research-article

Open access

A Card-based Ideation Toolkit to Generate Designs for Tangible Privacy Management Tools

Authors:

Arosha Bandara,

Blaine A. Price,

Bashar NuseibehAuthors Info & Claims

TEI '23: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction

Article No.: 19, Pages 1 - 13

https://doi.org/10.1145/3569009.3572903

Published: 26 February 2023 Publication History

All formats PDF

TEI '23: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction

A Card-based Ideation Toolkit to Generate Designs for Tangible Privacy Management Tools

Pages 1 - 13

Abstract
References

Abstract

Effective privacy protection in dynamic UbiComp environments requires users to be able to manage their privacy seamlessly across diverse contexts. To support this, designers need to go beyond GUI-based interactions and utilise tangible and embodied interactions. To help designers in such endeavours, we present the TTP toolkit: a card-based ideation kit to generate designs for tangible privacy management tools. The toolkit translates the Privacy Care framework for tangible-supported privacy management into a game intended to support designers in developing TUI privacy management tools. We demonstrate use of our toolkit through 10 online participatory workshops with 22 interaction designers. Our results demonstrate that the toolkit was effective in supporting the participants to creatively and collaboratively generate meaningful conceptual designs of tangible tools for privacy management.

References

[1]

David Barnard-Wills and Debi Ashenden. 2015. Playing with privacy: Games for education and communication in the politics of online privacy. Political Studies 63, 1 (2015), 142–160.

[2]

Victoria Bellotti and Abigail Sellen. 1993. Design for Privacy in Ubiquitous Computing Environments. In Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work 13–17 September 1993, Milan, Italy ECSCW ’93, Giorgio de Michelis, Carla Simone, and Kjeld Schmidt (Eds.). Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2094-4_6

[3]

Erlend Bergen, Dag F. Solberg, Torjus H. Sæthre, and Monica Divitini. 2020. Supporting the Co-design of Games for Privacy Awareness. In The Challenges of the Digital Transformation in Education, Michael E. Auer and Thrasyvoulos Tsiatsos (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 888–899.

[4]

Eva Brandt and Jörn Messeter. 2004. Facilitating Collaboration through Design Games. In Proceedings of the Eighth Conference on Participatory Design: Artful Integration: Interweaving Media, Materials and Practices - Volume 1 (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) (PDC 04). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1145/1011870.1011885

Digital Library

[5]

Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2 (Jan. 2006), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

[6]

Ying Deng, Alissa N. Antle, and Carman Neustaedter. 2014. Tango cards: a card-based design tool for informing the design of tangible learning games. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems - DIS ’14. ACM Press, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 695–704. https://doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2598601

Digital Library

[7]

Tamara Denning, Batya Friedman, and Tadayoshi Kohno. 2013. The Security Cards: A Security Threat Brainstorming Toolkit. Univ. of Washington, http://securitycards. cs. washington. edu.

[8]

Liz Dowthwaite, Helen Creswick, Virginia Portillo, Jun Zhao, Menisha Patel, Elvira Perez Vallejos, Ansgar Koene, and Marina Jirotka. 2020. " It’s your private information. it’s your life." young people’s views of personal data use by online technologies. In Proceedings of the Interaction Design and Children Conference. ACM, London, UK, 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1145/3392063.3394410

Digital Library

[9]

Berry Eggen, Koert van Mensvoort, David Menting, Emar Vegt, Wouter Widdershoven, and Rob Zimmermann. [n.d.]. Soundscapes at Workspace Zero – Design Explorations into the Use of Sound in a Shared Environment. ([n. d.]), 8.

[10]

Saul Greenberg and Hideaki Kuzuoka. 1999. Using digital but physical surrogates to mediate awareness, communication and privacy in media spaces. Personal Technologies 3, 4 (1999), 182–198. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01540552

[11]

Eva Hornecker. 2010. Creative Idea Exploration within the Structure of a Guiding Framework: The Card Brainstorming Game. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA) (TEI ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 101–108. https://doi.org/10.1145/1709886.1709905

Digital Library

[12]

Eva Hornecker and Jacob Buur. 2006. Getting a grip on tangible interaction: a framework on physical space and social interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems. ACM, Montréal, Canada, 437–446.

