siddhartha S Srinivasa. 2023. Unintended Failures of Robot-Assisted Feeding in Social Contexts. In Submitted to the Proceedings of the Companion of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Stockholm, Sweden) (HRI '23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA.

[52]

Yutaro Ohshima, Yuichi Kobayashi, Toru Kaneko, Atsushi Yamashita, and Hajime Asama. 2013. Meal support system with spoon using laser range fnder and manipulator. In 2013 IEEE workshop on robot vision (WORV). IEEE, 82--87.

[53]

Tomohiro Oka, Jorge Solis, Ann-Louise Lindborg, Daisuke Matsuura, Yusuke Sugahara, and Yukio Takeda. 2020. Kineto-Elasto-Static design of underactuated chopstick-type gripper mechanism for meal-assistance robot. Robotics 9, 3 (2020), 50.

[54]

Jan Ondras, Abrar Anwar, Tong Wu, Fanjun Bu, Malte Jung, Jorge Jose Ortiz, and Tapomayukh Bhattacharjee. 2022. Human-Robot Commensality: Bite Timing Prediction for Robot-Assisted Feeding in Groups. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.03348 (2022).

[55]

Daehyung Park, Yuuna Hoshi, Harshal P Mahajan, Ho Keun Kim, Zackory Erick- son, Wendy A Rogers, and Charles C Kemp. 2020. Active robot-assisted feeding with a general-purpose mobile manipulator: Design, evaluation, and lessons learned. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 124 (2020), 103344.

Digital Library

[56]

Karie Jo Peralta. 2018. Politics of knowledge in community-based work. In Dimensions of Community-Based Projects in Health Care. Springer, 67--78.

[57]

Ornella Plos, Stéphanie Buisine, Améziane Aoussat, Fabrice Mantelet, and Claude Dumas. 2012. A Universalist strategy for the design of Assistive Technology. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 42, 6 (2012), 533--541.

[58]

Graham Pullin. 2009. Design meets disability. MIT press.

[59]

André Queirós, Daniel Faria, and Fernando Almeida. 2017. Strengths and limitations of qualitative and quantitative research methods. European Journal of Education Studies (2017).

[60]

Rehabmart Reviews. 2013. Winsford Self-Feeder. https://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=vYG2dVuPmos&ab_channel=RehabmartReviews

[61]

Travers Rhodes and Manuela Veloso. 2018. Robot-driven trajectory improvement for feeding tasks. In 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, 2991--2996.

Digital Library

[62]

Paul Rozin. 2005. The meaning of food in our lives: a cross-cultural perspective on eating and well-being. Journal of nutrition education and behavior 37 (2005), S107--S112.

[63]

Jon A Sanford. 2012. Universal design as a rehabilitation strategy: Design for the ages. Springer Publishing Company.

[64]

W Seamone and G Schmeisser. 1985. Early clinical evaluation of a robot arm/worktable system for spinal-cord-injured persons. Journal of rehabilitation research and development 22, 1 (1985), 38--57.

[65]

Teresa E Seeman. 1996. Social ties and health: The benefts of social integration. Annals of epidemiology 6, 5 (1996), 442--451. Amal Nanavati et al.

[66]

Richard K Sherwin, Neal Feigenson, and Christina Spiesel. 2007. What is visual knowledge, and what is it good for? Potential ethnographic lessons from the feld of legal practice. Visual Anthropology 20, 2--3 (2007), 143--178.

[67]

Shoshanna Sofaer. 1999. Qualitative methods: what are they and why use them? Health services research 34, 5 Pt 2 (1999), 1101.

[68]

Tifany Thang, Alice Liang, Yechan Choi, Adrian Parrales, Sara H Kuang, Sri Kurniawan, and Heather Perez. 2021. Providing and Accessing Support During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Experiences of Mental Health Professionals, Community and Vocational Support Providers, and Adults with ASD. In The 23rd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. 1--6.

