Cited By
View all- Güner SCebeci HAydemir E(2023)How popular is a topic on social media? A multi-criteria decision-making framework based on user engagementKybernetes10.1108/K-05-2023-0884Online publication date: 16-Oct-2023
Twitter has a Binary Privacy Setting, are Users Aware of How It Works?
Article No.: 104, Pages 1 - 18
Abstract
Twitter accounts are public by default, but Twitter gives the option to create protected accounts, where only approved followers can see their tweets. The publicly visible information changes based on the account type and the visibility of tweets also depends solely on the poster's account type which can cause unintended disclosures especially when users interact. We surveyed 336 Twitter users to understand users' awareness of account information visibility, as well as the tweet visibility when users interact. We find that our participants are aware of the visibility of their profile information and individual tweets. However, the visibility of followed topics, lists, and interactions with protected accounts is confusing. Only 31% of the participants were aware that a reply by a public account to a protected account's tweet would be publicly visible. Surprisingly, having a protected account does not result in a better understanding of the account information or tweet visibility.
References
[1]
Abeer Aldayel and Walid Magdy. 2019. Your Stance is Exposed! Analysing Possible Factors for Stance Detection on Social Media. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 3, CSCW (2019), 1--20.
[2]
Irwin Altman. 1976. A conceptual analysis. Environment and behavior, Vol. 8, 1 (1976), 7--29.
[3]
Nazanin Andalibi and Andrea Forte. 2018. Announcing pregnancy loss on Facebook: A decision-making framework for stigmatized disclosures on identified social network sites. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--14.
[4]
Nazanin Andalibi, Oliver L Haimson, Munmun De Choudhury, and Andrea Forte. 2016. Understanding social media disclosures of sexual abuse through the lenses of support seeking and anonymity. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 3906--3918.
[5]
Miriam Bartsch and Tobias Dienlin. 2016. Control your Facebook: An analysis of online privacy literacy. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 56 (2016), 147--154.
[6]
Eric PS Baumer, Phil Adams, Vera D Khovanskaya, Tony C Liao, Madeline E Smith, Victoria Schwanda Sosik, and Kaiton Williams. 2013. Limiting, leaving, and (re) lapsing: an exploration of facebook non-use practices and experiences. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, 3257--3266.
[7]
Michael S Bernstein, Eytan Bakshy, Moira Burke, and Brian Karrer. 2013. Quantifying the invisible audience in social networks. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, 21--30.
[8]
Danah Boyd. 2012. Networked privacy. Surveillance & society, Vol. 10, 3/4 (2012), 348.
[9]
Petter Bae Brandtzaeg and Marika Lüders. 2018. Time collapse in social media: extending the context collapse. Social Media Society, Vol. 4, 1 (2018), 2056305118763349.
[10]
Moritz Büchi, Natascha Just, and Michael Latzer. 2017. Caring is not enough: the importance of Internet skills for online privacy protection. Information, Communication & Society, Vol. 20, 8 (2017), 1261--1278.
[11]
SoeYoon Choi. 2022. Privacy Literacy on Social Media: Its Predictors and Outcomes. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction (2022), 1--16.
[12]
Sauvik Das and Adam Kramer. 2013. Self-censorship on Facebook. In Seventh international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media.
[13]
Bernhard Debatin, Jennette P Lovejoy, Ann-Kathrin Horn, and Brittany N Hughes. 2009. Facebook and online privacy: Attitudes, behaviors, and unintended consequences. Journal of computer-mediated communication, Vol. 15, 1 (2009), 83--108.
[14]
Statista Research Department. 2021a. Distribution of Twitter users worldwide as of July 2021, by age. https://www.statista.com/statistics/283119/age-distribution-of-global-twitter-users/ Retrieved Sep 4, 2021 from
[15]
Statista Research Department. 2021b. Distribution of Twitter users worldwide as of July 2021, by gender. https://www.statista.com/statistics/828092/distribution-of-users-on-twitter-worldwide-gender/ Retrieved Sep 4, 2021 from
[16]
Brianna Dym and Casey Fiesler. 2018. Vulnerable and online: Fandom's case for stronger privacy norms and tools. In Companion of the 2018 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 329--332.