Digital Library

[13]

IDEO IDEO. 2003. Method Cards: 51 ways to inspire design.

[14]

Lukasz Jedrzejczyk, Blaine A. Price, Arosha Bandara, and Bashar Nuseibeh. 2010. Privacy-shake: a haptic interface for managing privacy settings in mobile location sharing applications. In Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Human computer interaction with mobile devices and services. ACM, Lisbon, 411–412. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1851690

Digital Library

[15]

Apu Kapadia, Tristan Henderson, Jeffrey J. Fielding, and David Kotz. 2007. Virtual walls: Protecting digital privacy in pervasive environments. In International Conference on Pervasive Computing. Springer, Toronto, 162–179. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-540-72037-9_10

[16]

Mike Kuniavsky. 2010. Smart things: ubiquitous computing user experience design. Elsevier.

[17]

Bastian Könings. 2015. User-centered awareness and control of privacy in Ubiquitous Computing. PhD diss. PhD diss., Universität Ulm.

[18]

Marc Langheinrich. 2002. Privacy invasions in ubiquitous computing. In Workshop on Socially-informed Design of Privacy-enhancing Solutions in Ubiquitous Computing. UbiComp. Citeseer, na, na. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.6.6743&rep=rep1&type=pdf

[19]

Scott Lederer, Anind K Dey, and Jennifer Mankoff. 2002. A conceptual model and a metaphor of everyday privacy in ubiquitous computing environments. Computer Science Division, University of California, Berkeley.

[20]

Andrés Lucero and Juha Arrasvuori. 2013. The PLEX Cards and its techniques as sources of inspiration when designing for playfulness. International Journal of Arts and Technology 6, 1 (2013), 22. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJART.2013.050688

[21]

Andrés Lucero, Peter Dalsgaard, Kim Halskov, and Jacob Buur. 2016. Designing with Cards. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 75–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29155-0_5

[22]

Ewa Luger, Lachlan Urquhart, Tom Rodden, and Michael Golembewski. 2015. Playing the legal card: Using ideation cards to raise data protection issues within the design process. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, Seoul, South Korea, 457–466. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702142

Digital Library

[23]

Vikram Mehta. 2019. Tangible Interactions for Privacy Management. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. ACM, Tempe Arizona USA, 723–726. https://doi.org/10.1145/3294109.3302934

Digital Library

[24]

Vikram Mehta, Arosha K. Bandara, Blaine A. Price, and Bashar Nuseibeh. 2016. Privacy Itch and Scratch: On Body Privacy Warnings and Controls. In Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Press, San Jose, 2417–2424. https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2892475

Digital Library

[25]

Vikram Mehta, Arosha K. Bandara, Blaine A. Price, Bashar Nuseibeh, and Daniel Gooch. 2021. Up Close and Personal: Exploring User-Preferred Image Schemas for Intuitive Privacy Awareness and Control. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Salzburg, Austria) (TEI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 7, 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3430524.3440626

Digital Library

[26]

Vikram Mehta, Daniel Gooch, Arosha Bandara, Blaine Price, and Bashar Nuseibeh. 2020. TTPtoolkit - repository. https://github.com/TangiblePrivacy/TTPtoolkit

[27]

Vikram Mehta, Daniel Gooch, Arosha Bandara, Blaine Price, and Bashar Nuseibeh. 2021. Privacy Care: A Tangible Interaction Framework for Privacy Management. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. 21, 1, Article 25 (Feb. 2021), 32 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3430506

Digital Library

[28]

Simone Mora, Francesco Gianni, and Monica Divitini. 2017. Tiles: A Card-based Ideation Toolkit for the Internet of Things. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems - DIS ’17. ACM Press, Edinburgh, United Kingdom, 587–598. https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064699

Digital Library

[29]

Florian Mueller, Martin R. Gibbs, Frank Vetere, and Darren Edge. 2014. Supporting the creative game design process with exertion cards. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI ’14. ACM Press, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2211–2220. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557272

Digital Library

[30]

Sebastian Mueller. 2020. How to run great remote workshops. https://uxdesign.cc/how-to-run-great-remote-workshops-da4720777bbe

[31]

David H Nguyen and Elizabeth D Mynatt. 2002. Privacy mirrors: understanding and shaping socio-technical ubiquitous computing systems. Technical Report. Georgia Institute of Technology.