Digital Library

[69]

Kristina A Theis, Amy Steinweg, Charles G Helmick, Elizabeth Courtney-Long, Julie A Bolen, and Robin Lee. 2019. Which one? What kind? How many? Types, causes, and prevalence of disability among US adults. Disability and health journal 12, 3 (2019), 411--421.

[70]

Garreth W Tigwell, Roshan L Peiris, Stacey Watson, Gerald M Garavuso, and Heather Miller. 2020. Student and Teacher Perspectives of Learning ASL in an Online Setting. In The 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. 1--6.

Digital Library

[71]

Mike Topping. 2000. An overview of the development of Handy 1, a rehabilitation robot to assist the severely disabled. Artifcial Life and Robotics 4, 4 (2000), 188--192.

[72]

Jennifer Utter, Simon Denny, Roshini Peiris-John, Emma Moselen, Ben Dyson, and Terryann Clark. 2017. Family meals and adolescent emotional well-being: fndings from a national study. Journal of nutrition education and behavior 49, 1 (2017), 67--72.

[73]

Jennifer Utter, Simon Denny, Elizabeth Robinson, Theresa Fleming, Shanthi Ameratunga, and Sue Grant. 2013. Family meals and the well-being of adolescents. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health 49, 11 (2013), 906--911.

[74]

Meera Viswanathan, Alice Ammerman, Eugenia Eng, Gerald Garlehner, Kath- leen N Lohr, Derek Grifth, Scott Rhodes, Carmen Samuel-Hodge, Siobhan Maty, Linda Lux, et al. 2004. Community-based participatory research: Assessing the evidence: Summary. AHRQ evidence report summaries (2004).

[75]

Alan Warde and Lydia Martens. 2000. Eating out: Social diferentiation, consump- tion and pleasure. Cambridge University Press.

[76]

Akira Yamazaki and Ryosuke Masuda. 2012. Autonomous foods handling by chopsticks for meal assistant robot. In ROBOTIK 2012; 7th German Conference on Robotics. VDE, 1--6.

Cited By

Nanavati ARanganeni VCakmak M(2024)Physically Assistive Robots: A Systematic Review of Mobile and Manipulator Robots That Physically Assist People with DisabilitiesAnnual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems10.1146/annurev-control-062823-0243527:1(123-147)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2024
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-control-062823-024352
Padmanabha AYuan JGupta JKarachiwalla ZMajidi CAdmoni HErickson Z(2024)VoicePilot: Harnessing LLMs as Speech Interfaces for Physically Assistive RobotsProceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology10.1145/3654777.3676401(1-18)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3654777.3676401
Lindgren PLjungblad S(2024)Drones as Accessibility Probes in Able-Bodied Norms: Insights from People with Lived Experiences of DisabilitiesProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661580(2946-2957)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3661580
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Design Principles for Robot-Assisted Feeding in Social Contexts
1. Computer systems organization
  1. Embedded and cyber-physical systems
    1. Robotics
2. Human-centered computing
  1. Accessibility
    1. Accessibility technologies
  2. Interaction design
    1. Interaction design process and methods
      1. Participatory design

Recommendations

Unintended Failures of Robot-Assisted Feeding in Social Contexts
HRI '23: Companion of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

Over 1.8 million Americans require assistance eating. Robot-assisted feeding is a promising way to empower people with motor impairments to eat independently. Yet, most robot-assisted feeding research has focused on individual dining (e.g., eating at ...
Vision Augmented Robot Feeding
Computer Vision – ECCV 2018 Workshops
Abstract
Researchers have over time developed robotic feeding assistants to help at meals so that people with disabilities can live more autonomous lives. Current commercial feeding assistant robots acquire food without feedback on acquisition success and ...
Self-Conscious or Self-Confident? A Diary Study Conceptualizing the Social Accessibility of Assistive Technology

With the recent influx of smartphones, tablets, and wearables such as watches and glasses, personal interactive device use is increasingly visible and commonplace in public and social spaces. Assistive Technologies (ATs) used by people with disabilities ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