[17]
Casey Fiesler, Michaelanne Dye, Jessica L Feuston, Chaya Hiruncharoenvate, Clayton J Hutto, Shannon Morrison, Parisa Khanipour Roshan, Umashanthi Pavalanathan, Amy S Bruckman, Munmun De Choudhury, et al. 2017. What (or who) is public?: Privacy settings and social media content sharing. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. ACM, 567--580.
[18]
John Fox. 2002. An R and S-Plus Companion to Applied Regression. Sage.
[19]
Sukeshini A Grandhi, Linda Plotnick, and Starr Roxanne Hiltz. 2019. Do I Stay or Do I Go? Motivations and Decision Making in Social Media Non-use and Reversion. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 3, GROUP (2019), 1--27.
[20]
Thilo Hagendorff. 2018. Privacy literacy and its problems. Journal of Information Ethics, Vol. 27, 2 (2018), 127.
[21]
Roberto Hoyle, Srijita Das, Apu Kapadia, Adam J. Lee, and Kami Vaniea. 2017. Viewing the Viewers: Publishers' Desires and Viewers' Privacy Concerns in Social Networks. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW). 555--566.
[22]
Xiaoyun Huang, Jessica Vitak, and Yla Tausczik. 2020. " You Don't Have To Know My Past": How WeChat Moments Users Manage Their Evolving Self-Presentation. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--13.
[23]
Prachi Jain, Paridhi Jain, and Ponnurangam Kumaraguru. 2013. Call me maybe: Understanding nature and risks of sharing mobile numbers on online social networks. In Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Online social networks. ACM, 101--106.
[24]
Maritza Johnson, Serge Egelman, and Steven M Bellovin. 2012. Facebook and privacy: it's complicated. In Proceedings of the eighth symposium on usable privacy and security. 1--15.
[25]
Yumi Jung and Emilee Rader. 2016. The imagined audience and privacy concern on Facebook: Differences between producers and consumers. Social media society, Vol. 2, 2 (2016), 2056305116644615.
[26]
David Jurgens, Yulia Tsvetkov, and Dan Jurafsky. 2017. Writer profiling without the writer's text. In International Conference on Social Informatics. Springer, 537--558.
[27]
Ruogu Kang, Stephanie Brown, Laura Dabbish, and Sara Kiesler. 2014. Privacy Attitudes of Mechanical Turk Workers and the U.S. Public. In Symposium On Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS '14). 37--49.
[28]
Dilara Keküllüoug lu, Walid Magdy, and Kami Vaniea. 2022a. From an Authentication Question to a Public Social Event: Characterizing Birthday Sharing on Twitter. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Vol. 16. 488--499.
[29]
Dilara Keküllüoug lu, Kami Vaniea, and Walid Magdy. 2022b. Understanding Privacy Switching Behaviour on Twitter. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--14.
[30]
Dilara Keküllüouglu, Walid Magdy, and Kami Vaniea. 2020. Analysing privacy leakage of life events on twitter. In 12th ACM Conference on Web Science. 287--294.
[31]
Cliff Lampe, Jessica Vitak, and Nicole Ellison. 2013. Users and nonusers: Interactions between levels of adoption and social capital. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work. 809--820.
[32]
Hai Liang, Fei Shen, and King-wa Fu. 2017. Privacy protection and self-disclosure across societies: A study of global Twitter users. new media & society, Vol. 19, 9 (2017), 1476--1497.
[33]
E. Lieberman and R.C. Miller. 2007. Facemail: showing faces of recipients to prevent misdirected email. In Proceedings of the 3rd symposium on Usable privacy and security. ACM, 122--131.
[34]
Yabing Liu, Krishna P Gummadi, Balachander Krishnamurthy, and Alan Mislove. 2011. Analyzing facebook privacy settings: user expectations vs. reality. In Proceedings of the 2011 ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement conference. 61--70.
[35]
Yabing Liu, Chloe Kliman-Silver, and Alan Mislove. 2014. The tweets they are a-changin': Evolution of Twitter users and behavior. In Eighth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.
[36]
Riemer Hess LLC. 2020. Is Your Disability Insurer Monitoring Your Social Media? [Insider Tips]. https://www.riemerhess.com/wiki/top-5-ways-social-media-can-hurt-your-long-term-disability-claim Retrieved July 4, 2022 from
[37]
Michelle Madejski, Maritza Lupe Johnson, and Steven Michael Bellovin. 2011. The failure of online social network privacy settings. (2011).
[38]
Merja Mahrt, Katrin Weller, and Isabella Peters. 2014. Twitter in scholarly communication. Twitter and society, Vol. 89 (2014), 399--410.
[39]
Huina Mao, Xin Shuai, and Apu Kapadia. 2011. Loose tweets: an analysis of privacy leaks on twitter. In Proceedings of the 10th annual ACM workshop on Privacy in the electronic society. ACM, 1--12.
[40]
Alice E Marwick and Danah Boyd. 2011. I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New media & society, Vol. 13, 1 (2011), 114--133.
[41]
Alice E Marwick and Danah Boyd. 2014. Networked privacy: How teenagers negotiate context in social media. New media & society, Vol. 16, 7 (2014), 1051--1067.
[42]
Brendan Meeder, Jennifer Tam, Patrick Gage Kelley, and Lorrie Faith Cranor. 2010. RT@ IWantPrivacy: Widespread violation of privacy settings in the Twitter social network. In Proceedings of the Web, Vol. 2. 1--2.
[43]
Tim Mitchell. 2019. How is social media used to commit fraud? https://www.cifas.org.uk/insight/fraud-risk-focus-blog/how-is-social-media-used-to-commit-fraud Retrieved June 28, 2022 from
[44]
Mainack Mondal, Johnnatan Messias, Saptarshi Ghosh, Krishna P Gummadi, and Aniket Kate. 2016. Forgetting in social media: Understanding and controlling longitudinal exposure of socially shared data. In Twelfth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security ($$SOUPS$$ 2016). 287--299.
[45]
Helen Nissenbaum. 2009. Privacy in context: Technology, policy, and the integrity of social life. Stanford University Press.
[46]
Yong Jin Park and S Mo Jang. 2014. Understanding privacy knowledge and skill in mobile communication. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 38 (2014), 296--303.
[47]
Sarah Perez. 2018. 6 million users had installed third-party Twitter clients. https://techcrunch.com/2018/08/17/6-million-users-had-installed-third-party-twitter-clients Retrieved June 30, 2022 from
[48]
Sandra Petronio. 2015. Communication privacy management theory. The International Encyclopedia of Interpersonal Communication (2015), 1--9.
[49]
Nicholas Proferes. 2017. Information flow solipsism in an exploratory study of beliefs about Twitter. Social Media Society, Vol. 3, 1 (2017), 2056305117698493.
[50]
Yasmeen Rashidi, Apu Kapadia, Christena Nippert-Eng, and Norman Makoto Su. 2020. "It's easier than causing confrontation": Sanctioning Strategies to Maintain Social Norms and Privacy on Social Media. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 4, CSCW1 (2020), 1--25.
[51]
Emma Remy. 2019. How public and private Twitter users in the U.S. compare - and why it might matter for your research. https://medium.com/pew-research-center-decoded/how-public-and-private-twitter-users-in-the-u-s-d536ce2a41b3 Retrieved Sep 15, 2020 from
[52]
Elizabeth Rivelli. 2022. Your social media could affect your insurance rates. https://www.coverage.com/insurance/status-update-your-social-media-activity-could-affect-your-insurance-rates-more/ Retrieved May 12, 2022 from
[53]
Corina Sas, Steve Whittaker, Steven Dow, Jodi Forlizzi, and John Zimmerman. 2014. Generating implications for design through design research. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1971--1980.
[54]
Cornelia Sindermann, Helena Sophia Schmitt, Frank Kargl, Cornelia Herbert, and Christian Montag. 2021. Online privacy literacy and online privacy behavior--the role of crystallized intelligence and personality. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 37, 15 (2021), 1455--1466.
[55]
Manya Sleeper, Rebecca Balebako, Sauvik Das, Amber Lynn McConahy, Jason Wiese, and Lorrie Faith Cranor. 2013a. The post that wasn't: exploring self-censorship on facebook. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work. 793--802.
[56]
Manya Sleeper, Justin Cranshaw, Patrick Gage Kelley, Blase Ur, Alessandro Acquisti, Lorrie Faith Cranor, and Norman Sadeh. 2013b. " I read my Twitter the next morning and was astonished" a conversational perspective on Twitter regrets. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 3277--3286.
[57]
Katherine Strater and Heather Richter Lipford. 2008. Strategies and struggles with privacy in an online social networking community. People and Computers XXII Culture, Creativity, Interaction 22 (2008), 111--119.
[58]
Fred Stutzman, Robert Capra, and Jamila Thompson. 2011. Factors mediating disclosure in social network sites. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 27, 1 (2011), 590--598.
[59]
Frederic Stutzman and Woodrow Hartzog. 2012. Boundary regulation in social media. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on computer supported cooperative work. 769--778.
[60]
Sue Yeon Syn and Sanghee Oh. 2015. Why do social network site users share information on Facebook and Twitter? Journal of Information Science, Vol. 41, 5 (2015), 553--569.
[61]
Brendan Van Alsenoy, Valerie Verdoodt, Rob Heyman, Ellen Wauters, Jef Ausloos, and Günes Acar. 2015. From social media service to advertising network: a critical analysis of Facebook's Revised Policies and Terms. (2015).
[62]
Alexander JAM Van Deursen, Jan AGM Van Dijk, and Oscar Peters. 2011. Rethinking Internet skills: The contribution of gender, age, education, Internet experience, and hours online to medium-and content-related Internet skills. Poetics, Vol. 39, 2 (2011), 125--144.
[63]
Kami Vaniea, Lujo Bauer, Lorrie Faith Cranor, and Michael K. Reiter. 2012. Out of sight, out of mind: Effects of displaying access-control information near the item it controls. In PST 2012: Conference on Privacy, Security, and Trust.
[64]
Jessica Vitak. 2012. The impact of context collapse and privacy on social network site disclosures. Journal of broadcasting & electronic media, Vol. 56, 4 (2012), 451--470.
[65]
Jessica Vitak, Stacy Blasiola, Sameer Patil, and Eden Litt. 2015. Balancing audience and privacy tensions on social network sites: Strategies of highly engaged users. International Journal of Communication, Vol. 9 (2015), 20.
[66]
Kurt Wagner. 2021. Twitter Plans New Privacy Tools to Get More People Tweeting. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-09-02/twitter-plans-new-privacy-features-to-get-more-people-tweeting Retrieved Sep 4, 2021 from
[67]
Yang Wang, Gregory Norcie, Saranga Komanduri, Alessandro Acquisti, Pedro Giovanni Leon, and Lorrie Faith Cranor. 2011. " I regretted the minute I pressed share" a qualitative study of regrets on Facebook. In Proceedings of the seventh symposium on usable privacy and security. 1--16.
[68]
Stefan Wojcik and Adam Hughes. 2019. Sizing up Twitter users. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center (2019).
Index Terms
- Twitter has a Binary Privacy Setting, are Users Aware of How It Works?
Recommendations
Understanding Privacy Switching Behaviour on Twitter
CHI '22: Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsChanging a Twitter account’s privacy setting between public and protected changes the visibility of past tweets. By inspecting the privacy setting of more than 100K Twitter users over 3 months, we noticed that over 40% of those users changed their ...
Analysing Privacy Leakage of Life Events on Twitter
WebSci '20: Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Web SciencePeople share a wide variety of information on Twitter, including the events in their lives, without understanding the size of their audience. While some of these events can be considered harmless such as getting a new pet, some of them can be sensitive ...
Discovery of Interesting Users in Twitter by Overlapping Propagation Paths of Retweets
WI-IAT '12: Proceedings of the The 2012 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology - Volume 03In recent years, social networking services have come into wide use to people. Especially, one of micro blog services, Twitter is a significant service. Twitter user gets information by following other users whose tweets match his interest. Retweet is ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
Copyright © 2023 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 16 April 2023
Published in PACMHCI Volume 7, Issue CSCW1
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Funding Sources
- EPSRC DTA Award
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- View Citations1Total Citations
- 137Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)93
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)8
Reflects downloads up to 04 Oct 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
Cited By
View all- Güner SCebeci HAydemir E(2023)How popular is a topic on social media? A multi-criteria decision-making framework based on user engagementKybernetes10.1108/K-05-2023-0884Online publication date: 16-Oct-2023
View Options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in