[32]

Dorian Peters, Lian Loke, and Naseem Ahmadpour. 2021. Toolkits, cards and games – a review of analogue tools for collaborative ideation. CoDesign 17, 4 (2021), 410–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2020.1715444

[33]

Yvonne Rogers. 2004. New theoretical approaches for HCI. Annual review of information science and technology 38, 1(2004), 87–143.

[34]

Roman Schlegel, Apu Kapadia, and Adam J Lee. 2011. Eyeing your exposure: quantifying and controlling information sharing for improved privacy. In Proceedings of the Seventh Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security. ACM Press, Pittsburgh, 1–14.

Digital Library

[35]

Krista Siniscarco. 2020. Facilitating remote workshops. Part 1: Best Practices, Experiments, and Lessons Learned. https://uxdesign.cc/facilitating-remote-workshops-c60391cdcaa2

[36]

Anastasia Ushakova. 2020. 10 things about remote facilitation we (AJ&Smart) wish we’d known sooner. https://miro.com/blog/remote-facilitation/

[37]

Kirsikka Vaajakallio and Tuuli Mattelmäki. 2014. Design games in codesign: as a tool, a mindset and a structure. CoDesign 10, 1 (2014), 63–77.

[38]

Wei Wang, Lin Yang, and Qian Zhang. 2016. Touch-and-guard: secure pairing through hand resonance. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. ACM Press, San Jose, USA, 670–681. https://doi.org/10.1145/2971648.2971688

Digital Library

[39]

Christiane Wölfel and Timothy Merritt. 2013. Method Card Design Dimensions: A Survey of Card-Based Design Tools. In Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2013, Paula Kotzé, Gary Marsden, Gitte Lindgaard, Janet Wesson, and Marco Winckler (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 479–486.

Cited By

Gennari RKrik S(2024)Responsible Design of Socio-Technical Solutions with Social Design Students: a Case StudyProceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces10.1145/3656650.3656663(1-9)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3656650.3656663
Delgado Rodriguez SChatterjee PDao Phuong AAlt FMarky K(2024)Do You Need to Touch? Exploring Correlations between Personal Attributes and Preferences for Tangible Privacy MechanismsProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642863(1-23)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642863

Index Terms

A Card-based Ideation Toolkit to Generate Designs for Tangible Privacy Management Tools
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)

Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

Recommendations

Up Close & Personal: Exploring User-preferred Image Schemas for Intuitive Privacy Awareness and Control
TEI '21: Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction

Effective end-user privacy management in everyday ubiquitous computing environments requires giving users complex, contextual information about potential privacy breaches and enabling management of these breaches in a timely, engaging and intuitive ...
Tangible Interactions for Privacy Management
TEI '19: Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction

Due to the ubiquity of IoT devices, privacy violations can now occur across our cyber-physical-social lives. An individual is often not aware of the possible privacy implications of their actions and commonly lacks the ability to dynamically control the ...
Privacy Care: A Tangible Interaction Framework for Privacy Management
Visions Paper, Regular Papers, SI: Blockchain in E-Commerce, and SI: Human-Centered Security, Privacy, and Trust in the Internet of Things

The emergence of ubiquitous computing (UbiComp) environments has increased the risk of undesired access to individuals’ physical space or their information, anytime and anywhere, raising potentially serious privacy concerns. Individuals lack awareness ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

TEI '23: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction

February 2023

709 pages

ISBN:9781450399777

DOI:10.1145/3569009

Copyright © 2023 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 26 February 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Funding Sources

EPSRC

Conference

TEI '23

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

TEI '23: Seventeenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction

February 26 - March 1, 2023

Warsaw, Poland

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 393 of 1,367 submissions, 29%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

1
Total Citations
View Citations
720
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)359
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)32

Reflects downloads up to 07 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Gennari RKrik S(2024)Responsible Design of Socio-Technical Solutions with Social Design Students: a Case StudyProceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces10.1145/3656650.3656663(1-9)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3656650.3656663
Delgado Rodriguez SChatterjee PDao Phuong AAlt FMarky K(2024)Do You Need to Touch? Exploring Correlations between Personal Attributes and Preferences for Tangible Privacy MechanismsProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642863(1-23)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642863

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten