Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3583780.3615049acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Search-Efficient Computerized Adaptive Testing

Published: 21 October 2023 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT) arises as a promising personalized test mode in online education, targeting at revealing students' latent knowledge state by selecting test items adaptively. The item selection strategy is the core component of CAT, which searches for the best suitable test item based on students' current estimated ability at each test step. However, existing selection strategies behave in a brute-force manner, which results in the time complexity being linear to the number of items (N) in the item pool, i.e., O(N). Thus, in reality, the search latency becomes the bottleneck for CAT with a large-scale item pool. To this end, we propose a Search-Efficient Computerized Adaptive Testing framework (SECAT), which aims at enhancing CAT with an efficient selection strategy. Specifically, SECAT contains two main phases: item pool indexing and item search. In the item pool indexing phase, we apply a student-aware spatial partition method on the item pool to divide the test items into many sub-spaces, considering the adaptability of test items. In the item search phase, we optimize the traditional single-round search strategy with the asymptotic theory and propose a multi-round search strategy that can further improve the time efficiency. Compared with existing strategies, the time complexity of SECAT decreases from O(N) to O(logN). Across two real-world datasets, SECAT achieves over 200x speed up with negligible accuracy degradation.

    References

    [1]
    Jon Louis Bentley. 1975. Multidimensional binary search trees used for associative searching. Commun. ACM, Vol. 18, 9 (1975), 509--517.
    [2]
    Haoyang Bi, Haiping Ma, Zhenya Huang, Yu Yin, Qi Liu, Enhong Chen, Yu Su, and Shijin Wang. 2020. Quality meets diversity: A model-agnostic framework for computerized adaptive testing. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM). IEEE, 42--51.
    [3]
    Andrew P Bradley. 1997. The use of the area under the ROC curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms. Pattern recognition, Vol. 30, 7 (1997), 1145--1159.
    [4]
    Hua-Hua Chang and Zhiliang Ying. 1996. A global information approach to computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol. 20, 3 (1996), 213--229.
    [5]
    Paul Covington, Jay Adams, and Emre Sargin. 2016. Deep neural networks for youtube recommendations. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on recommender systems. 191--198.
    [6]
    Mohamad Dolatshah, Ali Hadian, and Behrouz Minaei-Bidgoli. 2015. Ball*-tree: Efficient spatial indexing for constrained nearest-neighbor search in metric spaces. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.00628 (2015).
    [7]
    Susan E Embretson and Steven P Reise. 2013. Item response theory. Psychology Press.
    [8]
    Xuhui Fan, Bin Li, and Scott Sisson. 2018. The binary space partitioning-tree process. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. PMLR, 1859--1867.
    [9]
    Weibo Gao, Qi Liu, Zhenya Huang, Yu Yin, Haoyang Bi, Mu-Chun Wang, Jianhui Ma, Shijin Wang, and Yu Su. 2021. Rcd: Relation map driven cognitive diagnosis for intelligent education systems. In Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 501--510.
    [10]
    Aritra Ghosh and Andrew Lan. 2021. Bobcat: Bilevel optimization-based computerized adaptive testing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.07386 (2021).
    [11]
    Artem Grotov and Maarten De Rijke. 2016. Online learning to rank for information retrieval: Sigir 2016 tutorial. In Proceedings of the 39th International ACM SIGIR conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 1215--1218.
    [12]
    Casper Hansen, Christian Hansen, Jakob Grue Simonsen, Stephen Alstrup, and Christina Lioma. 2019. Unsupervised neural generative semantic hashing. In Proceedings of the 42nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 735--744.
    [13]
    Johannes Hartig and Jana Höhler. 2009. Multidimensional IRT models for the assessment of competencies. Studies in Educational Evaluation, Vol. 35, 2--3 (2009), 57--63.
    [14]
    Hung-Yu Huang. 2018. Effects of item calibration errors on computerized adaptive testing under cognitive diagnosis models. Journal of Classification, Vol. 35, 3 (2018), 437--465.
    [15]
    Po-Sen Huang, Xiaodong He, Jianfeng Gao, Li Deng, Alex Acero, and Larry Heck. 2013. Learning deep structured semantic models for web search using clickthrough data. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Information & Knowledge Management. 2333--2338.
    [16]
    Yueh-Min Huang, Yen-Ting Lin, and Shu-Chen Cheng. 2009. An adaptive testing system for supporting versatile educational assessment. Computers & Education, Vol. 52, 1 (2009), 53--67.
    [17]
    Won-Seok Hwang, Ho-Jong Lee, Sang-Wook Kim, Youngjoon Won, and Min-soo Lee. 2016. Efficient recommendation methods using category experts for a large dataset. Information Fusion, Vol. 28 (2016), 75--82.
    [18]
    Young Kyun Jang and Nam Ik Cho. 2020. Generalized product quantization network for semi-supervised image retrieval. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 3420--3429.
    [19]
    Herve Jegou, Matthijs Douze, and Cordelia Schmid. 2010. Product quantization for nearest neighbor search. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, Vol. 33, 1 (2010), 117--128.
    [20]
    Yannis Kalantidis and Yannis Avrithis. 2014. Locally optimized product quantization for approximate nearest neighbor search. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2321--2328.
    [21]
    Seongju Kang, Chaeeun Jeong, and Kwangsue Chung. 2020. Tree-based real-time advertisement recommendation system in online broadcasting. IEEE Access, Vol. 8 (2020), 192693--192702.
    [22]
    Noam Koenigstein, Parikshit Ram, and Yuval Shavitt. 2012. Efficient retrieval of recommendations in a matrix factorization framework. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management. 535--544.
    [23]
    Jiatong Li, Fei Wang, Qi Liu, Mengxiao Zhu, Wei Huang, Zhenya Huang, Enhong Chen, Yu Su, and Shijin Wang. 2022. HierCDF: A Bayesian Network-based Hierarchical Cognitive Diagnosis Framework. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 904--913.
    [24]
    Yuxi Li. 2017. Deep reinforcement learning: An overview. arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.07274 (2017).
    [25]
    Defu Lian, Haoyu Wang, Zheng Liu, Jianxun Lian, Enhong Chen, and Xing Xie. 2020. Lightrec: A memory and search-efficient recommender system. In Proceedings of The Web Conference 2020. 695--705.
    [26]
    Frederic M Lord. 2012. Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Routledge.
    [27]
    Xu Lu, Lei Zhu, Zhiyong Cheng, Liqiang Nie, and Huaxiang Zhang. 2019. Online multi-modal hashing with dynamic query-adaption. In Proceedings of the 42nd international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval. 715--724.
    [28]
    Denghao Ma, Yueguo Chen, Xiaoyong Du, and Yuanzhe Hao. 2018. Interpreting fine-grained categories from natural language queries of entity search. In Database Systems for Advanced Applications: 23rd International Conference, DASFAA 2018, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia, May 21--24, 2018, Proceedings, Part I 23. Springer, 861--877.
    [29]
    Yu A Malkov and Dmitry A Yashunin. 2018. Efficient and robust approximate nearest neighbor search using hierarchical navigable small world graphs. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, Vol. 42, 4 (2018), 824--836.
    [30]
    Yusuke Matsui, Yusuke Uchida, Hervé Jégou, and Shin'ichi Satoh. 2018. A survey of product quantization. ITE Transactions on Media Technology and Applications, Vol. 6, 1 (2018), 2--10.
    [31]
    Craig N Mills and Manfred Steffen. 2000. The GRE computer adaptive test: Operational issues. In Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice. Springer, 75--99.
    [32]
    Andrew Moore. 2013. The Anchors Hierachy: Using the triangle inequality to survive high dimensional data. arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.3877 (2013).
    [33]
    Parikshit Ram and Alexander G Gray. 2012. Maximum inner-product search using cone trees. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. 931--939.
    [34]
    Lawrence M Rudner. 2009. Implementing the graduate management admission test computerized adaptive test. In Elements of adaptive testing. Springer, 151--165.
    [35]
    Andrey V Savchenko. 2017. Maximum-likelihood approximate nearest neighbor method in real-time image recognition. Pattern Recognition, Vol. 61 (2017), 459--469.
    [36]
    Shuanghong Shen, Enhong Chen, Qi Liu, Zhenya Huang, Wei Huang, Yu Yin, Yu Su, and Shijin Wang. 2022. Monitoring Student Progress for Learning Process-Consistent Knowledge Tracing. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (2022).
    [37]
    Benno Stein. 2007. Principles of hash-based text retrieval. In Proceedings of the 30th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. 527--534.
    [38]
    Nathan A Thompson and David A Weiss. 2011. A framework for the development of computerized adaptive tests. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, Vol. 16, 1 (2011), 1.
    [39]
    Manos Tsagkias, Tracy Holloway King, Surya Kallumadi, Vanessa Murdock, and Maarten de Rijke. 2021. Challenges and research opportunities in ecommerce search and recommendations. In ACM SIGIR Forum, Vol. 54. ACM New York, NY, USA, 1--23.
    [40]
    Wim J Van der Linden and Peter J Pashley. 2009. Item selection and ability estimation in adaptive testing. In Elements of adaptive testing. Springer, 3--30.
    [41]
    Fei Wang, Qi Liu, Enhong Chen, Zhenya Huang, Yuying Chen, Yu Yin, Zai Huang, and Shijin Wang. 2020. Neural cognitive diagnosis for intelligent education systems. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 34. 6153--6161.
    [42]
    Zhiliang Ying and CF Jeff Wu. 1997. An asymptotic theory of sequential designs based on maximum likelihood recursions. Statistica Sinica, Vol. 7, 1 (1997), 75--91.
    [43]
    Han Zhu, Xiang Li, Pengye Zhang, Guozheng Li, Jie He, Han Li, and Kun Gai. 2018. Learning tree-based deep model for recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. 1079--1088.
    [44]
    Yan Zhuang, Qi Liu, Zhenya Huang, Zhi Li, Shuanghong Shen, and Haiping Ma. 2022. Fully Adaptive Framework: Neural Computerized Adaptive Testing for Online Education. (2022).

    Cited By

    View all
    • (undefined)Model-Agnostic Adaptive Testing for Intelligent Education Systems via Meta-learned Gradient EmbeddingsACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology10.1145/3660642

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CIKM '23: Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
    October 2023
    5508 pages
    ISBN:9798400701245
    DOI:10.1145/3583780
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 21 October 2023

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. cognitive diagnosis
    2. computerized adaptive testing
    3. educational measurement
    4. educational resource search

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    CIKM '23
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,861 of 8,427 submissions, 22%

    Upcoming Conference

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)211
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
    Reflects downloads up to 12 Aug 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (undefined)Model-Agnostic Adaptive Testing for Intelligent Education Systems via Meta-learned Gradient EmbeddingsACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology10.1145/3660642

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media