HRI '23: Proceedings of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

March 2023

631 pages

ISBN:9781450399647

DOI:10.1145/3568162

General Chairs:
Ginevra Castellano
Uppsala University, Sweden
,
Laurel Riek
University of California San Diego, USA
,
Program Chairs:
Maya Cakmak
University of Washington, USA
,
Iolanda Leite
KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden

Copyright © 2023 Owner/Author.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 13 March 2023

Check for updates

Badges

Best Paper

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Funding Sources

National Science Foundation

Conference

HRI '23

Sponsor:

HRI '23: ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

March 13 - 16, 2023

Stockholm, Sweden

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 268 of 1,124 submissions, 24%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

13
Total Citations
View Citations
2,257
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)1,464
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)317

Reflects downloads up to 16 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Nanavati ARanganeni VCakmak M(2024)Physically Assistive Robots: A Systematic Review of Mobile and Manipulator Robots That Physically Assist People with DisabilitiesAnnual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems10.1146/annurev-control-062823-0243527:1(123-147)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2024
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-control-062823-024352
Padmanabha AYuan JGupta JKarachiwalla ZMajidi CAdmoni HErickson Z(2024)VoicePilot: Harnessing LLMs as Speech Interfaces for Physically Assistive RobotsProceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology10.1145/3654777.3676401(1-18)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3654777.3676401
Lindgren PLjungblad S(2024)Drones as Accessibility Probes in Able-Bodied Norms: Insights from People with Lived Experiences of DisabilitiesProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661580(2946-2957)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3661580
Gordon EJenamani RNanavati ALiu ZStabile DDai XBhattacharjee TSchrenk TKo JBolotski HKarim RKashyap AZhu BKessler Faulkner TSrinivasa SGrollman DBroadbent EJu WSoh HWilliams T(2024)An Adaptable, Safe, and Portable Robot-Assisted Feeding SystemCompanion of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610978.3641085(74-76)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3610978.3641085
Barrué CSuárez AInzitari MRibera AAlenyà GGrollman DBroadbent EJu WSoh HWilliams T(2024)NYAM: The Role of Configurable Engagement Strategies in Robotic-Assisted FeedingCompanion of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610978.3640691(228-232)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3610978.3640691
Nanavati AGrollman DBroadbent EJu WSoh HWilliams T(2024)Achieving Deployable Autonomy through Customizability and Human-in-the-Loop: A Case Study in Robot-assisted FeedingCompanion of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610978.3638356(136-138)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3610978.3638356
Pan XDoering MKanda TGrollman DBroadbent EJu WSoh HWilliams T(2024)What Is Your Other Hand Doing, Robot? A Model of Behavior for Shopkeeper Robot's Idle HandProceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610977.3634986(552-560)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3610977.3634986
Hsu LStafford PKhoo WSwaminathan MAmon KSato HTsui KCrandall DSabanović SGrollman DBroadbent EJu WSoh HWilliams T(2024)"Give it Time:" Longitudinal Panels Scaffold Older Adults' Learning and Robot Co-DesignProceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610977.3634979(283-292)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3610977.3634979
Jenamani RStabile DLiu ZAnwar ADimitropoulou KBhattacharjee TGrollman DBroadbent EJu WSoh HWilliams T(2024)Feel the Bite: Robot-Assisted Inside-Mouth Bite Transfer using Robust Mouth Perception and Physical Interaction-Aware ControlProceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610977.3634975(313-322)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3610977.3634975
Filthaut LMurray-Rust DLupetti MLii NSchmaus PLeidner D(2024)Cosmic Troubleshooting: Exploring Third-Person View for Error Handling in Telerobotic Planetary Infrastructure Maintenance2024 International Conference on Space Robotics (iSpaRo)10.1109/iSpaRo60631.2024.10687823(334-341)Online publication date: 24-Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/iSpaRo60631.2024.10687823
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents