research-article

It Is All About Criticism: Understanding the Effect of Social Media Discourse on Legal Crowdfunding Campaigns

Authors:

Brittany R.L. Duff,

Karrie KarahaliosAuthors Info & Claims

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Volume 7, Issue CSCW1

Article No.: 67, Pages 1 - 37

https://doi.org/10.1145/3579500

Published: 16 April 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Legal crowdfunding is an emerging domain where lawyers and individuals raise funds to fight legal actions. To study how prospective donors can verify the credibility of legal campaigns, we analyzed the conversations surrounding these campaigns on Facebook. We discovered three primary themes associated with the perceptions of the contributors of legal campaigns: supporters posting admiring and appreciative comments, supporters posting critical and disapproving comments, and opponents posting critical and disapproving comments. We observed that while supporters criticized campaigns' opponents, biased media, and dishonest authorities, opponents criticized campaign owners, campaigns' objectives and opaque logistics. To understand the impact of these perspectives on donors, we followed up with an online survey study where we presented a legal campaign with its corresponding social media conversations. We found that critical comments impacted donation decisions more than appreciative comments. We concluded with design implications to better support potential donors to make more informed donation decisions.

References

[1]

2020. Retrieved from BBB Wise Giving Alliance. https://www.give.org/.

[2]

2021. Retrieved from Charity Navigator: Your Guide to Intelligent giving. https://www.charitynavigator.org/.

[3]

2021. Retrieved from Compassion. https://www.compassion.com/.

[4]

NVivo 12. 2020. https://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo-qualitative-data-analysis-software/home.

[5]

Ajay K Agrawal, Christian Catalini, and Avi Goldfarb. 2011. The geography of crowdfunding. Technical Report. National bureau of economic research.

[6]

Mike Allen. 1991. Meta-analysis comparing the persuasiveness of one-sided and two-sided messages. Western Journal of Speech Communication 55, 4 (1991), 390--404.

[7]

Bobby Allyn and Tamara Keith. 2021. Twitter Permanently Suspends Trump, Citing 'Risk Of Further Incitement Of Violence'. https://www.npr.org/2021/01/08/954760928/twitter-bans-president-trump-citing-risk-of-further-incitement-of-violence.

[8]

Tim Althoff and Jure Leskovec. 2015. Donor retention in online crowdfunding communities: A case study of donorschoose. org. In Proceedings of the 24th international conference on world wide web. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 34--44.

Digital Library

[9]

Afsaneh Bagheri, Hasti Chitsazan, and Ashkan Ebrahimi. 2019. Crowdfunding motivations: A focus on donors' perspectives. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 146 (2019), 218--232.

[10]

Maansi Bansal-Travers, David Hammond, Philip Smith, and K Michael Cummings. 2011. The impact of cigarette pack design, descriptors, and warning labels on risk perception in the US. American journal of preventive medicine 40, 6 (2011), 674--682.

[11]

Richard F Beltramini. 1988. Perceived believability of warning label information presented in cigarette advertising. Journal of Advertising 17, 2 (1988), 26--32.

[12]

David M Blei, Andrew Y Ng, and Michael I Jordan. 2003. Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of machine Learning research 3, Jan (2003), 993--1022.

Digital Library

[13]

Olga Boginskaya. 2020. The Simplification of Jury Instructions: Legal-Lay Interactions in Jury Trials. ESP Today 8, 2 (2020), 297--318.

[14]

Chris Boian. 2019. UNHCR Ambassador Ben Stiller tells U.S. Congress: Syrian refugees still need support. https://www.unhcr.org/en-us/news/latest/2019/5/5cd2fb074/unhcr-ambassador-ben-stiller-tells-congress-syrian-refugees-still-need.html.

[15]

Nicola A Boothe-Perry. 2014. Friends of justice: Does social media impact the public perception of the justice system. Pace L. Rev. 35 (2014), 72.

[16]

Irma Borst, Christine Moser, and Julie Ferguson. 2018. From friendfunding to crowdfunding: Relevance of relationships, social media, and platform activities to crowdfunding performance. new media & society 20, 4 (2018), 1396--1414.

[17]

Jennifer K Bosson, Amber B Johnson, Kate Niederhoffer, and William B Swann Jr. 2006. Interpersonal chemistry through negativity: Bonding by sharing negative attitudes about others. Personal Relationships 13, 2 (2006), 135--150.

[18]

Rowena L Briones, Beth Kuch, Brooke Fisher Liu, and Yan Jin. 2011. Keeping up with the digital age: How the American Red Cross uses social media to build relationships. Public relations review 37, 1 (2011), 37--43.

[19]

Amy Bruckman. 2002. Studying the amateur artist: A perspective on disguising data collected in human subjects research on the Internet. Ethics and Information Technology 4, 3 (2002), 217--231.

Digital Library

[20]

Gordon Burtch, Anindya Ghose, and Sunil Wattal. 2013. Cultural differences and geography as determinants of online pro-social lending. MIS Quarterly, Forthcoming (2013), 14--021.

[21]

Miguel Carvajal, José A García-Avilés, and José L González. 2012. Crowdfunding and non-profit media: The emergence of new models for public interest journalism. Journalism Practice 6, 5--6 (2012), 638--647.

[22]

Carlos Castillo, Marcelo Mendoza, and Barbara Poblete. 2011. Information credibility on twitter. In Proceedings of the 20th international conference on World wide web. 675--684.

Digital Library

[23]

Joseph Chee Chang, Saleema Amershi, and Ece Kamar. 2017. Revolt: Collaborative crowdsourcing for labeling machine learning datasets. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2334--2346.

Digital Library

[24]

Joseph Chee Chang, Aniket Kittur, and Nathan Hahn. 2016. Alloy: Clustering with crowds and computation. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 3180--3191.

Digital Library

[25]

Robert P Charrow and Veda R Charrow. 1979. Making legal language understandable: A psycholinguistic study of jury instructions. Columbia law review 79, 7 (1979), 1306--1374.

[26]

Pei-Yu Chen, Samita Dhanasobhon, and Michael D Smith. 2008. All reviews are not created equal: The disaggregate impact of reviews and reviewers at amazon. com. Com (May 2008) (2008).

[27]

Todd A Collins and Christopher A Cooper. 2012. Case salience and media coverage of Supreme Court decisions: Toward a new measure. Political Research Quarterly 65, 2 (2012), 396--407.

[28]

Sanorita Dey, Brittany Duff, Karrie Karahalios, and Wai-Tat Fu. 2017. The art and science of persuasion: not all crowdfunding campaign videos are the same. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. ACM, 755--769.

Digital Library

[29]

Qianzhou Du, Weiguo Fan, Zhilei Qiao, Gang Wang, Xuan Zhang, and Mi Zhou. 2015. Money talks: a predictive model on crowdfunding success using project description. (2015).

[30]

Leslie Ellis. 2011. Friend or Foe? Social Media, the Jury and You. http://www.thejuryexpert.com/2011/09/friend-or-foe-social-media-the-jury-and-you/.

[31]

Robert Epstein and Ronald E Robertson. 2015. The search engine manipulation effect (SEME) and its possible impact on the outcomes of elections. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112, 33 (2015), E4512--E4521.

[32]

Robert Epstein, Ronald E Robertson, David Lazer, and Christo Wilson. 2017. Suppressing the search engine manipulation effect (SEME). Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 1, CSCW (2017), 1--22.

Digital Library

[33]

Vincent Etter, Matthias Grossglauser, and Patrick Thiran. 2013. Launch hard or go home! Predicting the success of Kickstarter campaigns. In Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Online Social Networks (COSN'13). ACM, 177--182.

Digital Library

[34]

Alex Feldman. 2014. Niche crowdfunding sites can out-perform Kickstarter - if you choose the right one. https://venturebeat.com/2014/08/10/niche-crowdfunding-sites-can-out-perform-kickstarter-if-you-choose-the-right-one/.

[35]

Brian J Fogg, Jonathan Marshall, Othman Laraki, Alex Osipovich, Chris Varma, Nicholas Fang, Jyoti Paul, Akshay Rangnekar, John Shon, Preeti Swani, et al. 2001. What makes web sites credible? A report on a large quantitative study. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 61--68.

Digital Library

[36]

Brian J Fogg, Cathy Soohoo, David R Danielson, Leslie Marable, Julianne Stanford, and Ellen R Tauber. 2003. How do users evaluate the credibility of Web sites? A study with over 2,500 participants. In Proceedings of the 2003 conference on Designing for user experiences. 1--15.

Digital Library

[37]

Christos Fotopoulos and Athanasios Krystallis. 2003. Quality labels as a marketing advantage. European Journal of marketing (2003).

[38]

Lawrence Meir Friedman and Grant M Hayden. 2017. American law: An introduction. Oxford University Press.

[39]

Frontline. 2005. The trial's significance and lasting impact. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/oj/themes/impact.html.

[40]

Jeff Galak, Deborah Small, and Andrew T Stephen. 2011. Microfinance decision making: A field study of prosocial lending. Journal of Marketing Research 48, SPL (2011), S130--S137.

[41]

Cecilie Gaziano and Kristin McGrath. 1986. Measuring the concept of credibility. Journalism quarterly 63, 3 (1986), 451--462.

[42]

Barney G Glaser, Anselm L Strauss, and Elizabeth Strutzel. 1968. The discovery of grounded theory; strategies for qualitative research. Nursing research 17, 4 (1968), 364.

[43]

Arthur C Graesser, Danielle S McNamara, Max M Louwerse, and Zhiqiang Cai. 2004. Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language. Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers 36, 2 (2004), 193--202.

[44]

Michael D Greenberg, Bryan Pardo, Karthic Hariharan, and Elizabeth Gerber. 2013. Crowdfunding support tools: predicting success & failure. In CHI'13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1815--1820.

Digital Library

[45]

Mark A Gunsch, Sheila Brownlow, Sarah E Haynes, and Zachary Mabe. 2000. Differential forms linguistic content of various of political advertising. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 44, 1 (2000), 27--42.

[46]

Ulrike Hahn, Adam JL Harris, and Adam Corner. 2009. Argument content and argument source: An exploration. Informal Logic 29, 4 (2009), 337--367.

[47]

Benjamin E Hilbig. 2009. Sad, thus true: Negativity bias in judgments of truth. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 45, 4 (2009), 983--986.

[48]

Yili Hong, Yuheng Hu, and Gordon Burtch. 2015. How does social media affect contribution to public versus private goods in crowdfunding campaigns? (2015).

[49]

Philip N Howard, Saiph Savage, Claudia Flores Saviaga, Carlos Toxtli, and Andrés Monroy-Hernández. 2016. Social media, civic engagement, and the slacktivism hypothesis: Lessons from Mexico's ?El Bronco". Journal of International Affairs 70, 1 (2016), 55--73.

[50]

Shuangfa Huang, David Pickernell, Martina Battisti, and Thang Nguyen. 2021. Signalling entrepreneurs' credibility and project quality for crowdfunding success: cases from the Kickstarter and Indiegogo environments. Small Business Economics (2021), 1--21.

[51]

Ting-Hao Huang, Joseph Chee Chang, and Jeffrey P Bigham. 2018. Evorus: A crowd-powered conversational assistant built to automate itself over time. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1--13.

Digital Library

[52]

Julie S Hui, Elizabeth M Gerber, and Darren Gergle. 2014. Understanding and leveraging social networks for crowdfunding: opportunities and challenges. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems. ACM, 677--680.

Digital Library

[53]

Hyesun Hwang and Kee-Ok Kim. 2015. Social media as a tool for social movements: The effect of social media use and social capital on intention to participate in social movements. International Journal of Consumer Studies 39, 5 (2015), 478--488.

[54]

Sungwook Hwang. 2010. The effect of charitable giving by celebrities on the personal public relations. Public Relations Review 36, 3 (2010), 313--315.

[55]

William G. Thomas III. 2004. Television News and the Civil Rights Struggle: The Views in Virginia and Mississippi. https://southernspaces.org/2004/television-news-and-civil-rights-struggle-views-virginia-and-mississippi/.

[56]

Nabil Jeddi. 2010. The Impact of Label Perception on the Consumers' Purchase Intention: An application on food products. IBIMA business review (2010).

[57]

Dieter Joenssen, Anne Michaelis, and Thomas Müllerleile. 2014. A link to new product preannouncement: Success factors in crowdfunding. Available at SSRN 2476841 (2014).

[58]

Curtis EA Karnow. 2015. Complexity in Litigation: A Differential Diagnosis. U. Pa. J. Bus. L. 18 (2015), 1.

[59]

Jennifer G Kim, Ha Kyung Kong, Karrie Karahalios, Wai-Tat Fu, and Hwajung Hong. 2016. The power of collective endorsements: credibility factors in medical crowdfunding campaigns. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 4538--4549.

Digital Library

[60]

Aniket Kittur, Bongwon Suh, and Ed H Chi. 2008. Can you ever trust a Wiki? Impacting perceived trustworthiness in Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. 477--480.

Digital Library

[61]

Travis Kriplean, Jonathan Morgan, Deen Freelon, Alan Borning, and Lance Bennett. 2012. Supporting reflective public thought with considerit. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. 265--274.

Digital Library

[62]

Tianyi Li, Kurt Luther, and Chris North. 2018. Crowdia: Solving mysteries with crowdsourced sensemaking. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW (2018), 1--29.

Digital Library

[63]

Q Vera Liao and Wai-Tat Fu. 2014. Can you hear me now? Mitigating the echo chamber effect by source position indicators. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing. 184--196.

[64]

Q Vera Liao and Wai-Tat Fu. 2014. Expert voices in echo chambers: effects of source expertise indicators on exposure to diverse opinions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2745--2754.

Digital Library

[65]

Lili Liu, Ayoung Suh, and Christian Wagner. 2018. Empathy or perceived credibility? An empirical study on individual donation behavior in charitable crowdfunding. Internet Research (2018).

[66]

The Legal Services Corporation (LSC). 2017. Justice Gap Report: Measuring the Civil Legal Needs of Low-income Americans. https://www.lsc.gov/media-center/publications/2017-justice-gap-report.

[67]

Chun-Ta Lu, Sihong Xie, Xiangnan Kong, and Philip S Yu. 2014. Inferring the impacts of social media on crowdfunding. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM international conference on Web search and data mining. ACM, 573--582.

Digital Library

[68]

Virginia Mayo. 2019. Exploring the Possibility of Crowdfunding for Lawyers. https://www.biggerlawfirm.com/exploring-the-possibility-of-crowdfunding-for-lawyers/.

[69]

Miriam J Metzger. 2007. Making sense of credibility on the Web: Models for evaluating online information and recommendations for future research. Journal of the American society for information science and technology 58, 13 (2007), 2078--2091.

Digital Library

[70]

Philip Meyer. 1988. Defining and measuring credibility of newspapers: Developing an index. Journalism quarterly 65, 3 (1988), 567--574.

[71]

Tanushree Mitra and Eric Gilbert. 2014. The language that gets people to give: Phrases that predict success on kickstarter. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing. ACM, 49--61.

Digital Library

[72]

Tanushree Mitra, Clayton J Hutto, and Eric Gilbert. 2015. Comparing person-and process-centric strategies for obtaining quality data on amazon mechanical turk. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1345--1354.

Digital Library

[73]

Alexey Moisseyev. 2013. Effect of social media on crowdfunding project results. (2013).

[74]

Ethan Mollick. 2012. The dynamics of crowdfunding: Determinants of success and failure. Journal of Business Venturing 29, 1 (2012), 1--16.

[75]

Ethan Mollick. 2014. The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. Journal of business venturing 29, 1 (2014), 1--16.

[76]

Mainack Mondal, Leandro Araújo Silva, and Fabrício Benevenuto. 2017. A measurement study of hate speech in social media. In Proceedings of the 28th acm conference on hypertext and social media. 85--94.

Digital Library

[77]

Meredith Ringel Morris, Scott Counts, Asta Roseway, Aaron Hoff, and Julia Schwarz. 2012. Tweeting is believing? Understanding microblog credibility perceptions. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on computer supported cooperative work. 441--450.

Digital Library

[78]

Garrett Morrow, Briony Swire-Thompson, Jessica Montgomery Polny, Matthew Kopec, and John P Wihbey. 2021. The emerging science of content labeling: Contextualizing social media content moderation. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (2021).

[79]

Michael Muller, Werner Geyer, Todd Soule, Steven Daniels, and Li-Te Cheng. 2013. Crowdfunding inside the enterprise: employee-initiatives for innovation and collaboration. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, 503--512.

Digital Library

[80]

Monty Munford. 2017. After Disrupting Brexit, Crowdfunding And CrowdJustice Come To The US. https://www.forbes.com/sites/montymunford/2017/02/28/after-disrupting-brexit-crowdfunding-and-crowdjustice-come-to-the-us/'sh=635fca092.

[81]

Sean A Munson, Stephanie Y Lee, and Paul Resnick. 2013. Encouraging reading of diverse political viewpoints with a browser widget. In Seventh international aaai conference on weblogs and social media.

[82]

Sean A Munson and Paul Resnick. 2010. Presenting diverse political opinions: how and how much. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1457--1466.

Digital Library

[83]

Sean Nevin, Rob Gleasure, Philip O'Reilly, Joseph Feller, Shanping Li, and Jerry Cristoforo. 2017. Social identity and social media activities in equity crowdfunding. In Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Open Collaboration. 1--8.

Digital Library

[84]

United States Southern District of California. [n.d.]. Juror Qualification Questionnaire. https://www.casd.uscourts.gov/jurors/juror-qualification-questionnaire.aspx.

[85]

James RP Ogloff and Neil Vidmar. 1994. The impact of pretrial publicity on jurors. Law and Human Behavior 18, 5 (1994), 507--525.

[86]

Souneil Park, Seungwoo Kang, Sangyoung Chung, and Junehwa Song. 2009. NewsCube: delivering multiple aspects of news to mitigate media bias. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 443--452.

Digital Library

[87]

Nikhlesh Pathik and Pragya Shukla. 2020. Simulated annealing based algorithm for tuning LDA hyper parameters. In Soft Computing: Theories and Applications. Springer, 515--521.

[88]

Richard E Petty and John T Cacioppo. 1984. The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality: Central and peripheral routes to persuasion. Journal of personality and social psychology 46, 1 (1984), 69.

[89]

Nicholas Proferes. 2017. Information flow solipsism in an exploratory study of beliefs about Twitter. Social Media Society 3, 1 (2017), 2056305117698493.

[90]

Vahed Qazvinian, Emily Rosengren, Dragomir Radev, and Qiaozhu Mei. 2011. Rumor has it: Identifying misinformation in microblogs. In Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 1589--1599.

[91]

Vineeth Rakesh, Jaegul Choo, and Chandan K Reddy. 2015. Project recommendation using heterogeneous traits in crowdfunding. In Ninth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.

[92]

Halim Rane and Sumra Salem. 2012. Social media, social movements and the diffusion of ideas in the Arab uprisings. Journal of international communication 18, 1 (2012), 97--111.

[93]

P.A. Robert Watkins & Company. 2021. Roger Stone Legal Defense Fund. https://stonedefensefund.com/.

[94]

Donald F Roberts. 1998. Media content labeling systems: Informational advisories or judgmental restrictions. The V-chip debate: Content filtering from television to the Internet (1998), 157--177.

[95]

Janell Ross. 2017. Want to help fight legal battles? There's a crowdfunding site for that. https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/want-to-help-fight-legal-battles-theres-a-crowdfunding-site-for-that/2017/02/10/a7fcb7f2-ec90--11e6-b7e8-df81bd6c4c30_story.html.

[96]

Yoel Roth and Nick Pickles. 2020. Updating our approach to misleading information. https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/topics/product/2020/updating-our-approach-to-misleading-information.

[97]

Eva Sharma, Koustuv Saha, Sindhu Kiranmai Ernala, Sucheta Ghoshal, and Munmun De Choudhury. 2017. Analyzing ideological discourse on social media: A case study of the abortion debate. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference of The Computational Social Science Society of the Americas. 1--8.

Digital Library

[98]

Radhika Sharma, Shirin Alavi, and Vandana Ahuja. 2017. Generating trust using Facebook-A study of 5 online apparel brands. Procedia computer science 122 (2017), 42--49.

[99]

Rachel A Simmons, Peter C Gordon, and Dianne L Chambless. 2005. Pronouns in marital interaction: What do ?you" and ?I" say about marital health? Psychological science 16, 12 (2005), 932--936.

[100]

Lauren Sudeall and Darcy Meals. 2017. Every year, millions try to navigate US courts without a lawyer. https://theconversation.com/every-year-millions-try-to-navigate-us-courts-without-a-lawyer-84159.

[101]

Sophie Tatum. 2018. Stormy Daniels crowdfunding her legal fees in suit against Trump. https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/14/politics/stormy-daniels-crowd-fund-legal-fees/index.html.

[102]

Yla R Tausczik and James W Pennebaker. 2010. The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of language and social psychology 29, 1 (2010), 24--54.

[103]

Kjerstin Thorson, Emily Vraga, and Brian Ekdale. 2010. Credibility in context: How uncivil online commentary affects news credibility. Mass Communication and Society 13, 3 (2010), 289--313.

[104]

Ilya Tirdatov. 2014. Web-based crowd funding: Rhetoric of success. Technical Communication 61, 1 (2014), 3--24.

[105]

Jason Turcotte, Chance York, Jacob Irving, Rosanne M Scholl, and Raymond J Pingree. 2015. News recommendations from social media opinion leaders: Effects on media trust and information seeking. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 20, 5 (2015), 520--535.

Digital Library

[106]

Holly Urban. 2019. How Crowdfunding Can Revolutionize Access to Justice. https://www.lawtechnologytoday.org/2019/07/crowdfunding-can-revolutionize-access-to-justice/.

[107]

"árka Velcovská, Giacomo Del Chiappa, et al . 2015. The food quality labels: Awareness and willingness to pay in the context of the Czech Republic. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis 63, 2 (2015), 647--658.

[108]

Iris Vessey. 1991. Cognitive fit: A theory-based analysis of the graphs versus tables literature. Decision sciences 22, 2 (1991), 219--240.

[109]

Mark Douglas West. 1994. Validating a scale for the measurement of credibility: A covariance structure modeling approach. Journalism quarterly 71, 1 (1994), 159--168.

[110]

Anbang Xu, Xiao Yang, Huaming Rao, Wai-Tat Fu, Shih-Wen Huang, and Brian P Bailey. 2014. Show me the money!: an analysis of project updates during crowdfunding campaigns. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, 591--600.

Digital Library

[111]

Amy X Zhang, Lea Verou, and David Karger. 2017. Wikum: Bridging discussion forums and wikis using recursive summarization. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 2082--2096.

Digital Library

[112]

Philip G Zimbardo. 1969. The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order versus deindividuation, impulse, and chaos. In Nebraska symposium on motivation. University of Nebraska press.

Cited By

Firdaus SNaila NPramesti ASari CAzzahra DAngela D(2023)Tiktok Sebagai Media Sosial dalam Melakukan Kritik terhadap Pembangunan di LampungIndonesian Journal of Social Development10.47134/jsd.v1i2.18821:2Online publication date: 12-Oct-2023
https://doi.org/10.47134/jsd.v1i2.1882

Index Terms

It Is All About Criticism: Understanding the Effect of Social Media Discourse on Legal Crowdfunding Campaigns
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Collaborative and social computing
    1. Empirical studies in collaborative and social computing
  2. Human computer interaction (HCI)
    1. Empirical studies in HCI

Recommendations

Discovering Temporal Retweeting Patterns for Social Media Marketing Campaigns
ICDM '14: Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining

Social media has become one of the most popular marketing channels for many companies, which aims at maximizing their influence by various marketing campaigns conducted from their official accounts on social networks. However, most of these marketing ...
Understanding and Identifying Advocates for Political Campaigns on Social Media
WSDM '16: Proceedings of the Ninth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining

Social media is increasingly being used to access and disseminate information on sociopolitical issues like gun rights and general elections. The popularity and openness of social media makes it conducive for some individuals, known as advocates, who ...
Social Media and Presidential Campaigns – Preliminary Results of the 2018 Brazilian Presidential Election
dg.o '19: Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research

The use of social media within modern political activities is a new phenomenon that reshapes election races and the way in which politicians communicate with voters. During the last presidential campaign in Brazil, the elected candidate had almost no ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction Volume 7, Issue CSCW1

CSCW

April 2023

3836 pages

EISSN:2573-0142

DOI:10.1145/3593053

Editor:
Jeff Nichols
Google

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © 2023 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 16 April 2023

Published in PACMHCI Volume 7, Issue CSCW1

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

1
Total Citations
View Citations
111
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)75
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4

Reflects downloads up to 11 Aug 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Firdaus SNaila NPramesti ASari CAzzahra DAngela D(2023)Tiktok Sebagai Media Sosial dalam Melakukan Kritik terhadap Pembangunan di LampungIndonesian Journal of Social Development10.47134/jsd.v1i2.18821:2Online publication date: 12-Oct-2023
https://doi.org/10.47134/jsd.v1i2.1882

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents